Unitary Ceylon was an error: British Politician - Dr.

Rachael

Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to thank you very much for the opportunity to speak at this event,
which is dealing with such important issues.

I would like to thank Bruce Fein for his ………………… speech. [very moving]. I would also like to
thank Gopal who invited me here today.

Dr. Rachel Joyce

Dr. Rachel Joyce
I would like to extend my sympathies to any of you have family who have been killed, hurt or
otherwise affected by the conflict. In particular today I would like to extend my deepest condolences to
the family of Murukathasan Vanakulasingam, who, as we know, committed suicide on Friday, February
13, in a desperate attempt to draw the world's attention to the plight of his fellow Tamils in Sri Lanka. I
cannot condone the loss of such a young and promising life, but my heart goes out to his family.

Acts such as this suicide are committed when people feel desperate, powerless, and feel they have
virtually no avenues left for their people.

The Tamil people have lived on the island currently called Sri Lanka for millennia - in their own
contiguous, distinct, geographical territory. They lay claim only to the territory they have historically
lived in. In fact, the 3 million Tamils of the island constituted a self governing nation until invaded and
occupied by Colonial powers – in particular Britain, who amalgamated them with the Sinhala nation
purely for convenience. In retrospect, this cultural naivety was a mistake that has caused problems
since independence. I would like to apologise for the British part in that error.

At the time of independence in 1948, both 3 million Tamils and 17 million Sinhalese inherited a
reasonably healthy state. Sri Lanka’s prosperity could have been set, with a good geographical position
for trade, a strong and productive economy, and a beautiful setting for a tourist industry as well.

Unfortunately, since then there has been an increasing catalogue of cultural and human rights atrocities.
The chances for the two peoples to continue to live side by side, as two distinct, though not antagonistic
cultures, has continually been threatened. Why did the government on the island, as one of its first acts,
make 1 million Tamils of Indian origin stateless? Many of these Tamils were 6th generation and had no
other home. Why also did they opt for the ‘Sinhala Only’ Language Act in 1956?

And, 25 years later, what could possibly be the logic of Sinhala police torching the Jaffna library and its
ninety seven thousand rare historical books and manuscripts in 1981?

These acts of cultural disrespect and vandalism have been condemned before, but I condemn them
again now.

Since then a raft of atrocities have been committed. In the 1980s, hundreds of thousands of Tamils were
forced to flee the island, many coming here to Britain. There are also hundreds of thousands of
internally displaced people people within the island. Every aspect of normal life has been affected. The
closing of the A9 highway effectively trapped nearly half a million Tamil civilians.
A year ago, the Sri Lankan government unilaterally withdrew from the Norwegian-brokered ceasefire,
and under the leadership of its hawkish President, Mahinda Rajapaksa, embarked on this current
campaign. All the evidence suggests that unless the international community acts very soon, about a
quarter of a million people could be caught in a bloodbath. The Sri Lankan government has asked
Tamil civilians to come over to their side for “protection”, but there is an understandably deep fear of
such a move. The Tamil people have seen so much death and destruction. They are terrified of Sri
Lankan troops and their "holding camps", with all the stories of assaults and rape.

On the other side there are stories suggesting that the LTTE has, or might, shoot anyone who tries to
escape from the areas that remain under their control. But none of this is verifiable. The Sri Lankan
government restricts all journalists and independent observers from entering the conflict zone. The
reports from the few remaining aid or humanitarian agencies still allowed in the area are dismissed by
the Sri Lankan authorities as propaganda.

Amnesty International, who is impartial to any political agenda, and only campaigns on human rights,
has called the recent alleged sustained bombing of the Vanni hospital a “despicable act”, in fact stating
that such an attack could constitute a war crime. They also say the so called ‘welfare villages’ violate
the international prohibition on hostage taking.

Can Amnesty International and United Nations workers all be lying? Are the horrific pictures of
bombed-out hospitals and lines of dead men, women and children all be fake?

It is clear that the majority of the Tamil people do not trust the Government of Sri Lanka to safeguard
their lives or their futures.

And the British government could do much more to help. This is not just diplomatically – in the UN, in
the Commonwealth, and through direct pressure on the government. In a debate in 2007, it was
revealed that Britain licensed £7 million worth of weapons and military equipment for export to Sri
Lanka that year alone. What on earth were they thinking?

Part of the problem here ironically is the democracy in Sri Lanka. I am a strong supporter of
democracy, but there are different degrees of democracy. The Economist labels Sri Lanka a "flawed
democracy" in its 2006 rankings. This is because there is a minority – the Tamils – who will always be
at a significant disadvantage electorally. If Scotland wanted to leave the United Kingdom, and voted to
do so, they would not be stopped by the rest of the British people. Perhaps the very fact that they could
leave if they wished to has meant that their minority rights have always been protected in the UK, and
is probably the reason that Scotland do not actually want to leave the union.

Foreign Policy ranks Sri Lanka 25th (ie Alert Category) in its Failed States Index for 2007. Sri Lanka
was considered one of the "world's most politically unstable countries" by the World Bank and Asian
Development Bank in 2004. However, Sri Lanka, according to the US State Department in 2005, was
classified a "stable democracy" – but only when there was a ceasefire period, which shows how a
peaceful solution could be so advantageous to both sides.

I know the British Tamils Forum have requested that the UN and the International Community:

1. Call for an immediate ceasefire in Sri Lanka and initiate peace talks;
2. Require that Sri Lanka allow all necessary humanitarian assistance and access by international
humanitarian organizations and UN Agencies to the Vanni;
3. Put the Sri Lanka issue on the Security Council’s Agenda; and
4. Urge the Government of Sri Lanka to allow an international human rights monitoring mission
under the auspices of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

I fully support those points.

Edmund Burke said “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing”.

This woman will not do nothing. I can give you my commitment that I will do what I can to lobby for a
peaceful solution to the conflict to the best of my ability. Any just and lasting solution MUST be
acceptable to the Tamil people. All options must therefore be on the table for discussion.

I will raise this issue at the highest levels within the Conservative Party, and with the Conservative
Party Human Rights Commission. If elected, I will join the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Tamils.
In the meantime, I commit to you that I will do what I can to lobby on behalf of the people of Tamil
Eelam.