Evaluative Language

X endeavours to show/prove, put forth Panova endeavours to show that although Holden is not a very likeable character on the surface, one comes to like him in the end. X seeks to criticise Panova seeks to criticise Holdens irresponsible behaviour. He believes Panova believes that Holden is a loafer. He achieves/doesnt achieve Panova achieves her purpose of showing how readers come to like Holden by focussing on incidences from the novel which draw on our sympathy. Looking briefly at two interrelated examples might allow us to Looking briefly at two interrelated examples might allow us to see how Holden is incapable of forming long term relationships. In reading Xs article, one may well be convinced that In reading Panovas article, one may well be convinced thatPanova doesnt like Holden. He offers no evidence to support his point Panova offers no evidence to support her point that Holden is a loafer. It would seem difficult to substantiate

It would seem difficult to substantiate Panovas claim that Holden is a loafer. He simply tells us that She simply tells us that Holden is a loafer without offering any evidence. Arguably Arguably, Holden is the complete opposite of a loafer. He seems reluctant to take into consideration Panova seems reluctant to take into consideration the fact that a large number of readers of the novel are in fact teenagers, just like Holden. X is right. Panova is right when she says that Holden is the son of a rich father.