Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conflict and Entrepreneurial Activity
Conflict and Entrepreneurial Activity
Acknowledgements This Synthesis Report is based on a longer paper wri5en by Tommaso Ciarli (Max Planck Ins?tute of Economics, Germany), Saeed Parto (APPRO, Afghanistan), and Maria Savona (University of Sussex and Cambridge University, the United Kingdom). The authors are grateful for support and advice from the Central Sta?s?cal Oce of Afghanistan. In par?cular, we would like to thank Amanulah Assil (CSO of Afghanistan), Andrew Pinney (Consultant to CSO of Afghanistan), and Royce Wiles of Afghanistan Research and Evalua?on Unit for his con?nued and dedicated support to advance research on Afghanistan. The authors also wish to thank Wim Naud (UNU-WIDER, Finland) and the organizers and par?cipants of the UNUWIDER ini?a?ve, Workshop on Entrepreneurship and Conict, held at INCORE, University of Ulster (Londonderry, Northern Ireland) on March 20-21, 2009. APPRO takes full responsibility for any omissions and errors.
Pictures Cover on the right: Ironmonger in Kabul (Photo by Saeed Parto, APPRO) Cover on the le^: Owner of Thresher Assembly Plant in Jalalabad, Nangarhar (Photo by Saeed Parto, APPRO)
About the Authors Tommaso Ciarli is a Researcher at the Max Planck Ins?tute of Economics, Jena, Germany. He currently works on economic development, technological and ins?tu?onal change. Saeed Parto is Director of Research at Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organiza?on (APPRO) in Kabul, Afghanistan. He is also Lecturer at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University (the Netherlands). Maria Savona is Lecturer at Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Sussex (SPRU) in Brighton, UK, and Visi?ng Research Fellow at the Cambridge-MIT Ins?tute, University of Cambridge, UK.
About APPRO The Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organiza?on (APPRO) is an independent social research organiza?on promo?ng social and policy learning to benet development and reconstruc?on eorts in Afghanistan. APPRO is registered with the Ministry of Economy (Registra?on Number: 1212) as a not-for-prot organiza?on and headquartered in Kabul, Afghanistan. APPROs mission is to measure development progress against strategic reconstruc?on objec?ves and provide insights on how to improve performance against the milestones set by the government of Afghanistan and the interna?onal donors. APPRO is staed by personnel with many years of collec?ve experience in various facets of development and scien?c research.
(c) 2010. Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organiza?on. Some rights reserved. This publica?on may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmi5ed only for non-commercial purposes and with wri5en credit to APPRO and the authors. Where this publica?on is reproduced, stored or transmi5ed electronically, a link to APPROs website www.appro.org.af should be provided. Any use of this publica?on falling outside of these permissions requires prior wri5en permission and can be sought by emailing mail@appro.org.af or by calling +93 700 538 081.
1.
Introduc:on
Despite
the
chronic
conict
in
Afghanistan
over
the
years,
anecdotal
informa?on
points
to
sustained
entrepreneurial
ac?vity:
a
look
around
any
major
popula?on
center
or
some
rural
areas
in
Afghanistan
reveals
numerous
cases
of
entrepreneurship,
par?cularly
among
the
small-scale
producers
across
the
country,
in
a
wide
range
of
areas
from
dairy
and
poultry
produc?on
to
carpet
weaving,
iron
mongering,
auto
repair
and
parts
produc?on,
and
carpentry.
These
features
of
the
Afghan
economy
tempt
one
to
suggest
that
the
persistence
in
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
is
due
to
a
unique
spirit
of
entrepreneurialism.
Indeed,
a
2005
publica?on
by
the
World
Bank
states
that,
Afghans
are
a
resourceful,
resilient,
crea?ve,
opportunity-seeking,
and
entrepreneurial
people
(as
witnessed
by
the
high
incidence
of
labor
migra?on,
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
wherever
they
are
located,
trading
networks,
and
remi5ances).1 This
paper
describes
the
main
ndings
from
an
earlier
study
by
the
authors
which
inves?gated
the
rela?onship
between
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
and
conict
in
Afghanistan
based
on
an
analysis
of
the
Na?onal
Risk
and
Vulnerability
Assessment
(NRVA)
survey
from
2005.2
A
key
objec?ve
in
our
analysis
was
to
qualify
the
impacts
of
low
security,
inadequate
infrastructure,
and
the
type
of
ins?tu?onal
arrangements
on
entrepreneurial
ac?vity.
A
related
objec?ve
was
to
iden?fy
entry
points
for
interven?on
through
policies
conducive
to
increased
(produc?ve)
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
in
Afghanistan.
In
the
next
sec?on
we
make
the
linkage
between
the
literature
on
entrepreneurship
and
development
and
make
a
case
for
applying
what
is
known
in
this
literature
to
Afghanistan.
Sec?on
3
provides
a
very
brief
background
to
the
current
opera?ng
condi?ons
for
entrepreneurs
in
Afghanistan.
Sec?on
4
provides
a
summary
of
the
ndings
followed
by
sec?on
5
to
conclude.
The Newsle5er of Economists for Peace and Security, Volume 21 (2), July 2009, available at: www.epsusa.org/publica?ons/newsle5er/2009/ july2009/july2009.pdf and Conict and Entrepreneurship in Afghanistan, in WIDERAngle, available at: h5p://www.wider.unu.edu/ publica?ons/newsle5er/ar?cles/en_GB/Afghanistan-ar?cle-1109/
contribute to the stability of the developmental state which in this case is Afghanistan. Contextualized in and regulated by the developmental state, entrepreneurship could have immeasurable poten?al for preven?ng, managing, and transforming conicts which are o^en rooted in poverty and bolstered by unstable, unpredictable, and uncertain opera?ng environments characteris?c of new, failing or failed states. From the reconstruc?on and development policy perspec?ve, it is important to dis?nguish between dierent types of entrepreneurship and nurture (through interven?on) ac?vi?es more consistent with reconstruc?on objec?ves. However, as we detail in the next sec?on, in the case of Afghanistan as a country suering from chronic conict, it might s?ll be appropriate and relevant to consider survivalist entrepreneurial ac?vi?es where this does not include rent-seeking or illegal ac?vi?es such as the drug trade as desirable and, at least pro-growth.
4.
Summary
of
Findings
In
this
work
we
have
considered
entrepreneurial
a
household
that
holds
a
small
business
as
a
source
of
income.
According
to
the
NRVA
data
for
2005,
9%
of
Afghan
households
undertake
some
form
of
business
ac?vity.
Our
analysis
of
the
data
suggests
that
entrepreneurs
in
Afghanistan
appear
to
have
a
strong
tendency
to
adapt
to
ongoing
conict
and
con?nue
to
operate
across
districts
with
very
dierent
levels
of
security
and
conict.
Controlling
for
dierent
sets
of
variables
we
also
nd
that
the
intensity
of
conict
yields
a
nega?ve,
albeit
small,
impact
on
entrepreneurship. 2
A
related
nding
is
that
the
impact
of
conict
on
entrepreneurship
is
reduced
by
only
one-fourth
when
we
further
control
for
access
to
resources,
social
capital,
formal
ins?tu?ons,
and
infrastructure.
Some
dimensions
contribute
more
than
others
to
this
reduc?on
(namely
ins?tu?ons,
infrastructure
and
social
capital),
but
none
of
them
can
be
rmly
considered
to
be
the
transmission
chain
of
an
indirect
eect
of
conict.
In
other
words
social
capital,
ins?tu?ons
and
infrastructure
turn
out
to
be
more
complementary
than
subs?tute
explana?ons
of
the
impact
of
conict
on
entrepreneurship.
Our
analysis
quite
clearly
suggests
that
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
is
mainly
a
means
to
survival,
rather
than
of
an
entrepreneurial
spirit,
and
is
therefore
rather
risk
averse.
In
the
remainder
of
this
sec?on
we
sum
up
the
main
results
that
support
these
ndings
and
conclude
with
recommenda?ons
for
further
research.
First,
many
of
the
household
features
replicate
the
evidence
found
in
the
standard
literature
on
entrepreneurship,
but
there
are
also
quite
a
few
Afghanistan-specic
eects.
By
far
the
strongest
posi?ve
eect
on
the
probability
of
being
an
entrepreneur
appears
to
be
a
func?on
of
the
number
of
ac?vi?es
in
which
the
household
is
involved,
followed
by
the
household
size.
This
suggests
that
it
is
much
easier
to
hold
a
business
when
the
risk
of
incurring
income
losses
is
covered
by
involvement
in
a
number
of
other
ac?vi?es
such
as
seasonal
or
other
income
yielding
work
by
the
entrepreneur
or
members
of
the
entrepreneurs
immediate
family.
Second,
entrepreneurship
is
mainly
a
coping
strategy
in
Afghanistan.
This
is
reected
in
the
nding
that
access
to
resources
such
as
credit
is
not
related
to
entrepreneurial
ac?vity.
Even
if
entrepreneurs
use
loans
more
for
business
investment,
they
access
loans
less
than
non-entrepreneurs,
and
not
through
formal
credit
ins?tu?ons.
This
is
consistent
with
risk-averse
entrepreneurship,
which
is
not
aimed
primarily
at
pursuing
business
opportuni?es
but
income
for
survival.
This
result
also
indirectly
conrms
the
ndings
in
other
studies
on
loans
from
formal
sources
being
used
for
consump?on
smoothing
purposes.3 Third,
entrepreneurial
households
appear
to
have
a
weak
preference
for
communi?es
with
lower
security
in
property
rights,
larger
possibility
of
regulatory
capture
and
rent
seeking,
and
a
smaller
par?cipa?on
by
the
rest
of
the
community
in
the
policy
making
process.
We
also
observe
a
small
but
signicant
posi?ve
rela?on
between
being
part
of
a
governmental
body
and
having
a
small
business.
These
two
ndings
would
support
a
hypothesis
on
predatory
entrepreneurship,
which
may
or
may
not
be
produc?ve
although
pockets
of
produc?ve
economic
ac?vity
in
low
tech
manufacturing
have
con?nued
to
persist.
Certainly,
con?nued
conict
has
generated
strong
incen?ve
dynamics
for
unproduc?ve
and
destruc?ve
entrepreneurship
in
Afghanistan.
Numerous
warlords
and
people
of
inuence
have
beneted
handsomely
from
the
conict
by
gesng
involved
in
the
many
physical
reconstruc?on
projects
that
require
local
counterparts
and
contractors
to
be
implemented.
Finally,
signicant
eects
of
the
ongoing
conict
have
manifested
in
inadequate
access
to
markets
and
lack
of
adequate
infrastructure
to
support
business
ac?vity.
Con?nued
inadequacy
of
access
to
markets
and
infrastructure
is
likely
to
prevent
the
process
of
expansion
and
moving
up
on
value
chains
by
the
produc?ve
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 3
See
A
Cri?cal
Analysis
of
Micronance,
Reconstruc?ng
Afghanistan
Series,
available
from
Afghanistan
Public
Policy
Research
entrepreneurs. The nega?ve non-linear rela?on between trade infrastructure and likelihood of entrepreneurship reinforces the hypothesis on the prevalence of survivalist and unproduc?ve entrepreneurialism: without any access to markets, communi?es rely on autarchic produc?on.
5.
Conclusion
Afghanistan
has
numerous
unresolved
conicts
along
ethnic
and
poli?cal
lines
and
faces
many
challenges
in
reconstruc?ng
its
economy,
not
least
because
of
extreme
poverty,
resource
scarcity,
and
a
lack
of
adequate
structures
to
support
produc?ve
entrepreneurial
ac?vity.
That
this
is
the
case
does
not
and
should
not
mean
that
interven?on
to
reconstruct
the
country
is
ill
advised
or
hopeless.
As
we
have
shown
in
our
analysis,
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
in
Afghanistan
persists
despite
the
ongoing
conict.
Building
on
this
entrepreneurial
spirit
requires
a
careful
and
clear
assessment
of
the
entrepreneurs
needs,
trajectories,
and
ambi?ons.
While
the
informa?on
collected
through
NRVA
surveys
is
useful
in
providing
a
picture
of
how
things
have
unfolded
in
the
socio-economy,
it
is
insucient
as
a
basis
on
which
to
develop
interven?on
strategies
aimed
at
suppor?ng
produc?ve
entrepreneurship.
Demand
assessment
in
labour,
raw
material,
and
product
markets
can
provide
valuable
informa?on
on
how
development
aid
can
bolster
the
ability
of
suppliers
to
meet
the
demands. Based
on
our
analysis
of
the
NRVA
data
from
2005
we
may
conclude
that
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
con?nues
despite
the
chronic
conict
in
Afghanistan.
We
have
also
suggested
that
because
of
the
chao?c
ins?tu?onal
landscape,
a5empts
to
generate
produc?ve
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
have
largely
failed
and
in
many
cases
have
in
fact
contributed
to
unproduc?ve
or
destruc?ve
ac?vity
and
rent
seeking
behaviour.
However,
given
the
dicult
condi?ons
for
conduc?ng
reliable
popula?on
surveys,
the
diculty
of
making
survey
data
available
in
a
?mely
manner4,
and
the
high
probability
of
rapid
data
obsolescence
due
to
chronic
conict,
our
analysis
is
inconclusive.
Because
of
these
constraints,
a
nal
conclusion
we
make
is
that
more
a5en?on
needs
to
be
paid
to
narra?ve- based
case
studies
of
entrepreneurial
ac?vity
to
contextualize
and
accompany
formal
analyses
based
survey
data
such
as
we
have
a5empted
to
do
in
this
paper.
The
value
of
intui?on
based
on
narra?ves
collected
through
case
studies
in
territorially
bounded
study
areas
or
on
specic
issues
of
interest
cannot
be
underes?mated
or
dismissed
in
contexts
such
as
Afghanistan.
If
we
want
to
know
how
entrepreneurs
cope
and
whether
they
are
produc?ve,
unproduc?ve,
or
destruc?ve
in
conict
situa?ons,
we
need
to
closely
engage
and
examine
the
entrepreneurs
involved
in
economic
ac?vity
in
our
areas
of
interest.
In
other
words,
it
is
at
best
dicult
to
generalize
on
conict
cases
such
as
Afghanistan
because
they
are
diverse,
fragmented,
and
uid.
Future
research
will
need
to
draw
on
the
available
quan?ta?ve
databases
and
on
locally
specic
case
studies
of
selected
segments
of
the
economy
for
more
depth
to
inform
policy
interven?on
and
reconstruc?on
decision
making.
_____________________________________________________________________________________ 4 The 2007-8 NRVA dataset remains unavailable at the ?me of wri?ng. In addi?on, there is very li5le congruence between the datasets
from 2003, 2005, and 2007-8 due to the signicant dierences between the survey ques?ons from the three periods.