Mississippi

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.mde.k12.ms.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$5,175 152

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 2,197 357,016 131,112 488,128
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1,805 351,145 126,361 477,506
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 446 Elementary 168 Middle 173 High 78 Combined 865 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 439 183 180 63 865 2001-02 13,473 6,113 7,611 2,523 29,720
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 1% Asian/Pacific Islander 51 Black * Hispanic 48 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 1% 51 1 47 — 2001-02 10% 2001-02 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 *
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 5 schools did not report.

71 80 376 354

Federal 14%

State 55%

Local 31%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

60

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 66% 55% English 72 60 Math 73 66 Science 83 72 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 12,012 5,172 6,347 3,300 26,831
○ ○ ○

1993-94 11%

1

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment District goal: Accredited (no performance criteria). School performance criteria to be established for 2002-03. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Not available. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Transition: Credit is given for growth toward proficiency goal for a decrease in the percentage of students scoring in lowest quarter on state assessments.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

603 88% 578 Schools meeting AYP goal 88% Schools in need of improvement 21 100%
Number of schools

80 12% 80 12% 0 —

683 100% 658 96% 21 3%

Title I allocation

$132,606,376

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

18% 48

21% 66

17% 62

12% 47

Mississippi
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Mississippi Curriculum Test, grades 4 and 8. Mississippi Subject Area Testing Program, high school. See Appendix A.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 9-12
English II
Proficient 0

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○○

9% 12

7% 9

62% 66

22% 13

25% 34

27% 32

36% 29

12% 5

Minimal

Basic

Proficient

Adv.

Minimal

Basic

Proficient

Adv.

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Minimal

Basic

Proficient

Adv.

43%

29%

24%

4%

○○

○○

○○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

14 11 21

19 11 11

65 67 57

2 11 11

82 28 64

0 33 20

18 35 14

0 4 1

Grade 4
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Grade^^
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Minimal

Basic

Proficient

Adv.

Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Minimal

Basic

Proficient

Adv.

11% 15

17% 21

41% 44

31% 20

30% 42

24% 27

28% 23

17% 8

11 17 19

29 25 23

38 44 40

23 14 18

50 40 63

21 26 23

21 26 13

7 8 1

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

6%
1994-95

5%
2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

69%

63%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

^^

High school mathematics assessment results not available for 2001-02.
R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

61