I'm tired of people calling our friend Palamas "anti-intellectual." If we would just follow our Orthodox buddy, Scholarios, we would know that Francis Mayron ate people like Kant and Thomist-conversio-ad-phantasmites for breakfast. Yes, the Scotists also believe in "knowledge above all rational discourse," and this doesn't exclude the beatific vision! Instead of talking about accidents that give us concepts of infinite objects, let's listen to our fellow lover of Mary who justifies Palamas' "intuition" of divine presence!
I'm tired of people calling our friend Palamas "anti-intellectual." If we would just follow our Orthodox buddy, Scholarios, we would know that Francis Mayron ate people like Kant and Thomist-conversio-ad-phantasmites for breakfast. Yes, the Scotists also believe in "knowledge above all rational discourse," and this doesn't exclude the beatific vision! Instead of talking about accidents that give us concepts of infinite objects, let's listen to our fellow lover of Mary who justifies Palamas' "intuition" of divine presence!
I'm tired of people calling our friend Palamas "anti-intellectual." If we would just follow our Orthodox buddy, Scholarios, we would know that Francis Mayron ate people like Kant and Thomist-conversio-ad-phantasmites for breakfast. Yes, the Scotists also believe in "knowledge above all rational discourse," and this doesn't exclude the beatific vision! Instead of talking about accidents that give us concepts of infinite objects, let's listen to our fellow lover of Mary who justifies Palamas' "intuition" of divine presence!