Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 15 15
18
18 21 27 31 34
40
40 41 45 50
55
58
58 60 60 61 64 65 65
a. Carving Obscenity out of the First Amendment b. Less Value Speech and Pornography 3.2.1.1.2. Europe compared: French outrage aux bonnes moeurs 3.2.1.2.1. The United States: Ofcial Art without Ofcial View 3.2.1.2.2. Europe compared: Ofcial View without Ofcial Art 3.2.2. Hate Art: Restrictions on Hate Speech 3.2.2.3.1. Cross-burning: Virginia v Black 3.2.2.3.2. NEA and the Respect Prong 3.2.3. Explaining the Difference: Civility vs. Decency? 3.2.4. Conclusion: The Limits of Law 3.3. Alternative WAYS of Dealing with Offensive Art 3.3.1. Counterspeech: Talking Back to Offensive Art 3.3.2. The Role of the Exhibitor: A Bridge towards the Community 3.4. Conclusion: the Artist and the Community
65 67 67 70 73 75 81 82 83 84 86 86 87 90
94
95 95 96 98 98 101 106 106 107 109 110
114
115 117 118 119 120 121 126 127 129
Chapter 6 Digital Preservation of the Cultural Record in Archives: A Comparative Copyright Analysis
6.1. Exclusive economic rights applied to the activities of archives 6.1.1. Acquisition and Preservation of Records 6.1.2. Dissemination of Records 6.2. The impact of moral rights on the activities of archives 6.3. Exceptions in favour of archives 6.3.1. Temporary Reproduction 6.3.2. Ofcial Documents and Public Speeches 6.3.3. Archives Exemption 6.3.4. Abuse of Right versus Fair Use 6.4. Copyright protection for special kinds of copyrighted works 6.4.1. Software 6.4.2. Databases 6.5. Legal protection for technological measures and rights management information 6.5.1. Denitions: Rights Management Information 6.5.2. Denitions: Technical Measures 6.5.3. Scope of Protection: Copyright Management Information 6.5.4. Scope of Protection: Technical Measures 6.5.5. Exceptions for Archives 6.5.6. Impact on Digital Archiving 6.5.7. The Future of Digital Archiving 6.6. Conclusion
132
134 135 136 140 142 144 147 147 151 155 155 158 161 164 165 168 171 177 181 182 186
190
190 192 192 193 193 194 194 195 195 196 197 200 200 204 204
7.6. Problematic cases in literature and case law: less radical disposal 7.6.1. Struycken and the Netherlands Architecture Institute 7.6.2. Halewijn and the Periodical Story 7.6.3. Oxenaar and Kruit on the One Hand, Ohra on the Other 7.6.4. Hageblling and the City of Minden 7.7. Is there more to be said relating to these cases? 7.7.2. Destruction Does Not Qualify as a Forbidden Atteinte 7.7.3. Conversions or Alteration 7.8. Conclusion
7.7.1. Does Complete Destruction Qualify as Atteinte as Mentioned in the Berne Convention? 211
Chapter 8 Does the Moral Right of the Author Extend to Destruction of his Work?
8.1. Introduction 8.2. BelgiumThe destruction of a work of art. Can moral rights come to the rescue? 8.2.1. The Right of Integrity in Belgium 8.2.2. Overview of Belgian Case Law 8.2.3. Discussion 8.2.3.2.1. A dilemma (partially) solved by the concept of abuse of right 8.2.3.2.2. Both subjective rights are equal (and none is more equal) 8.2.3.3.1. The nature of the work 8.2.3.3.2. Motives underlying the destruction 8.2.3.4.1. Duty to inform 8.2.3.4.2. Duty to maintain? 8.2.4. Concluding Remarks 8.3. The Netherlands Morals, Dogma and Destruction: Revolutionary Dutch Perspectives (?) 8.3.1. Introduction 8.3.1.1. Diverging Views 8.3.1.2. Honour and Reputation of the Author as the Core Value of Copyright 8.3.1.3. Conditions for a Valid Reason for Destruction 8.3.1.4. Jelles v Zwolle: Abuse of a Right Instead of Violation of a Right of Integrity 8.3.1.5. Consequences of the Decision: Increased Protection 8.3.1.6. Consequences of the Decision: Practice 8.3.1.7. Conclusion 8.4. GermanyThe moral right defence against the destruction of a work of art 8.4.1. Case Law: a Defence Against Partial Destruction Only 8.4.2. Legal Literature: Arguing Against the Legitimacy of Destruction 8.5. ConclusionThe right of integrity vS. the right of destruction: a balancing act 8.5.1. The International Scene 8.5.2. The National Scene
226
226 227 227 228 230 231 233 234 235 236 236 237 238 238 239 240 241 242 243 246 247 247 247 251 254 254 256
260
260 261 261 263 266 270 271 272 276 279 279 281 281 282 283 283 284
9.1.3. Fair Use in the Second Circuit and the New York District Court: Banality Is No Saviour 265
Chapter 10 One Year and Millions of Euros Later: Taking Stock of the Implementation of the European Directive 2001/84/EC on Droit de Suite
10.1. Introduction 10.2. The key provisions of the Directive 10.2.1. Right to Information 10.2.2. The Management of Royalties: Collecting Societies 10.3. Implementation of the Directive in four Member States 10.3.1. Member States with Droit de Suite Legislation prior to the Directive 10.3.1.1.1. Previous regime 10.3.1.1.2. Implementation in Belgium 10.3.1.2.1. Previous regime 10.3.1.2.2. Implementation in Germany 10.2.2. Member States without Droit de Suite Legislation prior to the Directive 10.3.2.1.1. Previous regime 10.3.2.1.2. Implementation in the Netherlands 10.3.2.2.1. Previous regime 10.3.2.2.2. Implementation in the United Kingdom 10.5. Bibliography
288 288 291 294 296 299 299 299 302 303 304 306 306 306 307 308 313
317
320
320 321 321 322 324 325 325 326 327 331 333 333 334 335 336
Chapter 12 UNESCOs Convention on Cultural Diversity and WTO Law: Complementary or Contradictory?
12.1. Introduction 12.2. Basic Features of the UNESCO Conventionon Cultural Diversity 12.2.1. Scope of Application 12.2.2. Rights and Obligations of the Parties to the Convention 12.3. The WTO Agreements and Cultural Diversity 12.3.1. The Dual Nature of Cultural Goods and Services 12.3.2. The Provision of Cultural Goods and Services as a Clear Example of Market Failure 12.3.3. Culture-Sensitive Provisions in the WTO Agreements? 12.4. Intersections between the WTO and the UNESCO Conventionon Cultural Diversity 12.4.1. Measures to Promote and Protect Cultural Diversity 12.4.2. Promoting Cultural Diversity in Development Policies 12.5. Conict of Norms 12.5.1. General Principles on Resolving Treaty Conicts 12.5.2. Conict Clauses and Their Practical Application 12.5.3. The Role of the Dispute Settlement Body 12.5.4. Evaluation of the Conict Clause in the Convention on Cultural Diversity 12.6. Conclusion
340
340 342 342 345 348 349 350 351 353 353 355 356 356 362 364 367 371
376
376 377 378 380 380 384 394 394 395 397 398 399 402 404 405 407 408 409 410
414
414 415 415 418 422 427 432 437 438 439 440 441 441
10
445
448
448 449 449 450 453 456 456 456 457 462 464 466
Chapter 16 Private Property Rights in Cultural Objects: Balancing Preservation of Cultural Objects and Certainty of Trade in Belgian and Dutch Law
16.1. Introduction 16.2. What are cultural objects? 16.3. The international framework: UNESCO (1954 and 1970), UNIDROIT (1995) and the European Directive 93/7 16.3.1. National Arrangements and International Precedents 16.3.2. The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention 16.3.3. European Union Directive 16.3.4. Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Conventionon Human Rights 16.4. Legal developments in Belgian law 16.4.1. Belgian Internal Law 16.4.2. Belgian Private International Law: Implementation of Directive 93/7 and the New Provisions of the PIL-Code 16.4.3. Analysis of the Internal Protective Measures 16.5. Legal developments in Dutch law 16.5.1. Dutch Internal Protection of Cultural Property 16.5.2. Claims to Foreign Cultural Property in the Netherlands 16.5.3. A Case and New Proposals for Reform 16.5.4. Analysis of Dutch Protective Measures 16.6. Conclusion: is the tension between legal certainty and the preservation of cultural patrimony a ground to adapt the general property rules?
470
470 471 472 472 474 475 477 478 479 484 485 486 486 487 490 491 491
11
Chapter 17 The Contract Between an Artist and a Gallery under Western European Law
17.1. General Remarks 17.2. Rules for Contracts with an Author, based on Copyright Law 17.2.1. The Creation or Material Expression of the Artwork 17.2.2. Warranty 17.2.3. The Exhibition 17.2.3. The Qualication of the Actions of the Author 17.3.1. Delivery of the Work 17.3.2. Specic Costs Linked with the Exhibition 17.3.3. Other Obligations Associated with the Exhibition 17.3.4. Information Duties of the Parties 17.3.5. Promotion of the Work 17.4. Sale of the work 17.4.1. The Capacity in Which the Gallery Acts 17.4.2. Delivery 17.4.3. Determination of the Price and Payment of the Artist 17.4.4. Failure to Abide by the Instructions Given 17.4.5. The Right of Restitution of the Work 17.5. Contracts Other than Sale Contracts Concluded by the Gallery Owner
496
496 498 500 503 503 504 506 510 511 511 512 513 513 515 515 516 517 517
17.3. The organisation of the exhibition: assignment of tasks between the gallery and the artist 505
522
523 524 525 528 530 534 536 537 541 548 550
12
Chapter 19 Great Expectations and Bitter Disappointments: A Comparative Legal Study into Problems of Authenticity and Mistake in the Art Trade
19.1. Prologue 19.1.1. Three examples 19.1.2. The questions 19.2. Concept of authenticity 19.3. Lacking authenticity 19.3.1. Warranties and opinions 19.3.2. Error 19.3.2.1.1. Error in substantia 19.3.2.1.2. Excusable error De non vigilantibus non curat praetora moral appreciation Error on the part of the seller 19.3.2.1.3. Relation between the different actions Error and duty to deliver Error and hidden defects 19.3.3. Mistake in Common Law 19.4. Conclusion
558
559 559 560 563 572 572 581 581 583 584 587 589 589 589 597 604
13
Part 1
In 2008 Jan Fabre (b. Antwerp, 1958) was at the focus of artistic interest. Marie-Laure Bernadac, the controversial curator of exhibitions such as Masculin/Feminin: le sexe de lart (Paris, 1995) invited Fabre to edit the fourth edition of Contrepoint: The Angel of the Metamorphosis. The thirty-nine rooms of the Richelieu wing of the Muse du Louvre were at his disposal to open a dialogue about the most important Flemish painters in the collection. Fabres self-estimation is legendary: I am the rst living artist to get a oneman exhibition in the Louvre. Jan van Eyck, Pieter Paul Rubens and Jan Fabre: equal fellow-craftsmen carrying on a tradition. There had earlier been a comparable initiative in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts in Antwerp in 2006. There, too, Homo Faber was set in confrontation with masterworks from the pictorial past. In Paris and Antwerp Fabre recycles works of art, installations and performances made earlier. For instance, in the 2006 Antwerp exhibition he showed videos and accessories from the Virgin/Warrior, Warrior/ Virgin performance which had previously been shown two years earlier in the Palais de Tokyo in Paris. In Antwerp he showed Virgin/Warrior, Warrior/Virgin on the main oor of the museum. Rubens monumental paintings provided the setting. The actual performance took place on 14 December 2004. Jan Fabre shut himself up with Marina Abramovic for four hours in a glass showcase. Both actors were at rst dressed in armour and embodied the ideas of sacrice and forgiveness. Later they were naked. In turn they were Warrior or Virgin. Now and then they wounded themselves, so that they could then write notices with their own blood for the public who were watching them from the other side of the glass walls. Fabre had toyed earlier with the concept of the warrior and thought it was a good opportunity to get together with Abramovic on stage in a live performance. It was actually the rst time that he staged such a double act with a living artist. That lady, twelve years older than him (b. Belgrade, 1946) was regarded as the icon of Body Art and has been called the grandmother of performance. Emil Hrvatin rightly suggested that here Fabre was not only exhibiting bodies but in fact put himself and Abramovic on the stage as institutions of contemporary performance art. As always with Fabre, the alliance was a strategic one. A canonized prototype, such as Abramovic, was introduced within his own artistic courtyard . In 2004 Abramovic had not given any performances for some time. In the period before that (1976-1989) she had explored the remotest corners of performance art with her partner, the artist Ulay. Moreover, within this alliance, she, as an artist, by denition used an emancipated, feminine visual language, a dimension which generally escaped Fabre and which was lost on him. He is the attacker, the war hero. Abramovic incorporates the sacrice, forgiveness. The sex-specic content is emphasized by her likeness to La Pucelle, the warrior Joan of Arc. She is the mother who shows him the way as a small boy. She is the Eternal Virgin, who leaves the theatre of war with a smile and shrugs her shoulders. The alternation of the virgin/warrior pattern or of the husband/wife role is a pose, just as the glazed air bubble is a pose. Old masters and traditional ideas always do well. However, they are thank God more stubborn than one would suspect.
16
17