## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Greek philosopher and mathematician Zeno of Elea (c. 490 BCE – c. 425 BCE) was the first great philosophical skeptic. He is famous for his paradoxes, which deal with the continuity of motion. He made a series of arguments in which he purported to prove by logical means that motion and plurality are impossible. In his view all human knowledge is based on an unprovable hypothesis: that time and space are continuous. In A History of Mathematics, Carl B. Boyer wrote:

“The arguments of Zeno seem to have had a profound influence on the development of Greek mathematics, comparable to that of the discovery of the incommensurable, with which it may have been related…. The realm of number continued to have the property of discreteness, but the world of continuous magnitudes (…) was a thing apart from number and had to be treated through geometric method. It seemed to be geometry rather than number that ruled the world. This was perhaps the most far-reaching conclusion of the Heroic Age, and it is not unlikely that this was due in large measure to Zeno of Elea and Hippasus of Metapontum.”

Zeno was born and died in Elea, which is in southern Italy, and he is identified by his place of birth to distinguish him from other Zenos of antiquity. According to E.T. Bell (The Development of Mathematics), by tradition Zeno of Elea was:

“a pugnacious dialectician with a passion for being different from everyone else….And it is told that his uncompromising intellectual honesty finally cost him his life. He had conspired with the political faction which lost, and met his death by torture with heroic fortitude.”

Zeno made a supposition and then gave an argument that led to an absurd consequence.According to Plato. and this is impossible in a finite amount of time. The Achilles: In a race between the running Achilles and the crawling tortoise. Originally there were forty paradoxes. In each. the former can never overtake the latter if the tortoise has a head start. Zeno’s now lost treatise. He may have been the first to employ this method of indirect proof. but before it can do that it has to reach the midpoint of the first half. better known as Lewis Carroll.” which are logical arguments that some cannot accept but neither can they refute them. it must first reach the midpoint of the distance to be traveled. Before Achilles reaches the point from which the tortoise started. and before it can do that it must reach the midpoint of the first fourth. pass through an infinite number of points. and revealed that time cannot be considered merely the sum of moments. Aristotle argued against Zeno’s paradoxes. Bell wrote that the paradoxes should be called “sophistries. Briefly the four arguments are as follows: 1. 2. and ad infinitum. and so on ad infinitum. therefore. . the tortoise will have move ahead a little way and Achilles must run to this new position but by the time he reaches it the tortoise has moved ahead again. but only eight have survived. It must. now referred to as reductio ad absurdum.” without being able to show where they were false. in which he indirectly argued against the reality of multiplicity and of motion. used the characters of Achilles and the tortoise to illustrate his paradox of infinity. consisted of several discourses. English mathematician and writer Charles Dodgson. Zeno’s arguments concerning motion introduced the element of time. calling them “fallacies. The Dichotomy: Motion cannot exist because if something moves from one place to another.

physicists. However. Hence. But as time is made up of instants. the arrow would have to be in one position at the beginning of an instant and at another at the end of the instant. The paradox arises from the assumption that space and time can be divided only by a definite amount. The Stadium: This is the most awkward of Zeno’s paradoxes to describe. each B has passed twice as many C’s as A’s. and motion. Thus half the time is the same as twice the time. which are time’s smallest measure and are not further divisible. 4. Then it takes row B twice as long to pass row A as it does to pass row C.3. because for motion to take place.4 * In the smallest unit of time A remains stationary while rows B and C move at equal speeds in opposite directions. Mathematicians. An arrow cannot move. When they have reached the second position. it was necessary to radically reinterpret the concepts of space. Suppose that there are three rows of soldiers. this is a contradiction.4]. and philosophers came to realize that to escape the contradictions found in Zeno’s paradoxes. B. and C [Figure 7. A. as . the arrow is always at rest. The Arrow: An arrow shot in the air is either in motion or at rest. It concludes that half the time is equal to twice the time. time. the time for rows B & C to reach the position of row A is the same. First Position A B C * * * * * * * * Second Position A * * * B * * * C * * * Figure 7.

then the segment can be bisected.well as the mathematical ideas of line. If it is assumed that a line segment is composed of a multiplicity of points. and the first half of this segment is a segment that can be bisected. 2. However. and Henri Lebesgue. Georg Cantor. for it is infinitely divisible. 1. showing that the continuous cannot be composed of units no matter how many or how small. Then the first half of the segment is itself a segment that can be bisected. Albert Einstein. no more. measure. number. In Reflections on Relativity. Augustin Cauchy. the line must also have an unlimited number of points. It therefore must have a definite number of points. Continuing this bisection process we will never come to a point. Karl Weierstrass. Contributors to the resolution of the paradoxes include: Isaac Newton. and the sum of a series. so the original line segment cannot be composed of points. Kevin Brown wrote: “Surely we can forgive Zeno for not seeing that his arguments can only be satisfactorily answered – from the standpoint of physics – by assuming Lorentzian invariance and the relativity of space and time. . He had two principal arguments. Therefore supposing a line has a multiplicity of points leads to a contradiction. Richard Dedekind. Zeno’s integers had to be replaced with modern notions of real numbers.” Zeno also made arguments against multiplicity. Gottfried von Leibniz. The line must be both limited and unlimited in the number of its points. no less. It is limited since it contains just as many points as compose it. a stopping place. and a definite number is a finite or limited number.

they must be finite [in number]. But if they are just so many as they are. neither more nor fewer. the existents are infinite [in number] between existents. If there are many.Quotation of the Day: “If there are many. they must be just as many as they are. and again others between these. And thus the existents are infinite [in number]” – Zeno of Elea .

- Recommended Reading for Economics
- Political Thoughts
- Module 2.1_Basics of Educational Philosophies
- Stoicism,,moi2x
- The Philosophy of the Young Kant (Martin Schonfeld)
- Philosophy of Medicine
- The University of Texas.doc
- Metaphysics
- A Journey Into Words of Emotional Counterparts iz Emergent in Self
- Aspects of Early Buddhist Sociological Thought
- Philosophy Jokes
- Philo
- Syllabus INR 3031-03
- Archimedes & Paradoks
- Introduction to Philosophy - UNO S13
- Walsh Review ABR Dec10-Jan11
- Frege Note on Translation by Max
- Morgan c. Lloyd. Psychology and the Ego , 1899
- Negotiation
- Critchley and Badou
- (Plateaus - New Directions in Deleuze Studies) Aarons, Kieran_ Deleuze, Gilles_ Smith, Daniel Warren_ Zourabichvili, François_ Lambert, Gregg-Deleuze, a philosophy of the event _ together with the voc.pdf
- Jean-Luc Marion-Cartesian Questions_ Method and Metaphysics-University Of Chicago Press (1999).pdf
- Introduction to the Word God
- Biography of Zakir Naik
- Mary Anne Atwood - Hermetic Philosophy and Alchemy56
- Property (Philosophy) - Wikipedia
- Phil 101 Syllabus
- An Introduction to the Policy Process - BIRKLAND
- School Brochure
- [Doi 10.1007%2F978!94!010-1592-9_8] Merlan, Philip -- From Platonism to Neoplatonism METAPHYSICA GENERALIS in ARISTOTLE

- First and Last Things by Wells, H. G. (Herbert George), 1866-1946
- THE MOST PRICELESS THING.doc
- tmp103F.tmp
- BE PREPARED.doc
- BUT IMMORTALLY FEARLESS LOVE..doc
- LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT GÇô PART 2.doc
- IN OUR SUCCEEDING LIVES.doc
- Esther by Adams, Henry, 1838-1918
- EQUAL EQUANIMITY.doc
- READY TO DIE.doc
- tmpF9C2.tmp
- tmpD6DE.tmp
- The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc. by Schopenhauer, Arthur, 1788-1860
- PULT (PEACE, UNITY, LOVE, TRUTH.).doc
- FOR ME TO BE EVER POSSESSED.doc
- NO OPTIONS AFTER DEATH..doc
- GREEDY FOR THAT ETERNAL BLACKNESS.doc
- DANCE - PART 2.doc
- tmp5630.tmp
- MY ROYAL RHYTHM.doc
- Humanist Focus of Attention
- THE RAIN AND MY NEW BORN BABY DAUGHTER.doc
- Auguste Comte and Positivism by Mill, John Stuart, 1806-1873
- LETS PRAY FOR LOVE.doc
- Personality in Literature by Scott-James, Rolfe Arnold
- tmpE760.tmp
- A Handbook to the Works of Browning (6th ed.) by Orr, Mrs. Sutherland, 1828-1903
- THE FIRST AND LAST NAME..doc
- REJOICING MY FIRST CRY.doc
- TheodicyEssays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil by Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading