Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4168 Filed10/17/12 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP THEODORE G. BROWN, III (SBN 114672) 1080 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 326-2400 Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 Email: tbrown@kilpatricktownsend.com OMELVENY & MYERS LLP KENNETH L. NISSLY (SBN 77589) SUSAN van KEULEN (SBN 136060) SUSAN ROEDER (SBN 160897) 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600 Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 Email: knissly@omm.com svankeulen@omm.com sroeder@omm.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH, Plaintiffs, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant. Case No. CV 00-20905 RMW DECLARATION OF THEODORE G. BROWN III IN SUPPORT OF (1) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF THE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL EFFECT OF REEXAMINATIONS OF RAMBUSS PATENTS; (2) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY TO DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM OF PLAINTIFF RAMBUS INC.S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM; AND (3) MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND MOTION FOR STAY Date: November 30, 2012 Time: 9:00 a.m. Ctrm: 6 (Hon. Ronald M. Whyte) /// ///
DECLARATION OF BROWN ISO MSJ RE ESTOPPEL EFFECT OF REEXAMS CASE NO. CV-00-20905 RMW

Case5:00-cv-20905-RMW Document4168 Filed10/17/12 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Theodore G. Brown III, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California and admitted to

practice before this Court. I am a partner in the law firm of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, attorneys for SK hynix Inc. (f/k/a Hynix Semiconductor Inc.), SK hynix America Inc. (f/k/a Hynix Semiconductor America Inc.), SK hynix U.K. Limited (f/k/a Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd.), and SK hynix Deutschland GmbH (f/k/a Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH) (collectively Hynix) in the above-captioned matter. 2. I am one of the attorneys primarily responsible for processing Hynixs requests for

reexamination of Rambuss patents. Regarding the reexaminations that are the subject of Hynixs Motion for Summary for Summary Judgment filed herewith, Hynix requested only ex parte reexams and did not request inter partes reexaminations as to any Rambus patents. 3. I was one of the attorneys representing Hynix in the 2006 patent trial. At trial,

Hynix relied upon the iAPX Intel Reference Manual, in addition to other references, as a key piece of prior art as to 6 of the 10 claims in suit. The iAPX Intel Reference Manual was admitted at trial as Exhibit 1109. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 17th day of October 2012, at Menlo Park, California.

Theodore G. Brown, III

64602265V.1

DECLARATION OF BROWN ISO MSJ RE ESTOPPEL EFFECT OF REEXAMS CASE NO. CV-00-20905 RMW

-1-