i i

.
.
The article examines the points of view to the state aid for economy on the basis of analysis of experience
of European countries. According to the results of the research the basic tendencies in this sphere are defined
and necessity of transition from the selective state aid to the horizontal aid is proved.

.
.

,


, , .
: . , . , . , . ,
. , . , . . : . , . ,
. .
- . ,
. , . .


.
,
. 2 (19), 2009 .

.

, [1, 204].
, ,
,
, , , - , ,
.
,
, ( ).
. ,
,

.
,
149

i i

.
. , ,
[2, 13]. ,

[3, 4]. ,

[4, 27]. ,
.
. , ,
,
, . ,
, [5, 10].

.


[6, 9].
, .
,
,
.
,
- .

,
, ( , ),
( , ,
)
( 150

, , ).

. .
1970- .

(picking winners),
, , ,

. , , (British
Telecom), (Thomson) (Alkatel), (Siemens),
(Detsche Bundespost)
(Nixdorf) [7, 7].


(Airbus).


. -
- . 2005 . 34 . ,
113 . .
,


54,8 . . ( 22,7 . . ),
153 . .
,

.
, 1970- .
, , , ,
. 2 (19), 2009 .

i i

,
.
,
, -
. ,


1980- .
.
1970- .
- ,
462
. 1980- . 128 .
2004 . 70% 1956 . 10%
2002 .[8, 15].
1980- 1990- .
.
, (Ford)
(Aston
Martin), (Jaguar), (Land
Rover) (Volvo), (General Motors)
(Opel)
(Saab), (Daimler-Benz) (Chrysler). ,
, .
, 1970- .

,
,
. ,
, .
, .
. 2 (19), 2009 .

, , - , .
, ,

, ,
.
, , 19801990- .
.
1980- (Nissan) 112
. , (Toyota) 75 .
.
1990- . (Ford) 80 .
,

[7, 19].
,
,
,

,

[9, 84].


1980-1990- . 160 .
,
20 . [7, 20].
,
,
. , ,
- , , 1992 .
0,2% .
151

i i

, , ,
.


. 1980- .
,
.
1980- .,
, , , , ,
.

.
, ,
,


,
(Microsoft), (Dell) (Intel). , 1994 . 2001 . 5% .
1990 . , . 1990- .
130% ,

12% . 1990- .
1997 .
70% [9, 82].
, ,

,

.
152

, , 1970- .
. ,
, , , , , 1980-
1990- . ,
.
1980- .
.
1980- .
. ,
:

;
1970- . ,
,
[7, 13].

,

, ;

;
,
[7, 14];

;
, , , -
, ;

,


. 2 (19), 2009 .

i i

.
,
.
1993 .

- .
19922007- .
. ,
26,7 . 1992 . 14,1
. 2007 ., 17,7 .
1992 . 3,9 . 2007 ., -15 67,2 . 1992 . 45,4 .
2007 ., 32% [11].
- 1992
2007- . ,

, - , ,
, ( ) .


19922007- . 1992 . . , 1992 .

38% , 2007 . 79%,
1992 . 68%, 2007 . 95%,
1992 . 11% ,
2007 . 74% [11]. 2008 .
-
100% (, , , , )
(, , , , ,
, , ) [11].
. 2 (19), 2009 .

, - 1
. 2002 .


. . , 2002 .
3,9% , 2007 .
0,6% .
, ,
,
-
1980-1990- .

19922007- .

,
,
. . .
,



, , ,

[10, 196].
, , .
,
.
,
, .
1
, , , , , , ,
, , , , .

153

i i

.
-
.
- . ,
,

.
-
.
.
,
, .
1970- . .

,
.
1970- .
, .

,
. ,
.

154

1. : .
. . . : 2 . / .
, . , . .; .
. . . .:
, 2001. 517 .
2. ., . . 1:
// .
2006. 7. . 423.
3. Rodrik D. Industrial Policy for the TwentyFirst Century // CEPR Discussion Papers. 2004.
4767. P. 157.
4. Pelkmans J., European Industrial Policy //
Working Papers of Brueges European Policy
Briefings. 2006. 15 P. 149.
5. Rodrik D. Normalizing Industrial Policy,
September 2007 // Working Paper of Commission on
Growth and Development 2008. 3. P. 150.
6. Communication from the Commission. The
application of State aid rules to measures taken in
relation to financial institutions in the context of the
current global financial crisis // Official Journal of the
European Union. 2008. 270/02. P. 814.
7. Sharp M. Industrial Policy and EU integration:
lessons from experience in Western Europe over
the last 25 years // Working Paper of Center for the
Study of Economic and Social Change in Europe.
2003. 30. P. 182.
8. Becker P. Marx S. Europaische Champions
Aufgabe europaische Industriepolitik? // SWP Berlin: Diskussionpapier der FG 1. 2005. 1.
P. 120.
9. Tanzi V., Schuknecht L. Public Spending in
the 20th Century. Cambridge University Press,
2000.
10. . . . .: , 2008. 376 .
11. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/

. 2 (19), 2009 .