TATS PLUMBER

Appendix F Course Evaluation Documents

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F1

TATS PLUMBER

INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION REPORT INSTRUCTOR:__________________________________________________________ GRADE:_____ COURSE:___________ DATE:_______ LOCATION:__________ GUIDES FOR EVALUATION P = POOR F = FAIR G = GOOD E = EXCELLENT

ELEMENTS OF A LEARNING SESSION PROVIDED BY THE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION ITEM Prepares student for learning: Provides instructional materials to students as applicable: Explains to students the layout of the training facility (as applicable) Conveys enthusiasm to the students: Establishes and maintains rapport in a professional manner: Senses students needs: Holds the respect of the students: Allows students to communicate with him/her: Provides clarification, amplification, and reinforcement of the objectives as necessary for achievement of the TSP objective: Handles behavior problems in an effective manner: Follows the TSP: Selects and uses media facilities and/or equipment: Uses instructional skills effectively: Teaches on the students' level: Uses good questioning techniques: Speaks clearly and concisely: Shows care in personal appearance: P F G E

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F2

TATS PLUMBER

INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION REPORT (continued) EVALUATION ITEM (continued) Demonstrates flexibility in adjusting to unplanned and spontaneous learning situations: Displays knowledge of subject matter: Demonstrates adequate capability in using learning materials: Manages time effectively: Shows evidence of careful planning: STUDENT RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION Evidence of student and instructor interaction: Evidence of class involvement: Evidence of attainment of objective through testing: OVERALL EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Has the evaluator reviewed the TSP and associated course materials? YES NO I certify that the instructor was critiqued immediately after evaluation. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Signature of Evaluator (Name and Title typed or printed) DATE ======================================================================= TO BE COMPLETED BY INSTRUCTOR ======================================================================= I have been critiqued on this evaluation. My instructor improvement plan is as follows: P F G E

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F3

TATS PLUMBER

TRAINING OBSERVATION REPORT SECTION A (General Information) 1. Date of Visit: 2. Start time: 3. Location: 4. Instructor's name: 5. Course in progress 6. Evaluator's name: 7. Number of students: Rank: Instructor/student ratio (actual): Rank: Unit: Completion time:

Use this scale for Sections B and C 1 = To standard 2 = Deficiency noted (Explain in Section D) 3 = Not applicable SECTION B (Administrative preparation) 1. Visitor's folder current & available: a. Training schedule current & available: b. Class roster current & available: c. POI current & available: 2. Instructor credentials current & available: (ITC certificate/orders awarding ASI/SQI) 3. Lesson plan/Training Support Package current & available: (ITC & proponent certificates) 4. Copies available of any approved waivers: 5. Training references for class available: 6. Required training area available: 7. Required training aids available: 8. Required ammunition available: ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) RATING

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F4

TATS PLUMBER

TRAINING OBSERVATION REPORT (continued) SECTION B (Administrative preparation) (continued) 9. Facilities meet course requirements: 10. Required equipment available and operational: SECTION C (Conduct of training) 1. Communicated material clearly and effectively 2. Maintained eye contact with students: 3. Demonstrated knowledge of class material: 4. Stated task/condition/standard: 5. Used methods/techniques suited to the learning session: a. Focused on the subject: b. Stressed main points: c. Defined new terms: ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) ( ___ ) RATING ( ___ ) ( ___ )

d. Made on-the-spot corrections and praises: e. Answered questions: f. Asked questions to assess student progress:

g. Summarized: h. Gave examples: i. j. k. Actively involved students: Used training aids effectively: Used transitions: (such as "We have just talked about...", "Now we are going to...", "After that we will...")

3. Students performed tasks as required: 4. Tests, exams, and practical exercises administered:

( ___ ) ( ___ )

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F5

TATS PLUMBER

SECTION D: (Comments) Explain any ratings of 2 from Sections B or C in terms of impact on student attainment of course objectives. (major/moderate/minor/no impact):

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F6

TATS PLUMBER

COURSE EVALUATION SUMMARY REPORT Class Location: _________________________ Class Number:___________ Conducted from _________to __________ 19______ 1. Number of students who began course: ____ 2. Number of student(s) who were dropped from the course: ____ 3. Number of students graduated from course: ____ 4. Primary reason(s) for dropping student(s):

5. Summary description of strengths of the course (i.e., lessons, tests, quality of instruction) as identified by the student evaluation reports:

6. Summary description of weaknesses of course (i.e., lessons, tests, quality of instruction) as identified by the student evaluation reports:

7. Specific recommendations for improving the course (to include TSPs, tests/examinations, student guides, training management plan, and/or POI).

_________________________________________________________________________________ (Course Managers Print Rank/Name) (Signature) Send to: Commandant U.S. Army Engineer School ATTN: ATSE-TD Fort Leonard Wood, MO 65473-5000

10/15/98 51K1CMPF.doc

F7