PSYCHOLOGY OF EVIL

Home

About

Do evil people know that they are evil?

Do extremists ever see more clearly than the rest of us?

Search

Homosexuality and radical social change

Posted on September 16, 2012

Archives
November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010

There is a gay agenda, namely to make gay behavior acceptable. There is a case to be made that this is harmful, and David Kupelian makes the case, in his book The Marketing of Evil. David Kupelian is religious, and I am not, but his case has merit even if you are a complete atheist. Consider the following quote: Until all woman are lesbians, there will be no true political revolution. (Feminist author and journalist Jill Johnston.) We might wonder why a feminist would want this outcome. Perhaps an explanation comes from the following quote: We cant destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage. ( Feminist author Robin Morgan, who became an editor at Ms. magazine.) Here is what Kupelian says: First, lets be very clear about what were looking atpure rage, and all-consuming hatred of men, and often a hatred of God also. If you think Im exaggerating, read the writings of these people for yourself. You will be shocked at the depth and intensity of their anger..Indeed, in some well known cases, feminist leaders report having been sexually abused as children or beaten by a violent husband. Apparently, they have concluded in their blind anger that all men are predatory beasts and molesters, and thus are determined to save their fellow women from the slavery and oppression of family life. The Catholic Church had a major sex scandal, usually identified by the ubiquitous news tag Pedophile Priests. Kupelian notes that this tag is not completely accurate, it was more accurate to identify the priests as homosexuals who assaulted teenage boys. And he says there is hypocrisy here, because the same media that exposed this issue, gave sympathetic coverage to critics of the American Boy Scouts who criticized them for not wanting to have homosexuals in charge of their boys. He adds that at least fifty United Way chapters have ceased to fund the Boy Scouts, some local governments and school districts have declared it to be discriminatory, and the American Civil Liberties Union attacks it endlessly.

Meta
Register Log in

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Kupelian notes that historically the Boy Scouts of America has had its own problem with sexual offenses committed by adult leaders against Scouts. and that they understand that adults interested in sexual contact with young people gravitate toward careersallowing proximity to their preypositions such as coaches, teachers, scoutmasters and priests. Kupelian: So the big question: Why does the mainstream press condemn the Catholic Church for allowing predatory homosexuals to destroy the lives of boys, while simultaneously condemning the Boy Scouts of America for trying to avoid precisely the same thing in their organization? It does seem odd to me that any honest person would attack the Boy Scouts on this basis. (Though a news item has just come in saying that not only was there a lot of sexual abuse in the Boy Scouts, but there were cover-ups of that abuse. see sources below, Los Angeles Times, October 19, 2012.) Consider this (not in the Kupelian book) The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education sent out a fundraising e-mail about a case it had taken a couple of years ago at Missouri State University. The letter itself sums it up best: Emilys troubles began in her freshman year when a class assignment required that she display homosexual behavior and write a reflection paper on that experience. Emily chose not to participate in the behavior but to nevertheless write the paper as if she haditself a compromise of her beliefs. Homosexuals naturally want their behavior to be accepted, but some of them, and their sympathizers, get simply too aggressive in pushing that acceptance. For instance, in some states, like California, homosexual proselytizing is mandated by law, starting in the earliest grades. One would think that little children could be spared sexuality discussions period. Let them be children. Is homosexuality genetic? It would seem to me that it probably is, or else it is due to prenatal influences. Some people seem to be homosexual as soon as they have sexual feelings. Kupelian disagrees, he says there is no proof so far of genetic influences. I havent looked into articles on this topic, but I do know one woman who had boyfriends, then had a bad experience with one of them, then took up with a female lover for the next couple of decades. I also have a distant female relative who married, raised a family, divorced, and then took up with a female lover. It would seem in the latter cases that there is some choice involved. In fact, there is always choice involved, you can have feelings, but you do not have to follow where those feelings lead. Kupelian tells the tale of Robert Baumann, who despite having a family and being a conservative congressman from Maryland, was caught having a rendezvous with a male prostitute. Bauman wrote that at a young age: This was a frightening force from deep within my being, an involuntary reaction to the sight, smell, and feel of other boys. I neither understood nor accepted it. And I came to hate myself because of thishorrible weakness. Bauman also wrote How could any normal and moral human being do what I did? How could anyone, however callous, repeatedly be unfaithful to ones spouseIn many ways I was driven by a force over which I seemed to have little controlI seemed willing to risk my marriage, my wife and children, even life itself
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

After being caught with the prostitute, Bauman lost his family. Gay behavior isnt exactly consensual behavior between 2 adults. A widely cited 1978 study by Alan Bell and Martin Wineburg reported that 43 percent of homosexuals had more than five hundred sex partners during their lifetime. That is a recipe for a large spreading of sexual disease. One could also ask, if all men, whether gay or not, had 500 partners, what sort of society would we have? One thing that peeves me, as a blogger on evil, is people who lie for an agenda. For instance, gay activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen advocated lying, in the book where they outlined the public relations plan they had been advocating for fellow gays for years. After The Ball became the public relations bible of the gay rights movement. One part that bothers me is their assertion that It makes no difference that the ads are lies, not to us, because were using them to ethically good effect to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies, and far more wicked ones. I would argue that if they (or advocates of any agenda) want our trust, they have to be honest with us. A society of liars cannot last. You can always have, what seems to you, a great excuse to lie. For instance, in another part of Kupelians book, he quotes Palestinian journalist Sami El Soudi who said that almost all Palestinian (movie) directors (fake horrible battle scenes with the Israelis, using) all possible means, including trickery and fabulation, to fight against the tanks and airplanes the enemy has and we dontwhen a scene was well done the onlookers laughed and applauded. Whatever your agenda is, be honest with us. Journalists may also rationalize biased behavior. Gay journalist Ramon Escobar (a MSNBC producer) said This whole issue of balance that we as journalists are supposed to achieve When we cover the black community, Ive never seen a newsroom where youre covering one side and then you have to go run out and get the Klans point of view. He said this at the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association conference of Sept 7-10, 2000. This is a bad argument. If, for example, you are covering the issue of homosexuals as scout leaders in the Boy Scouts, you should get the opinion of the folks who run the Boy Scouts, even if they criticize gays for their behavior. To do otherwise is to be dishonest with the public. Kirk and Madsen advocated desensitization (namely to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome.) and they also advocated that negative images be associated with their opponents such as Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered or castrated, hysterical backwoods preachers, drooling with hate, Nazis, etc. Then there is the hate crimes issue. There are now laws that say if you were assaulted, the perpetrator would get one sentence, but if you were assaulted because of your homosexuality, the perpetrator would receive a more severe sentence. Is this really fair? We have to be aware of the agendas of some people, which may make no sense to us. Kupelian says that: In 1948, Indiana University zoologist Alfred Kinsey released the book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. This was supposedly a dispassionate scientific study of American male sex habits, and it had a lot of influence. More than five decades later, he is still referred to as the father of the sexual revolution. Indiana University portrayed Kinsey as a conservative Republican and family man, and the press believed it. In reality, he was sadistic and a bi/homosexual, among other things. In 1997, a biographer of Kinsey, James Jones, revealed: The man I came to know bore no

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

resemblance to the canonical Kinseyhe approached his work with missionary fervorHe wanted to undermine traditional morality, to soften the rules of restraint People like this exist, from Jill Johnston (quoted at the opening of this post) to Alfred Kinsey. All sorts of agendas that dont make sense to most of us, do exist. Ill close with my wild experience with gays. My romantic interest (girlfriend) had a bad experience with me and eventually became a lesbian. She then tried to reconcile with me, but this was thirty years later, and I didnt even recognize her, and when I did, I caused a tragedy. What happened next is so unbelievable that I can say with confidence that you wont believe it, but here goes: After my ex went gay, I was attacked drugged first, and then molested multiple times. For various reasons, I believe I was attacked by a man, and women too. The details are rather graphic so just take my word for it. The organization that attacked me has drugs that affect sexual behavior too. In fact their first attack was with a sex drug, in an effort to plunge me into sexual behavior. As a result of the drug, I know what it is to be sex-crazed to the nth degree. They even have a homosexual drug which they used only once, that let me know what it feels like to be a sexcrazed woman. What I refer to as the homosexual drug showed me that to some small extent, there are inactive parts of our brain that perhaps in some men are activated, and that might explain homosexuality to some extent. I should say that I am no sexual innocent, but after having plunged into uncontrollable behavior in my hormone-fueled adolescence, I wanted to escape it. I wanted to be a decent person. Some very creepy people felt differently. One reason I cant get my story to be believed is that nobody can grasp a) that people with agendas like this exist, and b) that I am important enough to attract attackers, and c) if I did attract attackers, Im told they would just shoot me. The organization that did this to me was very diverse there were gays and straights, blacks and whites, men and women. It was anti-Semitic. My assumption is that most gays would abhor the activities of this organization. Good and evil divide every group that Ive known. Sources: (book) Coming Apart by Charles Murray (book) The Marketing of Evil by David Kupelian (book) The Gentleman from Maryland: The Conscience of a Gay Conservative One book I did NOT use but which looks relevant is: A Queer Thing Happened To America by Michael L. Brown about which one reviewer said: All in all, this book is a devastating rebuttal of the homosexualist agenda. . . . It is one long volume allowing the other side to speak for itself, condemning itself in the process. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-scouts-oregon-20121019,0,5468251.story? track=rss (on new scandal of sex abuse in the boy scouts.)
Rate this: Like this:

1 Votes Be the first to like this.

This entry w as posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Do evil people know that they are evil?

Do extremists ever see more clearly than the rest of us?

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Leave a Reply
Enter your comment here...

PSYCHOLOGY OF EVIL

Theme: Twenty Ten

Blog at WordPress.com.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com