Analysis of Variance Report

Page/Date/Time
1 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
Database
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Response
Y
Expected Mean Squares Section
Source
Term
Denominator
Term
DF
Fixed?
Term
A: Bloque
2
No
S(ABC)
B: Metodo
2
Yes
AB
AB
4
No
S(ABC)
C: Temperatura
3
Yes
AC
AC
6
No
S(ABC)
BC
6
Yes
ABC
ABC
12
No
S(ABC)
S(ABC)
0
No
Note: Expected Mean Squares are for the balanced cell-frequency case.
Analysis of Variance Table
Source
Sum of
Term
DF
Squares
A: Bloque
2
77.55556
B: Metodo
2
128.3889
AB
4
36.27778
C: Temperatura
3
434.0833
AC
6
20.66667
BC
6
75.16666
ABC
12
50.83333
S
0
-3.416191E-13
Total (Adjusted)
35
822.9722
Total
36
* Term significant at alpha = 0.05

Mean
Square
38.77778
64.19444
9.069445
144.6944
3.444444
12.52778
4.236111

F-Ratio

Expected
Mean Square
S+bcsA
S+csAB+acsB
S+csAB
S+bsAC+absC
S+bsAC
S+sABC+asBC
S+sABC
S

Prob
Level

7.08

0.048537* 0.608878

42.01

0.000202* 0.999999

2.96

0.051971

Means and Standard Error Section

Term
All
A: Bloque
1
2
3
B: Metodo
1
2
3
C: Temperatura
200
225
250
275
AB: Bloque,Metodo
1,1
1,2
1,3
2,1
2,2
2,3
3,1
3,2
3,3
AC: Bloque,Temperatura
1,200

Power
(Alpha=0.05)

Standard
Error

Count
36

Mean
36.02778

12
12
12

34.75
35.25
38.08333

0
0
0

12
12
12

35.66667
38.5
33.91667

0.8693601
0.8693601
0.8693601

9
9
9
9

31.22222
34.55556
37.88889
40.44444

0.6186405
0.6186405
0.6186405
0.6186405

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4

34.5
38.75
31
35.25
37.25
33.25
37.25
39.5
37.5

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

31

0.691495

1,225
1,250
1,275
2,200
2,225
2,250
2,275
3,200
3,225
3,250
3,275
BC: Metodo,Temperatura
1,200
1,225
1,250
1,275
2,200
2,225
2,250
2,275
3,200
3,225
3,250
3,275
ABC: Bloque,Metodo,Temperatura
1,1,200
1,1,225
1,1,250
1,1,275

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

34
36
38
30
32.66667
38
40.33333
32.66667
37
39.66667
43

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

29.66667
34.66667
39.33333
39
33.33333
39
39.66667
42
30.66667
30
34.66667
40.33333

1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292
1.188292

1
1
1
1

30
35
37
36

0
0
0
0

Page/Date/Time
Database
Response

Analysis of Variance Report

2 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Y

Means and Standard Error Section

Term
ABC: Bloque,Metodo,Temperatura
1,2,200
1,2,225
1,2,250
1,2,275
1,3,200
1,3,225
1,3,250
1,3,275
2,1,200
2,1,225
2,1,250
2,1,275
2,2,200
2,2,225
2,2,250
2,2,275
2,3,200
2,3,225
2,3,250
2,3,275
3,1,200
3,1,225
3,1,250
3,1,275
3,2,200
3,2,225
3,2,250
3,2,275
3,3,200
3,3,225
3,3,250
3,3,275

Count

Mean

Standard
Error

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

34
41
38
42
29
26
33
36
28
32
40
41
31
36
42
40
31
30
32
40
31
37
41
40
35
40
39
44
32
34
39
45

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Analysis of Variance Report

3 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Y

Page/Date/Time
Database
Response
Plots Section

Means of Y
45.00

40.00

40.00

35.00

35.00

Means of Y
45.00

30.00

30.00

25.00

25.00
1

Bloque

Means of Y

45.00

45.00

40.00

40.00

35.00

35.00

Means of Y

30.00

Metodo
1
2
3

30.00

25.00

25.00
200

225

250

275

Temperatura

Bloque

Means of Y

Means of Y

45.00

45.00

Bloque
1
2
3

40.00

35.00

30.00

Temperatura
200
225
250
275

40.00

Metodo

35.00

30.00

25.00

25.00
1

Metodo

Bloque

Page/Date/Time
Database
Response

Analysis of Variance Report

4 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Y

Means of Y

Means of Y

45.00

Bloque
1
2
3

40.00

Temperatura
200
225
250
275

40.00

35.00

45.00

30.00

35.00

30.00

25.00

25.00
200

225

250

275

Temperatura

Metodo

Means of Y
45.00

Metodo
1
2
3

40.00

35.00

30.00

25.00
200

225

250

275

Temperatura

Duncan's Multiple-Comparison Test

Response: Y
Term B: Metodo
Alpha=0.050 Error Term=AB DF=4 MSE=9.069445

Group
3
1
2

Count
12
12
12

Mean
33.91667
35.66667
38.5

Different From
Groups
2
3

Notes:
This report provides multiple comparison tests for all pairwise differences between
the means. According to Hsu(1996, page 130), the specified family-wise error rate (alpha)
is overstated and the Tukey-Kramer method is recommended instead.

Page/Date/Time
Database
Response

Analysis of Variance Report

5 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Y

Fisher's LSD Multiple-Comparison Test

Response: Y
Term B: Metodo
Alpha=0.050 Error Term=AB DF=4 MSE=9.069445 Critical Value=2.7764

Group
3
1
2

Count
12
12
12

Mean
33.91667
35.66667
38.5

Different From
Groups
2
3

Notes:
This report provides multiple comparison tests for all pairwise differences between
the means. When this procedure is used only after the F-test associated with this term
is significant at the same error rate, these tests are approximately accurate.
When the F-test associated with this term is ignored, this procedure does not account for
the multiplicity of tests. In either case, the Tukey-Kramer test is better.

Duncan's Multiple-Comparison Test

Response: Y
Term C: Temperatura
Alpha=0.050 Error Term=AC DF=6 MSE=3.444444

Group
200
225
250
275

Count
9
9
9
9

Mean
31.22222
34.55556
37.88889
40.44444

Different From
Groups
225, 250, 275
200, 250, 275
200, 225, 275
200, 225, 250

Notes:
This report provides multiple comparison tests for all pairwise differences between
the means. According to Hsu(1996, page 130), the specified family-wise error rate (alpha)
is overstated and the Tukey-Kramer method is recommended instead.

Page/Date/Time
Database
Response

Analysis of Variance Report

6 06/12/2011 10:12:10 a.m.
C:\Users\ADN2011\Desktop\Pro ... ENTOS\Alumnos\NCSS\Eje142.S0
Y

Fisher's LSD Multiple-Comparison Test

Response: Y
Term C: Temperatura
Alpha=0.050 Error Term=AC DF=6 MSE=3.444444 Critical Value=2.4469

Group
200
225
250
275

Count
9
9
9
9

Mean
31.22222
34.55556
37.88889
40.44444

Different From
Groups
225, 250, 275
200, 250, 275
200, 225, 275
200, 225, 250

Notes:
This report provides multiple comparison tests for all pairwise differences between
the means. When this procedure is used only after the F-test associated with this term
is significant at the same error rate, these tests are approximately accurate.
When the F-test associated with this term is ignored, this procedure does not account for
the multiplicity of tests. In either case, the Tukey-Kramer test is better.