Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation outline
Objectives Which membrane systems? Configurations Aeration techniques Activated sludge microbial populations Biomass separation
Objectives?
Organic removal Organic removal and nitrification Organic, nitrogen removal & water recycling Organic and nutrient removal & water recycling Persistent organic removal & water recycling High strength waste management Cleaner production
1=Organic removal, 2=Organic removal and nitrification, 3=Organic, nitrogen removal & water recycling 4=Organic and nutrient removal & water recycling, 5=Persistent UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA organic removal & water recycling, 6=High strength waste, 7 =Cleaner production 4 Institute of Environmental & Water Resource Management
MBR processes
Membrane separation bioreactors Membrane aeration bioreactors Extractive membrane bioreactors
MBR processes
Membrane separation bioreactors Submerged
Effluent Influent
MBR processes
Membrane separation bioreactors Side-stream Bioreactor Primary clarifier Membrane Unit Effluent
MBR Technology
Membrane separation bioreactors Advantages -Small footprint -Complete solid removal -Effluent disinfection -Removal of organic, nutrient & solid -High loading rate capability -Low/zero sludge production -Rapid start up -Sludge bulking not a problem -Modular/retrofit
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA Institute of Environmental & Water Resource Management
MBR processes
Membrane aeration bioreactors Effluent Bubbleless O transfer Bioreactor Hollow fiber membrane
Influent
Oxygen
MBR Technology
Membrane aeration bioreactors
Advantages -High oxygen utilization -Highly efficient energy utilization -Small foot print -Feed-forward control of O demand -Modular/retrofit
Disadvantages -Membrane fouling -High capital cost -Unproven at full scale -Process complexity
10
MBR processes
Membrane extractive bioreactors Treated wastewater Effluent For recycling Bioreactor Hollow fiber membrane
11
MBR Technology
Extractive membrane bioreactors
Advantages -Treatment of toxic industrial effluents -Small effluents -Modular/retrofit -Isolation of bacteria from wastewater
12
Performance comparison between activated sludge and MBR (Cicek et al., 1999)
Parameters Sludge age (d) COD removal (%) DOC removal (%) TSS removal (%) A-N removal Total P removal (%) Slude production
(kg VSS/COD.d)
Design values
1.2 to 3.2 kg COD/m3.d 0.05 to 0.66 kg BOD/m3.d 0.05 to 0.66 kg BOD/m3.d Sludge age 10 to 50 d 4 kg NH4-N/m3.d 5 kg NO3-N/m3.d 10,000 to 20,000 mg/l 5 to 300 L/m2.h 20 to 200 L/ m2 h bar 0.5 m3/m2.d
(specific flux 125-175 L/ m2 h bar)
14
Aerobic MBR
Examples of design criteria
Wastewater Type V (m3) 3.12 HRT (h) 13.4 (d) Organic load (kg/m3d) 0.245 MLSS Sludge (kg) yield (d) 12.9 Air (m3/h) 18
HF/S/ PE HF/S
72
Municipal
(Cote et al., 1997)
4.8
2.3
26
0.2
0.5-1.5
HF/S
21.4
13
120
0.315
12
42
15
16
MBR technology
Materials and pore size Pore size UF and MF submerged UF and MF Side-stream NF submerged 0.02 to 0.5 m 0.02 to 0.5 m <0.02 m Materials Polyethylene, polypropylene, polysulphone etc Ceramics (MF), polyethylene, polypropylene, polysulphone etc Polyethylene, polypropylene, polysulphone etc
17
18
19
Anaerobic MBR
Loading rates Parameters Side-stream MBR -Loading rates (acidogenic) Side-stream MBR - Loading rates (methanogenic) Submerged MBR- Loading rates HRT Values 54 kg COD/m3.d 12.2 kg COD/m3.d 15 kg COD/m3.d 67 h - POME 124 h - maize waste References
Anderson et al., 1986
20
Typical values for the design parameters for activated sludge processes
Process , d 3-15 0.7515 3-15 8-12 F/M,
lb BOD/ lb MLVSS.d
Volumetric loading,
lb BOD / 103 ft3.d
Qr/Q
21
Typical values for the design parameters for activated sludge processes
Process , d 5-15 20-40 15-30 12-25 10-30 F/M,
lb BOD/ lb MLVSS.d
Volumetric loading,
lb BOD / 103 ft3.d
V/Q, h 0.5-1
Qr/Q
Contact stabilization Extended aeration Oxidation ditch Intermittent decanted EA Sequencing batch reactor
22
23