Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Randomized Trial to Compare Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Massachusetts Hospitals With Cardiac Surgery On-Site and Community Hospitals Without Cardiac Surgery On-Site MASS COMM
Alice K. Jacobs, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Joseph M. Massaro, Donald E. Cutlip, Joseph P. Carrozza, Anthony D. Marks, Nancy Murphy, Iyah K. Romm, Madeleine Biondolillo, Laura Mauri for the MASS COMM Investigators and Coordinators
Disclosures
This study was funded by Massachusetts Hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery. There are no relevant RWI to disclose.
Background
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has become a rare event following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with a reported incidence of 0.1-0.4% in contemporary series. As data supporting primary PCI for patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have emerged, the need for timely access to the procedure has justified the expansion of emergency PCI to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery, where reported outcomes have been favorable.
Background
Yet, controversy exists over the further expansion of non-emergency PCI to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery, due to concern over the risk to benefit ratio in a setting where timely access to PCI is less important for optimal cardiovascular outcomes, which is reflected in the Class IIb recommendation in the 2011 PCI guidelines. MASS COMM was designed in 2006, with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MA-DPH), to provide evidence on which to base regulatory policy decisions about performing non-emergency PCI in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery.
Aim
To determine the short-term safety and 12-month outcomes of PCI (excluding primary PCI for STEMI) performed at hospitals without in comparison to with on-site cardiac surgery in Massachusetts
Exclusion Criteria
left ventricular ejection fraction < 20% target lesions with: - unprotected left main stenosis >50% - device other than balloon angioplasty prior to stent - saphenous vein graft location - vessel serving only viable myocardium
Methods
Design
- prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled
non-inferiority trial
Co-Primary End Points - composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI),* repeat coronary revascularization or stroke (MACE) at 30-days (safety) and 12-months (effectiveness)
*Q wave or non-Q-wave; non-Q wave MI defined as CK twice ULN plus elevated CK-MB or CK-MB 3 times normal
Methods
Secondary Outcomes
- included all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, stroke,
ischemia-driven target vessel and target lesion revascularization; Academic Research Consortium (ARC) defined definite or probable stent thrombosis; emergency CABG; emergency or urgent PCI; and major vascular complications
Angiographic Subset
- random sample of 10% of enrolled patients, CEC blinded to treatment assignment assessed lesion and procedure success, complete revascularization, and the proportion of lesions meeting PCI guidelines Class I or II recommendations for anatomic indications to perform PCI
Statistical Methods
Analysis
- primary end points were compared for non-inferiority assessed via the Farrington-Manning test using relative risk non-inferiority margins of 1.5 and 1.3, respectively; P value of less than 0.05 on both end points required to determine noninferiority overall; all other end points compared for differences
Sample Size
- 3,447 evaluable patients to yield 80% to 85% power for the 30day safety end point (expected MACE 6-7%) and 85% to 88% power for the 12-month effectiveness end point (expected MACE 15-16%) for both arms
Statistical Methods
Analysis
- Formal non-inferiority testing on an intent-to-treat
basis (all randomized patients) - Patients missing the 12-month follow-up visit -> 99% of records successfully linked to mortality data from state vital statistic records - Multiple imputation used for patients with remaining missing information regarding MACE
- Formal PCI development program - Participation in MA-DPH special project for primary PCI - Signed Collaboration Agreement with on-site surgery hospital (24/7 back-up, patient arrival within 60 minutes) - Perform minimum 300 diagnostic procedures in each of previous 2 years; 36 primary PCI procedures/year
Baseline Characteristics
No On-Site Surgery On-Site Surgery (n 2774) (n=917) 64.711.8 64.211.8
31.8 91.1 31.7 60.0 33.6 92.9 32.2 60.5
Age, years Female Sex (%) Caucasian (%) Diabetes (%) Current or Former Smoker (%)
8.1
2.8 10.4
7.1
3.5 10.4
Baseline Characteristics
No On-Site Surgery On-Site Surgery (n 2774) (n=917)
Prior PCI (%) 29.0 27.3
5.4
24.1 19.0 44.8 27.0 55.410.3
7.0
20.2 17.1 46.8 28.1 56.09.7
# vessels treated # lesions treated Ref. vessel diameter (mm)* Lesion length (mm) Pre % stenosis
Final % stenosis**
meanSD; *P<0.001, **P=0.005
2.4612.04
1.519.68
P Value
<0.001
Components of 30-day endpoint (%) Death Myocardial Infarction Repeat Revascularization Stroke 0.7 6.5 2.7 0.4 0.3 6.5 3.5 0.1 1.96 (0.58-6.64) 1.01 (0.76-1.35) 0.77 (0.51-1.17) 3.93 (0.51-30.21) 0.44 1.00 0.25 0.21
P Value
<0.001
Components of 12-month endpoint (%) Death Myocardial Infarction Repeat Revascularization Stroke 2.3 8.6 8.5 1.0 2.4 7.8 9.9 0.8 0.95 (0.57-1.60) 1.10 (0.84-1.45) 0.86 (0.67-1.11) 1.24 (0.51-3.04) 0.89 0.55 0.24 0.83
At 30 days
At 12 months Stent thrombosis (%) At 30 days At 12 months Major vascular complications at 30 days
+Ischemia-driven
1.5
5.6 0.6 1.1 1.5
1.5
5.4 0.8 2.1 1.5
1.03 (0.56-1.92)
1.05 (0.75-1.48) 0.75 (0.31-1.81) 0.55 (0.30-1.02) 1.04 (0.56-1.92)
1.00
0.86 0.48 0.07 1.00
P Value
0.59
81.3
60.2 94.1
74.7
59.8 91.5
1.09 (0.951.24)
1.01 (0.831.23) 1.03 (0.971.10)
0.22
1.00 0.37
Kaplan-Meier Curves for Freedom from MACE within 12-Months Post PCI Procedure
Summary
In patients treated with non-emergency PCI performed in hospitals without in comparison to with on-site cardiac surgery in Massachusetts:
There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, MI, repeat revascularization, or stroke at 30days or 12-months.
Limitations
While data were available in 97% of subjects at 30- days, data were not available for the 12-month follow-up visit in 13% of subjects. While the study inclusion criteria were broad, certain clinical and anatomic subsets were excluded, and thus, the findings in this study should not be extrapolated to these subgroups.
The study was powered to detect non-inferiority regarding the two co-primary composite end points but not the individual components, such as mortality or stroke.
Conclusions
These data suggest that performance of PCI at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery but with established programs and requisite hospital and operator procedural volume, may be considered an acceptable option for patients presenting to such hospitals for care.
Acknowledgements
Participating Hospitals
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital Boston Iniversity Medical Center Brigham and Womens Hospital Brockton Hospital Good Samaritan Medical Center Holy Family Hospital Lahey Clinic Lawrence General Hospital Lowell General Hospital Massachusetts General Hospital Melrose Wakefield Hospital Metro West Medical Center Norwood Hospital Saints Memorial Medical Center South Shore Hospital St. Elizabeths Medical Center Tufts Medical Center