Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 RF Optimisation
8 RF Optimisation
17/7/2005
Troubleshooting
Blocked Calls Poor Quality and Drop calls Abnormal Handovers Interference Termination Failures
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Blocked Call
Troubleshooting
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Blocked Calls
Blocked Calls can occur due to : Access Failures SDCCH Congestion SDCCH Drop TCH Congestion
Trouble shooting cause : Use Layer 3 messages to analyze the cause Decode System Information Type 3 messages. Note the parameter , max_retransmission ; CCCH CONF and BS_AG_BLKS_RES
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
The best way of analyzing blocked calls, to identify the cause, is from a Layer III protocol log. * Paging Failure A paging message always originates from the MSC and is sent to all the BSCs in the Location Area of the MS to be paged. The BSC will then calculate the Paging group of the MS and send a Paging Command to the BTSs controlling the Location Area of the MS. On the air interface there are two cases of Paging Failure, either the Mobile receives no Paging message or it receives a Paging message, but is not able to respond (not able to send a RACH) which could be due errors in the Paging message. * Access Failure Irrespective of the purpose, for any communication required with the network, a mobile sends a Channel Request (for SDCCH) on a RACH and waits for some time for a response which should come from the BTS on an AGCH. A mobile will do several retransmission of RACHs (predefined) and if it still does not get a response, it goes back to idle mode and preferably does a cell reselection. At this stage we call it an Access Failure. * SDCCH Blocked Once a mobile has sent a Channel Request on a RACH , it expects a response from the BTS on the AGCH. This should be an Immediate Assignment Command to an SDCCH. If an Immediate Assignment Reject comes instead , then this is SDCCH blocking. * TCH Blocked After the completion of call set-up signaling, a mobile expects an Assignment Command to a TCH so that speech can commence. If no Assignment occurs for a specific period and the Mobile has to return to idle mode, then it is due to TCH congestion.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Access Failures
- CCCH Overload at the Base Station
- Uplink Interference at the Base Station - Low Rxlev at the Base Station - Base Station TRX decoder malfunctioning - Downlink Low Rxlev ( Coverage Hole ) - Downlink Interference - Excess Cell Range
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR
Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request Channel Request System Information 1 Paging Request Type 2 Paging Request Type 2 System Information
Phone back to Idle Mode Call Blocked !!! Access Failure !!!
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Causes:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. AGCH Overload at Base Station RACH Collisions MS out of Range Poor Uplink quality BTS Receiver Problem
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
Cause : Downlink Messages are seen after Channel Request. Problem suspected in Uplink !!!!!
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
10
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
11
17/7/2005
12
Check for Distance from Base Station -- Plot a map for BCH ARFCN -- Export the Channel Request and CellID Label -- Import the Site IDs Raster Images on the Map -- Calculate distance between Channel Request and BTS -- Compare this distance with the Max_Distance_Allowed set for thjs cell. -- Note: Max_Dist_Allowed is a BSC paramter ( not on Air ) -- If the MS distance is more than max_distance then problem with Max Range
If both the above conditions dont meet, then problem is Non-Detection
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
13
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
14
Downlink Fine
SDCCH/TCH RF Losses
Uplink Intrfer Yes
No
Yes
High
No
UL-Interference Test
No
Problem Found
Yes
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
15
Now let us go a step further in understanding the most probable causes behind call block problems. * Access Failures It could simply be caused by coverage holes . Interference could however play an important role. Uplink interference on a serving cell can result in RACH rejections and hence no AGCH assignments. Improper channel distribution between AGCH and PCH (paging channel) can result in RACH/AGCH overloading. Paging Failures can be impacted by BCH pollution (cochannel and adjacent channel interference). * SDCCH Blocked Heavy Traffic and excessive Location Updates can result in congestion of SDCCH resources. Interference can block the channels , so though resources are available they may not be able to be used. * TCH Blocked Heavy Traffic is the main cause of TCH congestion. The TCH can also be blocked due to continuous interference in the uplink. Solutions to access failures would be to ensure continuous coverage and optimization of CCCH configuration parameters . For TCH and SDCCH congestion, the hot spots need to be identified and load sharing techniques implemented. Some techniques that have been used successfully involve adjusting cell powers to vary the coverage and therefore the location where mobiles will handover from one cell to the next. Interference management is essential for optimum network performance. Location updates can be optimized by independent drive tests on the ALL BCH carriers. The delta is measured of each BCH with the current serving BCH and the Reselect Hysteresis parameters adjusted appropriately.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
16
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
17
Blocked Call
TCH Blocked - Causes Interference -- Verify Idle Channel Interference reports from OMC -- If suspected, carry out uplink interference measurements Heavy Traffic -- Verify the TCH Holding time and no of attempts statistics from OMC -- During low traffic hours, Activate Cell barring in the cell -- Carry out Time slot testing , by setting Ignore Cell Barring. Solutions To Blocked Calls Optimize coverage Optimize Cell loading Interference management Channel configurations Optimize neighbors
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
18
Network will assign Timeslots starting from lower band Interference Band 5 Timeslots are considered as BLOCKED OMC reports Hourly average statistics for each timeslot.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
19
Timeslot - Testing
Activate Cell Barring from OMC. Remove this cell from the neighbor list of other cells. Get the cell configuration ARFCNs and Timeslots configured for TCH.
For BCH carrier select the Timeslot and carry out the Testing
For TCH Carriers: Block the BCH Timeslots from OMC Carry out Timeslot testing. If more than 1 TCH Carrier is activated, block all others .
17/7/2005 20
Company Confidential
Immd Assign
MM/CC Signaling ALL TCHs Busy
Assign Command
BSC
Assignment Request
MSC
*** Some of the systems may also do handover existing calls to strong neighbors and assign TCH for this call from the same cell
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
21
OMC statistics may not reveal the actual congestion in a cell. Drive Testing may be required in the Peak traffic hours to estimate how many times this happens. Drive Testing may also be required to optimize the neighbor list for effectiveness of this feature.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
22
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
23
Call drops are identified through SACCH messages. A Radio Link Failure Counter value is broadcast on the BCH. The counter value may vary from network to network. At the establishment of a dedicated channel, the counter is set to the broadcast value (which will be the maximum allowable for the connection). The mobile decrements the counter by 1 for every FER (unrecoverable block of data) detected on the SACCH and increases the counter by 2 for every data block that is correctly received (up to the initial maximum value). If this counter reaches zero, a radio link failure is declared by the mobile and it returns back to the idle mode. If the counter reaches zero when the mobile is on a SDCCH then it is an SDCCH Drop. If it happens on a TCH, it is a TCH drop.
Sometimes an attempted handover, which may in itself have been an attempt to prevent a drop, can result in a dropped call.
When the quality drops, a mobile is usually commanded to perform a handover. Sometimes however, when it attempts to handover, it finds that the target cell is not suitable. When this happens it jumps back to the old cell and sends a Handover Failure message to the old cell. At this stage, if the handover was attempted at the survival threshold, the call may get dropped anyway. If on the other hand the thresholds were somewhat higher, the network can attempt another handover.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
24
SDCCH / TCH Handover Command Hand Access Handover Failure HANDOVER FAILURE DROP !
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
25
Solutions to Dropped Calls Optimize Coverage Interference Management Optimize neighbors Optimize handover parameters Effective Frequency Hopping Use of DTX & Power control
17/7/2005
26
We will examine the potential causes behind call drops and some solutions to combat them. * Coverage Poor non-contiguous coverage will reduce C/N and hence will reduce the Ec/No and will result into call drops. * Interference This is one of the major causes of dropped calls. Interference could be co-channel, adjacent channel or external. Under certain severe cell interference conditions, the call will be dropped before a handover can be initiated.. Multipath interference can also add to the problems. Strong signal reflections result in time dispersion issues resulting in a large coherence bandwidth.
* Network initiated drops Certain network features, like preemption, can kill an ordinary call to provide connection to an emergency class subscriber.
A handover is the key to survival from dropping calls. But if there are problems in the Handover process itself, then this will not avoid a drop. Dropped calls can be effectively reduced by improving coverage, detecting and reducing interference, setting appropriate Handover Margins , thresholds for handovers and the correct selection of neighbors. Use of DTX and dynamic downlink power control will also reduce average interference which should lead to some improvements.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
27
DROP CALL
YES
RLT=0
YES
No
No
RxQual > 4
YES
YES
Pri/Int <= 9
YES
No ** C/IAb <= -9 No
YES
No
C/IAa <= -9 No
YES
No
Multipath
No
** If TCH is Hopping, then all causes needs to be verified further, before concluding on the root cause and optimizing.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
28
SDCCH Drop - Coverage SDCCH Drop - Co- Channel Interference SDCCH Drop - Adjacent Channel Interference SDCCH Drop - Uplink Problem TCH Drop - Coverage TCH Drop - Co-Channel Interference TCH Drop - Adjacent Channel Interference TCH Drop - Uplink Problem Handover Failure
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
29
Poor Quality
Poor Speech Quality could be due to Patchy Coverage ( holes) No Target cell for Handover Echo , Audio holes, Voice Clipping Interference ---: Co-channel Adjacent channel External Multipath Noise
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
30
Echo and distortion : Generally caused by the Transmission and switching system.
Audio holes : Blank period of speech, due to malfunctioning of Transcoder boards or PCM circuits. Voice Clipping : Occurs due to improper implementation of DTX. Mean Opinion Score (MOS) : ITU standard for estimating speech quality.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
31
MOS 5 4 3 2 1
Quality Scale Excellent ( speech perfectly understandable) Good ( speech easily understandable, some noise) Fair ( speech understandable with a slight effort, occasional repetitions needed) Poor ( speech understandable only with considerable effort, frequent repetitions needed) Unsatisfactory ( speech not understandable)
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
32
MOS up to a certain extent can easily estimated by configuring an algorithm using the Alarms in the HP E74XX systems for the following elements, an example of subset of which is illustrated above - RxQual Full and Sub - RxLev Full and Sub - FER and RLT - L3 Measurement Report - L3 Handover specfic messages
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
33
Poor Quality
Patchy Quality Multipath High Probability with Hopping ON
MOS < 4
No DTX_DL ON
YES
RxQual> 6
YES
No
Hopping ON
YES YES
No
No FER > 1%
YES YES
FER > 2%
No
Troubleshoot Multipath/ Co-Channel/ BSIC decode
A
Area of concern
Pri/Int <= 9
YES
Co-Channel Interference!!
No ** C/IAb <= -9
YES
No
C/IAa <= -9
YES
B
YES
B
Troubleshoot Source Cell Using BCH Analyzer
** If TCH is in Hopping, then all interference causes needs to be verified further, before concluding on the root cause and optimizing.
17/7/2005
Company Confidential
34
Serving Cell Information -- CellID -- BSIC Neighbor Cell Measurements Neighbor Meas Count() Timeslot ARFCN
Company Confidential
Bad Spot 1
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
36
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
37
Select Labels
Select CellID. Display it on the MAP
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
38
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
39
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
40
Conclusion
BAD Spot 1 has poor quality and Call Drop This spot is covered by Cell 47450 Poor Coverage. Level below -97 dbm But Call should not Drop The other Problem is Interference. Mobile is Hopping on 99 and 84 99 is also the BCH. Co-Channel on BCH is very high. 50% of the time quality will be poor. But Poor Quality is consistent. Channel 84 is also suffering from Interference. No Adjacent Channel on 84 and 99 This means there is Co-Channel on 84 also. It could also be multipath issue on 84. WHY NO HANDOVER
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
41
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
42
Troubleshooting - No Handover
Weak Neighbors - Reported by Phone Create a Handover PLAN Total Attempted Calls Total Dropped Calls Total Blocked Calls RxQual Full RxLeve Full RLT Current Value ARFCN Neighbor Cell Measurements RR Message Phone State Sequency Number
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
43
Analyzing - No Handover
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
44
Missing Neighbors
Real Time
BCH Analyzer : TOP N = 7 Configure an Alarm for Missing Neighbor Subset BCH TOP N not-subset Value ARFCN
Frequency Reuse
'B' NET
CH 35
BSIC 16
'B' NET
CH 35
'A' NET
BSIC 21
CH 88
'A' NET
CH 40
BSIC 53
CH 98
BSIC 57
PHONE REPORTS
CH 27 35 40 25 RxQual 1 RxLev -80 -85 -83 -95
'B' NET
CH 27
BSIC 23
'A' NET
BSIC 22
CH 29
CH 25
BSIC 17
CH 72
BSIC 75
17/7/2005
45
Missing Neighbor is a very critical problem in optimizing GSM neighbors. Missing Neighbor as such doesnt means that there is no neighbor. We define neighbors to a cell based on the geography, I.e which base stations are nearby. In certain cases we may also use the Planning Tools to predict neighbors. It is such not desirable to use excessive neighbors also, since this reduces the samples collected per neighbor. Since Mobile has to look for each neighbor in one TDMA frame, and we have 104 frames for measurement. This means if we define 32 neighbors , the number of samples per neighbor will be only 3-4, which means the authenticity of Handovers will not be there. So we need to define appropriate neighbors only. In certain cases the neighbors we define may not be able to cope up with traffic or at certain significant patches of the cell, these neighbors signals would be weak and may result into no handovers or handover failures. So in such kind of problem spots , we should be see the possibility that signals from any other cell is coming or not, so that we can define that as a neighbor. So how do we find such missing neighbors.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
46
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
47
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
48
Types of Interference
We already know .
Co-Channel BCH - BCH TCH - BCH BCH - TCH TCH - TCH Adjacent Channel Interference BCH - BCH TCH - BCH BCH - TCH TCH - TCH
Multipath
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
49
TroubleShooting
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
50
Uplink Problems
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
51
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
52
Trend shows: High receive level And High Ms Tx Levels in this area.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
53
Link Imbalance will result into low uplink level even if DL Level is good. Then MS will be at high power in all those spots where level is good. BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE !!! ( as seen from two spots)
This means this is a problem of Uplink quality being poor at good level. This can happen due to UPLINK INTERFERENCE. This interference seems to be burst in nature !!!!
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
54
Uplink Interference measurement needs long term monitoring , collection of data, processing the data and estimating the probability of interference , and also estimating the source.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
55
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
56
Termination Failures could be due to: Paging Problems with Network No response to page from MS Blocking of Resources If Paging Success Rate = 100 %, but still the caller reports termination failures, then this Blocking.
If Paging Success Rate < 100 % ,then this could be : - Paging Problems with Network Or - No response to page from MS
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
57
Troubleshooting-Termination Failures
Verify and Isolate the problem as: Interference Excessive Cell Reselection Excessive Location Updates None of above indicates Network Problem ( no paging)
Excessive Cell Reselection and Location Updates can occur due to Interference ( Downlink signaling Counter reaches 0) BCH Pollution Overlapping of Location Areas. Carry out protocol analysis on Abis and A Interface to isolate network problem further
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
58
Cell Optimization
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
59
Optimization
Cell Loading
C 3
C 2
C 1
Cells C1 and C2 are reporting Blocking Cell C3 is added to cater for capacity Still C1 and C2 report blocking. Why ?????
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
60
With this approach more MS's will camp on or do cell reselection to C3, thus reduce load in C1 & C2. These issues are very common to fast growing networks, because new cells when are planned , we don't know the HOT SPOTS. In most cases , new cells investment could also be minimized by understand the RF environment and optimizing cell loading.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
61
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
62
17/7/2005
63
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
64
Mobile in the dedicated mode measures the BCH of the neighbor cells. The list of BCH to be measured is informed to the Mobile in the System Information Type 5 message which can have maximum 32 neighbors BCHs Mobile has to report the measurements of the neighbors to the network , every 480ms which corresponds to 104 TDMA frames. Mobile will take several samples of the neighbors, average it and then send the report as one value of Rxlev of the neighbor, with a minimum requirement of measuring at least 1 neighbor in 1 TDMA Frame. So , more the BCHs in the neighbor list, less will be the number of samples. If the Mobile just meets the minimum requirement, then for a neighbor list of 32, only 3 - 4 samples per neighbor will be available and 12-13 samples per neighbor with a list of 8 neighbors If the samples collected are less, then average value reported will not be authentic, and can result into Ping-Pong effect of handovers. So, the Neighbor list must be optimized with the minimum best possible neighbors
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
65
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
66
As shown above, Cell B is a cell which is reporting Blocking due to heavy traffic. Cell B on OMC analysis is found to have traffic generated due to call setups within the cell , as well as handovers, since it covers a major highway with heavy mobility traffic coming from Cell A. Instead of implementing an excess TRX or a new cell to resolve this issue, we can optimize this problem, we can optimize the neigbbor lists, so as to drag the Mobiles coming from A to handover to cells other than B, unless B is the only candidate for handover. We can drive through the area between Cell A and Cell B and mark the spots where handover occurs. Look for the continuity between BCHs. This will indicate to us, which are the strong BCHs other than Cell B which could be potential targets for handovers and with what handover margins, so in case we dont get an alternative for a certain patch which is above the handover margin threshold, we can reduce the handover margin .
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
67
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
68
Tight Re-use patterns can permit the use of Adjacent ARFCN in adjacent cell. This should not pose an problem if Handover margin is set appropriately low.
C/Ia = -1 db C/Ia = -6 db C/Ia = -9 db
C1
A B C
C2
If Handover Margin is set to 6 dB, Handover will occur from C1 to C2 at spot B itself
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
69
Handover Parameters
C3
Reduce HO_margin Increase HO_margin
C2
Reduce HO_margin
C1
H
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
70
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
71
cells are generating severe co-channel problem We also know by decoding BSIC , the interefering source Following processes could be adopted to optimize interference ---- Power Control ---- Antenna Tilts ---- Frequency Reallocations ---- Transmitter Tests ---- Mobile dispatch inspection ---- Space Diversity ---- Frequency Hopping /DTX
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
72
In order to optimize interference the cells which are generating high level of interference should be located from the OMC Performance Database. It is essential to locate the source of interference whether it is external or internal. If it is internal then it could be due to multipath, adjacent, co-channel, inter-modulation or spurious. This can be located by analyzing the spectrum. There are various methods involved in optimizing interference. Appropriate Power Control of the interfering entities could be done. For Co-channel Interference problems, Tilting of antenna could be done with proper coverage aspects, for adjacent channel analysis should be done to locate if any adjacent channel is allocated to the neighbors , If it is then frequency allocation could help with this. It is very essential to carry out Transmitter and Mobile tests for Power v/s time output spectrum and intermodulation products, generally a mobile should be tested for these basic tests before being dispatched. In the Uplink Space Diversity is the worldwide adopted method for reducing the effect of Multipath fading, where as in the downlink it is the mobiles equalizer which has to do this job. One very relevant solution to interference is frequency hopping where the mobile constantly changes frequency for every burst which reduces the effect of interference. Implementation of DTX.DRX also reduces average interference.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
73
Co-Channel Optimization
Antenna Tilting
Trade Off with EC/No
Frequency Reallocation
Implementing Features like Dynamic Power Control, DTX and Frequency Hopping
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
74
Antenna Tilts
M
A 50m
x
6 km 1 km
Point x is having problem of C/I from Cell M Estimate the C/I improvement required at Point x. Refer to the Antenna Vertical Pattern, and calculate the tilting angle required Example : To get an improvement of 3 dB , a tilt of 10 degrees is required. Tilting of Antenna in certain cases may reduce coverage also. Tilting of Antenna should be done after proper study.
Company Confidential
17/7/2005
75