VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA JANICE WOLK GRENADIER Plaintiff, v.

ILONA ELY FREEDMAN GRENADIER et al, And GRENADIER INVESTEMENT CO., LTD et al, And DAVID MARK GRENADIER Defendant Case No. CH010654

Statement of Facts For Hearing on September 26, 2012 in the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria Filed to perfect Order by Judge Clark on October 12, 2012 approving Plaintiffs Appeal Notice
COMES NOW JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, PLAINTIFF files Statement of Facts from the illegal Orders by Judge Clark who had recused himself from hearing Plaintiffs Motions in the past having had received in May of 2012 a letter stating he would be party to legal action against him by Plaintiff, that his actions on September 26, 2012 were with prejudice and that Plaintiff has still not had her day in court according to Brody v. Connecticut. That the Judges have been ruling on Favoritism and Cronyism not the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court. On September 26, 2012 the following picture shows the Notebook of evidence that was summited to the Judge and copies to the Defendants attorneys with no Objections by Defendants attorneys when asked by Judge Clark. Judge Clark allowed all evidence in the Notebook to be put into the record

On around October 11, 2012 Plaintiff went to the Clerks in the City of Alexandria office to confirm Plaintiffs file was in Order. Plaintiff found the Exhibits that the Judge had ordered into record where not in the file. When Plaintiff questioned it Judges Chambers informed the Clerks office after about 45 miniutes that Judge Clark was on the bench Plaintiff would need to come back. Plaintiff went to the 4th floor to find that was a lie. A clerk from Judges Chamber came down claiming she had been in court on September 26, 2012 and 1. The Judge never had them on the bench which is unture how would the Judge have them if they hadnt been on the bench and he hadnt received them in court? 2. They were never put into evidence - Judge Clark very clearly asked Defendants lawyers if they had objections and niether attorney nor defendant whom is a lawyer and was in the court room had an issue with them being entered on the record. 3. Then it was Plaintiff could check the transcripts and they would say that they were never entered into the record ( which means to Plaintiff the transcripts have been tampered with) 4. Prior to leaving the court house Sheriff Kapetanis of the Alexandria Sheriffs office escorted Plaintiff back into the Court house where Plaintiff requested the notebooks back from Defendants lawyers if they didnt wish to have them - They both in agreement informed Plaintiff they needed them as they had been entered into the record as evidence. Plaintiff walked away agreeing with them. The Clerk from Judges chambers then gave Plaintiff the choice of taking Plaintiffs Exhibits or they would be destroyed

On October 13, 2012 in the Mail Plaintiff received the following Box which has not been opened from the Circuit Court of Alexandria

On October 11 2012, Plaintiff wrote a letter to Chief Judge Lisa Kemler requesting a special Grand Jury to look into the illegal behavior and irresponsible way the court handled the documents summited into court The fraud on the court since September 5, 2007. Plaintiff was served in response to the request the following Order Plaintiff was served this Order as she walked into the Court house on or around October 16, 2012
3

These two examples since September 26, 2012 shows the extremes the Judges are going to keep the truth from being head since September 5, 2007. That Plaintiffs fundamental right to Due Process the basic Freedoms that our country stands for. The right to due process without Fraud from Lawyers, Judges, Judicial, Elected officials is a primary component of Freedom. The right to a Fair Trial Due Process is the basic Constitution right that has been the source of the light of freedom that our Country has given the World. This basic Liberty is what our flag stand for and here is where the standard of Liberty is set for the rest of the World. This case started out as a Real Estate Partnership where one partner took advantage of another partner that partner defendant Ilona showed how little integrity she has from how she stole from the Sonia Grenadier Trust - not once but on several occasions, etc. etc. But, it is deeply saddening now to see how harsh the effects of deprivation of basic freedoms, deprivation of constitutional rights are to Plaintiffs freedom and basic human rights are to Plaintiffs freedom, On Wednesday September 26, 2012 in the City of Alexandria Circuit Court room with Judge Clark presiding, Judge Clark did a roll call to see who was there and how long they would take. The docket was full. When Grenadier v. Grenadier was called Defendants attorneys asked to go last Plaintiff informed Judge she was ready to go. As has been the situation since September 5, 2007 the Judge favorite the decision of the Defendants Which from what took place in court by all appearance as in the past the Defendants and the Judge had planned how he would rule and how he would handle the situation - through Favoritism and Cronyism and not the Law or the Rules of the Supreme Court. Showing the Basic Freedom of Due Process had no place in his court room. Taking 3 hours of wait time so defendants could go last in a locked down court room then Judge Clark ruled Plaintiff has to pay Defendants attorneys for that time. It is stated in the City of Alexandria Bar Magazine how well the Judges and lawyers work together. From all the pictures in the magazine of them, dining, boating, once or twice a month together - how many lives of Victims are decided at these parties? When you have the Power that these Judges have over our being to have the decisions made at parties or by if you are part of the Old Boy Network is disgusting. Many times Plaintiff said a mistake was made lets fix it; instead they went to another Party and thought how we can further ruin Plaintiff and her girls lives. After all others had been heard and several did go past the 30 minutes with the Judge being patient to litigants. The only litigant Judge Clark was rude to besides Plaintiff was another Pro se litigant. After everyone had left and Grenadier v. Grenadier was heard the Sheriffs were standing outside the Court Room to make sure that no one was allowed in to watch the proceedings. On the Plaintiff side you had pro se Janice Wolk Grenadier On the Defendants side you had John Tran for Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman et al, and Michael Wieser for David Grenadier. (Defendant Ilona attorney was a Bait and switch as Ben DiMuro and Hillary were involved in the Fraud on the Court in the filing with the Supreme Court of Virginia) Plaintiff started out with asking that Judge Clark recuse himself for the following reasons: 1. Refusing to hear 2 Motions filed by Plaintiff 2. The letter delivered in May that Plaintiff planed on naming him in a suit she plans to file because by all appearance Plaintiff believe him to be in collusion with the other Circuit Court Judges to rule in Defendants favor. Because she is part of their elite Old Boys Network group.
6

Plaintiff then discussed the issue of John Tran being disingenuous and not servicing Plaintiff properly and all the grief from the court Plaintiff received with any type of filing or service. John Tran took up and to the Judge said he had mailed the filing to Plaintiff. Which as red as he turned Plaintiff believes there is little truth to that? Michael Weiser had complaints about the names on the Filing - of not his client but, John Trans client. Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman. Plaintiff than told the Judge she had a notebook for him and Defendants lawyers and would like to have them entered into the court record - Plaintiff handed the Notebook (pictured above) to the Sheriff who then handed it to the Judge. The Plaintiff then handed both attorneys each a notebook with the Exhibits. Judge Clark asked Defendants if they had any objections which both Mr. Weiser and Mr. Tran said no. The documents then were entered into the record. Plaintiff had planned on starting in the beginning of the Notebook and taking the Judge through 1. Showing how much money was owed to Plaintiff from Defendants and that Plaintiff has a claim. A right to file the Les Penitence. But, not one Judge nor have Defendants attorneys ever denied that Plaintiff had a claim. All Orders only deny Motions without explanations ruling only on Favoritism. 2. Judge Clark made it clear he didnt care about the money he wanted to know about the Fraud. Which Plaintiff went into as follows: 1. Plaintiff to date has never had a Judge with Jurisdiction to hear her case no Judge has been properly appointed 2. That Ilona Grenadier a lawyer when she mislead and lied to the Court on September 5, 2007 about being served all the Circuit Court Judges at the time Judge Kloch, Judge Kemler, Judge haddock recused themselves. Not filing the appropriate paper work with the Supreme Court of Virginia - Being disengeonus to Plaintiff on several occasions telling her the complete opposite of the rule 17. Plaintiff then went into the following facts with Judge Clark at one point saying he didnt understand just move on you have used your 15 minutes.
September 5, 2007 - Plaintiff Filed with the Alexandria Circuit Court a Motion for Reinstatement of the Bill of Complaint of 28 E Bellefonte Ave Partnership. At the time I thought it best for notification to the parties to be served through the Sheriffs office. The court date for the Motion was on September 12, 2007. September 12, 2007 - Motions Day Judge Kloch is the judge that hears the case. This resulted in the Motion for Default against Ilona filed on September 21, 2007. As the Motion for Default goes into more detail Ilona was disingenuous in court claiming she hadnt been served. But, she couldnt have known of the court date unless she was served. She admitted in court to Judge Kloch that David Grenadiers attorney; Mr. Michael Weiser was aware of the court date because she had faxed the information to him. Judge Kloch kept passing it over to give Mr. Weiser the chance to show up. He then sent a clerk down to the Sheriffs office that came back and according to Judge Kloch said that neither Ilona nor Mr. Weiser had been served according to the Sheriffs records. I explained to the Judge the only way Ilona could be there was if she was served. Ilona admitted to having been served and faxing the service to Mr. Weiser. At which point Judge Kloch dismissed everything to be re-heard. Ilona had not been telling the truth when she said she hadnt been served. Plaintiff also now finds it very questionable what the clerk was told by the Sheriffs office or what was really said to Judge Kloch.

After Court Plaintiff went down to the Sheriffs office. They gave Plaintiff a copy of Ilonas service. Mr. Weisers papers were not in the box, his office is in the same building as the Sheriffs offices, they couldnt say whether he had been served or not. September 21, 2007 - JWG filed Motion for Default, and The Motion to Reinstate (just in case) for October 10, 2007. September 22, 2007 All the Alexandria Judges recuse them from hearing the case. This is the start of them bringing in Judges that hold Kangaroo Court where the decision is made prior to court. This is the start of the collusion to bring in Judges to rule in Ilona & Davids side. Ilona would brag about her relationship with the Judges and how they called her and she would give free legal advice. . October 17, 2007 Letter from Diane Fiske After informing Plaintiff that the Judges had recuse themselves she would be finding Judges to hear the case. Judge Frank A. Hoss was available for November 28, 2007 at 10.00 am. At the time of this letter the Judges were: 1. Judge Donald M. Haddock We learned in the Spring of 2008 he had recused himself from hearing the case. 2. Judge John E. Kloch Ilona had lied to him in court on September 5, 2007 He could have heard the Motion for Default as he knew the truth But, the truth is not what he was looking for. 3. Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler Her Father was our pediatrician for our girls, I believe David had gone to Hebrew School with her, His father and her father were good friends/I had shown her and her husband Real Estate. December 5, 2007 - Judge Thomas A. Fortkort heard Motion. Denied Plaintiffs Motion for Default. The Motion for Default was due to Ilona Grenadier an attorney, officer of the court lying to Judge Kloch in court. Fraud on the Court December 2007 - Question Diane Fiske about a Fair Judge she informs Plaintiff the only way anyone else (Supreme Court choses Judge) is if they cant find one. Which is incorrect the rule is the complete opposite in accordance with 17.1-105(B): Learn of June of 2010 If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case. 2008 February 8, 2008 - Letter from Ilona (on her law firm stationary) to Plaintiff, Ilona asserts ownership of 75% of a property Known as 28 East Bellefonte Ave, Alexandria, VA 22305. Plaintiff also felt threatened by the letter which is full of misleading and deceitful statements. She then puts it in writing February 13, 2008 Judge Brown hears Motions * Ilona is not in court Heather Jenquien represented her. Motions to compel February 26, 2008 Filed with Clerk of Courts following letter: Because keep in mind all Judges had recuse themselves and all Motions had to go through Diane Fiske as she needed to find a judge or it had to be on a day they had a visiting Judge. The letter asks Ilona for dates to get back to Diane Fiske to file a Motion as no Motions could be filed without everyones ageing on the date before Diane found a Judge.

February 27, 2008 - Ilona Grenadier filed on February 27, 2008 with the Circuit Court of The City of Alexandria an Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint claiming 75% ownership of the property at 28 East Bellefonte Ave., Alexandria, VA 22305 which is a documented lie. Most of Ilona Grenadiers statements in the Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint were disingenuous which Plaintiff has supplied documentation to VSB for the purpose of establishing the truth. The following are the lies Ilona Grenadier Filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria Fraud on the Court by a lawyer 1. 75% ownership 2. That plaintiff has provided no proof of actual payment for expenses ~ provided 3 times to defendants 3. Plaintiffs Bankruptcy caused by Bellefonte as Plaintiff in & out ~ Which now Plaintiff realizes she would never had been in and out if it wasnt for the manipulation and lies of Ilona Grenadier 4. 4 times Ilona ~ Defendant, Ilona Ely Grenadier, denies that Plaintiff owns or owned 50%of East Bellefonte. The document on February 27, 2008 by Ilona Ely Grenadier a lawyer was rattled with Lies - The VSB - The Judges in Alexandria and her good friend - Judge Brown had no problem with that. This can be backed up with information/documentation from Admission statements from Ilona Grenadier which had several conflicting statements. The amount of money Ilona put into the property can be established by an accounting done by Ilona. The Accounting shows the 25% down payment that was contributed in the purchase of the Bellefonte Property. The documents that were filed with the Motion for Default in the Circuit Court of Alexandria can be used to verify the amount of ownership Ilona had. Ilona had in her possession the documents which showed her ownership at the time she filed the pleadings. Those pleadings were disingenuous and misleading when filed with The Circuit Court of Alexandria. March 5, 2008 File 2 Court by a Lawyer
nd

Motion for Default to be heard March 12, 2008 for the following reasons: Fraud on the

1. For all the reasons as stated in Motion for Default Dated September 21, 2007 2. For all the untruths told in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint filed on February 27, 2008. 3. For the letters Defendant sent bulling, threatening attached to the February Response to Ilona Ely Grenadier/GIC Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Amended Complaint / From February 8, 2008. 4. For the non-response to letters to try and set a new date for depositions or to set a trial date. March 5, 2008 Filed Motion to Change Date for: Notice of Deposition and to Set Date for Trial As Defendants would not respond to any correspondence. March 11, 2008 Plaintiff files Praecipe - Remove Motions for March 12 no visiting Judges. 1. Clerk of the Court will please remove from the docket on March 12, 2008 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel as there isnt a visiting judge available to hear it. 2. This again shows that the Circuit Court Judges had recused themselves. That Plaintiff though out the case voiced her concern on getting a fair Trial. To the deaf ears of the Circuit Court of Alexandria who took the arrogant view of doing whatever they wanted to do.

April 30, 2008 Praecipe re-file to have Motion for Default heard as Diane Fiske has found a date that works for the Judges of Alexandria to find a Judge of their choice for May 7, 2008 May 7, 2008 Motions heard by Judge Brown Ilona after court informs me after he has ruled in her favor allowing her to file false papers as an attorney in the Alexandria Circuit Court of law what good friends she and Judge Brown are and how he called her all the time for legal advice. - Fraud on the court by a Judge using Friendships to Rule in favor of a lawyer who has on several times committed FRAUD ON THE COURT May 7, 2008 after Court -

1. Ilona Grenadier again brags about her relationship with the Judges - Which she has in the past & continues to give free legal advice to Judge Brown. 2. Ilona Grenadier explains to Plaintiff why no one has anything do to with Plaintiffs children are because Plaintiff raised them Catholic. In 19 years she has seen the girls once by her choice. 3. That Plaintiff should be grateful to her for the listing on Holland Road. 4. That Ilona doesnt believe David Stole the money from the Sonia Grenadiers Trust -which only left Ilona and her law firm to steal over $95,000.00 5. Plaintiff introduced herself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilona he explains to Plaintiff I could never get a fair trial as they all Love Ilona I turn to Diane Fiske shocked by the statement and express I cant believe he just said that to me. 6. Again Plaintiff asks Diane Fiske about getting Judges that arent friends of Ilonas. May 13, 2008 Letter from Diane P Fiske that the case would be heard by Judge John J. McGrath. This letter shows the following Judges in the letter head: 1. Donald M. Haddock 2. John E. Kloch (Retired) which means at the time Judge McGrath was chosen Judge Kloch and Judge McGrath were working together. 3. Lisa Bondareff Kemler June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Files: 1. Motion for Default - Defendant Ilona has lied in the Admissions A. For Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 - Motion for Default B. For Motion for Default filed in February for Lying in the Answer to Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counter claim and Cross Complaint C. For lies in Admissions D. For the letters Defendant sent Bulling & Threatening Plaintiff if Plaintiff didnt drop suit.

2. Motion for Trial by Jury Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Ilona Grenadier A. Judge Haddock telling Plaintiff she could never get a fair trial as they all LOVE Ilona B. Ilona informing Plaintiff all the Judges were friends of hers & she gave them free legal advice when they called her July 2, 2008 Motion to be heard July 9, 2008 to include: 1. Motion for Trial by Jury 2. Motion to Compel 3. Motion for Default July 9, 2008 Judge Howe Brown rules: 1. Denies motion for Default 2. Denies motion for Trial by Jury 3. And makes both sides work on responses in the Motion to Compel Spring of 2008 Diane Fiske again advices Plaintiff the only way anyone else would choose a Judge was if they couldnt find one then it would go to the Supreme Court and they would then choose the Judge. Which was incorrect? The minute in September of 2007 when the Judges had recuse themselves is when the Supreme Court should have been choosing the Judges not the Judges themselves or Diane Fiske should not have been choosing the Judges. The Head Judge Judge Haddock was talking and hugging Ilona while I was talking with Diane Fiske about Fair Judges that were arms length. When Ilona left I turned to Judge Haddock and introduced myself which he then went onto inform me I wouldnt get a fair trial because they all Loved Ilona . Judge Haddock is the Head Judge at the Alexandria Circuit Court. I then turned to Diane Fiske in shock and said I cant believe Judge Haddock just told me I would never get a Fair Trial

10

because they loved Ilona. - That the Circuit Court of Alexandria on several occasions was disingenuous with Plaintiff - FRAUD ON THE COURT September 11, 2008 Trial with Judge John McGrath as our Judge. 1. The 1 issue I have is how first thing he did that morning was he called Ilona Grenadier and me into Chambers to have a conference to see if this could be settled. The problem I have with this is he said he had studied the file for the last 45 minutes and understood there to be an issue in including David in the conference. He also made a comment that the money/settlement shouldnt go directly to me because of judgments against me which I had none at that time. He then suggested the funds could be disbursed through Burke & Herbert Bank towards my daughters education. This was my money, not my daughters. Not that every cent I have doesnt go to them. Now please keep in mind I had been led to believe this was a judge from Harrisonburg, he had no ties to this area. While this was going on Judge Kloch lingered in the hall way. I had been very specific with the Judges office in Alexandria; I expected to have a fair judge, especially after Ilonas comments about Judge Brown, and other Judges. I still felt if I was able to tell the truth, there wouldnt be an issue. 2. Then Ilona was allowed to bring up a situation which dealt with the theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust that was run out of her law office. First in the Opening Statement, and then with questioning me under oath. 3. Then when it was my time to question David and Ilona, I wasnt allowed to question them or bring The Sonia Grenadier Trust up in any way. Judge McGrath said he wasnt going to allow it brought into his court room and he really didnt understand it. I asked to explain it to him and he wouldnt hear of it. When I mentioned how they had brought it up he just went on to say he wasnt allowing it in his court room. 4. David Grenadier lied under oath. Judge McGrath was just move on. 5. He then allowed the attorneys to hammer on me. When Mrs. Grenadier got on the stand I was WARNED on how I question Mrs. Grenadier and what questions I asked her. I started asking Mrs. Grenadier questions, she broke down crying. I asked for recess to give her a chance to compose herself and was denied. 6. Mr. McGrath then went and had a very friendly lunch with Judge Kloch at Jackson 20 a new restaurant in Old Town. Only for Judge Kloch to be discussing going to work with Judge McGrath and his company Judicial Solutions. 7. He then of course found in favor of Ilona and David which I would not have had a problem with if it had been a fair trial with a Judge that had integrity. Judge McGrath was tainted and had discussed this case prior to court with Judge Kloch, and possible other Judges in the chambers. The order was written prior to closing arguments. September 22, 2008 - File Motion for Reconsideration With new evidence that had been dropped off at my house - A letter that David Ellsberg the Settlement attorney for Bellefonte had me write him that showed I was loaning the money to Ilona / David / GIC September 23, 2008 1. Diane Fiske - Question: Protocol (Judge was out of town last week) She will e-mail / call Judge see if he wants mailed to him or in area to stop by 2. Plaintiff Need to know take to next level 3. Andrea 703-624-4557 Commonwealth Attorneys Office Randy Sengel explained to me that Judge McGrath did a lot of work in the Circuit Court of Alexandria and was well known with the Judges. September 24, 2008 Diane heard from Judge sent him Motion-but he didnt want Exhibits - So basically didnt even consider the facts of the Motion September 26, 2008 Friday 1. Diane Fiske - 21 days hopefully something today Judge has everything
st

11

2. Diane Afternoon received order from Judge in mail sent on 24 denying and he never looked at Exhibits confirmed by Diane 3. Randy Sengel Commonwealth Attorney tells me the JIRC Commission is where I need to go Randy Sengel Commonwealths Attorney Informs me that Judge McGrath has done a lot of work in Alexandria Circuit Court 4. Call to Judicial Inquiry & Review Commission Donald Curry informed Plaintiff that Judge McGrath was from the Arlington Area and that is how he knew about Burke & Herbert Bank - had done extensive work in Alexandria Courts. 5. Plaintiff realized that the fact he was from Harrisonburg was mute it was a farce. With this new knowledge Plaintiff realized the following was true Type of Complaints the commission investigates comes under: A) Allowing Family, social or other relationships to influence this judgment B) Engaging in private conversations which may influence judicial actions C) Failing to disqualify in a proceeding in which impartiality reasonably might be Questioned, because of his actions under A & B December 18, 2008 Plaintiff learns from the internet that Judge John Kloch is now working with Judge john McGrath Jr. with a firm called Judicial Solutions PC *In Letter from Judge John Kloch he may have already started at Judicial Solutions at the time of my trial or it may have been agreed opinion at that time. This made it more of a conflict of interest. Not an arms length situation. If it isnt enough to have the Commonwealths Attorney tell you Judge John McGrath has done a lot of work in the Alexandria Courts. 2009 February 2009 Washingtonian top 25 Divorce attorneys includes Ilona and is referred to as A tough cookie for cases that might not be amicable, she can mix it up in a state where the old-boy network is strong March 2009 Alexandria Bar Thanks Ilona / law firm for their generosity in table sponsors April 17, 2009 Letter from Ben DiMuro threatening Plaintiff that she was trying to extort money from Ilona April, 29, 2009 2 VSB complaint response was FU our lawyers can lie steal or cheat and if they are part of the Old Boy Network we along with JIRC and the Supreme Court of Virginia are going to protect them. July 7. 2009 - Ben DiMuro, Davids sisters Robin/Racial, Andrea & Karen e-mail calling Pope a Wanker Best description of e-mail is full of Bull shit On or around October 28, 2009 LM for Detective Pak about getting together I had been advised not to meet with him. I choose to Plaintiff knew I had the truth. October 29, 2009 Conversation to meet with Detective Pak October 30, 2009 Meet with Detective Pak and a woman at my home for a few hours. I ask to have it recorded. It is recorded. Yet when I later asked Detective Pak if there would be charges I was informed it was up to Randy Sengel. Randy Sengel had personally requested the investigation. There is no insistent report or any record with the Alexandria Police of such investigation. 2010 June 21, 2010 Letter Ms. Patricia L. Harrington Re- VSB August 2010 Virginia Attorney Calls Diane Fiske she confirms all the Judges in The Alexandria Circuit Court had recuse themselves
nd

th

12

July 12, 2010 e-mail to Defendants that Plaintiff was filing Motion for Default to be heard on September 21, 2010 to be heard on July 28, 2010 July 13, 2010 File Motion July 26, 2010 w/ 4 min left Michael Wieser files he cant be there * Remember Plaintiff in September of 2007 was admonished for giving enough time and notice to Defendants. Mr. Wieser knew about this conflict 11 days prior to deciding he wasnt going to be able to show up in court. July, 2010 Ilona files Opposition werent we supposed to be in court on the 28 ? When did she know that Michael Wiser would be filing with the court the conflict? August 4, 2010 After being reprimanded by the Circuit Court about contacting everyone being treated rudely now every time Plaintiff calls the Alexandria Circuit Court file Motion to be heard on August 11, 2010 August 11, 2010 Judge Kloch visiting Judge is 100% Disingenuous August 11, 2010 Plaintiff is informed The Circuit Court would not take her phone calls or any messages from her August 12, 2010 Plaintiff receives an e-mail - Judge Kloch Decides to recluse himself works with Judge McGrath Quote from Judge Klochs letter I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justice itself On or around August 13, 2010 it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court, Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing for October 13, 2010 at 2pm. October 6, 2010 Plaintiff files Praecipe for Hearing on October 13, 2010 for all Motions that had been filed to be heard along with a Motion for Sanctions filed on October 6, 2010. The Circuit Court of Alexandrias rules are 7 days prior to a Motion being heard it is to be filed with the Clerks office and Notice to be delivered to opposing parties. October 13, 2010 / In the Alexandria Circuit Court 1. Judge Nolan B Dawkins preceding, Michael Weiser Esq was there for David Grenadier Defendant, Hillary J. Collyer, Esq for Ilona Grenadier & GIC, Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier was present pro se. Ilona & David were not present 2. There was no Court Reporter. 3. Janice Wolk Grenadier started with her Motion to have her Motion for Default to be reheard as the Judges in the Circuit Court of Alexandria Virginia in 2007 had recluse themselves from hearing the case. That the Alexandria Circuit Court had not followed the rules of the Supreme Circuit Court 17.1 -105 (B). 4. The Judges of record in 2007 were Judge John Kloch, Judge Lisa Bondareff Kemler, & Judge Donald M. Haddock. 5. Judge Nolan Dawkins pointed out to Plaintiff she had misstated the Motion as it should have been titled a Motion for Default Judgment. 6. Plaintiff then went on to focus on the Merits of the Case which included the following Facts: Stressing that the Judge understands a Mistake was made by the Alexandria Circuit Court and this was a chance to make right that Mistake. The following facts & evidence was presented to Judge Nolan Dawkins: 7. On September 12, 2007 that Defendant had been disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court that Defendant Ilona Ely Grenadier as a lawyer representing herself and Grenadier Investment as an officer of the Court had been disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court. Ilona Grenadier is the widow to the late Judge Albert Grenadier of the Alexandria Circuit Court. Judge Albert Grenadier had worked with and had personal relations with Judge Haddock, Judge Kloch, and a close relationship to the father of Judge Lisa Bondereff Kemler whose father was the pediatrician to Plaintiffs girls, and had gone to Hebrew school with David Grenadier Defendant. 8. Plaintiff presented to the Judge that the Motion for Default was filed on September 21, 2007 and was not heard till December 5, 2007 by Judge Frank A. Hoss. 9. Plaintiff presented to Judge Dawkins a Letter Dated October 17, 2010 setting the date for November 28, 2007 from the Circuit Court of Alexandria written by Diane Fiske Court Administrator. Plaintiff then Presented letter dated November 15, 2007 that the Judge had to reschedule to December 5, 2010. Both letters were written by Diane Fiske court Administrator.
th

13

10. Plaintiff then presented letter dated May 13, 2008 that Judge John J. McGrath had been chosen as the Judge for Trial. This letter was also written by Diane Fiske who had informed Plaintiff all Alexandria Circuit Court Judges had recluse themselves from hearing any Motions or Trial nd 11. Plaintiff then addressed the rules of the Alexandria Circuit Court and that Motions are normally heard the 2 and th st rd 4 Wednesday of the month and the Motions needed to be filed by the 1 or 3 Wednesday of the month. That my motion took almost 3 months to be heard. 12. Plaintiff then informed Judge Dawkins how after the Motions would be heard by visiting Judges Defendant Ilona Grenadier an officer of the court would brag about what good friends she was with the Judge and how the Judges would call defendant Ilona Grenadier when they had legal questions. 13. Plaintiff would then go to Judges chambers and request Judges that were chosen at arms length. Plaintiff explained to Judge Dawkins that she was informed that the Alexandria Circuit Court Judges choose the Judge unless they couldnt find a Judge. The Alexandria Circuit Court choose the Days Motions & Trial to be heard to coincide with the dates they could find the Judge of their choose. 14. Plaintiff then also presented to Judge Dawkins letter that Judge Kloch had written on August 12, 2010, at which time Plaintiff pointed out Judge Kochs statement further I believe strongly that the appearance of justice is equally important as justice itself It was Judge Kloch that defendant had been disingenuous September 12, 2007. Which is at that point the Judges had recluse themselves. 15. Judge Dawkins acknowledged having seen the letter prior to court at which time Plaintiff asked Judge Dawkins to recluse himself. Plaintiff felt as a Judge working with Judges who had been disingenuous in this court he could not Judge this situation fairly. Judge Dawkins refused to recluse himself saying he wasnt a Circuit Court Judge at the time this case was heard. On or around August 13, 2010 it was agreed by the Alexandria Circuit Court, Defendants & Plaintiff after Alexandria Circuit Court giving the Plaintiff much grief scheduled a new hearing for October 13, 2010 at 2pm. 16. Judge Dawkins then went on to reference that Judge John McGrath was from Harrisonburg, Virginia. Which Judge John McGrath is from Harrisonburg, Virginia? 17. Plaintiff then went on to inform Judge Dawkins that Judge John McGrath now lived in Harrisonburg, but, was raised in Arlington which she learned from Donald Curry attorney for the JERK committee who as a friend of Judge John McGrath and refused a complaint to be filed. When complaint was forced on him, rejected it with no follow up on the facts. That the Commonwealth States Attorney Randy Sangel had informed Plaintiff that Judge John McGrath had done extensive work in The Circuit Court of Alexandria as a Judge. Plaintiff then informed Judge Dawkins what had taken place the day of trail with Judge John McGrath on September 11, 2008: October 13, 2010 Judge Dawkins Order reads: 1. Denied Motion for Default to be heard by a Judge with Jurisdiction 2. Denied Sanctions 3. Denied action to Recluse Himself. October 13, 2010 Plaintiff calls Alexandria Circuit Court to set up a date for a Motion to be heard. Plaintiffs is told she must not just e-mail defendants; she must talk to them as well before date can be set. Plaintiff follows the rules put to her by the Circuit Court of Alexandria October 14, 2010 Plaintiff is informed The Alexandria Circuit Court will not allow any other Motions on this case to be filed. October 14, 2010 Plaintiff files with the court Facts of what the Plaintiff has claimed and what the actions were of the Alexandria Circuit Court to have it on file. October 19, 2010 Plaintiff flies with the court Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dated October 13, 2010 Plaintiff in researching information for Appeal to the Supreme Court finds the following information that had been filed with the Circuit Court of Alexandria, which Plaintiff felt proved Plaintiff had not lied in court as Judge Dawkins had accused Plaintiff of doing.

1.

March 11, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Praecipe in the Alexandria Circuit Court that states the Alexandria Circuit Court wouldnt hear the Motion on the date first filed because there wasnt a visiting Judge , that the only way Motions would be heard is if there was a visiting Judge.

14

2.

June 18, 2008 Plaintiff Filed a Motion for Trial by Jury So Plaintiff could get a fair trial, again it was denied. Even though Plaintiff stated in Motion for Trial by Jury the difficulties of filing Motions as it could only be done on the days of Visiting Judges and referenced Since the start of this the Judges in Alexandria have explained to Plaintiff the difficulties of being able to hear the motions or fairly judge this case June 18, 2008 Motion for Default (Should have been Motion for Default Judgment) At this point defendants had September 12, 2007 disingenuous in court, Had knowingly filed untruths and false statements in there Bill of Complaint by defendant and Counterclaim and Cross-complaint filed on February 27, 2008. All the untruths filed in there Admissions that can be backed up with the interrogatories. Defendant Ilona Grenadier is a lawyer, an officer of the court that should be held to a higher standard than to be allowed to be disingenuous in the Alexandria Circuit Court.

3.

October 20, 2010 Order by Judge Nolan B. Dawkins 1. Denies Reconsideration Order along this case is dismissed with prejudice and to be placed among the ended cases. November 4, 2010 Plaintiff delivers to the trial Judge a copy Written Statement of Facts to the Alexandria Circuit Court Chambers. 2011 January 20, 2011 ~ JWG Appeal to Supreme Court ~ Record # 110156 February 2, 2011 - Letter Ben Dimuro Give notice file dismiss of Petition for Appeal February 3, 2011 - Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal Due to Plaintiff not filing Statement of Facts - Disingenuous February 8, 2011 Petitioners Response to Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal on Page 2 Respondents state Petitioners state Petitioner failed to ensure that the record contains either a transcript or a written statement of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues is fatal to her appeal. Accordingly, the Petition should be dismissed for Petitioners non-compliance with rule 5:11 Petitioner filed Court Statement of Facts for October 13, 2010 & October 20, 2010 Order o Made a part of Record in accordance to Supreme Court Rule 5:11 (c) (1) and (2). FRUAD ON THE COURT BY LAWYERS MICHAEL WEISER, BEN DIMURO & HILLARY COYLER WHICH IS WHY THE BAIT AND SWITCH WITH HAVING JOHN TRAN IN COURT ON SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 February 10, 2011 May 4, 2011 May 24, 2011 June 20, 2011 June 27, 2011 September 2011 Respondents filed with the Supreme Court - Joint Brief in Opposition to Petition for Appeal

Letter from Supreme Court of Virginia to Plaintiff May 24, 2011 Oral Argument Plaintiff Oral Argument in Richmond in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia Supreme Court of Virginia Denies Petition, Ignores the law. Plaintiff Petition for Reconsideration Ilona Grenadier & Ben DiMuro generous donation to the Judge Donald M. Haddock Portrait fund

September 15, 2011 Ilona Grenadier through her law firm throws a party on the Miss Mallory in Alexandria, Virginia, by all appearance a $100,000 + party. September 20, 2011 Supreme Court Deny Petition for Reconsideration, once again ignores the law.

November 21, 2011 JWG Learns about the Magistrate can also bring charges - Calls City of Alexandria Magistrate to learn that he requires a Police Report - JWG then calls Detective Pak to ask for Police Report # he ignores phone calls, e-mails when Plaintiff gets him on the phone first excuse is Computers are down, next excuse not to give me the number

15

is he hasnt had time to look it up. When asked where Plaintiff can call to get it he sounds nervous on phone and tells Plaintiff he will get it for Plaintiff. Plaintiff leaves several messages etc.. To never hear back from Detective Pak. Plaintiff Calls Records in Alexandria to learn - There is no Police Report # for the Extortion investigation brought on by Randy Sengel commonwealths attorney which there is a letter from Ben DiMuro April 16, 2009 charging Plaintiff with acts of Extortion. January 9, 2012 Letter to The Honorable Cynthia Kinser Chief Justice of the Virginia Supreme Court - Plaintiff did not send after conversation with Doug Roublin that anyone can write a Judge a letter. The issue is back in the Circuit Court and must be dealt with in the Circuit Court. January 18, 2012 Praecipe to be heard on January 25, 2012 January 20, 2012 Letter from Law Clerk Circuit Court of Alexandria that my Motion for Sanctions against Mr. Sengel would be heard by Judge Potter. Again the Circuit Court of Alexandria does not follow the rules or the laws of the court. Justice delayed is Justice denied. February 1, 2012 - Motion filed to demand Ed Semonian Clerk of Court answer simple questions about Grand Jury Since Alexandria has shown in the past not to follow the rules of the courts It was reasonable for Plaintiff to ask basic questions which he refused to answer. Most likely he doesnt know the basic rules. February 1, 2012 - Parecipe filed on Feb 1 for Motion to be heard on February 8, 2012 by the new Judge - Judge Clark who had not recused himself from hearing this case. February 2, 2012 Letter Circuit Court of Alexandria Motion Sanctions against Ed Semonian to be heard at 9am February 13, 2012 by Judge Potter. February 7, 2012 Letter to Circuit Court Judges & Ed Semonian Plaintiff planed on being in court on February 8, 2012 that Judge Clark had not recused himself. February 8, 2012 Judge Clark in court confirms he has not recused himself from the matter and that it isnt on his docket. Yet Judge Clark then turns and says yes I am going to hear this even though it is not on my docket.

In the End what we have is A Judge that blocked Defendant Ilona from taking the stand after Plaintiff had gone to the time, money and trouble to have her subpoena and, by all appearance the Judges and Clerk of Court had not planned for the Sheriff to serve her. It was the diligence of the Plaintiff that got the Defendant served. The Defendants attorneys defense was 8. Something the Judge wouldnt explain it when Plaintiff asked and when Plaintiff looked it up - It is a Rule that you can use to Rule in Favoritism and Cronyism instead of the Law and the Rules of the Supreme Court. What Plaintiff proved over and over again - Defendant Ilona a lawyer mislead and lied in court, in documents filed in the court, Fraud on the Court on several occasions That Defendants Lawyers Michael Weiser, Ben DiMuro & Hillary Coiler filed false statements in the documents filed with the Supreme Court of Virginia on February 3, 2012 that Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts which was untrue. FRAUD ON THE COURT

16

That Judges Lawyers, Elected Officials, Government employees, have lied time and time again to protect one another That the Judicial system in Virginia is about Favoritism and Cronyism not the Law and the Rules That the Plaintiff sited the following in court : Read the Judicial Cannons CANON 1. - A JUDGE SHALL UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY. CANON 2. - A JUDGE SHALL AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL OF THE JUDGE'S ACTIVITIES. CANON 3. - A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY. CANON 4. - A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE LAW, THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND SHALL CONDUCT ANY SUCH EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH JUDICIAL OBLIGATIONS. CANON 5. - A JUDGE SHALL REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY INAPROPRIATE TO THE JUDICIAL OFFICE. CANON 6 - JUDGES PRO TEMPORE, RETIRED JUDGES, SUBSTITUTE JUDGES AND PERSONS SELECTED FOR JUDGESHIPS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE CANONS. As to why Judge Clark should recuse himself. That Supreme rule 17-1-105 (b) had been ignored and lied about to Plaintiff If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case. Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of his Oath of Office I do solemnly swear (or affirm ) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all of the duties incumbent on me as: Judge of the Judicial Circuit

According to the best of my ability: (so help me God). Plaintiff reminded Judge Clark of Due Process The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central
17

promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law. If you are denied due process in any way the judge's order is VOID!

Under the color of the law the appearance of a legal right.

The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting himself or herself in the course of official duties. Under the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state. Justice Delayed is Justice Denied If a judge doesnt have Jurisdiction to make an order the order is VOID. The issue whether the judge had authority to do what was done, even if doing so was erroneous or even despicable. If he does not have jurisdiction to act he loses judicial Immunity. Stump v. Sparkman 435 US 349, 55 L Ed 2d 331, 98 S Ct 1099 (1978) If a judge participates in a conspiracy the acts which do not have judicial immunity are subject to suit and judgment against the judge The true test in a judicial proceeding is whether the judge is acting within the jurisdiction. With absence of jurisdiction there is no judicial immunity. When a judge presides over a case which he has no authority to preside the acts are void and he loses judicial immunity. If appointed judge purports to preside under the original appointment, is an order void if the judge has no authority or jurisdiction over the new matter. The three legged stool upon which the judge is standing when the judge engages in the judicial act which gives rise to the claim. All three legs of the jurisdictional stool must be present. All must be sturdy. If any leg fails, neither the judge, nor the judges judicial immunity defense, can stand. 1. The Court must have subject matter jurisdiction. This element or leg is about the power of the court as an institution, not the power of the individual who presides as judge. Subject matter jurisdiction allows the act to be done by the court in that kind of case. 2. The court must have jurisdiction over the particular case or matter. Generally this means that a case must be pending. That generally requires that a pleading was filed to activate the courts jurisdiction. This element or leg is also about the power of the court as an institution, not the power of the individual who presides as judge.

3. The judge must have authority to act as the judge. The judge must have jurisdiction over that court in that particular case. This element is sometimes mentioned in passing. It is
18

generally not in doubt. It is required. This element may be loosely stated as, the judge must be a judge and the judge must be the judge of the particular court with power over the particular case. When only one leg is challenged, a court which examines a different leg has engaged in judicial malpractice. The consequence of a judge acting without authority or jurisdiction over a case or court, he loses judicial immunity. He had no authority, He had no power, and His only duty was to not act. Treason ~ whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. V. Will, 449 U. S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct, 471 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) When reviewing a pro se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of actions. See e.g. Harrison v. U. S. Postal Service, 840 F.2d 1149, 1152 (4th Cir. 1988). The factual allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party Davis v. City of Portsmouth. 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 ( E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F.2d 1448 (4th /cur. 1984) I am not a lawyer since 2007 - I have been fighting for a Trial with a Judge with Jurisdiction - I didnt graduate from college - A lot of people dont know why I didnt graduate from College - It is because a year after Ted Bundy had killed a girl from my high school in Tallahassee. I was being stalked by a local boy in Statesboro Ga. - I reported it to my RA, that this boy made me nervous, I had an apartment on campus - One Friday night in the middle of the he broke into my apartment and hurt me he went to jail for 6 years. I was on trial for the way I lived my life just as he was on trial for what he had done to me. I understand Justice I understand the Old Boy Network A mistake was made in 2007 the Slippery Sloop of injustice started with a lot of people not knowing the whole truth about Defendant Ilona and that included Plaintiff. What I have learned about Defendant Ilona and many have learned is horrid. This is just one of many things Ilona used to control me in helping her cover her mess with the Theft of the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. I am Never Never Never going to give up I have gone from being a victim of Ilona & Davids to being a victim of yall. Judge Clark in his Order has taken away all my rights as a citizen in the United States of America by saying I cannot file anything without his permission. He didnt write it once he wrote it 3 times. The question is how premeditated was it. He has created a Trustee type situation that he must take into consideration when reading this and in his decision to sign this or not sign this. But, it should be date stamped November 20, 2012 showing I had met the requirements to perfect my Appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Plaintiff has proven more than once that she has not had a Judge with jurisdiction, that there has been Fraud on the court by Defendants and their attorneys. It should not be held against
19

Plaintiff that the Old Boy Network doesnt like her or she is not a part of it. Attached copy of Exhibits that Plaintiff is assuming is in the Box sent back from the Circuit Court of Virginia that has not been opened by Plaintiff. Exhibits 1 -4 Show the Money Ilona owes Plaintiff for this suit and other moneys for the purpose and reason of Lis Pendens Exhibit 5 Documents that back up all other Fraud on the Court The information on the Bellefonte Property The Documents that Ilona filed and lied in the documents that prove Judges didnt have jurisdiction, the documents that show Attorneys Motion to Supreme Court that Plaintiff had not filed a Statement of Facts.
November 20, 2012 Janice Wolk Grenadier Pro Se 15 West Spring Street Alexandria, Virginia 22301 Jwgrenadier3@aol.com 703-836-9655 202-368-7178

Certificate of Service Documents have been delivered to Judges Chambers on November 20, 2012 for Judge Clarks approval as called for in Orders. Copies have been delivered to Defendants lawyers ( all Defendants lawyers have received e-mail copies) Judge James Clark shall notify all partys that Statement of Facts was delivered with the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia and has been filed to and will have it filed stamped and sent to all parties involved as Trustee to Plaintiffs suit. Ilona Grenadier/ GIC /Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffett & Kiesler PC to Ben Dimuro at DimuroGinsburg, 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria, VA 22314 & David Grenadier to Michael J. Weiser, 510 King St., Suite 416, Alexandria, VA 22314. November 20, 2012

Janice Wolk Grenadier

20

21