Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IBC 2006 Chapter 16 2007-06-12 by Martin Johnson
IBC 2006 Chapter 16 2007-06-12 by Martin Johnson
Schedule of Adoption
2006 IBC, ASCE 7-05 and material standard documents are available now. 2007 CBC will be published by ICC on or before July 1, 2007. 2007 CBC/2006 IBC will become law on Jan.1, 2008. From July 1 to Jan. 1 interval is optional to designers & building officials
$73 $94 $175 $20 $98 $72 $40 $572 $130 for 3 vol. set Free!
2006 IBC
2006 IBC
D D+ L D + (LR or R) D + 0.75(L) + 0.75(LR or R) D + (W or 0.7E) D + 0.75[L + (LR or R) + (W or 0.7E)] 0.6D +W 0.6D + 0.7E
for this set of load combinations, E = Eh EV where EV = 0.14SDSD
2006 IBC
D + L + (LR or R) D + L + 1.3W Use 2/3D to counteract Wind uplift D + L + E/1.4 0.9D E/1.4 EV = 0 1/3 stress increase is permitted w/ W or E The 25% reduction in E overturning from ASCE 7 Sect. 12.3.4 is not permitted with Alt. ASD comb.
Even simplest ASCE 7 method is lengthy and complex, but may not often govern within LA area. W load cases include
direct lateral force in each direction 0.75 force + wind torsion component (at least 4 W conditions to consider)
Nature of Occupancy
Minor storage, agricultural & temporary facilities Normal Buildings Schools Public assembly >300 occupants Jails & detention facilities Some types of healthcare > 50 occup. Power-generation, water-treatment facilities Any building > 5,000 occupants Hazardous occupancies Hospitals, Fire, rescue, & police stations Emergency preparedness centers, & more
I II III
IV
SMS and SM1 are 2,500 year values adjusted for design soil conditions by coefficients Fa and Fv. SDS = 2/3 SMS and SD1 = 2/3 SM1 = DESIGN VALUES Equiv. recurrence interval of the SDS, SD1 in Calif. will vary depending on fault creep rate & characteristic interval.
Some sites < 300 years, others perhaps 750 years.
SDC Based on Short-Period Response SDS Value of SDS SDS < 0.167g 0.167g < SDS < 0.33g 0.33g < SDS < 0.5g 0.5g SDS
mapped S10.75g Many near-fault sites have S1 0.75g
www.terraserver.microsoft.com
Ground Motion
Using USGS ground motion JAVA application:
SS = 1.462 S1 = 0.516
http://earthquake.usgs.gov
Calculate Ss and S1
Calculate SM and SD
IBC 1613.5.6.1 defines an alternate method to determine Seismic Design Category Permitted to be used where S1 is less than 0.75 Four conditions must ALL be met
Rigid diaphragms Approx. Fundamental Period Ta < 0.8Ts Fundamental Period used to calculate story drift is less than Ts Seismic Response Coeff. Cs calculated using ASCE 7-05 Eqn 12.8-2.
Permits SDC to be determined using SD1 ONLY. Not likely within So.Cal. area
1613.6.2 Use of OCBFs and OMFs is permitted in seismically isolated structures (w/conditions).
Provides useful tables separated by basic material types, defining verification and inspection requirements, with reference standards and IBC section references. 1705.1 Requires statement of special inspections in construction documents
SDC D+ Includes significant special inspection for non-structural components such as cladding, ceilings and storage racks
1708.5 Seismic Qualification of mechanical and electrical equipment. The registered design professional in responsible charge shall state the applicable seismic qualification requirements for designated seismic systems on the construction documents. 1709 will require structural observation visits (with written statement) for SDC D+ or in high-wind regions for some Occupancy Categories, when height > 75 ft, or when building official requires.
Ch 17 Seismic Design Requirements for Seismically Isolated Structures (base isolation) Ch 18 Seismic Design Requirements for Structures with Damping Systems (such as viscous dampers) Ch 19 Soil Structure Interaction for Seismic Design
(not commonly used)
Ch 23 Reference Documents App. 11A Quality Assurance Provisions (not used w/IBC) App. 11B Existing Building Provisions (replaced by IBC Ch. 34)
Most ordinary buildings will only use this chapter & Ch. 13 (nonstructural components) & material stds. R-Factor and Ht. Limit tables (3 pages!) Definitions of Irregularity types Rules for Horizontal & Vertical combinations of structural systems Definitions of Rigid & Flexible Diaphragms
Introduces semi-rigid diaphragms
Special Load Combinations incl. new redundancy-factor ELF & Response Spectrum Procedures More.
R-Factors
Table is 3 pages long (vs. 1 in UBC) New Structural Systems
Unbonded bracing systems Steel Plate Shear Walls Precast Concrete Systems Prestressed Masonry Shear Walls (not in SDC C-F)
Note!
Changes to R-Factors
Bearing Wall Systems Light-framed walls w/ wood
structural panels or steel sheets
97 UBC R 5.5
4 2 5 4 5
CIP Concrete Shear Walls Tilt-Up Concrete Shear Walls (Intermediate Precast) Masonry Shear Walls
ASCE 7-05 R
7, w/o MF 8, w/ MF
5
(35 ht. limit)
6 6 5.5
8.5 2.2
8 Varies 1 to 2.5
Diaphragm Flexibility
12.3.1 Unless a diaphragm can be idealized as either flexible or rigid , the structural analysis shall explicitly include consideration of the stiffness of the diaphragm.
12.3.1.1 Flexible Diaphragm Condition. Diaphragms constructed of untopped steel decking or wood structural panels shall be permitted to be idealized as flexible in structures in which the vertical elements are steel braced frames, or concrete, masonry or steel shear walls. Diaphragms of wood structural panels or untopped steel decks in one and two-family residential buildings of lightframe construction shall also be permitted to be idealized as flexible. 12.3.1.2 Rigid Diaphragm Condition. Etc.
Irregularity Tables
Three new irregularity types
Extreme Torsional Irregularity Extreme Soft Story Irregularity Extreme Weak Story Irregularity
Example Problem
Vertical distribution of seismic lateral design forces
Four Story Residential Building Occupancy Category II (Table 1-1) Importance Factor I = 1.0 (Table 11.5-1) Seismic Design Group: D (Table 11.6-1&2)
Building Information
Roof 3rd 2nd 1st H=54 ft H=41 ft H= 28 ft H=15 ft
Elevation
Height (ft) 54 41 28 15
Design Coefficients
Light Framed Walls Sheathed with Wood Panels
R = 6.5 0 = 3 Cd = 4 (Table12.2-1- bearing wall system)
Approximate Period T = Ct h x n
Ct = 0.02 (Table 12.8-2) x = 0.75 hn = 54 ft T = 0.40 s (Eqn.12.8-7)
V = CSW = 0.15 W
(12.8-1)
Where:
S DS = 0.15 CS = R I
(12.8-2)
SD1 CS = = 0.2 R T I
0.5S1 CS = = 0.04 R I
(12.8-6)
Load Distribution
V = 0.15xW = 166 kips T 0.5 s : k = 1.0 Fx = CvxV
k wx hx Cvx = wi hik
(12.8-1) (12.8.3)
hi 54 41 28 15
Fx 35 65 43 23 166
No redundancy factor
1.0 for single-story 1.1 for two story 1.2 for three story
Example Problem
Flexible Diaphragm Structure checks to use simplified alternative criteria
M1
) (
M2
Occupancy Category I or II
0.025hsx 0.010hsx 0.007hsx 0.020hsx
III
0.020hsx 0.010hsx 0.007hsx 0.015hsx
IV
0.015hsx 0.010hsx 0.007hsx 0.010hsx
1997 UBC
2006 IBC
Fp = 1.6 S DS I pW p
Fp = 0.4a p S DSW p z 1 + 2 h Rp I p
Fp = 4.0Ca I pWp
apCa I p hx 1+ 3 Wp Fp = Rp hr
0.3S DS I pW p Fp 1.6 S DS I pW p
1997 UBC
Interior Partitions URM other Exterior Wall Element Cantilever Parapet Penthouses (not defined) 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0
2006 IBC
1.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5
Summary: Although the Fp z/h coefficient was reduced from 3 to 2, Rp was also reduced, so that the net change is less.
Chapter Detail: Chapter 15 Nonbuilding Structures Far more extensive scope than ever before
Tanks, Vessels, Racks, Boilers, Spheres
R 31/4
o 2
Cd 31/4
SDC C NL
SDC D 35
SDC E 35
SDC F NP
21/2 1.5
2 1
21/2 1.5
NL NL
160 NL
160 NL
100 NL
Other
TL Maps
Very long period 8 or 12 sec.
Tank sloshing
ASCE main committee is currently balloting a Supplement 2 change to seismic provisions. Would re-institute 2nd minimum base shear equation.
V=0.44 SDS IW
ATC 63 preliminary finding that very tall buildings may need more min. lateral strength Bonus: would also result in compliance with Calif. 1933 Field Act (3% min. x 1.4)
Existing UBC SRSS equation being submitted as correction for next cycle of ASCE 7-10.
End of Presentation
Thank You for Staying Awake