Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN
Submitted
BIRLA COLLEGE OF ARTS, SCIENCE, & COMMERCE, KALYAN (Conducted by Kalyan Citizens Education Society) (Affiliated by University of Mumbai)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that MISS. SUVARNA YADAV of S.Y.B.Com (Banking & Insurance) (IV Semester) has successfully completed the project on INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN, under the guidance of MISS. RINKY RAJWANI.
Principal
DECLARATION
I, SUVARNA YADAV, student of S.Y.B.Com Banking & Insurance semester IV (2011-2012) hereby declare that I have completed the project on INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN. I further declare that the information imparted is true and fair to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNATURE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I hereby express my heartiest thanks to all sources who have contributed to the making of this project. I oblige thank to all those who have supported, provided their valuable guidance and helped for the accomplishment of this project. I am very much grateful to my project guide Miss. Rinky Rajwani who inspite of her busy schedule spent her valuable time on this project. I am thankful to Mumbai University for giving me such a challenging task to explore the urbanization which includes not only thinking and analyzing various facts and updates about real work. I would also like to thanks our coordinator Mr. Anand Dharmadikari and our principal Dr. Naresh Chandra. I also extent my hearty thanks to my family, friends, and all the well wishers.
INDEX
CONTENTS
Pg.No
Types of Ombudsman Insurance Ombudsman Scheme of insurance ombudsman Functioning of the offices of the insurance ombudsman Filing complaint with insurance ombudsman Conclusion Wibliography Annexure
PREFACE
OBJECTIVES
To present Insurance Ombudsman Scheme & how it works. To present the services of the Banking Ombudsman offered to the customer. To show how the Banking Ombudsman deals with customer complaints. To explain the duties, functions & powers of the Ombudsman.
METHODLOGY
Secondary data Secondary data refers to information that has previously been gathered by someone other than the researcher or for the same purpose at hand. It is collected from Magazines, Internet, books.
In some countries an Inspector General, Citizen Advocate or other official may have duties similar to those of a national ombudsman, and may also be appointed by the legislature. Below the national level an ombudsman may be appointed by a state, local or municipal government, and unofficial ombudsmen may be appointed by, or even work for, a corporation such as a utility supplier or a newspaper, for an NGO, or for a professional regulatory body. Making a complaint to an ombudsman is usually free of charge.
IN POLITICS
In general, an ombudsman is a state official appointed to provide a check on government activity in the interests of the citizen, and to oversee the investigation of complaints of improper government activity against the citizen. If the ombudsman finds a complaint to be substantiated,
the problem may get rectified, or an ombudsman report is published making recommendations for change. Further redress depends on the laws of the country concerned, but this normally involves financial compensation. Ombudsmen in most countries do not have the power to initiate legal proceedings or prosecution on the grounds of a complaint. This role is sometimes referred to as a "tribunitian" role, and has been traditionally fulfilled by elected representatives the term refers to the ancient Roman "tribunes of the plebians" (tribuni plebis), whose role was to intercede in the political process on behalf of common citizens. The major advantage of an ombudsman is that he or she examines complaints from outside the offending state institution, thus avoiding the conflicts of interest inherent in self-policing. However, the ombudsman system relies heavily on the selection of an appropriate individual for the office, and on the cooperation of at least some effective official from within the apparatus of the state. Perhaps for this reason, outside Scandinavia, the introduction of ombudsmen has tended to yield mixed results.
IN ORGANIZATIONS
Many private companies, universities, non-profit organizations and government agencies also have an ombudsman (or an ombuds office) to serve internal employees, and managers and/or other constituencies. These ombudsman roles are structured to function independently, by reporting to the CEO or board of directors and according to International Ombudsman Association (IOA) Standards of Practice do not serve any other role in the organization. They are beginning to appear around the world within organizations, sometimes as an alternative to anonymous hot-lines in countries where these are considered inappropriate or are illegal, and in addition to hot lines because ombuds offices typically receive many more calls than do hot lines.(See Charles L. Howard, The Organizational Ombudsman: Origins, Roles and Operations, a Legal Guide, ABA, 2010). Since the 1960s, the profession has grown in the United States, and Canada, particularly in corporations, universities and government agencies. This current model, sometimes referred to as an organizational ombudsman, works as a designated neutral party, one who is high-ranking in an organization, but who is not considered part of executive management in the sense of being able to make management decisions. Using an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) sensibility, or perhaps more apt, an appropriate dispute resolution sensibility, an organizational ombudsman can provide options to whistleblowers or employees and managers with ethics concerns; provide coaching, shuttle diplomacy, generic solutions (meaning a solution which protects the identity of one individual by applying to a class of people, rather than just for the one individual) and mediation for conflicts; track problem areas; and make recommendations for changes to policies or procedures in support of orderly systems change. (It may be of interest that the term appropriate, as in appropriate dispute resolution, is something of a term of art. ADR is usually thought to be alternative dispute resolution, as in an alternative to formal, rights-based processes, including formal grievance procedures and the courts. It usually is thought to include mediation and arbitration. However, the word "appropriate" in this context includes rights- or rights- and power based dispute resolution. For example, appropriate dispute resolution of a work-place assault might be a formal grievance procedure or an appeal to