Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SM
ACHIEVER www.ed.gov • May 1, 2005 • Vol. 4, No. 7
U
nder a new approach to implementing No Child Left
Behind (NCLB), states that can demonstrate they are state accountability plans or consolidated applications, titled
raising student achievement and meeting several guid- “Raising Achievement: A New Path for No Child Left Behind,”
ing principles can request additional flexibility to help them builds on the fundamental principles of the law while taking
meet the law’s goals of getting every child to grade level by into account the unique situations of states.
2013–14, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings “Think of this new policy as an equation,” she said. “The
announced last month at a meeting with the nation’s state edu- principles of the law, such as annual testing and reporting of
cation chiefs. The meeting was held at George Washington’s subgroup data, plus student achievement and a narrowing of
estate at Mount Vernon, Va., where three years ago the law was the achievement gap, plus overall sound state education poli-
first introduced to the chiefs. cies, equal a new, commonsense approach to implementation
of No Child Left Behind.…In other words, it is the results that
“Our goal is to take motivated students and give them the help and truly matter, not the bureaucratic way that you get there.
support they need to get through,” said Armando Gonzales II, the That’s just common sense, sometimes lost in the halls of the
10th-grade integrated government.”
science teacher at the
California Academy of
For more information about the new policy, including the
Mathematics and secretary’s speech, visit www.ed.gov. For highlights of “Raising
Science. At left, one of Achievement,” see Page 3.
Gonzales’ students,
Iván López, works
on a project.
The Variable That Makes
The Difference Factors in
e School
California Math and Scienc
l Equation
Small Groups for Successfu
On th
:
at u re d . Like n ew parents, we al g.”
infant law has m
, an d as we g et better at parentin
ong
things as we go al ks at a
, in her remar
ation M argaret Spellings ashington’s
U.S. Secretary of
Educ
ate ed uc ation chiefs, George W
e nation’s st
meeting with th ril 7, 2005.
ta te at Mou nt Vernon, Va., Ap May 17
es 8:00–9:00 p.m. ET
Education News Parents Can Use
for details.
A New Path for
Raising Achievement
S
ince its inception three years ago, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has dramatically changed
American education by driving up achievement, increasing accountability, giving parents
options and expanding the use of scientifically based instruction. At the same time, the U.S.
Department of Education has recognized the need to give states some alternatives in implementing the law,
provided that they are increasing student achievement.
Last month, the Department announced a set of guiding principles, titled “Raising Achievement: A New Path for No Child Left
Behind,” which takes into consideration the unique situations of states. An example of this new approach is providing more flexibili-
ty to states to use alternate assessments and modified achievement standards for students with disabilities. States would be able to
include, for accountability purposes, the test scores from such alternative assessments of students with persistent academic disabilities
in determining adequate yearly progress, subject to a cap of 2 percent of the total tested population. By comparison, the current reg-
ulation permits states to give alternate assessments to students with significant cognitive disabilities, about 1 percent of all students.
In addition, the Department is directing an additional $14 million in immediate support for these students and, later this summer,
would provide states with a comprehensive tool kit to help them identify and assess students with disabilities.
These principles will guide the Department’s decisions when considering amendments to state accountability plans or consoli-
dated applications, allowing for innovative methods for achieving the goals of NCLB. Below is a list of those principles, each fol-
lowed by some examples of ways in which states may demonstrate their adherence to each principle.
Ensuring that students are learning:
• Adequate yearly progress (AYP) results;
• Significant improvement in overall achievement or in specific grade levels on state assessments, particularly for subgroups; and
• National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results that show reductions in the achievement gap.
Making the school system accountable:
• Assessments in reading/language arts and mathematics in grades 3–8 and once in high school by 2005–06;
• Alternate assessments and achievement standards based on content standards; and
• A four-year longitudinal graduation rate that can also be disaggregated by student subgroups.
Ensuring that information is accessible and parental options are available:
• Reader-friendly report cards accessible online or through other means (e.g., newspapers, direct mail);
• Schools identified for improvement before the beginning of the school year; and
• State-approved providers of supplemental services available in both urban and rural areas, as well as for special education and
limited English proficient students.
Improving the quality of teachers:
• Reports on the percentage of public school classes taught by highly qualified teachers;
• Measures for rigorously evaluating teachers’ subject-matter knowledge in each core academic subject taught; and
• Policies for ensuring that low-income students and their more affluent peers are comparably taught by highly qualified teachers.
In addition to considering a state’s implementation of these principles, the Department may consider such factors as dropout
rates or fiscal management in providing additional flexibility. For the full listing of these factors along with examples evidencing
a state’s implementation of the guiding principles, visit www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/raising/new-path-long.html.
3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ED PUBS THE POSTAGE AND FEES PAID
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
P.O. Box 1398
JESSUP, MD 20794-1398
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
ACHIEVER EDUCATION
Permit NO. G-17
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300 SM May 1, 2005 • Vol. 4, No. 7 PRESORTED
FIRST CLASS
“When it comes to
the education of our
children ... failure is
not an option.”
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
ENTION, P UB LI C!
ATT ent About
Seeking Comm
tion’s Special Education Law
Na ative
ffi ce of Sp ec ial Ed ucation and Rehabilit
of Education’s O ons for
he U.S. Department on th e up coming draft of regulati
T
m m en t
seeking public co EA). First enacted
Services (OSERS) is isa bi lit ies Education Act (ID
Individ ua ls wi th D mmunities in pro-
the newly amended lla rs to ass ist states and local co
EA provides fed era l do rying degrees
three decades ago, ID im ate ly six m illion students with va
portunities for ap pr ox e reforms of
viding educational op riz ed in D ec em be r 2004, builds on th
legislation, reautho ts for students, while
of disability. The new ng pa ren tal ch oi ce and academic resul
, inclu di
No Child Left Behind ilities.
qu ality ed ucation for children with disab try where individuals wi
ll have the
re a e co un
addressing other iss ue s th at en su
st a series of public he
arin gs ac ro ss th , Calif.; June 24,
D ep ar tm en t wi ll ho , N ash vil le, Te nn .; June 22, Sacramento
This summer, the nio, Texas; June 17 ington, D.C.
co m m en ts: June 6, San Anto Ill.; and July 12, Wash ” in the
opportuni ty to m ak e
Yo rk , N .Y .; June 29 , Ch icago ,
ea se in clu de “C om ments on IDEA 2004
27, N ew comments@ed.gov. Pl
Las Vegas, Nev.; June su bm itted electronically to
Suggestions m ay als o be tment’s Individuals
in pu t pr ocess, visit the Depar
subject line of the m ess ag e. ideli ne s fo r th e 04.html. Or
th e pu blic hearings as well as gu v/ po lic y/ sp eced/guid/idea/idea20
For specific loca tio ns fo r
t of 2004 Web page
at ww w. ed .go ll the Federal
on Im pr ov em en t Ac de vic e fo r th e de af (TDD) is needed, ca
ati telecommunications
with Disabilities Educ at (202) 245-7468. If a
ions to O SE RS
direct quest 877-8339.
rvice (FIRS) at (800)
Information Relay Se