Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Basel III Liquidity Risk Requirements
New regulation for liquidity risk Modeling on liquidity risk
Cash flow modeling Deposit modeling Stress test Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) Monitoring standards
Guiding Principles Basel (2008) Principles for Sound liquidity Risk Management and Supervision
A New Regulation for Liquidity risk Guiding Principles Basel (2009) Principles for Sound Stress Testing Practices and Supervision
In principle, the bank has two levers to manage the ratio: Increase ASF (-> higher costs)
Securitize existing business which is already term funded (and keep existing funding) Substitute liabilities with short duration (<1y) by liabilities with longer duration (>1yr) Substitute liabilities with low ASF (wholesale) by liabilities with higher ASF (retail) Originate new liabilities (and invest cash into assets with lower RSF)
ASF
1 2
NSFR =
RSF
ASF RSF
NSFR
in the chart
The institution can increase the ASF by adjusting the liability side of its balance sheet (e.g. liabilities with higher roll-over factors or longer duration) The institution can decrease the RSF by adjusting the asset side of ist balance sheet (e.g. assets with lower roll-over factors or shorter duration)
2.
Shifted stochastic distribution after inclusion of business strategy and future business assumptions
Dynamic analysis: Integrating business strategies Future business assumptions will largely impact the cash flow distribution Time dynamics (including external economic variables) will change the distribution too
Reference: Algo Liquidity Risk Management
From our analysis of historical deposit data, we determined deposit balances were driven by six primary factors or terms
1 2
Aging Term Build Incentive Term Seasonal Term Rate Seeking Term Burnout Term External Market Term
3 4 5 6
Stress Test
Stress Scenarios: Stress scenarios are essential for evaluating the durability and dependability of the liquidity management processes. Stress scenarios are generated according to the three risk factors: structural, contingent, and market risk.
Reference: Basel 2010 - International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring
ASSETS Cash and equivalents Cash and investments required to be segregated under federal or other regulations Trading securities Available-for-sale securities (includes securities pledged to creditors with the right to sell or repledge of $3,916,927 and $5,621,156 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively) Held-to-maturity securities (fair value of $6,282,989 and $2,422,335 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively; includes securities pledged to creditors with the right to sell or repledge of $2,092,570 and $884,214 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively) Margin receivables Loans receivable, net (net of allowance for loan losses of $822,816 and $1,031,169 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively) Investment in FHLB stock Property and equipment, net Goodwill Other intangibles, net Other assets Total assets LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY Liabilities: Deposits Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Customer payables FHLB advances and other borrowings Corporate debt Other liabilities Total liabilities $ 2,099,839 1,275,587 54,372 $ 2,374,346 609,510 62,173
15,651,493
14,805,677
Short duration Add cash on assets to offset long side, add debt on duration of asset liability side portfolio Offset the duration change by floating rate Call the bond and re-issue at lower rate when rates fall Positive convexity to offset the negative convexity of prepayment Net value recorded on either asset or liability side Add cash on assets side, add debt on liability side Net value recorded on either asset or liability side
Convexity Risk
Reference
Basel Committee 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision 2009 Strengthening the resilience of the banking sector 2009 Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision 2010 International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring 2011 Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems OCC 2012 Liquidity: Comptrollers handbook 1998 Interest rate risk: Comptrollers handbook FDIC 2008 Liquidity risk management
Appendix
E*Trade Deposit
Amount September 30, December 31, 2011 2012 Weighted-Average Rate September 30, December 31, 2012 2011
Sweep deposits (1) Complete savings deposits Other money market and savings deposits Checking deposits Time deposits (2) Total deposits (3)
(1) (2) (3)
A sweep product transfers brokerage customer balances to banking subsidiaries, which hold these funds as customer deposits in FDIC insured demand deposit and money market deposit accounts. Time deposits represent certificates of deposit and brokered certificates of deposit. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had $101.3 million and $89.2 million in non-interest bearing deposits, respectively.
Deposit accounts for 64% of the liability Need to build deposit balance model to predict balance change
Main portion of the liability
Basel III will influence internal processes, but is neither a blue-print for an internal steering system nor for an internal (liquidity) funds transfer price system
3. Use a consistent methodology across the enterprise that enables fair performance measurement across LOBs and sound risk management 4. Treat deposits as a line of business by transfer pricing balances using the same FTP principles as we do for loans