Roy G. Callahan, USN, Ret.

1529 NW 143rd Street Gainesville, Florida 32606 Tel: (352) 332-9144 Fax: (352) 332-9144 Call6603@Bellsouth.net

Monday, April 22, 2013 Representative Ted Yoho 511 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Representative Yoho I received your April 19, 2013 response to a message Numbers USA sent to you in my name concerning Immigration. You astutely picked up on the fact my message came from an interest group that is known for defending American sovereignty. What follows is the result of your encouraging me to share my personal thoughts and concerns with you on this subject. I agree we must be able to control our borders but I want a clear definition of control means defined. Washington speak and clichs like melting pot, legal orderly enforcement, and workable guest worker program are catch words to mislead or hide agendas. Clarity is necessary. I also agree security and enforcement are vital components of a successful strategy. However, they should not include support for NAU, NAFTA, and CAFTA et al. I am familiar with the bipartisan traitors of eights agenda. The issues they raise like bringing aliens out of the shadows is a false flag of reasonableness designed to cover up an agenda I do not support. One such agenda is the idea that wealthy nations are obligated to pave the way for poorer nations because the rich stole from them. The Mexican invasion represents such a welfare program I object to. Americans are not responsible for their choices. Foreigners invading this country are criminal aliens1. Politicians refusing to enforce our immigration laws are also criminals because they violate the rule of law embodied in the Constitution. Aliens violate our laws by being here without our permission. They are not from this country; they dont identify with it and they refuse to assimilate to it. Immigrants on the other hand assimilate and become part of the whole. My German born wife is more American than most natives. She defines the difference between Alien and Immigrant. She gave up her citizenship and loyalty to her native country to become an American. Home, identity, and loyalty to most Hispanics are just across the border. Judge Napolitanos I know if the government had not allowed newcomers to come to the country and flourish, you and I and a lot of good folks in the studio wouldnt be here. Thats why Im in favor of open borders. I think you have natural rights. It doesnt matter where your mother was when you were born, you can go where you want and live where you go, and its none of the governments business where you were born. is a Libertarian concept that parallels the UN agenda of nations without borders and one world government. It is Humanist doctrine. Judge Napolitano claims to be a constitutional expert but his disregard for and willingness to condone a sitting president that is illegally seated according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4 makes him the problem, not the solution. He wants to

Defined is a resident born in or belonging to another country who has not acquired citizenship by naturalization ( distinguished from citizen ). 2. A foreigner. 3. a ...
1

Page 1 of 4

change the Constitution and this country without amending it which requires ratification by of the states. I reject this concept and so too should you. Melting pot Providence gave Americans one connected country and one united people. We are a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, and attached to the same principles of government. Americans are very similar in manners and customs. They forged a nation by joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war establishing our general liberty and independence.2 In context, the often heard new age mantra about this country being a melting pot is politically correct bull hockey designed to destroy national cohesion and identity. The wave of invading alien Mexicans is different from immigrants in the past. Mexicans believe in racial rights. Ethic entitlements have taken root. Cultural elites hell bent on denigrating the melting pot concept encourage and preach the glories of multiculturalism. They encourage enclaves to maintain separate identities. Ethnic chauvinism is also rife in the barrios. The integrationist impulse of the 1960s is dead. Liberal chic in the 1990s is segregation dressed up as group identity- politics. If Calvin Coolidge declared America must remain American today he would be charged with a hate crime. If over one million Mexican soldiers crossed the border Americans would treat it as a major threat to national security and react accordingly. The invasion of over one million Mexican civilians is a comparable threat to societal security. Mexican immigration is a unique, disturbing, and looming challenge to our cultural integrity, national identity, and our future as a country. Americans should react against it with vigor since our leaders refuse to do so. Enforcement A nation is defined as one people of common ancestry, language, literature, history, heroes, traditions customs, mores, and faith who live together over time on the same land under the same rulers. This is the blood-and-soil definition of a nation. John Quincy Adams pressed this by laying down the conditions for immigrants: They must cast off the European skin, never to resume it. They must look forward to their posterity rather than backward to their ancestors. The same must hold true for Hispanics migrating from south of the border. Theodore Roosevelt thundered against hyphenated Americanism, He shared Adamss views. So too did Woodrow Wilson. Speaking to newly naturalized Americans in 1915 in Philadelphia, said, A man who thinks of himself as b elong to a particular national group in America has yet to become an American.3 This idea of Americans as a separate and unique people was first given expression by John Jay in Federalist 2: Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people. A people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached in the same principles of government, very similarly in their manners and customs and whom by their joint counsels, arms and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established their general liberty and independence.4 In the 1950s President Eisenhower sent illegal aliens packing in Operation We apologized to no-one for defending our borders and ordering intruders to go home. Yet Republicans today refuse to demand we seal a border that 1.5 million aliens attempt to breach every year. Most people who leave their homelands to come to America are good, decent people. They seek the better life our ancestors sough when they came. They came to work, obey our laws, and cherish our freedoms. They relish the opportunities the greatest nation on earth has to offer; they want to become part of the American family.

222

3 Dan 444

John Jay, The Federalist #2 October 31, 1787 Schweikert, Cultural Wars; A General Ignorance of Language, Logic and Philosophy, E-News Views, June 27, 1999, p. 1 John Jay, The Federalist #2 October 31, 1787

Page 2 of 4

Republicans dont want to be called nativists. They are afraid Hispanics will retaliate against those members who demand enforcement of our immigration laws. Republicans refuse to insist the president enforce our laws. Their cowardice is costing us our country. I have no problem with people calling me a racist or xenophobe because I wish to preserve this countrys unique character and national identify and character. Neither should you. Republicans must find the moral courage to deport illegal aliens. If there is no sanction for breaking into the United States, what is the sense of having immigration laws? If we turn a blind eye to what is happening on our borders, a huge slice of the Third World will arrive here in the first decades of the twenty-first century because the word is out the candy store is open and the cop no longer walks the beat. This has to stop. The Gang of Eights proposal is amnesty for illegal aliens. It is not much different than the amnesty proposed by former Mexican President Fox and others. The Gang of Eights new proposal invites tens of millions or more to break Americans immigration laws and break into our country in anticipation of yet another amnesty. This is tantamount to declaring open borders. Opposition to another amnesty is imperative. The atrocities that occurred at the World Trade Center and Pentagon plus the other acts of terrorism should have been a wakeup call to this generation of what is at risk in our nave embrace of Open borders. The world is not as we wish it would be, but it is a world where some regimes and renegade terrorists have a murderous hatred of America. Our enemies are already inside the gates because of our immigration policies. To preserve the security and freedom of Americans we must run them down and remove them from our midst. We must protect our borders. The survival of a free American society depends on it. An end to bilingual education is essential. Two languages mean two cultures and eventually two countries. English must become the official language of the United States. Immigrant children must be immersed in English from the day they enter an American classroom because immersion works. The New York Post reported, Two years after Californians voted to end bilingual education to force a million Spanish-speaking students to immerse themselves in English as if it were a cold bath, those students are improving in reading and other subjects at often striking rates; according to standardizes test scores.5 The U.S. Border patrol must have the manpower it needs to police our borders and Americans alone should decide whether and when our national family should be enlarged. If the Mexican President and his cronies want open borders, He can start by opening his own border with Guatemala. Expansion of NAFTA must be also opposed. The Europe Economic Community (EEC) evolved from a customs union into a political union. A U.S. Mexico economic union is a fatal steep toward political union of the United States and Mexico. It portends the end of true independence and nationhood. President Bush may not have been aware of it, but President Fox was. The history and culture of Mexico and our Southwest are inseparable, but we remain separate and distinct nations neighbors not brothers. Robert Frost wrote Good fences make good neighbors. We hold the line and set the wall between us once again.6 The Republican Partys drive to make Puerto Rico a state must be defeated. Cuba and Costa Rica, and Puerto Rico are separate countries with their own language, customs, and culture. These peoples right to independence and eventual nationhood should not be taken away. Sovereignty The political construct of immigration debate today is found in the humanist manifesto of 1973 (Marxist) which deals with American sovereignty. It declares, Americans must transcend the limits of national sovereignty

5 6

Jacques Steinberg, Test scores Rise, Surprising Critics of Bilingual Bans, New York Times, August 20, 2000, p 1 The New Oxford Book of American Verse, Richard Ellmann, ed. (New York; Oxford University Press, 1976) pp. 395-96

Page 3 of 4

and move toward the building of a world community. We look to a world order based on transnational federal government.7 Charles Reich, in the Greening of America, the manifesto, said The true revolution is occurring . . . At the present junction of history, commitment to all humankind is the highest commitment of which we are capable; it transcends the narrow allegiances to church, state, party, class or race in moving toward a wide vision. What more daring a goal for humankind than for each person to become, in ideal as well as practice, a citizen of the world community.8 The idea of the end of nations and the creation of a world government has been to dream of intellectuals since Kant. It is Christian Heresy. Trading the hereafter for the here-and now is the bargain. As Christianity dies in the west the foundation of the first floor of a world government is already in place. The Supreme Court ruling on religion was not an aberration or an accident. The invasion of Illegal aliens is no accident. The ongoing debate over immigration and open borders represents an effort to further the goals of the 73 manifesto. The often touted Global Economy is the precursor to global governance where the UN is the parliament, the Security Council is its upper chamber (abolishing the veto) the General Assembly is the lower house. The International Criminal Court, the World Court, and the World Trade Organization constitute its judicial branches; and the IMF is the Federal Reserve. The World Bank and its sister development banks are the foreign aid agencies. The UN Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization are an example of its welfare agencies. The Kyoto Protocol and global warming marks the creation of a global EPA. This represents the model and forerunner of the EU. 9 I do not support global governance; neither should you. Like many other Americans I see my country transforming into something do not I recognize. I resent being a stranger in my own country. I reject and vehemently oppose Seeing old holidays disappear. Seeing old heroes degraded. Seeing the art and artifacts of a glorious past removed from their museums and replaced by authors and titles I have never heard of. Seeing the moral code I was raised with being overthrown by a popular culture that is saturated with raw sex that trumpets hedonistic values taught, encouraged, and condoned in public schools which is causing the culture I grew up to die inside the country I grew up in. God being dethroned, my heroes defiled, my culture polluted, my values assaulted and my country invaded. Yours in the Bill of Rights,

Roy G. Callahan Copy to: Florida State Representatives, Governor Scott, Senator Rubio et al

American Humanist Association , Humanist Manifesto II, 1973, http://humanist .net/documjents/manifesto2.html American Humanist Association, Humanist Manifesto II, 1973. 9 All countries are basically social arrangement . . . No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary. Within the next one hundred years nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, glob al authority. A phrase briefly fashionable in the mid-20th century Citizen of the world will have assumed real meaning by the end of the 21st. Strobe Talbott, America Abroad, The Birth of a Global Nation, Time , July 20 1992 p. 70
7 8

Page 4 of 4