Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Neema Rusibamayila Assistant Director, Preventive Health Services RCH Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare
review availability and status of human resources with midwifery capabilities at the community level
Health Workforce Alliance (GHWA), ICM, FIGO, ICS Integrare, Jhpiego, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT) and University of Southampton
What is the appropriate midwifery workforce, and how is it to be deployed, to equitably deliver MNH interventions at scale and quality, and what (including costs) needs to be in place to achieve universal access?
gaps Collection of data to fill the gaps Analysis of data Stakeholder verification workshops
Areas assessed
Essential interventions for MNH and utilization.
Access, equity, quality, efficiency and utilization of MNH services. Midwifery workforce. Production and performance of the midwifery workforce. Work environment. Enabling working environment to maximise and sustain the midwifery workforces contribution to MNH. Management and policies. Management system and policies, leadership and partnerships to maximise and sustain the midwifery workforce Financing. Financial resources for providing adequate financial incentives and developing costed plans to maximise and sustain the midwifery workforce
Key findings
Essential MNH interventions and utilization
11 categories of health workers comprise the midwifery
allows them to provide at the least the 7 basic EmOC signal functions, their working environment and/or practical training is insufficient to allow them to do so
Key findings
Midwifery workforce
Equitable distribution of
deployment processes are still issues in ensuring RCH services are equitably delivered vacancy rates estimated between 40% to 86%
Lack of full midwifery
Key findings
Work environment
Distribution of facilities
seems to align with areas where most pregnancies expected, though not conclusive
referral, commodity and equipment systems, and to find ways to improve staff motivation
Key findings
Management and policies
Targets, policies,
45000
Staffing needs for the RCH units in Tanzania according to the DPSG.
Staffing needs according to the 2012 draft staffing guidelines - Total number of EN, ANO, CO, AMO and MO ]working in the RCH units Number of EN currently available in the RCH units (48% of EN is working in the RCH units)
strategies, standards, guidelines, information systems, donors and implementing partners are in place and aligned
Implementation of these
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
Number of ANO currently available in the RCH units (34% of ANO is working in the RCH units)
10000
5000
Number of CO currently available in the RCH units (11% of CO is working in the RCH units)
0 2010 - current number 2017 - total number of of facilities facilities required under MMAM
Key findings
Financing
Fragmented health financing system
7% of the total health expenditure (THE), with THE for RH estimated at 18% of THE
Health insurance initiatives expanding
16000 Supply of EN 14000 Supply of ANO Supply of CO Supply of AMO 12000 Supply of MO Total staffing needs 10000
2015 39% 407% 42% 66% 46% 2015 143% 1474% 118% 207% 1170%
2020 40% 423% 42% 73% 66% 2020 130% 1380% 104% 207% 1504%
2025 39% 416% 40% 77% 81% 2025 113% 1215% 90% 195% 1651%
Suggested solutions
Eight policy options identified for costing comprising issues
allowances for newly posted workers This estimate does not take into account annual inflation
Using LiST, estimated that up to 259,000
Assessment conclusions
Total number of projected pregnancies 2015-2025 is
42,898,166
If the 8 policy options are implemented from 2013, this
will save 2,000-6,400 maternal lives and 11,800-30,000 newborn lives; and prevent 900-2,900 stillbirths
Total cost between 2014 and 2025 is USD
$2,057,760,586
By 2025, 129,000-259,000 lives could be saved at the
findings and proposed solutions and make recommendations for discussion with the Minister of Health and Social Welfare Develop a joint action plan (departments within the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, as well as other relevant Ministries) for roll-out of proposed solutions
Acknowledgements
Authors: Neema Rusibamayila, Maryjane Lacoste, Dunstan Bishanga, Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Christel Janssen, Kathy Herschderfer, Mariam Khan, Rutasha Dadi.
Institutions: The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, ICS Integrare, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), UNFPA/Tanzania, UNICEF/Tanzania, WHO/Tanzania, USAID/Tanzania, AMCA and Jhpiego/Tanzania
Asanteni sana