STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION FILE NO.

: PDC10-005
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Existing Zoning A Planned Development Rezoning from A(PD) Planned Development Zoning District to R-1- Proposed Zoning 8(PD) Planned Development Zoning District to General Plan allow for the demolition of four industrial/office buildings and the development of 94 sing!e-family detached residences on a Council District Annexation Date 15.8 gross acre site. LOCATION: West side of Guadalupe Mines Road, approximately 1,130 feet southerly of Via Campagna.

P.C. Agenda: 08-11-10 Item: 3.c.

Submitted: March 23, 2010

A(PD) Planned Development R-1-8(PD) Planned Development Medium Low Density Residential (8 DU/AC) 10

November 14, 1984 (Guadalupe No. 20)

SNI NA Historic Resource NA Redevelopment Area NA Specific Plan NA

Aerial Map

File No. PDC10-005 Page 2 of 10 GENERAL PLAN

ZONING

Town of Los Gatos

File No. PDC10-005 Page 3 of 10

RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends CONDITIONAL APPROVAL with the following conditions and plan revisions to be included in the proposed rezoning:

1. The project fully compliant with the Riparian Corridor Study with a riparian setback development standard of 100 feet except for a 30-foot riparian setback on the south end of the site (defined by the south edge of"public street A" to the southern property line); 2. All streets to be public streets with full cross sections;
3. Oak trees within the area proposed for residential development be reviewed for integration into the development including revised site grading to preserve natural grades; and

4. The net density not exceed 8.0 housing units per net acre as defmed by the General Plan.
The staff recommendation of CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the proposed Planned Development Rezoning to allow for the development of single-family detached residential units on the subject site is made for the following reasons: The proposed Planned Development is consistent with the goals and policies of the San Jose 2020 General Plan, specifically: =: a. The zoning will comply with the Land Use Transportation Diagram designation of Medium Low Density Residential 8.0 dwelling units per net acre (du!ac).

b. The Housing Major Strategy, as the project will allow single-family detached units in a neighborhood of single-family detached homes.
c. Urban Design Policy #3, as the development will include new streets with a sidewalk and park strip. 2~ The project is consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines appropriate for small lot singlefamily detached dwellings. Without the recommended conditions of approval, staff would recommend DENIAL of the proposed rezoning as it would significantly depart from the Riparian Corridor Policy. BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION On March 23, 2010, Erik Schoennauer, representing the applicant, Trumark Companies, applied for a Planned Development Rezoning from A(PD) Planned Development Zoning District to R-1-8(PD) Planned Development Zoning District to allow for the demolition of four industrial/office buildings and the development of 94 single-family detached residences on a 15.8 gross acre site. Site and Surrounding Uses The subject site, located on the west side of Guadalupe Mines Road, approximately 1,130 feet southerly of Via Campagna, is currently developed with two office buildings, a caretakers residence, and a building pad for a building that was never constructed. The existing development is surrounded by a surface parking lot. The buildings are currently occupied by office uses which will be eliminated with the development of the site.

The subject site is bordered by very large lot single-family detached residences to the west across the creek, in the town of Los Gatos, the Guadalupe Land Fill entrance and extensive open space across Guadalupe Mines Road to the east, single-family detached residences to the south, and north east.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 4 of 10 Previous Land Use Approvals In 2006 the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (File No. GP05-10-01) to change the land use designation from Administrative Office/Research and Development to Medium Low Density Residential (8 DU/AC). The applicants original request was for Medium Density Residential (8-16 DU/AC), but in working with the area residents and the City, they modified their application to request the lower density of 8 DU/AC. ANALYSIS The proposed project was analyzed with respect to: 1) conformance with the San Jose 2020 General Plan, 2) conformance with the Riparian Corridor Policy, 3) conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines, 4) sustainability, and 5) fire access. ~ General Plan Conformance The subject 15.8 gross acre site has a San Jose 2020 General Plan land use designation of Medium Low Density Residential (8 DU/AC). This density is typified by 6,000 square foot lots which are prevalent in San Josr. It is characteristic of many residential neighborhoods, and is the density at which the majority of San Josrs single-family housing has been built. Smaller lot single-family residences are also appropriate in this category provided that the overall project density maintains an average density no greater than 8 DU/AC.

The proposed 94 small lot single-family detached residential units on the site equals a density of 6.76 DU/AC when the creek area is included in the calculation of density. The General Plan defines net density to exclude streets and other public use areas such as flood control easements. Typically that is the top of bank of a creek and the maintenance road located at the top of bank. In this case, it does not appear that an easement is being requested by the Santa Clara Valley Water District and thus the applicant is benefiting by a larger area to transfer residential units from to the smaller development area. Should that remain the case, the density would technically conform to the General Plan designation of up to 8 du/ac. Should an easement be required, the area to spread the density would decrease, and the density would increase potentially above 8.0 du per net acre.
A comparison to similar residential development with the size of the proposed lots results in an effective density of approximately 12 du/ac. The General Plan allows, as noted above that residential units can be grouped into smaller areas of the property to achieve a better development. The applicant in this case is proposing to locate the development outside of the riparian areas into a smaller portion of the site.

The proposed project should be considered in the context of the following General Plan Major Strategies and Policies as discussed in the following:
Growth Management Major Strategy: The purpose of a growth management strategy is to find the delicate balance between the need to house new population and the need to balance the Citys budget, while providing acceptable levels of service. The proposed project will facilitate new single-family homes on the edge of the city already served by existing infrastructure and facilities such as libraries, schools, parks, community centers and eommercial amen#ies. The proposed projeet replaces revenue generating uses with new housing. 2. Housing Major Strategy: This strategy seeks to maximize housing opportunities on infill parcels already served by the City and to consider the addition of new residential lands only when the City is confident that urban services can be provided.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 5 of 10

The proposed project will provide significantly more housing opportunities than would have been possible by matching near by lot sizes and at the same time be compatible and consistent with the surrounding land uses.

Urban Design Policy #3: Residential subdivisions should be designed to provide for internal circulation within neighborhoods, prevent through vehicular traffic from traversing neighborhoods, and encourage pedestrian and bicycle connections between neighborhoods and to adjacent commercial uses and transit facilities.
The site will be accessed by two new streets off of Guadalupe Mines Road All new streets within the development will have the typical street design with a sidewalk and park strip to provide a safe pedestrian connection throughout the new subdivision, as well as provide a connection between Guadalupe Mines Road, the existing surrounding neighborhoods, and the creek trail along the Guadalupe Creek, which runs the along the western boundary of the site. To further this, staff& recommending that all of the streets within the development be public streets. This will enable public access to not be restricted at any point, especially for those coming from outside of the development to access the creek trail and will also provide the residents of the new development with all the typical amenities, street parking and park strip with street trees, that other residents in the city enjoy.
o

Urban Design Policy #4: Residential developments which are adjacent to parks or open spaces should be encouraged to provide direct access to, and common open space contiguous to, such areas. Consistent with this policy, the proposed project provides access to the creek trail, as well as locates the common open space for the project adjacent to the trail The project also includes creek frontage roads to provide great public access to the Guadalupe Creek

Riparian Corridor and Upland Wetland Policy #2: New public and private development adjacent to riparian corridors should be consistent with the provisions of the Riparian Corridor Policy Study.
The project is NOT consistent with the Riparian Corridor Policy. The Policy requires a setback of a minimum oflOOfeet and the projectprovides 30feet. Therefore, staff is recommending the projeet provide a l OO foot riparian setback for the majority of the reek frontage in order to conform to this Policy. Additional discussion on the Riparian Corridor Policy follows below under the next heading of this report. Schools Policy #23: The City supports a system of open communication between the City, the public school districts and the development community in order to coordinate the activities of each to achieve the highest quality of education for all public school students. State law (Government Code 65996) specifies the method of offsetting a projects effect on the adequacy of school facilities as the payment of a school impact fee prior to the issuance of a building permit. The proposed projeet would increase the number of school children attending public schools in the project area, the impact to schools would be less than significant and development of the subject site will require the payment of a school impact fee, as mandated by the State, to offset the increased demands on school facilities caused by the proposed project. In addition, the affected school districts were made aware of the land use change on the subject site from office/research and development to residential when the City Council changed the San Jose 2020 General Plan land use designation in 2006.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 6 of 10 Riparian Corridor Policy The Riparian Corridor Policy provides development guidelines to help protect riparian habitat and minimize impacts to riparian resources. The subject site is bordered by the Guadalupe Creek along the western property line and large portions of the riparian corridor occur on the site itself. The Policy includes a setback guideline that requires a 100 foot riparian setback in order to preserve the continuity of the Citys riparian environments. The 100 foot setback was established to set the predominate minimum setback to be utilized for new development. Certain exceptions are allowed recognizing that creeks and rivers in San Jos6 have different character and quality. The normal tendency with development projects has been to gravitate to the exceptions of the policy vs. the 100 foot minimum. That is the case with the developer with this project. Staff does not support the request for a reduced setback of 30 feet.
Guadalupe Creek supports a dense stand of riparian vegetation and is intact. According to the Biotic Report, the structural diversity of the riparian and woodland habitat occurring on the site results in relatively high species richness and diversity. The 100 foot setback will allow for greater habitat Protection and rehabilitation, as well as preserve more existing trees on site. The subject site is the last large developable site on this reach of the Guadalupe Creek, as at the southern end of this site the creek extends into the hills and open land. Allowing an encroachment would preclude further restoration of the currently compromised riparian habitat. Preserving the 100 foot setback will also allow for the proposed recreational trail to be moved further away from the stream channel to further protect the riparian resources. The Policy does state that there are circumstances which warrant consideration of a reduced setback, which include sites with unusual geometric characteristics and/or disproportionately long riparian frontages. Although the riparian corridor extends along the entire western edge of the site, the depth of the site, with the exception of the southern most "finger" is approximately 540 feet and a 100 foot riparian setback does not impact the ability to develop the site with single-family residential development that is consistent with the Citys Riparian Policy and its guidelines. The southern "finger" of the site does qualify for the exception, as there is a disproportionate amount of riparian frontage on this section (defined by the south edge of"public street A" to the southern property line). Therefore, staff would support a reduced setback in this area to 30 feet. However, only the encroachment of the street is supported and the residential units with lot numbers 91, 92, 93, and 94 should be removed from the site plan. It is important to note that the site plan is correctly oriented to the creek. The orientation guideline in the Policy states that development should be oriented towards the creek to provide views of the corridor for visibility, habitat protection, and public safety. Frontage roads are a preferred interface and buildings should not back up to the riparian corridor. The proposed site design does provide a frontage road along the creek and the residential buildings face towards it consistent with the guideline. Tree Removal The existing site contains 979 trees of various species. A total of 62 of the trees are ordinance size and the most frequently occurring species is the 409 Chinese Pistache trees that dominate the parking lot. Most of these trees were planted with the development of the office buildings. Of the ordinance size trees, the project is proposing to preserve seven of the 62. The trees that are smaller than ordinance sized are assumed to be removed. Some may be replanted on the site where possible.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 7 of 10

There are 66 Valley or other Oak species trees on the site. Several of these trees were preserved as a part of the industrial office development on the site. Some of the trees were preserved successfully and for the ones that were not, it was due to the fact that they were left in irrigated landscape areas. Oak trees are intolerant of excess water and have therefore declined in health. The project as proposed will preserve five of the oak trees on the site. With staffs proposed 100 foot riparian setback, an additional seven Oak trees would be preserved as well as several Coast Redwood trees.

One consequence of developing the site with single-family detached residences is that many healthy trees will be lost to accommodate proper grading for site drainage as part of the new subdivision. Preserving major trees such as Oaks in single-family lots is very difficult due to the individual homeowners making landscaping choices, and the developers desire to grade this sloped site essentially flat to maximize unit yields. The average finished grade elevations will be about 3 to 8 feet different than the existing grades which makes tree preservation harder. Staff still wants at the PD Permit stage to look for opportunities to adjust grading and lot pattern to preserve oaks that are in good condition instead of just assuming the removal of healthy Valley Oak trees to squeeze in additional houses. A biotic report including an arborist report and tree survey was completed for the site. Under the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the removal of a majority of the trees on the site can be mitigated and is therefore a less than significant impact. From a larger citywide policy stand point, preservation of the native Valley Oaks should aggressively pursued.
Residential Design Guidelines

This zoning application proposes small lot, two-story, single-family detached residences. The lot sizes range from 3,404 to 4,029 square feet. The primary site design issue for this proposed zoning is the conformance of the proposed development standards with Chapter 17. Single-Family Detached House of the Residential Design Guidelines as discussed below.
Site Design Consistent with the guidelines, there is one residential unit per lot that is oriented towards the street with front, rear, and side setbacks, and private rear yards. The project design details and final site design will be refined and effectuated through the subsequent Planned Development Permit process. Setbacks

The project proposes two lot sizes, 3,000 square feet plus and 3,000 to 4,000 square feet. The Guidelines recommend that the front setback to the first and second floor living area be at least 12 feet and 15 feet and to a porch 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively. The project provides front and porch setbacks consistent with this guideline. The Guidelines recommend that the side setback from living area to interior lot line is of 4 to 8 feet and a corner side of 8 feet. However, typical single-family detached under a conventional zoning is five feet, which is an appropriate setback for this type of development and is consistent with the guidelines. The project provides a corner side setback of 8 feet consistent with the guideline.
The Guidelines recommend a rear setback of 15 feet. The project provides a 15 foot rear setback for the larger lot types and a 13 foot setback for the smaller lot types consistent with this guideline.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 8 of 10

Heig_~ht The Guidelines recommend a maximum building height of 30 feet and two stories. The project proposes a maximum height of 29 feet and two stories consistent with this guideline. Parking The Guidelines recommend that single-family detached units provide two covered parking spaces per unit plus one off-lot parking space for units with a driveway apron and 1.3 off-lot parking spaces for units without a driveway apron. The off-lot parking spaces should be located within 150 feet of each unit, which includes on street parking. Consistent with the guidelines, the project proposes for each unit to have a two car garage and a driveway apron, as well as, on street parking totaling 109 spaces, which exceeds the required 94 off-lot parking spaces.
Open Space The Guidelines recommend a minimum of 500 square feet of private open space per unit. The project provides each unit with a minimum of 500 square feet of open space consistent with this guideline. The Guidelines recommend 150 square feet of common open space per unit for projects that exceed 20 units. As the proposed project is for 94 units, a total of 14,100 square feet should be provided. The proposed project exceeds this amount and provides 123,218 square feet, approximately 2.8 acres of useable common open space.

Sustainability This project is located on the edge of the city and is not served by transit, thus totally auto dependent to get to jobs and shopping. The previous General Plan change set the stage for the ultimate elimination of the current onsite jobs that residents in the Almaden Valley Could benefit from to work closer to their homes reducing commute distances. The new homes are subject to the City of San Jose Green Building Ordinance for New Construction Private Development, currently requiring the minimum green building certification of Green Point Rated or LEED Certified. The applicant has submitted a preliminary Green Point Rated checklist and has marked yes on the following items: recycle 100% asphalt and concrete, use recycled content in roadway, size door/window headers for load, use of engineered lumber, use energy heels on roof trusses, use of recycled content for ceiling insulation, install water efficient fixtures, use low VOC paint, and develop a homeowner manual of the green features. While many of these items will be required when the State Building Code (CAL Green) is adopted next year or already required by separate ordinance, the applicant is thinking ahead and planning to include some additional elements now.
Fire Access The proposed project is located on Guadalupe Mines Road which terminates just south of the entrance to the land fill as shown in Figure 1. A second point of access is provided by means of Puerto Vallarta Drive approximately 750 feet to the north of the site (shown with Blue Line). The community has expressed concern about adding 90 more homes in the area served by Guadalupe Mines Road that already has a large amount of traffic and in the case of an emergency that blocked Guadalupe Mines Road, they might be trapped, or emergency crews might be delayed in response.

File No. PDC10-005 Page 9 of 10

Figure 1

The Fire Marshall has reviewed the proposed project and access and has concluded that the proposed homes do not significantly impact emergency response; nor expose future residents to a high risk hazard. The majority of the residents that have shared their concerns regarding this project live in the residential development which was developed in the late 1990s to the northwest of the proposed project and also have the same access situation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was circulated on July 8, 2010, which ends circulation on July 28, 2010, and states that the proposed Planned Development Rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment with mitigation. The primary issues addressed in the Initial Study include the potential impacts of the physical development of the site on: air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions and energy, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and noise. The MND includes mitigation measures that would reduce any potentially significant project impacts to a less-thansignificant level. The mitigation measures are included in the staff proposed development standards of the Planned Development Zoning. The entire MND and Initial Study are available for review on the Planning web site at: www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/eir/MND.asp

File No. PDC10-005 Page 10 of 10

PUBLIC OUTREACH/INTEREST

The property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius were sent public heating notices for the Planning Commission and City Colmcil hearings. This staffreport has been posted on the Citys web site. Signage has been posted at the site to inform the public about the proposed change. Staff has been available to discuss the proposal with interested members of the public. On June 2, 2010, a commtmity meeting was held at the Vineland Branch Public Library on Blossom Hill Road, at which 11 area neighbors were present. Those in attendance were concerned about overcrowding in the area school district and that more units would add to the existing traffic problems at the Guadalupe Mines Road and Camden Avenue intersection, especially on Sundays when the church at this intersection makes it difficult to get onto Camden Avenue. Also, there is a concern about the loss of the existing trees and green space on the site. Those who were involved with the project at the General Plan stage of the project appeared to be supportive of the density of project, but did also have concerns about the existing traffic problems and loss of green space on the site.
General Correspondence

In addition, multiple e-mails were received from area neighbors. All of them are in opposition to the project and state that the proposed density is too high, a greater amount of green space should be ~ preserved, an evacuation route should be designated should there be a large fire or earthquake, Guadalupe Mines Road needs to be widened, and police patrols should be increased to stop speeding. In addition, all letters stated a concern that the additional homes would impact the service of Los Gatos Union School District. Letters received from the Los Gatos Union School District and the Los Gatos-Saratoga High School District state that the number of homes proposed will put a strain on their district in serving its students.
Project Manager: Lesley Xavier Approved by: Owner/Applicant: Owner: Brokaw Interests 10600 N DeAnza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Applicant: Tmmark Companies Attn: Chris Davenport 4185 Blackhawk Plaza Circle, Suite 200 Danville, CA 94506 Attachments: Neighbor e-mails School District Letters Development Standards Plan Set

Staffs Proposed Development Standards

F~LE NO. PDC10-005

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

*In any cases where the graphic plans and text may differ, the text takes precedence. * INTE~UM USE: All of the uses permitted under File No. PDC83-104 shall be permitted until the time of the redevelopment of the site. UsE/MAx~rUMNUM~ER OF UNITS: 94 single-family detached units
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 3,000 square feet RIPARIAN SETBACK: 100 feet between the drip line of riparian vegetation and any portion of the new development including roads and buildings. Recreational uses are permitted within the setback area. Riparian Setback Exception: The southern "t~mger of the site qualifies for an exception to the 100 foot setback, as there is a disproportionate amount of riparian frontage on this section. The minimum setback in this area shall be 30 feet. For the purposes of this zoning the Tmger" shall mean the area starting at the southern most edge of the new public street A to the southern property line as shown on the site plan.
SETBACKS -- 3,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS:

[] [] [] [] []

From to building- 12 feet Front to porch- 10 feet Side- 5 feet Side Comer- 8 Rear- 13 feet From to Garage- 18 feet

SETBACKS 3,001 -- 4,000 + SQUARE FOOT LOTS: [] [] [] [] Front to building - 15 feet Front to porch - 12 feet Side- 5 feet Side Comer- 8 feet Rear- 15 Front to Garage - 18 feet

BUILDING HEIGHT:

[] 29 feet/2 stories PARK~G REQUIREMENTS: [] Two covered parking spaces per unit, plus one additional off-lot space per unit located within 150 feet of each unit. Off-lot spaces can be provided as on-street parking and!or parking bays.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 2 of 11

DRIVEWAYS:

Minimum driveway width - 15 feet . Minimum driveway length- 18 feet

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE:

Each unit shall have a front and rear yard. , Minimum of 500 square feet of open space per unit.

ACCESSORY STRUCTURES/BUILDINGS:

Permitted as of right, per Chapter 20.30, Part 5 Accessory Buildings and Structures, of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended.
Minor architectural projections such as, fireplaces and bay windows, may project into any setback or building separation by up to 2 feet for a length not to exceed i0 feet or 20% of

MINOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS:

the building elevation length. Minor additions which conform to the above setbacks do not require approval of the Director of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN:

The architectural design of the houses shall confolan to the standards of the SingleFamily Design Guidelines and be consistent with the conceptual elevations in the approved plan set.
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION:

I.

AIR QUALITY

a) The following dust control measures will be implemented by contractors during demolition of existing structures. i. Watering to control dust generation during demolition of structures and break-up of pavement; ii. Cover all trucks hauling demolition debris from the site; iii. Use dust-proof chutes to load debris into trucks whenever feasible. Watering will be used to control dust generation during transport and handling of recycled. b) The following construction practices will be implemented during all phases of construction to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site.Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods; i~cti;ce areas adjacent to existing land uses will be kept damp at all times, or will be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives; i. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard;

Development Standards File No. PDC 10-005 Page 3 of 11

ii. Pave, apply water at least three times dally, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; 111. Sweep daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers), all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; water sweepers will vacuum up excess water to avoid runoff-related impacts to water quality;
iv.

Sweep streets daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers), if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets; Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more);
to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.) to prevent visible dust from leaving the site;

vi. Enclose, cover, water at least twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders

vii. Limit traffic speed on unpaved roads to 15 mph; viii. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways; and ix. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
II. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a) Any tree that is removed shall be replaced with the addition of a new tree(s) at the ratios shown in the following Tree Replacement Ratios table. Tree Replacement Ratios Diameter of Tree to be Removed 18 inches or greater 12 to 17 inches Less than 12 inches 5:1 3:1 il:l 4:1 2:1 1:1 3:1 None None Type of Tree to be Removed Non-Native Orchard Native Minimum Size of Each Replacement Tree 24-inch box 24-inch box 15-gallon container

x:x = tree replacement to tree loss ratio Note: Trees greater that 18" diameter shall not be removed unless a Tree Removal Permit,or equivalent, has been approved for the removal of such trees.

b) The species and exact number of trees to be planted bn the site shall be

determined at the development permit stage, in consultation with the City Arborist and the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 4 of I 1

c) Replacement trees are to be above and beyond standard landscaping; required

street trees do not count as replacement trees.
In the event the project site does not have sufficient area to accommodate the required tree mitigation, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, at the development permit stage:

e)

i. The size of a 15-gallon replacement tree may be increased to 24-inch box and count as two replacement trees. ii. An alternative site(s) will be identified for additional tree planting. Alternative sites may include local parks or schools or installation of trees on adjacent properties for screening purposes to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. Contact Jaime Ruiz, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Landscape Maintenance Manager, at 975-7214 or jaime.ruiz@sanjoseca.gov for specific park locations in need of trees. iii. A donation of $300.00 per mitigation tree will be paid to Our City Forest for in-lieu offsite tree planting in the community. These funds will be used for tree planting and maintenance of planted trees for approximately three years. Contact Rhonda Berry, Our City Forest, at (408) 998-7337 xl06 to make a donation. A donation receipt for offsite tree planting will be provided to the Planuing Project Manager prior to issuance of a development permit. The following tree protection measures shall also be included in the project in order to protect trees to be retained during construction: i. The applicant willretain a consulting arborist. The construction superintendent will meet with the consulting arborist before beginning work to discuss work procedures and tree protection. ii. Fence all trees to be retained to completely enclose the tree protection zone prior to demolition, grubbing or grading. Fences will be 6-foot chain link or equivalent as approved by consulting arborist. Fences are to remain until all grading and construction are completed. iii. Prune trees to be preserved to clean the crown and to provide clearance. All priming will be completed or supervised by a Certified Arborist and adhere to the Best Management Practices for Praning of the Intemational Society of Arboriculture. iv. No grading, construction, demolition or other work will occur within the tree protection zone. Any modifications must be approved and monitored by the consulting arborist. v. Any root pruning required for construction purposes will receive the prior approval of, and be supervised by, the consulting arborist. vi. Supplemental irrigation will be applied as determined by the consulting arborist.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 5 of 11

vii. If injury should occur to any tree during construction, it will be evaluated as soon as possible by the consulting arborist so that appropriate treatments can be applied. viii. No excess soil, chemicals debris, equipment or other materials will be dumped or stored within the tree protection zone. ix. Any additional tree priming needed for clearance during construction must be performed or supervised by an Arborist and not by construction personnel. x. As trees withdraw water from the soil, expansive soils may shrink within the root area. Therefore, foundations, footings and pavements on expansive soils near trees will be designed to withstand differential displacement. f) If possible, construction should be scheduled between September and December (inclusive) to avoid the nesting season. If this is not possible, pre-construct!on surveys for nesting white-tailed kite, non-listed raptors and other non-listed breeding birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to identify active nests that may be disturbed during project implementation. Between January and April (inclusive) pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities or tree relocation or removal. Between May and August (inclusive), pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no more than thirty (30) days prior to the initiation of these activities. The surveying biologist shall inspect all trees in and within 250 feet of the construction area for active nests. If an active nest is found in or close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the biologist shall, in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game, designate a construction-free buffer zone (typically 250 feet) around the nest, which shall be maintained until after the breeding season has ended and/or a qualified biologist has determined that the young birds have fledged. The applicant shall submit a report to the Citys Environmental Principal Planner indicating the results of the survey and any designated buffer zones to the satisfaction of the Citys Environmental Principal Planner prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. g) A detailed bat survey shall be conducted to determine if bats are roosting or breeding in the onsite buildings prior to demolition. A qualified bat specialist shall look for individuals, guano, staining, and/or vocalization by direct observation and potential waiting for nighttime emergence. The survey shall be conducted during the time of year when bats are active, between April 1 and September 15. If demolition is planned within this timeframe, the survey shall be conducted within 30 days of demolition. An initial survey could be conducted to provide early warning if bats are present, but a follow-up survey will be necessary within 30 days. If demolition is planned outside of this timeframe (September 16 through March 31), the survey shall be conducted in September prior to demolition. If no bats are observed to be roosting or breeding in these structures, then no further action would be required, and demolition can proceed.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 6 of 11

If a non-breeding bat colony is found in the buildings to be demolished, the individuals should be humanely evicted via the partial dismantlement of the buildings prior to demolition under the direction of a qualified bat specialist to ensure that no harm or "take" would occur to any bats as a result of demolition activities. If a maternity colony is detected in the buildings, then a constructionfree buffer shall be established around the structure and remain in place until it has been determined that the nursery is no longer active. Demolition should preferably be done between March 1 and April 15 or August 15 and October 15 to avoid interfering with an active nursery.

i)

A biologist report outlining the results of pre-construction bat surveys and any recommended buffer zones or other mitigation shall be submitted to the Citys Environmental Principal Planner and shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit.

III.

CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California: In the event of the discovery of human remains during construction, there will be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains. The Santa Clara County Coroner will be notified by the developer and will make a determination as to whether the remains are Native American. ffthe Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his authority, he will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who will attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. If no satisfactory agreement can be reached as to the disposition of the remains pursuant to this State law, then the landowner will reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. b) Any Native American human remains that are discovered and would be subject to disturbance will be removed and analyzed, a report will be prepared, and the remains will be rebuffed in consultation and agreement with the Native American Most Likely Descendant designated by the Native American Heritage Commission. Prior to obtaining a Building Permit, a copy of the report will be submitted to the Citys Environmental Principal Planner to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. c) A qualified professional archaeologist shall be required to monitor all construction grading and utility trenching until the archaeologist is satisfied that construction will not disturb important archaeological deposits, as follows:
i. If no resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall submit a report to the Citys Environmental Principal Planner verifying that the required monitoring occurred and that no further mitigation is necessary.

ii. If evidence of any archaeological, cultural, and/or historical deposits is

found, hand excavation and/or mechanical excavation shall proceed to evaluate the deposits for determination of significance as defmed by CEQA guidelines.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 7 of 11

111.

The archaeologist shall submit reports, to the satisfaction of the Citys Environmental Principal Planner, describing the testing program and subsequent results; these reports shall identify any program mitigation to be completed in order to mitigate archaeological impacts (including resource recovery and/or avoidance, testing and analysis, removal, reburial, and euration of archaeological resources at a recognized storage facility). A final report shall verify completion of the mitigation program to the satisfaction of the Citys Environmental Principal Planner.

iv.

In the event that human remains and/or cultural materials are found, all project-related construction shall cease within a 50-foot radius in order to proceed with the testing and mitigation measures required.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS A Certificate of Geologic Hazard Clearance has been obtained from the Director of Public Works prior to any discretionary approval for all development in areas shown on the Geologic Hazards Ordinance map; and any Conditions of Clearance including, but not limited to, measures identified in the geologic evaluation for slope stabilization, surface and subsurface drainage control, offsite improvements, use restrictions, erosion control and/or maintenance guarantees for private improvements contained therein shall be implemented as specified. A Certificate of Geologic Hazard Clearance was issued for the project on June 25, 2010.

b) A City-approved Erosion Control Plan will be developed and implemented prior

c)

to approval of a grading permit or Public Works clearance with such measures as: 1) the timing of grading activities during the dry months, if feasible; 2) temporary and permanent planting of exposed soil; 3) temporary check dams; 4) temporary sediment basins and traps and/or 5) temporary silt fences. The proposed structures on the site will be designed and constructed in conformance with the Uniform Building Code Guidelines for Seismic Zone 4 to avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking on the site.
The geologic hazard and preliminary geotechnical investigation report addressing the potential hazard of liquefaction will be submitted to, and reviewed and approved by, the City Geologist prior to issuance of a grading permit or Public Works clearance. The investigation should be consistent with the guidelines published by the State of California (CDMG Special Publication 117) and the Southern California Earthquake Center ("SCEC") report.

e) The upper 3 to 4 feet of all existing artificial fill shall be over-excavated and

replaced as engineered fill. f) All of the previously-placed fill material in the former detention pond area shall be over-excavated and replaced as engineered fill. g) Material transitions shall be over-excavated and rebuilt with engineered fill to reduce the potential for differential movement beneath structures. A creek bank setback equivalent to a 2:1 slope projection shall be established from the base of the creek bank.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 8 of 11

Foundations constructed within the potential co-seismic deformation zones shall be supported on rigid mat foundations designed to tolerate increased foundation movement compared to foundations located outside the designated zones.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND ENERGY

Energy efficient design standards including the design and exposure of windows, insulation, mechanical and electrical eqtfipment and landscaping will be incorporated in accordance with the provisions of Title 24 of the California Administrative Code and of the San Jose Building Code.
b) The project will be reviewed for conformance to the Green Building Policy (Policy 6-32) at the Planned Development Permit stage. VI.

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS If a well is found during grading operations, a well destruction permit will be obtained ~om the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the well will be destroyed in accordance with District standards.

b)

ff a septic system is found during grading operations, it will be abandoned in accordance with the requirements of the Santa Clara County Sewage Disposal Ordinance.

The structure(s) to be removed will be surveyed for the presence of asbestoscontaining materials at the demolition permit stage; and if any suspect ACM are present, they will be sampled prior to demolition in accordance with NESHAP guidelines, and all potentially friable ACM will be removed prior to building demolition and disposed of by offsite burial at a permitted facility in accordance with NESHAP, Cal-OSHA and BAAQMD requirements. The structure(s) to be removed will be surveyed for the presence of lead based paint at the demolition permit stage; and if any suspect LBP is present, it will be sanapled prior to demolition, and all potential LBP will be removed prior to building demolition and disposed of by offsite burial at a permitted facility in accordance with EPA and OSHA requirements. A Soil Management Plan that provides protocol for contractors in the event that pockets of buried suspect materials (debris and/or garbage) are encountered during site development activities shall be prepared and implemented. Soil at the location of the boring with the mercury concentration detected above the residential CHHSL (SB-8) shall be over-excavated for appropriate offsite disposal. Soil at the location of the boring with the cadmium concentration detected above the residential CHHSL (SB-5) shall be over-excavated for appropriate offsite disposal. Verification samples shall be collected and analyzed for mercury and cadmium to document that the impacted soil has been sufficiently removed from the site.

Development Standards File No. PDCI0-005 Page 9 of 11

Regulatory agency oversight shall be requested if significantly elevated levels of contaminants of concern are detected in the soil samples. j) Soil with TPHd and TPHmo detected above the residential ESLs shall be overexcavated for appropriate offsite disposal. k) If pockets of petroleum-impacted soil are observed (i.e., soil with significant odors or discoloration) during project development, such soil shall be overexcavated for appropriate offsite disposal. 1) Verification samples shall be collected and analyzed for TPHd and TPHmo to document that the impacted soil has been sufficiently removed from the site.
VII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

b) c)

Prior to the commencement of any cleating, grading or excavation, the project will comply with the State Water Resources Control Boards National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N-PDES) General Construction Activities Permit, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, as follows: The applicant will develop, implement and maintain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to control the discharge of stormwater pollutants including sediments associated with construction activities; and ii. The applicant will file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)The project design will conform to the Citys Residential Design Guidelines. The project will incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) into the project to control the discharge of stormwater pollutants including sediments associated with construction activities. The project applicant will comply with the City of San Jose Grading Ordinance, including erosion and dust control during site preparation and with the City of San Jose Zoning Ordinance requirements for keeping adjacent streets free of dirt and mud during construction. The following specific BMPs will be implemented to prevent stormwater pollution and minimize potential sedimentation during construction:
Restriction of grading to the dry season (April 15 through October 15) or meet City requirements for grading during the rainy season;

ii. iii.

Utilize onsite sediment control BMPs to retain sediment on the project site;

vi.

Utilize stabilized construction entrances and/or wash racks; Implement damp street sweeping; Provide temporary cover of disturbed surfaces to help control, erosion during construction; and Provide permanent cover to stabilize the disturbed surfaces after construction has been completed.

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 10 of 11

e)

Prior to the issuance of a Planned Development Permit, the applicant will provide details of specific BMPs including, but not limited to, bioswales, disconnected downspouts, landscaping to reduce impervious surface area, and inlets stenciled "No Dumping- Flows to Bay" to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. The project will comply with the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit No. CAS612008, which provides enhanced performance standards for the management of stormwater of new development. The project will comply with applicable provisions of the following City Policies - 1) Post-Construction Urban Runoff Management Policy (6-29) which establishes guidelines and minimum BMPs for all projects; and 2) PostConstruction Hydromodification Management Policy (8-14) which provides for numerically-sized (or hydraulically-sized) TCMs.

VIII. NOISE a) Mechanical ventilation will be provided in accordance with Uniform Building Code requirements when windows are to be closed for noise control, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Inspector. b) Post-construction mechanical equipment will conform to the Citys General Plan limitation of 55 dB DNL at residential property lines and 60 dB DNL at commercial property lines by utilizing measures such as equipment selection and location and, if necessary, equipment enclosures. c) Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for any onsite or offsite work within 500 feet of any residential unit. Construction outside of these hours may be approved through a development permit based on a site-specific construction noise mitigation plan and a finding by the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement that the construction noise mitigation plan is adequate to prevent noise disturbance of affected residential uses. d) The contractor will use "new technology" power construction equipment with state-of-the-art noise shielding and muffling devices. All internal combustion engines used on the project site will be equipped with adequate mufflers and will be in good mechanical condition to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engines or other components. e) Stationary noise-generating equipment will be located as far as possible from sensitive receptors. Staging areas will be located a minimum of 200 feet from noise-sensitive receptors, such as residential uses. f) A 6-foot-high noise attenuation barrier shall be constructed along Guadalupe Mines Road. g) Windows and sliding glass doors shall be operable and STC 40 to 45 rated windows and doors and!or exterior wall assemblies including additional layers of gypsum board shall be installed to reduce indoor noise levels to 50 dBA in

Development Standards File No. PDC10-005 Page 11 of 11

J)

bedrooms and 55 dBA in other rooms at all residences subject to excessive singleevent noise. Windows and sliding glass doors shall be operable and STC 28 or higher rated windows and doors shall be installed at all living spaces on the remainder of the site. All units shall be equipped with forced air ventilation systems to allow the occupants the option of maintaining the windows dosed to control noise, and maintain an interior noise level of 45 dB DNL. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall retain a qualified acoustical consultant to check the building plans for all units to ensure that interior noise levels will be attenuated to 45 dB DNL to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement. A "noise disturbance coordinator," who will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise, shall be designated. The disturbance coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaints (e.g., beginning work too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site.

Applicants Requested Development Standards

Brookside Estates Development Standards

3,380+ SF - 3,875+ SF Lot 1. Proposed Lot Setbacks: a. Front Porch = 15 b. Front Living = 12 c. Side Yard = 5 d. Comer Side = 8 e. Rear Living = 11 f. Garage = 18

3,300+ SF Lot 1. Proposed Lot Setbacks: a. Front Porch = 12 b. Front Living = 10 c. Side Yard = 5 d. Comer Side = 8 e. Rear Living = 9 f. Garage = 18

Building Height: 2. Building Height: a. Plan 3 (2 Story) = 28-2" max a. Plan 1 (2 Story) = 25-8" max b. Plan 2 (2 Story) = 28-3" max b. Plan 4 (2 Story) = 29 max Minimum Lot Size: a. 46 x 72 Building Areas: a. Plan 1 = 2,469 SF b. Plan 2 = 2,628 SF 3. Minimum Lot Size: a. 47 x 72 b. 51 x72 4. Building Areas: a. Plan3 =2,802 SF b. Plan 4 = 3,011 SF

\~Nch-pbee3X!mplementation~LANNING FILES~Zonings~2010~PDC10-005 Brooksido EstateskDevelopment Standards from ApplicanLdc~

Development Standards
1. Site Coverage:

a. Buildings b. Common Open Space c. Private Open Space d. Parkway Landscape Area e. Roadway Area (Road, Dwy, Walk, Etc.)

=152,720 SF = 123,218 SF = 198,544 SF =23,800 SF = 191,568 SF

=22.1% = 17.9% = 28.7% = 3.5% = 27.8%

Total = 689,850 = 100%

2. Total Number of Parking:

a. Garage (2 Per Unit) b. Driveway (2 Per Unit) c. On Site Street d. Guadalupe Mines road

= 188 spaces = 188 spaces = 109 spaces 210 spaces Total = 495 spaces

3. Parking Ratio = 5.3 spaces/unit

Notes:

Offsite improvements for the project consist of above and below ground infrastructure work within the Guadalupe Mines Road right of way adjacent to and along the project frontage. Above ground improvements include installing new curb, gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, and signing and striping. Underground improvements include installing a new water line for looping purposes, and storm drain and sanitary sewer tie-ins. 2. See Environmental Report for environmental mitigation requirements.
o

Pursuant to Part 2.75 of Chapter 15.12 of the San Jose Municipal Code, no vested right to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications when and if the City Manager makes a determination that the cumulative sewage treatment demand on the San Jose-Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant represented by approved land uses in the area served by said plant will cause that total sewage treatment demand to meet or exceed the capacity of the San JoseSanta Clara Water Pollution Control to treat such sewage adequately and within the discharge standards imposed on the city by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco bay region. Substantive conditions designed to decrease sanitary sewage associated with any land use approval may be imposed by the approving authority.

\~Nch-pb ce3~Im ple m ent ation~PL ANNTNG FlLES~Zonings~2010~DC10-005 Brookside EstatesX.Development Standards from Applicant.doe

4. Private infrastructure shall be designed to meet or exceed public improvement standards. 5. Onsite existing buildings, structures, and above and below ground utilities are to be demolished. 6. See land use plan-existing trees for tree removal.

\~Nch-pbce3X/mpleraentationkPLA~X~lTNG F1LES~Zonings~010~tDC10-005 Brookside EstateskDevelopm~nt Standards from Appllcmat~doo

Los Gatos Union School District 17010 Roberts Road Los Gatos, CA 95032-4510 Phone: (408) 335-2000 Fax: (408) 395-6481 www .I ~usd .k 12 .ca.us
J. Richard Whitmore, Superintendent

LOS GATOS
SCIHOOL DISTRIGT

April 22, 2010

Mr. Mike Enderby, Project Manager City of San Jose Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement 200 East Santa Clara Street, 3rd Floor Tower San Jose, CA 95113 BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Dear Mr. Enderby: I am writing on behalf of the Los Gatos Union School District to express my concern about the proposed housing on the West side of Guadalupe Mines Road referenced by APN 57502022 and City File Number PDC10-005. Our elementary and middle schools are currently operating at capacity. Based on the current estimate of a student generation factor for this type of housing, this development will add more than 30 students to our district, which will require both additional facilities and additional teaching staff. Because our district is a "basic aid" district, we receive no additional funding along with the additional students. This proposed housing will place an operational and financial strain on the district and have a negative effect on our ability to serve our children. In addition to the impact of the housing on our educational program, the development will create new traffic along Blossom Hill Road in the morning and at pick up time. Blossom Hill Elementary School is the nearest school, but is four miles distant from the development. It is already highly impacted during school pick up and drop off and the main intersection at Blossom Hill and Cheny Blossom is ill suited for additional traffic, which will not only clog the road but can threaten pedestrian and bike traffic. The capacity issues at our schools may well cause students from this development to have to drive beyond Blossom Hill to Louise Van Meter Elementary or to Lexington Elementary where overflow students would be sent on a space available basis. For instance, if the development were to add students in the upcoming school year, our kindergarten classes at Blossom Hill Elementary are already full and the students would be routed to an overflow location. It is my belief that the project is too dense and too high in its impact on our schools to be approved in its current proposal.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

oKathlee~, Rays

-Phil E. Couchee

,Doug Halbert

-C~ Miller

,Tina Orsi-Hartigan

Page 2

I would be glad to answer any questions you may have about the districts ability to serve the students from this development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proPOsal. I would appreciate receiving notice of any public hearing or public agenda concerning this development. Sincerely,

Richard Whitmore Superintendent

c~

Cary Matsuoka, Superintendent, Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District Los Gatos Union School District Board of Trustees

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

oKathleen Rays i

,Phil E. Couchee

,Doug Halbert

oC~-"~s Miller i~

oTina Orsi-Hartigan

17421 Farley Road West o Los Gatos, California 95030 (408) 354-2520 o Fax (408) 354-3375

GOVERNING BOARD Cynthia Chang Roger Mason Michele van Zuiden Rosemary Rossi Lorrie Wernick, Ed.D. SUPERINTENDENT Cary Matsuoka

June 8, 2010

Mr. Mike Enderby, Project Manager City of San Jose Department of Planning, Building & Code Enforcement 200 East Santa Clara Street, 3rd F1 Tower San Jose, CA 95113 Dear Mr. Enderby:

BY FACSIMILE AND US MAIL

I am writing on behalf of the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District to express my concern about the proposed housing on the West side of Guadalupe Mines Road referenced by APN 57502022 and City File Number PDC10-005. Los Oatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District is operating at capacity. Based on the current estimate of a student generation factor for this type of housing, this development will add more than 20 students to our district, which will require both additional facilities and teaching staff. The proposed housing will place an operational and financial strain on the district and have a negative effect on our ability to serve our children. In addition to the impact of the housing on our educational program, the development will create additional traffic along Los Oatos Avenue, which is already significantly impacted during student pick up and drop-off. Additionally, parking is at capacity at the school and development will worsen this situation. It is my belief that the project is too dense and too high in its impact on our schools to be approved at its current proposal. I would be glad to answer any questions you may have about the districts ability to serve the students from this development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposal. I would appreciate receiving notice of any public hearing or public agenda concerning this development. Sincerely, Ca~y~suoka Superintendent CO: Richard Whitmore, Superintendent, Los Gatos Union School District Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees
DISTINGUISHED CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED FOR EXCELLENCE
Los Gatos High School Saratoga High School Adult Education Alternative Education

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: cc: christine kay [chrismkay@yahoo.com] Wednesday, July 2~8, 2010 11:47 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Reed, Teresa; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Christine Kay

Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 Dear City Officials, Thank you for informing us about this new development proposal. I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadalupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. Here are my concerns: (1) Any new business venture must be profit driven, but it also has to keep in mind the importance of customers benefit and social impact. With so many crisis from recent national incidences such as financial collapse starting from Lehman Brothers, GP oil spill in Mexico Bay, and the so many housings on the market due to mortgage credit line issue, I feel that any new business plan has to take its business conduct very seriously to prevent creating any new griefs to the customers and the society. (2) The area of the proposed development is not suitable for the health and safety of prospective residents. The polluted gas from the diesel trucks which pass through Guadalupe Mines Road tend to spread to this proposed development area due to its low altitude. Also, the area is well known as a snake habitat. With this information available, I wonder how many new prospective buyers will be interested in purchasing a new home in this new development area. Also, adding new housings to the already battered housing market does not look pretty. Suppose if it is developed as planned, the new residents move in. If they begin to suffer the problems and they realize that the concerns were raised during planning process, I do not know how much complaints go to San Jose City. Some thing to think about from San Jose Citys liability point of view. (3) Lastly, I concur with the concerns of our neighbors on the following points. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250-500 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of.car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-sanjose. html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of such incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to LGUSD superintendent, R. Whitmore the proposed number of homes proposed will put existing LGUSD schools over capacity, compromise student resources and worsen education quality. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Also Blossom Hill Elementary School is completely full and many of the children will have to attend Lexington Elementary, which is 25 minutes away in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This increased number of students could also result in the area being out of LGSUD into the Union School district, which is already at

7/28/2010

Page 2 of 2
capacity. This would cause our housing prices to lower significantly. Third, our present home values will plummet as buyers flock to the new homes. In addition and of great concern to us is that we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. This area being known for its habitat for the endangered Red Legged Frog, California Tiger Salamander and Western Pond Turtle, this project should warrant a full Environmental Impact Report. Futhermore, the stream that passes through the area attracts a large number of species, exotic birds, animals, and insects. The herds of deer are coming down from the hill to drink waters. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the > 2 year construction period.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Name: Christine Kay Address: 1663 Via Cortina, San Jose, CA 95120

7/28/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
luke cheng [hiluke@gmail.com] Tuesday, July 27, 2010 11:27 AM Xavier, Lesley To: Subject: Great concerns about PDC10-005 From: Sent:

Dear Lesley, We are resident at the Campagna Community in Almaden and I am writing this email to express our following concerns regards to the proposed development on Guadalupe Mind road (PDC10-005). 1. Safety: - As you might know, with the existing Campaga residents (I believe there are 188 houses) and the busy landfill trucks schedule daily, the Guadalupe Mind Road has already been overloaded with traffic and presented certain level of risk for the residents (when walking, biking, and driving). If you approve to add 94 more of the houses down the street, we are very worries the risk will be out of control. - As you might also know, there was a fire not long ago on Guadalupe minds road. Have we thought about if there is a fire in that new development, will fire engines/ ambulances able to get into the house through the tiny road timely? and will that create more potential risk for the existing houses on Guadalupe mind road and the Campagna community? 2. Environmental quality: - My understanding is that the big trees in the planned development will be removed. While the world is more conscious about preserving the trees and greens, I wonder shouldnt re-consider installing more houses to replace the trees in San Jose? - With more traffic to be expected if we add the new houses, I am sure road condition and air quality will be worsen especially at the cross section of Guadalupe mind and Camden road. Most of the residents share the same great concerns as I described above and we hope the City of San Jose fully understand and do NOT approve the development. Thank you. Best regards, Luke & Rebecca Cheng 1625 Via Campagna, San Jose, CA 95120

7/27/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley johnlisabalboni@comcast, net Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:26 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Lesley Xavier Subject: Concerns Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose: Permit number PD 10-005 From: Sent: To:

Dear Mayor Reed, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier,

We are homeowners in the Campagnas at Almaden development in San Jose, consisting of 188 homes located off of Guadalupe Mines Road, 95120. We are writing to express our concerns regarding the proposed development of approximately 95 new homes on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose: Permit number PD10-005. We are concerned with problems with traffic safety, emergency access, school redistricting, and the loss of green space. We understand that new development is necessary, please read our recommendations below. We strongly urge You to consider them before approving this new housing project. First and foremost, we are extremely concerned for the loss of safety of our entire neighborhood. The proposed large number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow two-lanes of Guadalupe Mines Rd. The proposed development will increase the traffic on Guadalupe Mines Rd, with an increased risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and collisions between autos and children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, the design of Guadalupe Mines Road beyond Puerto Vallarta Drive renders it a single access road for fire and emergency vehicles. It is already an evacuation entrapment problem, and the increased population from new proposed development would make the situation much worse than it is now. The recent fire on Guadalupe Mines Rd is an example of the danger of the limited access on Guadalupe Mines Rd, (ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-san-jose. htm!). If that fire had been one block closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. Note also that the condition of Guadalupe Mines Road is very poor because of little or no maintenance from the City. With the new development of the proposed large size, the chance of safety incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that operations of the Guadalupe Mines Landfill brings scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the narrow road all day.long, six days a week, (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). , The large number of new students from the proposed new development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The large number of proposed new homes will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and will likely cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. The developers one time impact fee would not be sufficient to fill the funding shortfall created by the population from the new development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the

7/26/2010

Page 2 of 2

development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion Of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and would cause more deer accidents with vehicles. To alleviate these concerns, we are asking the City to consider the following suggestions: Require lower density housing to be built, no more than four homes per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD and maintain more trees and green space. Add an additional traffic lane to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it two lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add an evacuation route at the south end of Guadalupe Mines Rd to provide a backup route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space, trees, and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the greater than two-year long construction period
We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns.

Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. John A and Lisa M Balboni 1536 Via Campo Aureo San Jose, CA 95120-5006 408-927-5390

7/26/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Zhengyong (Simon) Zhu [zhuzhygm@gmail.com] Monday, July 26, 2010 1:14 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Von Raesfeld, Darn]l; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: concern of PD10-005 development

Office of Mayor Chuck Reed mayoremail@sanioseca.~ov Office of Congresswoman for District 10 Nancy Pyle Districtl0@sanjoseca.~ov Office of the Fire Chief: Darryl Von Raesfeld darryl.vonraesfeld@sanjoseca.gov Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement: Joseph Horwedel, ioseph.horwedel@sanjoseca.gov Assistant Director Planning division: Laurel Prevetti Laurel.Prevetti@sanjoseca.Gov Planner II Planning Division, Lesley Xavier Lesley.Xavier@san!oseca.gov

I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built.
My first concern is about the risk of our safety. For most part, Guadalupe Mines Rd is just a narrow two lane road, which we have to share with numerous heavy dump trucks to the landfill. With those extra 94 new homes, the traffic on Guadalupe Mines Rd will get significantly worse. Also Guadalupe Mines Rd is not a through street, which means there is only one narrow exit to the main road for thousands of people. This will pose a great danger in case of fires and natural disasters. The school district issue is also my top concern because I have a 4 years old daughter. I bought my house last year mainly because it belongs to the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). The new development is also in LGUSD and these new 94 homes will create a sudden burden on the district and compromise student resources and education. Even worse, it may cause overcapacity issue to LGUSD, which may result in a redraw of school boundary, according to R. Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD. The change of school district will not only put my daughter to a less prestigious school, but will also significantly reduce the house value.

7/26/2010

Page 2 of 2
With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - The number of houses to be built should be reduced so as to mitigate the impact on school capacity and traffic. No more than 4 homes should be built per acre. - Make sure houses that belong to LGUSD will not be redistricted out. - Connect Guadalupe Mines Rd to Hicks Rd, so that there will be another evacuation route - Add more lanes and improve the condition of Guadalupe Mines Rd. -Add left turn signal at Guadalupe Mines Rd and Coleman. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. A park with playground is desperately needed in this area. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Best Regards, Zhengyong Zhu

7/26/2010

Xavier, Lesle~,
From: Sent: To: Subject: Prevetti, Laurel Friday, July 23, 2010 6:08 PM Xavier, Lesley FW: File No. PDCl0-005. Planned Development at Guadalupe Mines Road

..... Original Message ..... From: Hoa Nguyen [mailto:hoa_q_nguyen@yahoo.com] Sent~ Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:13 AM To: Prevetti, Laurel Subject: File No. PDC10-005. Planned Development at Guadalupe Mines Road

Dear Ms. Laurel Prevetti: My name is Hoa Nguyen, and Im currently living with my family at 1727 Via Lugano, San Jose, CA 95120. There is a proposed planned development with File No. PDC10-005 to build 94 homes across my street, and I believe that this project will adversely affect my neighborhood. The proposed project of building 94 new homes on Guadalupe Mines Road wi!l significantly increase traffic. This will lead to increase risk of car accidents and road damage. The increased number of residents also raises more fire and earthquake safety risk. Since there is only one evacuation route through Guadalupe Mines Road, the added residents will make it more difficult for current residents to escape to safety in case of an emergency such as fire or earthquake. New homes in this area will bring more students to the Los Gatos Union School District, and this will cause overcapacity problem at Los Gatos schools. This issue may trigger a risk of redistricting my neighborhood area out of Los Gatos Union School District. Im worried that my daughter will no longer be able to attend schools in the Los Gatos Union School District. The above issues together with the new houses available will also drive the house value in my neighborhood down. Moreover, the building of these new homes will eliminate green space around my neighborhood, and the feeling of being in the mountain area will be compromised. I hope that you will reconsider this proposed planned development and help me keep my neighborhood safe and pleasurable. Sincerely, Hoa Nguyen

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: wang shin [ws9977@gmail.com] Friday, July 23, 2010 5:35 PM Sent: Xavier, Lesley To: jason_wei@sbcgobal, net Cc: Subject: PDC10-005

Dear Lesley Xavier Im a resident a Campagnas in Almaden, Im writing to express concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mine rd. PDC10-005. As you know the 2 lanes road( one lane each way ) is narrow and the reach the maximum capacity to be shared by the current residents within Campagna as well as shared by the Guadalupe Mines Landfill down the road. The new development for adding 94 homes will significantly increase traffic and pose more threat for children and people riding or walking on the road. As a reminder theres house fire on Guadalupe Mine Rd. On June and the fire trucks block the whole 2 lanes for 3 to 4 hours since the road is narrow, imagine what will happen if theres another emergency at the same time down the road in the community.s Not to mention the school overcapacity and the environmental issues caused by the development. I know in economic difficulty time city need development to bring in revenue but nonetheless safety is by far the most important issue and with my concerns Im asking the following to be addressed : 1) Add extra lanes for Guadalupe Mines rd. to make it 2 lanes each way. 2)Limit the house density to be no more than 50. 3)Add extra route in case of large fire or earthquake. 4)Preserve more green space for wildlife. Im looking forward to your response addressing those concerns. Sincerely, Wang & Yoon Shin 1642 via campagna San Jose, CA. 95120

7/26/2010

Xavier, Lesle},
From: Sent: To: Subject: Hoa Nguyen [hoa_q_nguyen@yahoo.com] Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:56 AM Xavier, Lesley Planned Development File No. PDC10-005

Dear Ms. Lesley Xavier:

My name is Hoa Nguyen, and Im currently living with my family at 1727 Via Lugano, San Jose, CA 95120. There is a proposed planned development with File No. PDC10-005 to build 94 homes across my street, and I believe that this project will adversely affect my neighborhood.

The proposed project of building 94 new homes on Guadalupe Mines Road will significantly increase traffic. This will lead to increase risk of car accidents and road damage. The increased number of residents also raises more fire and earthquake safety risk. Since there is only one evacuation route through Guadalupe Mines Road, the added residents will make it more difficult for current residents to escape to safety in case of an emergency such as fire or earthquake. New homes in this area will bring more students to the Los Gatos Union School District, and this will cause overcapacity problem at the Los Gatos schools. This issue may trigger a risk of redistricting my neighborhood area out of the Los Gatos Union School District. Im worried that my daughter will no longer be able to attend schools in the Los Gatos Union School District. The above issues together with the new houses available will also drive the house value in my neighborhood down. Moreover, the building of these new homes will eliminate green space around my neighborhood, and the feeling of being in the mountain area will be compromised. I hope that you will reconsider this proposed planned development and help me keep my neighborhood safe and pleasurable. Sincerely, Hoa Nguyen

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
Harry Fu [fuhui@hotmail.com] Tuesday, July 20, 2010 9:56 PM Reed, Teresa; The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 Attachments: ViaCompoVerde.pdf From: Sent: To: Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Reed, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier: The following residents of Campagnas at Almaden have signed petitions expressing their concerns with safety issues related to the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose - Permit number PD10-005. First of all, they are extremely concerned for the risk to their safety. The new houses will add at least 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2-lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is easily jammedin the morning when parents driving their children to the schools. Also the road has been in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill in the same neighborhood already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The extra 250 cars will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children and seniors walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, the current design of the Guadalupe Mines Road, can become a trap in the case of any fire on that road or any disaster such as earthquake. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:llfascv.blogspot.com120101051may-5-2010-4alarm-response-in-san-jose.html). With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Besides, they are concerned with losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With these concerns, they are asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: ~, Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period

Petition names are below and petition signatures are attached. PETITIONERS CONCERNED WITH SAFETY ISSUES: Martin Dasher - 1657 Via Campo Verde Le Sotir - 1651 Via Campo Verde Doug Leong, - 1645 Via Campo Verde Duc Trat~ - 1639 Via Campo Verde Joseph Hajost - 1633 Via Campo Verde

7/21/2010

Page 2 of 2
John Dasher- 1627 Via Campo Verde Afsaneh Bahrami- 1621 Via Campo Verde Kevin Cerutti - 1615 Via Campo Verde Tom & Verginia Delurio - 1693 Via Campo Verde Paul & Veronica Majoulet - 1687 Via Campo Verde Christina Chen- 1596 Via Campo Verde Darren Hom- 1597 Via Campo Verde

7/21/2010

Page 1 of I

Xavier, Lesley kyung ji [ks0402@yahoo.com] Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:37 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Permit Number PD10-005 From: Sent: To:
I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Seconci, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to R. VVhitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School District, the district serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at capff~it~;~ ~};~l~i~Kdmber of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the the district and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Third, our present home values will plummet, as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or eadhquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns.

7/21/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley From: sent: To: Cc: Jason Wei [jason_wei@sbcglobal.net] Tuesday, July 20, 20i0 3:29 PM Xavier, Lesley Jason Wei

Subject: PDC10-005

Dear Lesley Xavier, I am a resident a Campagnas in Almaden, I am writing to express concerns regarding the proposed development on Gradalupe Mine Rd. PDC10-005. As you know the 2 lanes road ( one lane each way) is narrow and reach the maximum capacity to be shared by the current residents within Campagnas as well as shared by the Gradalupe Mine, s Landfill down the road. The new development for adding 94 homes will significantly increase traffic~ and pose more threat for children and people riding or walking on the road. As a reminder theres house fire on Gradalupe Mine Rd in June and the fire trucks block the whole 2 lanes for 3 to 4 hours since the road is narrow, imagine what will happen if theres another emergency at the same time down the road in the

community.

Not to mention the school overcapacity and the environment issues caused by the development. I know in economic difficulty time city need development to bring in revenue but nonetheless safety is by far the most important issue and with my concerns I am asking the following to be addressed : 1)add extra lanes fo Gradalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes cash way 2)limit the house density to be no more than 50 3)add extra route in case of large fire or earthquake 4)preserve more green space for wildlife I am looking forward to your response addressing those concerns. Sincerely, Jason & Lori Wei 1689 Via Fortuna, San Jose CA95120

7/20/2010

,Xavier, Lesle~/
From: Sent: To:
Subject:

Duc Tran [trucdan@gmail.com] Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:56 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Reed, Teresa; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Hi,

I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250-500 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents,~pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarmresponse- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of such incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to R. Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School District, the district serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at capacity and the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the district and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development.
Third, our present home values will plummet, as buyers flock to the new homes. In addition and of great concern to us is that we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. This area being known for its habitat for the endangered Red Legged Frog, California Tiger Salamander and Western Pond Turtle, this project should warrant a full Environmental Impact

Report. Futhermore, the stream that passes through the area attracts a large number of species, exotic birds, animals, and insects. The herds of deer are coming down from the hill to drink waters. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the > 2 year construction period.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Duc Tran 1639 Via Campo Verde San Jose, CA 95120

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Subject: Brent Grahm [bgraham@miragemri.com] Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:15 PM Xavier, Lesley PDC 10-005

Dear Ms. Xavier,

I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposed Guadalupe Mines Rd. project. I have seen the draft of the housing project and I feel that it doesnt fit the current neighborhood standards. It seem that it will also put in place a safety hazard, namely there is only one two lane road into and out of the area which would serve all the families south of Via Campagan. This area is up against a heavily wooded hillside. Please consider less dense zoning for this project. Sincerely, Brent Graham 6548 Guadalupe Mines Rd.

7/20/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Lydia Wheeler [lyl2000@yahoo.com] Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:33 AM Reed, Teresa; The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 Attachments: CampagnaPetitionList.pdf Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Reed, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier: The following residents of Campagnas at Almaden and Guadalupe Mines Rd. have signed petitions expressing their concerns with safety issues and LGUSD impact issues related to the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose - Permit number PD10-005. First and foremost, they are extremely concerned for the risk to their safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv.blogspot.com/2010/05/may-5-2010-4-alarm-response-in-san-jose, html). With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, they are concerned with losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With their concerns, they are asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more.than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period Petition names are below and petition signatures are attached. PETITIONERS CONCERNED WITH SAFETY ISSUES:

7/20/2010

Page 2 of 2
G. Herrel - 1530 Via Campo Aureo John Balboni - 1536 Via Campo Aureo Laura Ambrose - 1542 Via Campo Aureo Dennis Toohey - 1548 Via Campo Aureo Ralph Zimmermann - 1554 Via Campo Aureo Yuhua Wu - 1566 Via Campo Aureo Steve Trigonis - 1578 Via Campo Aureo Olga Ermolin - 1579 Via Campo Aureo Gerald Isaac - 1573 Via Campo Aureo Hong Guo - 1529 Via Campo Aureo Ken Schuler - 1493 Via Campo Aureo Chris Kavanagh - 1487 Via Campo Aureo Fred Safar - 1500 Via Campo Aureo Dave Rue - 1606 Via Campo Aureo Shad Krandel - 6225 Via Saronno Christine Wang - 1635 Via Fortuna Daniel Tam - 1638 Via Fortuna Yawen Chu - 1653 Via Fortuna Julia Wen - 1668 Via Fortuna Ying Chen- 1696 Via Campagna ~ Sam Kim - 1684 Via Campagna Eric Bergles - 1678 Via Campagna S. Chang - t679 Via Campagna Janath Peisis -1673 Via Campagna Paul Nguyen - 1667 Via Campagna M. Walitsih - 1655 Via Campagna Andy Tai - 1654 Via Campagna Jae Sim - 1624 Via Campagna Mark Willey - 1576 Via Campagna K. Chy - 1571 Via Campagna Zhengyong Zhu - 1672 Via Campagna Ali Rezaee - 1582 Via Campagna Kathleen Willey - 1576 Via Campagna Kyung Ji - 1558 Via Campagna Brent Graham - 6458 Guadalupe Mines Rd. Ron Jacobs - 6460 Guadalupe Mines Rd.

0 o o

o o

o o

o o o

PETITIONERS CONCERNED WITH IMPACT TO LGUSD AND SAFETY ISSUES: Jing Sung - 1726 Via Cortina Vivian Chen- 1678 Via Cortina Joe Zhao - 1639 Via Cortina Nick Katakis 1642 Via Cortina JJ Shen - 1672 Via Cortina S. Kim - 1707 Via Fortuna M. R. Lee - 1636 Via Fortuna

7/20/2010

Xavier, Lesle~,
From: Sent: To: Subject: Yawen Chu [ychu_2000@yahoo.com] Monday, July 19, 2010 4:06 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PDt0-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005
First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadal.upe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/ 05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-san-jose. ht~l)

With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles.

With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above:

* Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. * Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. * Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. * Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. * Increased police patrols to stop speeding * Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.

We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Yawen Chu 1653 Via Fortuna San jose, CA95120

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
J Wen [weniulia@gmail.com] Monday, July 19, 2010 1:10 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darn/I; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley .Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood .Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 From: Sent: To:

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle; ChiefVon Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier,
I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005.

First and foremost, I am personally extremely concemed for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of GuadalupeMines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv.blo gspot.com!2010/05/may-5-2010-4-alarm-response-in-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: * Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. * Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic.
7/19/2010

Page 2 of 2

* Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. * Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. * Increased police patrols to stop speeding * Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Julia Wen and Jesse Chen 1668 Via Fortuna San Jose, CA 95120

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley From: Sent: To: All Rezaee [110rezaee@gmail.com] Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:21 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryi; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley

Subject: RE: proposed development on Guadelupe Mlns Road To:

Office of Mayor Chuck Reed mayoremail@sanjoseca.gov

Office of Congresswoman for District 10 Nancy Pyte Districtl0@sanjoseca.gov Office of the Fire Chief: Darryl Von Raesfeld darryl.vonraesfeld@sanjoseca.gov Director of:Planning, Building and Code Enforcement: Joseph Horwedel, joseph.horwedel@sanjoseca.gov Assistant Director Planning division: Laurel Prevetti LaureI.PrevettiC~.sanjoseca.Gov

Planner II Planning Division, Lesley Xavier Lesley.Xavier@sanjoseca.gov

RE: proposed development on Guadelupe Mlns Road

My wife, son, and I are residents of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons:

First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with .the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to R. Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School District, the distdct serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at capacity and the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the the district and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Third, our present home values will plummet, as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our

7/19/2010

Page 2 of 2
existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety..~ - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period, Thank you for your attention to our concerns.

Best Regards, Ali Rezaee, MD and Pantea Mahtosh, MD 1582 Via Campagna San Jose, CA 95120

7/19/2 010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley From: Sent: To: Deborah Jacobs [rondebjacobs@yahoo.com] Sunday, July 18, 2010 8:38 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti@sanjoseca.Gov; Xavier, Lesley

Subject: Guadalupe Mines Rd. proposed development

I am the owner of 6460 Guadalupe Mines Road. Being the last house on Guadalupe Mines Rd., the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005 has my full attention. This development proposes to build 94 new homes w~th 8 homes per acre. If this project is allowed to proceed as planned, several serious problems will occur. First and foremost, is the issue of safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehk~les and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. In addition, the Guadalupe Dam, directly upstream of this proposed development, is currently being studied for its seismic stability. The upstream concrete face is badly broken. This area is in the 15 minute inundation zone of the dam. It would be a good idea to wait until the study is completed and the dam is retrofitted. Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to LGUSD superintendent, R. Whitmore the proposed number of homes proposed will put existing LGUSD schools over capacity, compromise student resources and worsen education quality. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Also Blossom Hill Elementary School is completely full and many of the children will have to attend Lexington Elementary, which is 25 minutes away in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This increased number of students could also result in the area being out of LGSUD into the Union School district, which is already at capacity. This would cause our housing prices to lower significantly. Third, the timing of this project doesnt make sense. This is the worst real estate market in decades. History shows that there is likelihood that this project will go bankrupt before completion. The developer, builder and subs will be paid but not the investors. Empty, incomplete houses could sit vacant for years. This will seriously affect our home values. Lastly, with this area being known for its habitat for the endangered Red Legged Frog, California Tiger Salamander and Western Pond Turtle, this project should warrant a full Environmental Impact Report.. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: -Perform a full Environmental Impact Report. - Require lower density.housing to be built no more than 4. per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security dudng the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Ron Jacobs 6,460 Guadalupe Mines Rd. San Jose, CA 95120

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley From:

Sent: To:

smditter@aol.com
Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:54 PM Xavier, Lesley; Prevetti, Laurel; Horwedel, Joseph; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Office of ouncilmember Nancy Pyle; The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed

Subject: File No. PDC10-005 Brookside Estates

I, as a resident of Campagnas at Almaden, am writing to express the significant concems that I have regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. I am also a physician and have a masters in public health with a specialty in injury control. There are serious negative public health and financial consequences that will likely occur as a result of the development being built at its present level of density, 8 homes per acre. I am snre that you do not want to be on the TV news explaining why you did not act to ensure the public safety of this neighborhood. First let me describe the area since most of you have probably never been there. Guadelupe Mines Road is a small two lane road that already has significant potholes and open trenches. The proposed development lies at the end of the road and is across from the landfill at th~ end of the road. Thus there is already significant large truck traffic throughout the day, in addition to all the car traffic from the homes. There are a large number of children who ride their bikes and skateboards all over the area and who go to play in and around the creek next to the development. The entire area lies directly on the San Andreas Fault. There is only one other alternate route out and that is on Puerto Vallarta Road which lies about mid way between Camden Ave and the proposed development. Building this development at the present density is likely to have" (1) I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add an additional 250 to 500 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the Guadalupe Mines Rd. Statistically this will increase the risk of car accidents, result in more pedestrian and bicycle injuries and deaths, and endanger children playing on Guadalupe Mines Rd. (2) In addition, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. As it was the evacuation using Puerto Vallarta Road during the fire was snarled with traffic, slow, and dangerous. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of such incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents endangered by this poor planning increases. (3) Presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to LGUSD superintendant, R. Whitmore, the proposed number of homes will put existing LGUSD schools over capacity, compromise student resources and worsen education quality. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Also Blossom Hill Elementary School is completely full and many of the children will have to attend Lexington Elementary, which is 25 minutes away in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This increased number of students could also result in the area being residstriced out of LGUSD into the Union School District, which is already at capapcity. This will cause our housing prices to lower significantly.
(4) Our present home values will plummet as buyers flock to the new homes, Many of us are already "underwater" and our housing prices have plateaued at much lower prices. I know San Jose City has a large budget deficit, but the amount taxes generated will be significantly lower if our housing prices

7/19/2010

Page 2 of 2

remain low and the market is oversaturated. (5) The development will decimate the natural green space and wildlife environment that we presently enjoy. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today, decrease the number of people trapped and/or evacuating in an emergency, ameliorate the overeapaeity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety, and help our housing prices. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve significantly more green space and wildlife in the development design than the few areas of grass and benches now planned. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns.
Susan M. Ditter, M.D., M.P.H.

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: janath peiris [janath.peiris@gmail.com] Monday, July 19, 2010 7:01 AM

The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005 : A resident of

Campagnas

Office of Mayor Chuck Reed Office of Congresswoman for District 10 Nancy Pyle Office of the Fire Chief: Darryl Von Raesfeld Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement: Joseph Horwedel, Assistant Director Planning division: Laurel Prevetti Planner II Planning Division, Lesley Xavier

Dear Sir/Madam,
I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to R. Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School .District, the district serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at capacity and the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the the district and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Third, our present home values will plummet: as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation reute in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Sincerely, Bemini Hennadige Janath Peiris

7/19/2010

Page 2 of 2

1673 Via Campagna San Jose CA 95120

7/19/2010

Page i of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Mohammad Darbandi[mhdarbandi@yahoo.com] Monday, July 19, 2010 7:56 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadatupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: * Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. * Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to.handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. * Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. * Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. * Increased police patrols to stop speeding * Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Name: Mohammad Darbandi

7/19/2010

Page 2 of 2
Address: 1626 Via Fortuna, San Jose, 95120

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
Fromi Sent: To: Arkady Estdn [arkadye@gmail.com] Monday, July 19, 2010 11:45 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Dar~yl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley

Subject: Concerns regarding proposed new development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. Office of Mayor Chuck Reed mayoremail@sanjoseca.gov Office of Congresswoman for District 10 Nancy Pyle District10@sanjoseca.gov Office of the Fire Chief: Darryl Von Raesfeld darryl.vonraesfeld@sanjoseca.gov Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement: Joseph Horwedel, joseph.horwedel@sanjoseca.gov Assistant Director Planning division: Laurel Prevetti Laurel. Prevetti@sanjoseca. Gov Planner II Planning Division, Lesley Xavier Lesley.Xavier@sanjoseca.gov I am a resident of Campagna at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned about the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Second, presently thedevelopment is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to LGUSD superintendent, R. Whitmore the proposed number of homes will put existing LGUSD schools over capacity, compromise student resources and worsen education quality. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by thedevelopment. Also Blossom Hill Elementary School is completely full and many of the children will have to attend Lexington Elementary, which is 25 minutes away in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This increased number of students could also result in the area being out of LGSUD into the Union School district, which is already at capacity. This would cause our housing prices to lower significantly. Third, our present home values will plummet as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle load and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns.

Best regards, Arkady Estrin, resident of Campagna at Almaden.

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Subject: jaesim@sbcglobal.net Monday, July t9, 2010 12:57 PM Xavier, Lesley Regarding San Jose Permit Number PD10-005

I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe~i~es ~J~l~~ddition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes~Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to R. Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School District, the district serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at cap~~t~;~ri~"t}~l~.~]~r~~mber of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the the district and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Third, our present home values will plummet, as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns.

Sincerely Yours Sim, Jae Kwang, Resident at 1624 Via Campagna San Jose CA 95120

7/19/2010

Page 1 of 3

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Cc: nysjconnection@hotmail.com Tuesday, July 13, 2010 2:28 PM horwedel@sanjoseca.gov The Office of Ma~jor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Prevetti, Laurel; lyl2000@yahoo.com; mgghosh@aol.com; smditter@aol.com; e7qz@yahoo.com; Xavier, Lesley; es@stanfordalumni.org Subject: Brookside Estates Rezoning Plans - Guadalupe Mines Road -San Jose Permit PD10-005 Mitigated Negative Declaration Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Dear Mr. Horwedel: We are residents of Campagna (1669 Via Cortina) and just read the Mitigated Negative Declaration. We have several concerns that were not included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and would like these addressed. If there is anyone else we should contact, please let us know. Here are our concerns and that of many other homeowners in the Campagna development: 1. Traffic: This planned development has too many homes (94 planned) which will increase traffic on Guadalupe Mines Road by around 250 - 500 cars per day, This is in addition to the truck traffic heading to the landfill almost every day. The trucks are carrying heavy loads (many without tarps) and are placing daily stress on the roads (potholes) already. Guadalupe. Mines Road should be expanded to two lanes each way to handle the extra volume of traffic no matter how many homes will be built, In addition, the roads are already filthy from the debris and dust from the trucks. The City of San Jose should double up efforts to do street sweeping and picking up the debris left by truckers to the landfill. Lastly, the lights and turning lanes to/from Camden Avenue will need to improved to handle ~e additional traffic. Right now, the left turning lanes from Guadalupe Mines Road onto Camden Avenue around 8:00 am during the school year is crowded already. Sometimes, it takes two light switches to make the turn safely. At this time in the morning many cars are coming from Coleman Avenue and crossing Camden to get into the Hicks turning lane for the Catholic School. Someone needs to do a study of these traffic patterns so it doesnt become a morning traffic nightmare in the future. 2. Schools: Richard Whitmore, Superintendent of the Los Gatos Saratoga Union High School District, has already written to you about his concerns due to current overcapacity already. He believes that the planned 94 new homes is too much at one time and may even create future financial and/or redistricting issues. Who will take responsibility for this? The developer or the City of San Jose? Whitmore states It is my belief that the project

7/13/2010

Page 2 of 3
is too dense and too high in its impact on our schools to be approved in its current proposal. Has anyone contacted him to address his concerns? 3. Evacuation Route: A recent fire on Guadalupe Mines Road caused some access issues to the Campagna neighborhood. Fortunately, in this instance, we could gain entry/exit via Puerto Vallarta, Others have stated that this already poses a safety issue in case of earthquake or fires..How will emergency vehicles gain access to the neighborhood? Has an additional evacuation route been planned especially with this plannned 94 home development? Has the Fire Chief provided his input to this situation? 4. Construction Delays and Dirt: During construction, who will be responsible for safety, security and delays due to construction equipment and dirt and water haulers? We would ~ike increased police patrols to stop speeding, enforce current tarp requirements, and monitor security of the area. Who will be responsible for this and keeping the roads free from debris? ~
5. Construction Hours: The Mitigated Negative Declaration states that during the week construction will take place between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. That twelve (12) hours is a long time for extra noise, dirt, and traffic. Even the landfill has the following hours: M-F, 8 a.m.- 4:45 p.m. which is more reasonable for a residential area. 6. Green Space and Wildlife: Weve walked this area many times. Its considered a Wildlife habitat. In fact, signs say that its a native snake habitat. Weve seen deer all of the time along the Guadalupe River. What is the developer or the City of San Jose planning to ensure that this wildlife is not exterminated or evacuated to make room for the massive changes to this area? In summary, we hope that you can see the significant impact on the environment, the schools, the traffic as well as the neighborhood if you place such a high density project in this area. We hope that you reevaluate the density, and do the necessary impact planning to ensure safety for the tax paying San Jose residents who will be effected by your decisions. The existing Mitigated Negative Declaration looks like it is mostly a rubber stamped document to rush this rezoning project through.

Thank you for your consideration and attentiveness to these matters.

Sincerely,

7/13/2010

Page 3 of 3
Gary and Adriana Weiner and Family 408-227-5140 1669 Via Cortina

Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more.

7/13/2010

Page 1 of 3

Xavier, Lesley
From: dennistoohey [dmtoohey@earthlink.net] Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:40 AM Sent: Xavier, Lesley To: Subject: FW: EMAIL SUBJECT: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 Lesley, Please include me in public hearing notifications regarding this development. Thank you, Dennis Toohey From: The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed [mailto:TheOfficeofMayorChuckReed@sanjoseca.gov] Sent: Thursday, 3uly 08, 2010 10:53 AM To: dennis toohey Subject; RE: EMAIL SUBJECT: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San 3ose. Permit number PD10-005 -: July 8, 2010 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Toohey, Thank you for taking the time to write to Mayor Reed regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road. We appreciate that you have shared your very well-informed concerns regarding the project with our office. Mayor Reed will be informed of your thoughts on this matter. The proposed development plans are currently under review by our Planning Department staff and we are waiting for their completed report. The Planning Staff will consider and include information from traffic, environmental, and biologic analysis in their report. However, the Los Gatos School District is a separate entity and the city is limited in its evaluation of this impact. It is very likely that the plans will include some revisions based upon comments from the Planning Department. Property within 1000 feet of the site will receive notification of any public hearing (Planning Commission or City Council) and the staff report and analysis will be available on line. If you have further questions, please contact Lesley Xavier at Lesley.xavier@sanjoseca.gov or 535-7852. To ensure that you receive notice of the meetings, please contact Lesley and ask to be added to her notification list. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Sara Wright Agenda Services Manager Office of San Jos~ Mayor Chuck Reed San Josd City Hall [ 200 E. Santa Clara Street, 17th Floor [ San Jos~, California 95113 408-535-3887I sara.wright@sanioseca.gov

From: dennis toohey [mailto:dmtoohey@earthlink,net] Sent: Monday, 3uly 05, 2010 11:16 AM To. The Office of IVlayor Chuck Reed; Nancy; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, .Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Cc: lyl2000@yahoo.com; mgghosh@aol.com; smditter@aol.com; eTqz@yahoo.com Subject: EMAIL SUB3ECT: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council MemberPyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti 7/12/2010

Page 2 of 3

and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:l/fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4alarm- response- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down thesame narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.

7/12/2010

Page. 3 of 3

We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Dennis and Jean Toohey 1548 Via Campo Aureo San Jose, CA 95120

7/12/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sudheesh Nair [snairv@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:59 AM To: The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley
Respected Madams/Sirs I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden/Guadelupe Mines Road area. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development, San Jose Permit Number PD10-005. This development proposes to build 94 new homes with 8 homes per acre. No new roads are to be built. This density is far too high for the following reasons: First and foremost, I am extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narroW2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the dsk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadaiupe Mines Rd. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of resideqts affected would increase as well. Second, presently the development is in the Los Gatos Saratoga Union School District (LGUSD). According to Ro Whitmore, the superintendent of LGUSD, the number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools, and could cause LGUSD to redistrict the area out of the district. Union School District, the district serving my home, is where these students will most likely be sent. Union SD is already at cap~d~t~;fffi~ ~fi~ |~i~~L~mber of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the the distdct and compromise student resources and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. Third, our present home values will plummet as buyers flock to the new homes. Lastly, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: - Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD, improve the road safety.. - Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. - Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. - Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. - Increased police patrols to stop speeding & monitor security during the 2 year construction period. Thank you for your attention to my concerns.

Sudheesh Vadakkedath ~

7/7/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Subject: mgghosh@aol.com Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:04 AM Sutherland, Kathy; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Re: Guadalupe Mines Road Project

Dear Ms Sutherland,

Thank you for your response acknowledging our email petition regarding our concerns on the proposed housing development on Guadalupe Mines Road.(PD-10-005). Additional concerns from our end that were not mentioned in the previous petition letter are:

The plac_e is not safe for_.the new residents once developed because the area is known as the snake habitat. The employees of the -com~a-n3-escurrently olo-cated in the pTo=po-sedarea use-dbewarned to be careful about the snakes. In addition., the stream which passes through the area attracts so many species, exotic birds, animals, and insects. The herds of deer are coming down from the hill to drink waters. We want the place to be protected for the preservation of eco-systems.
Our concerns are very valid and we hope that Ms Pyle who represents our area gives due attention to the points we have raised and voices our concerns to the planning board.
Best regards,

Soumen Ghosh

1733 Via Lugano San Jose, Ca 95120

.....Original Message ..... .From: Sutherland, Kathy <Kathy.Sutherland@sanjoseca.gov> To: msbhat@pacbeli.net; mgghosh@aol.com; shari.krandel@sbcglobal.net; skrandel@sbcglobal.net; pradeepchandra@yahoo.com; e7qz@yahoo.com; acwpang@hotmail.com Sent: Tue, Jun 22, 2010 5:28 pm Subject: Guadalupe Mines Road Project Good Afternoon On behalf of Counciimember Pyle, I would like to express her wish to thank all of you for writing in with your concerns regarding the housing project on Guadalupe Mines Road, I would also like to let you know that I will be following up with staff regarding your concerns and comments. I should be able to get back to you by the end of the week.

6/29/2010

Page 2 of 2
Please accept my apologies for the delay responding to you. Kathy Sutherland Chief of Staff Councilmember Nancy Pyle Phone 408-535-4981 Fax 408-292-6478 I~.$.Councilmember Pile would like to keep you apprisbd of current issues in Disirict 10 and the City of san Jos~, if youd like to be added to our newsletter distribution list, please sign-up online here.

6/29/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Hankh Han [hankh.han@gmail.com] Monday, July 05, 2010 1:53 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley

Subject: Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Rd, San Jose Permit # PD10 - 005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chick Von Rasesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagna at Almaden and writing to express my concerns of the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Rd, San Jose permit # PD -10 - 005. First of all, I am extremly concerned for the risk to our safety. The proposed number of homes will add at least an additional 250 or more vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. With the new development of the proposed size, not only increase the chance of incidents dramatically. It also becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines Rd. had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. (Ref:http:/)fascv.blog~pot.com/2010/05/may-5-2010-4-alarm-esponse-in-san-jose.html)
And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighbor which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week. With my concerns, I am asking for couple of things to alleviate the issues above"

1. Ask for lower density housing to be built (No more than 4 per acre - would decrease the traffic load to the Guadalupe Mines Rd). ._ 2. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire o)~arthquake. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Han Family 1645 Via Cortina San Jose, Campagna.Residents

7/6/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
dennis toohey [dmtoohey@earthlink.net] Monday, July 05, 2010 11:16 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Nancy; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley lyl2000@yahoo.com; mgghosh@aol.com; smditter@aol.com; eTqz@yahoo.com Cc: Subject: EMAIL SUBJECT: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 From: Sent: To:

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:l/fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4alarm- response- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well, And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.or.q/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to. dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the. area and even cause morse deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above:
Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD.

7/6/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
Douglas Kay (dkay) [dkay@cisco.com] Monday, June 28, 2010 5:16 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Xavier, Lesley Cc: Christine Kay; Douglas Kay Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 From: Sent: To:

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Yon Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, Recently, I noticed that there was a development proposal posted on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005. I would like to express my extreme concerns againstthe development proposal as follows: .... First, The place-is n~t safe for the n~v re~ident-s-~nce~le~eloped be-~au~e~the area is known ..... as the snake habitat. The employees of the companies currently located in the proposed area used be warned to be careful about the snakes. Second, the.stream which passes-through the area attracts so many species; exotic birds, animals, and insects. The herds of deer are coming down from the hill to drink waters. I want the place to be protected for the preservation of eco-systems. Third, there is the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadaiupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot. com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the
6/29/2010

Page 2 of 2

green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to. our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. ,, Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security duringthe > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely,
Douglas & C-hi:~s~ne Kay

1663 Via Cortina San Jose, CA 95120

6/29/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
Fan, Karen [yunkunf@yahoo.com] Monday, June 28, 2010 9:28 AM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley yunkunf@yahoo.com Cc: Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 From: Sent: To:

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, 1 ama resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of-homes-will add. at least-an-additional.250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on.the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant!ncident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of reside nts (Ref: http:llfascv.blogspot.coml2OlOlO51may-5-2OlO-4-alarm-responsein-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green .space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease

6/28/2010

Page 2 of 2

the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concems. Sincerely, Yunkun Fan and Bo Qi 1697 Via Lugano, San Jose, CA 95120

6/28/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Wuyi Zhao [wuyi.zhao@sbcglobal.net] Friday, June 25, 2010 9:29 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Horwedel, Joseph; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Re: petition info for Guadulpe mines road project

Dear Mayor Reed, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2_la_ne Guadalupe Mines .Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on GuadalupeJVlines Rd.. Already_the road is in a veL_poor state with little_ormo, maintenance ............ from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarmresponse- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Addextra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the

6/28/2010

Page 2 of 2

additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols tomonitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.
We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns.

Sincerely, Jinlin and JoeZhao 1639 Via Cortina, San Jose, CA 95120

6/28/2010

Page 1 of 1

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Lydia Wheeler [lyl2000@yahoo.cem] Thursday, June 24, 2010 t1:02 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; Office of Councilmember Nancy. Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Horwedel, Joseph; Xavier, Lesley

Cc: Malavika; Jin; Susan Ditter; Todd S Wheeler Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005
Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Van Raesfetd, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost~ I am personaliy extremely concerned for the dsk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or dding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guedalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, itwould have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: ~. blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarm- response- in-san-jose, html) -Withffhe-new development of the proposed-size; the chance of incidentsincreasesdramatically and the-number-of residents affected would-increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.s!recvcl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school di~tdot and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development, The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose dsks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: * Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic lead to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. * Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. * Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. * Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. * Increased police patrols to stop speeding * Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking fon~vard to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Lydia & Todd Wheeler 1632 Via Fortuna, San Jose CA 95120

6/25/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: john.jx.wu@gmail.com on behalf of John Wu [john.wu@viaworld.com] Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:10 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of ~omes will add at lea~t an additional 250-v~hicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalup~ Mines Rd. Th!_s.wi_ll increase the ris~_o.f_car accidents, ped_es_t[i_a_n and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna~ it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5- 2010-4-alarmresponse- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the

6/22/2010 "

Page 2 of 2

overcapacity issue at LGUSD. ,, Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.
We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns.

Sincerely, Name: Xingqiang John Wu Address 1717 Via Cortina San Jose, CA 95120 .......

6/22/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Pradeep Chandra [pradeepchandra@yahoo.com] Monday, June 21, 2010 8:15 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, ..C.p..n.g.r..e..s..s...m...a..n....H...o..n..d...a., Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guad_a!_upe Mines Road, San__ Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am pers_onal!_y extremely concer._ne_d for the risk to our sa_f.ety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines .Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In. addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-5-2010-4-alarmresponse- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes, The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area andeven cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above:

6/22/2010

Page 2 of 2

Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop Speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concems. Sincerely, Name:Shamzozaman & Pradeep CHANDRA Address 1-718 Via Lugano, San Jose, CA 95120 email:pradeepchandra@yahoo.com This mail addressed to the following
Office of Mayor Chuck Reed Office of Congrssman Mike Honda Office of Council Member for District 10 Nancy. Pyle Office of the .F.!.r.e,..C..h.!.e.f.: Darryl Von Raesfeld Director of Planning, Building and .C...o..d,.e,..E..n.f..o..r.c..e..m...e..n.t.: ~Joseph Horwedel, .A...s.s.!.s..t.a..n..t..D..i,r..e.c..t..o.r. Planning division: Laurel Prevetti Planner II Planning Division, Lesley Xavier

--

6/22/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Steve Krandel [skrandel@sbcglobal.net] Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:34 PM mayoremail@sanjose.gov; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; joseph.hordwel@sanjoseca.gov; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley

Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Read, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First .an_d.foremost, I am persgn_ally extremely concer=ned for the risk to our_.safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the . narrQ~._2_l_ane Guadalupe_Mi.oe_s_ Rd. This will increase the risk of car.accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:llfascv.blogspot.coml2OlOlO51may-5-2OlO-4-alarm-responsein-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity

6/21/2010

Page 2 of 2

issue at LGUS[~. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.
We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns.

Sincerely, Name: Steven Krandel Address: 6225 Via Saronno, San Jose

6/21/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Manjeshwar S Bhat [msbhat@pacbell. net] Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:02 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti,. Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, ..C..o...n.g.r..e..s..s...m...a..n....H...o..n..d...a., Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, We are residents of Campagnas at Almaden. We are writing to express our concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First ai~d foremost, we are e~tremely concerned about the risk to our safety. The number of hom.es_w!ll add at least..an., a_dditional 250 vehicles_and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http://fascv, blogspot, com/2010/05/may-.5-2010-4-alarmresponse- in-san-jose, html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycl es.org/landfills .asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development.. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With our concerns, we are asking for the followi,ng to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease

6/21/2010

Page 2 of 2

the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2.year long construction period.

We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, Manjeshwar S and Nina S Bhat 1518 Via Campo Aureo San Jose, CA 95120 msbhat@pacbell.net

6/21/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: mgghosh@aol.com Sunday, June 20, 2010 6:39 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of the Neighborhood Residents Regarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier,

I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuriesl andpose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:llfascv.blogspot.coml2OlOlO51may-5-2OlO-4-alarm-responsein-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity

6/21/2010

Page 2 of 2

issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. ,, Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Name: Soumen Ghosh Address: 1733 Via Lugano,San Jose, CA 95120

6/21/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Shari Krandel [shari.krandel@sbcglobal.net] Sunday, June 20, 2010 8:23 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; horwedel@sanjoseca.gov; prevetti@sanjoseca.gov; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Guadalupe Mines Rd.

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines. Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250vehicles and significantly increase traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, arid pose much more of a threat for children ~valking or riding on .... Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor state with little or no maintenance from the City. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents (Ref: http:llfascv.blogspot.com/2OlOlO51may-5-2OlO-4-alarm-responsein-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http:llwww.sjrecycles.orgllandfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the following to alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease 6/21/2010

Page 2 of 2

the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire or earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period.

We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns.

Sincerely,
Shad Krandel 6225 Via Saronno San Jose, CA 95120

6/21/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Allen Pang [acwpang@hotmail.com] Monday, June 21, 2010 1:26 PM The Office of Mayor Chuck Reed; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti@sanjoseca.Gov; Xavier, Lesley Subject: Concerns of theNeighborhood ResidentsRegarding Proposed Development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005

Dear Mayor Reed, Congressman Honda, Council Member Pyle, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Prevetti and Ms Xavier, I am a resident of Campagnas at Almaden. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005 First and foremost, I am personally extremely concerned for the risk to our safety. The number of homes will add at least an additional 250 vehicles and significant_ly_!ncrease traffic on the narrow 2 lane Guadalupe Mines Rd. This will increase the risk of car accidents, pedestrian and bicycle injuries, and _pose much more of a threat for children walking or riding on Guadalupe Mines Rd. Already the road is in a very poor-~t~{e~vith little or no m~inten~nce from the Cit~f~ Ifi a~dition, with the d~si~n ~f Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire~ earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of reside nts (Ref: http://fascv.blogspot.com/2010/05/may-5-2010-4alarm-response-in-san-jose.html) With the new development of the proposed size, the chance of incidents increases dramatically and the number of residents affected would increase as well. And please keep in mind that the Guadalupe Mines Landfill is in the same neighborhood which already has scores of large trucks and vehicles careening up and down the same narrow road all day long 6 days a week (ref: http://www.sjrecycles.org/landfills.asp). The number of homes proposed will create an overcapacity issue with the existing LGUSD schools and cause LGUSD to redistrict the area either out of the district or force new students to the less crowded and distant schools in the Santa Cruz mountains. In addition, the large number of new students from the development will create a sudden burden on the existing school district and compromise student resource and education. The developers one time impact fee is not sufficient to fill the gap in funding shortfall created by the development. In addition, we will be losing the natural green space and wildlife environment with the development. The design calls for removal of almost all of the trees and the conversion of the green spaces on Guadalupe Mines to dense residential homes. The loss of natural green space will also pose risks to the wildlife in the area and even cause more deer accidents with vehicles. With my concerns, I am asking for the followingto alleviate the issues above: Require lower density housing to be built no more than 4 per acre. This would decrease the traffic load to our existing roads today. This would also ameliorate the overcapacity issue at LGUSD. .Add extra traffic lanes to Guadalupe Mines Rd to make it 2 lanes each way to handle the additional vehicle loading and traffic. Add another evacuation route in the event of a large fire o.r earthquake. Preserve more green space and wildlife in the development design. Increased police patrols to stop speeding

6/21/2010

Page 2 of 2 Increased police patrols to monitor security during the > 2 year long construction period. We are looking forward to your responses addressing and providing solutions to our concerns. Sincerely, Allen Pang 1636 Via Campagna San Jose, CA 95120

6/21/2010

Page 1 of 2

Xavier, Lesley
From: J W [eTqz@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June21, 2010 1:48 PM To: Office of Councilmember Nancy Pyle; mike.honda@mail.house.gov; Von Raesfeld, Darryl; Horwedel, Joseph; Prevetti, Laurel Cc: Xavier, Lesley

Dear Council Member Pyle, Congressman Honda, Chief Von Raesfeld, Ms Horwedel, Ms Prevetti an~l Ms Xavier,

We are residents of Campagnas at Almaden. We are writing to here to express our concerns regarding the proposed development on Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose. Permit number PD10-005. .First of all, we are very concerned about the school capacity at LGUSD. As all the information that we have-grabbed, schools at [GUSD are already mier packed. The clas~sizes are over state average class sizes alre_ad_y.__This year, the biggest element school in LGUSD, Blossom hill eler~e-fi-t ~-chool, has 5 classes in kindergarten Witi~ 5-nly 4 classroom~ ~va~-Iable. With almost 100 new houses added in this new development, at least 30 more kids would be added to school each year. This would stress even more on the school resources and some children might have to be routed, to off school site according to LGUSD superintender. We are very worried about the the eduation quality and childrens safty under this condition. Currently there are only two narrow-lanes on Guadalupe Mines Rd, one on each side. with lots traffic already from the residents and the landfill trucks. The new development would add more than 200, up to 500 vehicles to this road, according to the development plan. This would cause more traffic issues and increase incidents dramatically. In addition, with the design of Guadalupe Mines Road, any fire, earthquake or significant incident that closes Guadalupe Mines becomes an evacuation entrapment issue. If the recent fire on Guadalupe Mines had been closer to Via Campagna, it would have trapped hundreds of residents. With these concerns, we are hoping that you will consider the following suggestions: 1) Lower the density of the housing in this new developement or replace some commercial houses with senior residents housing. This would decrease the traffic especially during the rush house, and make overcapacity issue at LGUSD a bit better. 2) Add one extra traffic lanes on each way to the Guadalupe Mines Rd. Thank you very much for your considerations and we are looking forward for your helps regarding these issues. Thanks, Jianfei Shao, Jin Wang 1708 Via Cortina, San Jose, CA, 95120

6/21/2010

Page 1 of i

Xavier, Lesley
From: Sent: To: Subject: FYI. From: Ina Vaughn [mailto:mivaughn@sbcglobal.net] Sent= Monday, April 19, 2010 3:03 PM To; Enderby, Mike Subject= Zoning Change west of Guadalupe Mines Road Enderby, Mike Monday, April 19, 2010 3:10 PM Xavier, Lesley FW: Zoning Change west of Guadalupe Mines Road

Almaden area is overcrowded now, what is the City thinking? Traffic, water, city streets, were not equipped to handle it all. Please build somewhere else, or utilize San Benito County for additional houses. Ina Vaughn Almaden Valley

7/15/2010

LULU< --.I

m<

/ \.,

/ \ I

2 2 C ~_ 2

iii \\L

[]

[]

3SVHd 1VI~tf3S NDIS3(3

3SVHd 1V_I_/IW~tlqS NOIS::I(3

3SVHd -1V_I__LllA!{IDS NDIS3CI

3SVHa 1VIIA/fl/3S NDIS30

qSVHd lV/_I. IW~INS NDIS:tC]

~SVHd 1V/lV~flS

NDIS3(]

/ ~z::::~ ,,, E~-_-

r-------- .~,.n

3SVHd 1V_LIIB/{tPIS NDIS3(3

3SVHd IV/IliaDS

NDIS~{3

~ISVHd 1VfllW{]FIS NDIS:IC]

[]

[]

3SVHd -IV_L.LI~q~]DS NDIS3C]

-q

]SVHd -IV ]_/I W ~1 Iq g

NDIS3CI

:::1 S V H (I 1 V_l_ / I B~ {] i1 S NDIS~CI

I1

3SVHd

NDIS3(]

3SVHd 1V//IVq{]AS

NDIS3CI

:ISVHd lV//I~/~iflS

NDIS3CI

3SVHd 1V_LllA/{t~S NDIS~]CI

Z;

1V//IW{]PIS NDIS3(I

DL_ []

rq

o o

900-0!, OOcl "ON BI!-~

_J

\ \

SO0-O~ O(]d oN elH esor ues jo/q!O

LL

~;00-01. OOd ON ol!~ osoF ueS jo ~!0

900-0 I, Oa~l ON el!_H esor ueB ~o

,~I!o

z 0 N