Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CMMI Maturity Profile 2010SepCMMI
CMMI Maturity Profile 2010SepCMMI
Carnegie Mellon
The Software Engineering Institute is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University
CMMI, Capability Maturity Model and Carnegie Mellon are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University SM SCAMPI and SEI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Outline
Introduction Current Status Community Trends Organizational Trends Summary And Terms used in this Briefing How to Report your Appraisal Results to the SEI
This briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of all organizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification purposes. The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes/certifies lead appraisers, team leaders and high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization is a certifying authority of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be used for this purpose can not be fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported results of the use of CMMI products and services only. Organizations performing source selection or verification should consider performing an evaluation appraisal. For more information on appraisal methods and for a directory of authorized lead appraisers who can perform them, visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 2
Carnegie Mellon
Introduction: Purpose
Characterize the adoption of CMMI - DEV Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals using Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS v1.1 or CMMI - DEV v1.2) * Encourage continued reporting of results
* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 and which have not reappraised against v1.1 or
v1.2 are not included in this report Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm for additional information or questions you may have about this briefing before contacting the SEI directly
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
3. Organizational Trends
- Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturity level and time between appraisals
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Current Status
SCAMPI v1.1/v1.2 Class A appraisals conducted from the SCAMPI V1.1 April 2002 release through June 2010 and reported to the SEI by July 2010
75.3%
Additional charts providing different views and break down of this information will be added to this briefing as more appraisal data is reported to the SEI over time.
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 5
Carnegie Mellon
Number Of Organizations
3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
55.3%
27.5%
6.5%
7.3%
0.8%
2.5%
Carnegie Mellon
Number Of Organizations
2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Not Given Initial Managed
63.9%
24.5%
4.5% 0.4%
Defined
5.0% 1.7%
Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
Carnegie Mellon
Commercial/In-house
77.8%
18.0%
Military/Government Agency
4.2%
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Number of Organizations
Based on 4909 organizations reporting an organization category
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 8
Carnegie Mellon
58.1%
49.3% 45.6%
30%
22.3%
25.8%
26.7%
20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
8.0% 5.3% 0.6% 1.4% 1.0% 2.9% 1.0% 1.5% 8.8% 2.9%
7.2%
Carnegie Mellon
Organization Type
Based on Primary Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code
Wholesale Trade 0.1% Retail Trade 0.2% Transportation, Communication, Electric, Gas and Sanitary Services 3.4% Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 5.4% Public Administration (Including Defense) 3.1% Fabricated Metal Products 0.1% Primary Metal Industries 0.3% Industrial Machinery And Equipment 0.7%
Manufacturing 15.7%
Services 72.1%
Electronic & Other Electric Equipment 10.1% Instruments And Related Products 0.9% Transportation Equipment 2.2% Other Manuf acturing Industries 1.3%
Health Services 1.3% Engineering & Management Services 24.2% Other Services 10.9%
Based on 4222 organizations reporting SIC code. For more information visit: http://www.osha.gov/oshstats/sicser.html
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 10
Carnegie Mellon
Organization Size
Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised
1001 to 2000 2.4%
2000+ 1.6%
25 or fewer 17.3%
1 to 100 60.2%
26 to 50 22.0%
Carnegie Mellon
% of Organizations by Size
62.6%
61.2%
61.7%
56.6%
52.4%
54.2%
52.1%
50% 40%
47.3%
29.5%
26.9%
21.6%
21.3%
22.1%
30% 20%
17.7%
16.7%
12.8%
25.5%
9.3% 8.1%
5.6% 0.7%
5.4%
8.2%
1.7%
0.8%
2.5% 4.2%
3.5%
10% 0%
5.3%
12.6%
25 or fewer
26 to 50
51 to 75
76 to 100
101 to 200
201 to 300
301 to 500
2000+
Not Given
Initial
Managed
Defined
Quantitatively Managed
Optimizing
1.3%
40.0%
Carnegie Mellon
3354
651 223
Military/Government Agency
130 76
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of Organizations
Based on 1206 USA organizations and 3653 Non-USA organizations reporting an organization category
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 13
Carnegie Mellon
% of Organizations
457
10%
13
7
81
Carnegie Mellon
% of Organizations
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing
279
895
173 25
117
Carnegie Mellon
- expired appraisals are removed from PARS and replaced with the newest reappraisal result
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Countries where Appraisals have been Performed and Reported to the SEI
Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Dominican Republic Egypt Finland France Germany Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel Macedonia Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malaysia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States * Red/Italic country name: New additions with this reporting since March 2010
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010
Belarus Costa Rica Greece Italy Mauritius Panama Saudi Arabia Taiwan Uruguay
Belgium Czech Republic Guatemala Japan Mexico Paraguay Singapore Thailand Viet Nam
Brazil Denmark Hong Kong Korea, Republic Of Morocco Peru Slovakia Tunisia
Carnegie Mellon
Number of Appraisals
2600 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Africa Asia Australia Europe North America South America
72 42 355 760 1885
Based on 6126 appraisals * North America includes Canada, the USA, and Mexico; South America includes Central America and the Caribbean ; Australia includes New Zealand
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 18
Carnegie Mellon
1 1 1
89 17 25 142 14
62 25 15 1213 15
1 5 44 4
11 4 2 51 4
22
5 3 5
6 12 7 3
8 1
3 1
4 4
1 4 9
25 108 40
18 56 15
2 1 1
3 2 1
12
117 2
61 12
4 19 2 3 19 88 59
11 320 4 11 23 146 78 16 19 25
5 197
81 13
58 25 16
2 2 3
4 17 8
Italy 46 Japan 324 Korea, Republic Of 176 Latvia 10 or fewer Lithuania 10 or fewer Luxembourg 10 or fewer Macedonia 10 or fewer
Ukraine 10 or fewer United Arab Emirates10 or fewer United Kingdom 118 United States 1719 Uruguay 10 or fewer Viet Nam 18
3 30
52 611
36 683 13
1 23 2
4 149 3
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
1300
Number of Appraisals
1200
POSTED ON PARs
1029
1001
1000
842
943 938
800
600
692
600
437
615
588
400
186
230
425
200
52
0 2002
85
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Carnegie Mellon
1006
Number of Appraisals
1200
First Appraisal
834
Reappraisal
1000
180 241 1021
598
800
109 733 849 760
437
600
96 504
180
400
186
43 394
435
200
52
23 163
1 51
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Carnegie Mellon
Year
2002-2005 2006 2007 2008
55.3% 55.3%
Orgs
1112 1845 2694 3454 4,474 4,909
% of Organizations
2009 2010
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not Given Initial Managed
9.1% 9.1% 8.9% 7.8% 6.5% 6.5% 48.3% 32.9% 32.0% 32.3% 30.1% 27.5% 27.5% 33.0% 37.2% 41.6%
Based on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 22
Carnegie Mellon
70%
% of Organizations
Latest
60% 50%
38.1%
34.8%
56.7%
10.1%
3.9%
Based on 957 reappraised organizations using their first and latest appraisal
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 23
0.1%
2.9%
10%
6.1%
10.3%
20.8%
Carnegie Mellon
Time to Move Up
60
50
Number of months to move to next maturity level
40
30
24 21
28
28 25 23
75th Percentile
Median
20
18
18.5
19
25th Percentile
10
0
Time Period of Initial Appraisal Level Orgs 1 to 2 13 2002 to 2005 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 118 28 59 2006 to Present 1 to 2 2 to 3 7 184 3 to 4 39 3 to 5 37 All (2002 to Present) 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5 20 302 67 96
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Summary
6126 appraisals have been reported to the SEI Since 2002 Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Egypt, Taiwan reported appraisals are increasing at a rapid rate More than 60% of appraised organizational units have 100 or fewer employees The percentage of appraised organizations with a unit size 100 or fewer employees is increasing steadily The majority of reported appraisals are Maturity level 2 and 3 organizations
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Summary - 2
For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort in 2002 or later, the median time to move from: maturity level 1 to 2 is 5 months maturity level 2 to 3 is 19 months maturity level 3 to 4 is 25 months maturity level 3 to 5 is 23 months
Note: Since the March 2009 report, the median time to move from maturity level 1 to 2 increased from 4.5 months to 5 months. The median time to move from maturity level 3 to 4 increased from 24 months to 25 months , the median time to move from maturity level 3 to 5 increased from 19 months to 23 months
2010 by Carnegie Mellon University September 2010 Process Maturity Profile - Page 26
Carnegie Mellon
Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An appraised entity can be the entire company, a selected business unit, units supporting a particular product line or service, etc. Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United States. The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based within the United States. - Published Appraisal Results webpage contains CMMI appraisals published at the request of the appraisal sponsor. The link is: http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/
PARS
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
September 2010
Carnegie Mellon
Contact Information
Please visit: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm and review the information provided before contacting: SEI Customer Relations SEI FAX number (412) 268-5800 (412) 268-5758
Internet Address customer-relations@sei.cmu.edu Mailing Address Customer Relations Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
September 2010