Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mary E. Homan, MA
Spring 2007
For the duration of President Bush’s tenure in office, the public and private sector
has been consistently reminded of the draining cost of healthcare to insurers, the insured,
and to those who do business with both. We hear tales of small-business owners
suffering the burden of cost to cover employee health insurance. We hear of middle-class
families and working poor struggling to pay healthcare premiums, co-pays, and other
health-related costs. We hear about the uninsured and the growing faction of
underinsured Americans who cannot pay for chronic prescription medication or to take a
However, not all the evidence is as anecdotal of a family member unable to afford
prescriptions or an impoverished mother not being able to establish prenatal visits. The
literature suggests and policymakers concur that lack of access to healthcare is beyond
troubling; it is a crisis. The National Academies (which include the National Academy of
Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the
Americans without health insurance in 2005 rose to 15.9 percent, 46.6 million people,
according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The number of uninsured children also increased,
for the first time since 1998, to 8.3 million.”(1) The Institute of Medicine estimates that
approximately 18,000 Americans die prematurely each year because they lack health
insurance.
Recognizing such a crisis, this issue paper will seek to parse out the underlying
issue of lack of healthcare coverage as well as the challenges to addressing the issue.
Third, this paper will articulate the public health community’s response to the crisis,
taking into particular consideration the tenuous relationship between notions of justice
Homan, ME 3
versus notions of fairness especially when public health must make recommendations to
policymakers. Finally, this paper will seek to recommend not an outlined procedure or
legislation as that is beyond the scope of the paper but rather what should be the
objectives of such legislation. In analyzing the issue of uninsured and uninsurability, this
Beauchamp and Childress(2) in the 1970s, recognizes four key principles that arose from
reflections on common morality and the medical tradition. Accordingly, the four
healthcare.(3)
The single most influential factor contributing to the lack of insurance coverage is
poverty. More than 30% of those at or below the poverty level had no insurance
coverage, a rate double that for the total population. However, it should be noted that
many argue that the current and official poverty measure(4)(5) in the United States is
flawed and does not adequately inform policy-makers or the public about who is poor and
who is not poor, according to a national research panel led by Robert Michael, the
Eliakim Hastings Moore Distinguished Service Professor in the Irving B. Harris Graduate
School of Public Policy Studies.(6) One study points out that persons who border the
poverty line (between 100 and 125% of the poverty line) faced an uninsured rate of
that for almost every variable influencing the uninsured rate, the addition of poverty
The State of Missouri faces similar challenges. The Missouri Foundation for
Health reports that in 2005, between 635,000 and 707,000 Missouri residents were
without health insurance. In 2004 dollars, the total national value of health lost in a single
year because of lack of insurance is estimated at $104 billion, which represents more than
two times the estimated $48 billion cost of covering all of the nation’s uninsured.(9)
Economically speaking, the more people are ill, the more work is missed, the less pay is
Women and in particular pregnant women find themselves in a very difficult spot
with healthcare coverage. The number of women in the United States who are uninsured
grew 3 times faster than the number of men without health insurance during the late
1990s and early 2000s.(10) In 2003, it was estimated that of the 45 million Americans
(15.6% of the total population) without health insurance for the entire year, 21.2 million
were women (14.4% of all women).(11, 12) This represents an increase from 2002 when
it was estimated that of the 43.6 million Americans (15.2% of the total population)
without health insurance for the entire year, 20.2 million were women (13.9% of all
following diagram from the Institute of Medicine illustrates pregnant women and infants’
lack of coverage.
Homan, ME 5
mean that they are Medicare/Medicaid eligible. Medicare was established as a federal
health insurance program in 1965 under the Social Security Act. This act provided a
hospital insurance program for the with a supplementary medical benefits program. This
expanded program of medical assistance was to increase benefits under the Old-Age,
Survivors, and Disability Insurance System and to improve the Federal-State public
assistance programs. Whereas, Medicaid is a state administered program and each state
sets its own guidelines regarding eligibility and services. Medicaid is a program of health
coverage for certain people with low incomes or very high medical bills where eligibility
Homan, ME 6
for depends on age, disability or family status and on an individual’s (or family’s) income
and resources. Although the Federal government establishes general guidelines for the
program, the Medicaid program requirements are actually established by each State.
Whether or not a person is eligible for Medicaid will depend on the State where he or she
lives.(15)
The Missouri Foundation for Health reported in 2005 that Missouri Medicaid
currently covers over 540,000 low-income children and more than 200,000 low-income
adults in families with children. The majority of covered adults in families with children
are women. Children represent the largest demographic group served by Missouri
Medicaid, with nearly 56 percent of all Missouri Medicaid consumers being age 18 or
younger. (16) Missouri Medicaid also covers approximately 74,000 Missourians age 65
2000 and then hit a low of 2.827 million in August of 2003 for a job loss of 59,000.
Employment has since climbed to 2.903 million for a job gain of 76,000 jobs off of the
low. Despite this increase in jobs, it should be noted that in the most recent recession,
Furthermore, despite the fact that Missouri employment is up 2.7% off of the low in
August of 2003, the nation as a whole has experienced an increase of 6.5% in its total
During this period of time, the number of people below 200 percent of the federal
poverty level (FPL) increased by 330,000 (194,000 adults and 136,000 children). The
Homan, ME 7
rate of employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) fell from 71.9% to 64.2% while Medicaid,
Foundation for Health reports that a loss of Medicaid coverage because of the 2005
cutbacks in eligibility will likely translate into increases in the number of uninsured
Increases in health care costs and thus insurance premiums are likely to continue to grow
faster than workers’ earnings. The decline in ESI will be further exacerbated if
employment losses in large firms and the shift in employment from high-ESI industries to
low-ESI industries continue. The increased numbers of uninsured will place heavy
Many cannot afford the health premiums of large insurance companies typically
offered by employers. The Kaiser Family Foundation reports that the average annual
premium for an individual was $4,242, while family coverage cost an average of
$11,480. The 2006 poverty threshold for a family of four in the United States was
$20,000.(19) That means over half of the family income would be going towards health
insurance. The US Census Bureau reported in 2004, over 13% of Missourians lived in
poverty. Therefore, at minimum 13% of Missouri residents would have no way of paying
President Bush’s healthcare reform plan from the 2007 State of the Union
Address encourages a “tax-credit” for businesses for employee health insurance. Under
this new plan, the President's proposal “levels the playing field for Americans who
purchase health insurance on their own rather than through their employers, providing a
substantial tax benefit for all those who now have health insurance purchased on the
Homan, ME 8
individual market.”(20) The President’s plan “lowers taxes for all currently uninsured
Americans who decide to purchase health insurance.”(20) The plan begs the following
questions: Shouldn’t all people have health insurance? Why should a low-income family,
who statistically is at greater risk for workplace injury, chronic workplace disease, and
other diseases and illness derivative of lower socio-economic status, be forced to hand
over almost one-fourth of their family household income (under the new plan, workers
would receive a tax deduction – $7,500 for singles, $15,000 for couples and families)
unreasonably high costs don’t only affect persons of lower-income status. Middle-class
families and working adults will also face an increase in costs especially when searching
for companies willing to cover high-risk occupations (factory line jobs, construction, etc.)
that previously were not as high when employers purchased an employee package.
The other major challenge to uninsured persons aside from lacking healthcare
coverage is going without needed medical services. Uninsured families report the most
reported forgone care, and almost 20 percent of uninsured families across all income
groups did so.(22) The Commonwealth Fund found that 54 percent of underinsured
people went without at least one of four needed medical services because of cost—twice
the rate of those with adequate insurance.(23) A 2005 Kaiser study found that the care-
seeking behavior of those with private coverage and medical debt was more like the
uninsured than the insured without medical debt: about 28 percent of both the insured
with medical debt and the uninsured postponed care because of costs, compared to six
percent of the privately insured without medical debt.(24) Kathleen Stoll, health policy
Homan, ME 9
director at the Families USA consumer advocacy group, said 10.7 million insured
Americans spend more than a quarter of their annual paychecks on health care.(25)
In 1999, the Missouri pool’s average yearly premium for individual coverage was
$4,920 (the highest of all pool states), which is about 12.2 percent of the state’s median
household income. Also, Missouri’s quoted rate relative to pool rate is upwards of 300%.
Therefore the premium cap as a percentage of the average comparable plan is 150-200%.
For mental health benefits, Missouri has $25,000 lifetime maximum on benefits allowing
for 30 inpatient days per year, and $3,000 per year for outpatient services.(26)
The following table illustrates reasons why families forgo medical care.
Homan, ME 10
believes that "States that are using Medicaid to broaden health care coverage are using it
as a foundation to build upon for low-income people, which frees up other ways to make
insurance more affordable.” However, as recent as 12 April 2007, the Missouri Senate
passed legislation(27) that would move the state's Medicaid patients into three health
plans, two of which would be administered by managed-care companies. The new benefit
packages would replace the state's existing Medicaid program by 2013. Some critics
argue that Missouri ended Medicaid coverage prior to this bill. Timothy McBride, PhD,
and Policy at Saint Louis University School of Public Health recounts that, “they
federal rules, which took effect last year, that allow states to modify their Medicaid
programs on their own rather than through the burdensome process of petitioning the
federal government for approval.(29) SB577 repeals the June 30, 2008 expiration date
for Missouri’s Medicaid program. The bill establishes a pay-for-performance system for
doctors and other medical providers. It also introduces healthy lifestyle choice incentives
that work on a debit card system where one is credited for signing health improvement
plans and making healthy lifestyle choices. These credits could be spent on co-payments,
and older who earn up to 185% FPL ($18,889/yr single woman) can access various
women’s health and family planning services but they cannot have access to employer-
Amy Blouin, executive director for the Missouri Budget Project blasts the
changes in a letter to the editor. She writes that MO HealthNet does not move Missouri
towards universal coverage “by not restoring health coverage to the more than 300,000
low-income Missourians whose Medicaid health insurance was cut or decreased over the
past several years. Nor does HealthNet help the more than 700,000 uninsured
cuts is necessary because to not bring “the tens of thousands of people back into
Democrats also say the move ensures that Missouri will lose hundreds of millions of
compliance with HIPAA.(33) Rep. Sam Page of the 82nd District feels this bill shows a
movement to protecting high-risk individuals who move from one group health insurance
to another.(28) One insurance broker, Rick Gary, CEO, Equos Financial Group, LLP
points out that the bill is an attempt to make Missouri more compliant with an already
existing statute particularly in cases of pre-existing conditions. Rick Gary suggests that
those who are opposing the bill because it does not impact those who are uninsured.(28)
It only addresses people who have health insurance currently. It does, however, address
high-risk (risk will be assessed by members) individuals and that care is retained for that
30% risk. This means people who typically paid 300% of premiums would pay 150%
Homan, ME 12
instead. Another opposition comes from insurance companies because the bill does not
address group termination (how can they selectively eliminate group they don’t want to
cover; this bill prohibits group health providers to terminate group at will). This bill
protects people who move from one company to another especially a smaller company
because once a person is dropped from group health coverage, obtaining individual
insurance is problematic.
Fellows from the Brookings Institution believe that individual health plans could
work if the individual health plan market were not such a disaster.(21) Much of the mess,
they write, is due to inadequate pooling of risks. Pooling risks means grouping people
with high and low expected health outlays. Pooling makes health insurance affordable
for the average person. The workplace serves that function – not ideally but adequately.
Individual health plans cannot serve this function. They also write that the bigger
problem with the Bush plan is that it would not ensure that people would be able to find
and ill Americans at risk. It places the burden of finding an affordable insurance plan
with adequate coverage on the shoulders of families who are barely making it through the
month. The new plan will force insurers to question every procedure, every office visit,
more so than before. Families will be forced to endure higher co-pays and longer wait
times because so many families will not be able to afford private insurance. With this
plan, less money will go to services such as Medicare and Medicaid which will endanger
outlined procedure or legislation as that is beyond the scope of the paper but rather what
pertinent that legislatures and public health practitioners operate out of a sense of justice.
Beauchamp and Childress concede that justice is often equated with fairness or
equality.(2) Another way to look at justice is from the perspective of the common good
and acting in good stewardship. David Hollenbach explains that the common good is the
good of being a community where people work and make choices together about the
“direction in which our lives are going to go together.”(34) “The common good is
understood as the social conditions that allow people to reach their full human potential
and to realize their human dignity.” The promotion of the common good involves the
principles already considered: respecting human dignity, protecting the poor and
vulnerable, calling for full and active community participation and practicing good
stewardship. Ideally, the common good enables each and every human person to achieve
his or her human development more fully. The principle of common good is the total of
policymakers, and the general public (to name a few) must operate out of a sense of
social justice and from the operating principle of the common good. We might attempt a
cost-benefit analysis pertaining to prenatal women that might prove when women receive
prenatal visits they are at a lesser risk of delivery problems as well as a greater chance of
appropriate birth weights, etc. Limiting services based on cost alone needs to be
Homan, ME 14
eliminated. Insurance brokers in conjunction with clients need to seek out both academic
evidence of what needs ought to be addressed and covered. To operate within a common
identified five key principles(35) for guiding policy development. The first principle is
listed as the most fundamental however the remaining four receive no specific priority.
these five principles because not only is healthcare law established here but also
insurance laws, public health initiatives and funding as well as any amount of lobbying
enforcers to a greater sense of accountability is also in the hands of the general public.
We can particularly exercise this in our voting rights so that we are electing officials who
don’t just have one special interest group in mind but truly operate out of a sense of
responsibility to the common good and in line with this paper, operate out of the five
guiding principles put forth by the Institute of Medicine. Once such a precedent is set,
we may move to enhanced and ultimately universal healthcare insurance coverage for
References:
1. Pickoff-White L. Number of Uninsured Americans Up. In: Sciences NAo, ed.:
Office of News and Public Information; 6 September 2006.
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Bioethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford
UP; 1994.
3. Gillon R. Medical Ethics: Four Principles Plus Attention to Scope. BMJ;309:184-
90.
4. “In the 1960s, Molly Orshansky, an employee of the Social Security
Administration, developed the original poverty thresholds by using the U.S. Department
of Agriculture's Economy Food Plan, which she used to estimate a family's minimum
food needs. In 1955, Orshansky had determined that most families spent approximately
one-third of their after-tax income on food. Therefore, the Economy Food Plan for
various family sizes was multiplied by three to determine the poverty threshold figures.”
5. Poverty at Issue. University of Missouri Extension. (Accessed 6 November 2006,
at http://outreach.missouri.edu/cfe/quiz/1a.htm.)
6. Harms W. Poverty definition flawed, more accurate measure needed. University
of Chicago Chronicle;14(17).
7. Census UBot. Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2002. In;
September 2003.
8. Trotochaud K. Ethical Issues and Access to Healthcare. Journal of Infusion
Nursing 2006;29(3):165-71.
9. Consequences of the Lack of Health Insurance on Health and Earnings: Missouri
Foundation for Health; January 2006. Report No.: 1.
10. Labrew J. Diagnosing disparities in health insurance for women: a prescription for
change. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2001.
11. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor B, Mills R. Income, poverty, and health insurance
coverage in the United States:2003. In: Bureau USC, ed.; 2004.
12. 2004 annual social and economic supplement. Current Population Survey. In:
Bureau USC, ed.; 2004.
13. Mills R, Bhandari S. Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2002.
Consumer income. Current Population Reports. In: Bureau USC, ed.; 2004.
14. Thorpe K, Flome J, Joski P. The distribution of health insurance coverage among
pregnant women, 1999.: March of Dimes, Emory University April 2001.
15. Medicaid at a glance 2005: a Medicaid information service. In: Department of
Health and Human Services CfMMS, Center for Medicaid and State Opportunities, ed.;
2005.
16. Missouri Medicaid Basics 2005: Missouri Foundation for Health Winter 2005.
17. Economic Forecast 2006 3rd Quarter: Bureau of Economic Research, College of
Humanities and Public Affairs, Missouri State University; 2005.
18. The Missouri Economy and Changes in Health Insurance Coverage, 2000-2004:
Missouri Foundation for Health; March 2006. Report No.: 3.
19. Pugh T. Bush moves to expand health insurance by revising tax code. McClatchy-
Tribune 22 January 2007.
20. The 2007 State Of The Union Address. In: Communications WHOo, ed.; 2007.
21. Aaron HJ. The healthcare three-step. Los Angeles Times 10 February 2007.
Homan, ME 16