Receive and File The 2013 Pavement Management Program Update Report 12-03-13

66
To:
From:
Submitted by:
Subject:
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Council Report
December 3, 2013
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jason Stilwell, City Administrator
Sharon Friedrichsen, Public Services Director
Receive and file the 2013 Pavement Management Program Update
Report
Recommendation(s): Receive and file the 2013 Pavement Management Program Update
Report.
Executive Summary: The City has retained Nichols Consulting Engineers to complete an update
of the City's pavement management system, which was last assessed in
2007. The purpose of the updated report is to provide objective
information regarding the condition of the City's maintained roads;
determining the impact of different funding scenarios on the condition of
the City's roads over the next fifteen years and identifying options to
implement a multi-year road rehabilitation and preventative
maintenance program. It is intended that the recommendations included
within the report will be utilized by City staff when developing road
projects to be included within the City' s capital improvement program
and annual operating budget.
Analysis/Discussion: The City's pavement network includes nearly 27 miles of st reet s,
including about 17 miles of resi dential streets. The industry standard is
to measure the pavement grade or condition using the Pavement
Condition Index (" PCI"), which ranges from 0 to 100. A newly
constructed road would have a PCI of 100 while a failed road would have
a PCI of 25 or less. The average Pavement Condition Index ("PCI") for the
City's pavement network is 63, or "fair", as compared to a PCI of 74 in
2007, which is considered "good." Although the PCI has declined, 90% of
the roads are either "fair" or "good" meaning they can be rehabilitated
less expensively now than if they were left to fail. The PCI for of all of the
City roads is included within Appendix A of the attached report. The
1
67
Fiscal Impact:
Budgeted {yes/no)
replacement value for the City's network is estimated to be nearly $38
million.
In fiscal year 2013-14, $826,200 was allocated to streets and road
projects, including sidewalk and concrete curb repairs whereas the
capital improvement plan calls for $634,000 annually going forward.
Ongoing maintenance is much less expensive than deferring
maintenance. As noted in the report, several budget scenarios were
developed to determine the amount of funding needed to either
maintain or improve the City's pavement network, as summarized below:
1. Current City Funding level: Maintain funding at $634,000 each
year from 2014 until 2022 when Measure D funds are authorized
then decrease funding to $200,000 per year from 2022-2028. The
anticipated outcome results in the PCI being maintained in the
low 60s until 2024, then declining PCI to 52 in 2028. Some 41% of
the network would be in "very poor" condition by 2028.
Unfunded backlog of $22.7 million by 2028.
2. Maintain the Current PCI: Total funding of $12.2 million required
by 2028, with recommended funding levels in the $800,000 range
in 2015 and 2016. The anticipated outcome results in maintaining
the PCI at 63 and the network remaining in a "fair" condition each
year. Unfunded backlog of $16.5 million by 2028.
3. Unconstrained Funding: Total funding of $18.4 million required by
2028, with an annual budget of approximately $1.2 million each
year. The anticipated outcome results in improving the PCI each
year, with a PCI of 85 by 2025. Almost the entire network is in a
"good" condition and there is no unfunded backlog.
Funding Source {general fund, grant, state)
Yes- cost of study ($11,000) General Fund- Outside labor (76050)
Previous Council
Action/Decision History:
The Council allocated the current fiscal year funding for street and road
projects as part of the adoption of the budget in June 2013.
Attachment:
Report- City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Pavement Management Program Update Report
2
68
Reviewed by:
City City Attorney

Administrative Services D
Asst. City Admin. D Dir of CPB D Dir of Public Svcs D
Public Safety Dir D Library Dir D
Other ______ D
City Engineer D
3
69
City of
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Pavement Management
Program Update
Fin a I Report
70
City of
Carmel-by-the-Sea
Pavement Management
Program Update
Fin a I Report
Submitted to:
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
P.O. Box CC
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA 93921
NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Chtd.
Engineering and Environmental Services
50 I Canal Boulevard Suite I Richmond CA 94804
(51 0) 215-3620 Phone I (51 0) 215-2898 Fax
NCE Project No. 82.04.20
Collaboration. Commit ment. Confidence.
5
M
November 20 13
71
2013 Pavement Management Program
Update
Table of Contents
Background ............................ .............................................. ............................................... ...... .... .. 1
Study Objectives ..... ... .... .. ............. .... .. .. ..................................... ... .... ........................................ ..... . 2
Project Approach .................... ... ..................................... ....... .. ....... ........... ........ ....... ....... ..... .. ........ 3
Pavement Network and Current Condition .................................................................. .... .............. 3
Current Budget and Maintenance Practices ...... ............. .. ............... ... .. ..................................... ..... 8
"Pay Now or Pay MORE Later" .... ...... ....... .............................................................................. ..... 8
Budget Needs ........................................................ .......................... .... ............................ .............. 10
Budget Scenarios ........................ ......... .. ... ....... ... ........... ... ....... ..... ............. ... ............ ... ........ ......... 12
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level .. ...... ................ .. .......... .................................... .......... 13
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PCI. ...... .................... ................................. ......................... 15
Scenario 3: Unconstrained .............. ...................................................................................... . 17
Summary ..... ... .. ....... .................................. .. .. ... .. .................. .... ........................................... .......... 19
Conclusions ...... ..................................... ............................ ........ .................................................... 22
Appendix A
Section Description Inventory
Section PCI Listing- Sorted by Street Name
Section PCI Listing - Sorted by Descending PCI
Appendix 8:
Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
Appendix C:
Budget Needs- Projected PCI/Cost Summary Report
Budget Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary Report
Budget Needs- Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary Report
Scenarios 1-3:
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report
Appendix D:
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level- Sections Selected For Treatment
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd
72

...
list of Tables
Update
Table 1. Pavement Network and Condition Summary (2012} .................. ..................................... 5
Table 2. Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Class and Condition Category ...... ....... . 6
Table 3. Results of Funding Needs ............................................................... ....... ... .. ........ ............ 11
Table 4. Summary of Results for Scenario 1 ................................................................................ 13
Table 5. Summary of Results for Scenario 2 ................................................................................ 15
Tabl e 6. Summary of Results for Scenario 3 ............ .. ................ ............................. .... ...... ........... 17
list of Figures
Figure 1. Pavement Condition Categories .. ... ....... .. ........ ............................................................... 4
Figure 2. Examples of Roads with Different PCis .................. .......................................................... 5
Figure 3. PCI Breakdown by Functional Class ...... .... .................................................................. .... 7
Figure 4. Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time ....... .. ........ ......... .................. ....................... 9
Figure 5. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1 (Current City Funding level) ................. 14
Figure 6. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2 (Maintain Current PCI} ......................... 16
Figure 7. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 (Unconstrained) .................................... 18
Figure 8. Pavement Condition Index by Scenario by Year ..... .. ...................... ....... .. ..................... 19
Figure 9. Deferred Maintenance by Scenario by Year ................................................................. 20
Figure 10. Pavement Condition Changes for Each Scenario ................................. ... .... ... ....... ...... 21
Figure 11. Asphalt Price Index (1999-2012, Caltrans) ................................. ..... ............................ 23
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd II
73
Background
Update
Nichol s Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
(Carmel) in 2013 to perform an update of its pavement management system (PMS), which was
last updated in 2007. The data on the street network is therefore approximately five years old,
but the City has indicated that conditions have not changed significantly, and that a field
assessment is not necessary for the purposes of this report. The goal of this project was to
upgrade to the latest StreetSaver software, update the database with new unit costs, and
update the pavement management report.
Thi s report constitutes a summary of the update for Carmel.
Broadly, a " ... pavement management [program] system is designed to provide objective
information and useful data for analysis so that ... managers can make more consistent, cost-
effective, and defensible decisions related to the preservation of a pavement network."
1
In other words, a PMS is designed to assist cities answer typical questions such as:
What does the City's road network consist of? How many miles of roads are eligible for
federal, stat e or other funds? How many are subjected to t raffic from buses or heavy
trucks?
What is the existing condition of the City's maintained roads? Is this an acceptable level
for the City? If not, what is an acceptable level? How much additional funding is needed
to achieve an acceptabl e level?
Are there roads in specific areas that are much worse than others, and if so, how much
worse?
How will the condition of the City's maintained roads respond over time under existing
funding levels?
What maintenance and rehabilitation strategies exist to improve current road
conditions? What maintenance activities or treatments have occurred in the past on any
given road?
What impact would either additional funding or a decrease in funding, have on the
condition of the overall pavement network?
What is the backlog of maintenance and rehabilitative work that should be done? What
are the future maintenance and rehabilitation needs? Are there different needs for
different classes of roads i.e. arterials vs. local residentials?
Under different funding level s, what is the most cost-effective way to implement a
multi-year capital improvement program? Maintenance work program?
What are the road repair priorities, given different budgeting scenarios?
1
AASHTO " Guidelines for Pavement Management Syst ems". American Association of St ate Highway and Transportation Official s, Washington
DC, July 1990.
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd 1
74
Update
In order to answer the questions above, the City util izes the StreetSaver pavement
management system. StreetSaver is a program developed by the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) and is the most widely used PMS in California.
There are some unique characteristics within Carmel that need to be considered when
assessing the pavement network condition. Like many coastal cities, the pavement network
here is subject to high traffic volumes from visitors.
Study Objectives
The main goals of this study were:
1. Updating historical maintenance data
2. Updating the maintenance and rehabilitat ion (M&R) decision tree and associated unit
costs.
3. Performing budgetary analysis and determining the funding needs.
The purpose of this report is to assist decision makers in utilizing the results of the StreetSaver
PMS. Specifically, this report links the recommended repair program costs to Carmel' s current
and projected budget alternatives to improve overall maintenance and rehabi litation strategies.
This report assesses the adequacy of existing revenues to meet the maintenance needs
recommended, and maximizes the return from expenditures by:
Implementing a multi-year road rehabilitation and maintenance program.
Developing a preventative maintenance program.
Selecting streets for the most cost effective repairs.
It determines the overall condition of the City's maintained roads and highlights options for
improving them. These options are developed by conducting "what-if" analyses using the
StreetSaver program. By varying the budget amounts available for pavement maintenance and
repair, one can show how different funding strategies can impact the City's roads over the next
fifteen years.
75
Project Approach
Update
The scope of work included updating all maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) historical and
planned treatments in the database since the last update in 2007. This included any overlays,
reconstructions and any surface seals that may have occurred. While updating the M&R history,
some street sections had to be split, or subdivided, because the M&R projects did not always
align properly with existing street sections in the database.
The next step would normally be to discuss appropriate M&R strategies for future projects and
create a corresponding M&R Decision Tree. This includes the recommendation and selection of
appropriate treatments such as sl urry seals or overlays, and the determination of treatment
unit costs. However, as the City has not changed any maintenance policies, the existing M&R
decision tree was used for the analysis. The only changes to the decision tree were to update
the associated unit costs for each alternative based on recent bid tabs. With these updated unit
costs, a more accurate budgetary analysis can be performed. The unit costs include:
All related construction costs such as mobil ization, traffic control, base repairs, paving,
striping, rai sing monuments etc.
Engineering and design costs which include design, construction, inspections and
material testing etc.
NCE next performed a budget needs analysis using an analysis period of 15 years with an
infl ation rate of 5%. Thi s identified M&R requirements for each street section and determined
the total maintenance and rehabilitation requirements over the analysis period under different
f unding levels.
Pavement Network and Current Condition
The City is responsible for the repair and maintenance of approximately 26.8 centerline miles of
streets of which 4.47 miles are arterials, 3.68 miles are collectors, 16.71 miles are
residential/local streets, and 1.95 miles are li sted as other. As can be seen, the majority of the
street network is comprised of residential/local roads. Streets or pavements are one of the
City's most valuable assets, and the replacement value for the entire network is estimated to
be approximately $37.6 million. Note that this does not include any improvements (e.g.
widening) or other non-pavement elements, such as curb and gutters, sidewalks, drainage etc.
The pavement condition index, or PCI, is a measurement of pavement grade or condition and
ranges from 0 to 100. A newly constructed road will have a PCI of 100, while a failed road will
have a PCI of 25 or less. The pavement condition is primarily affected by the climate, traffic
loads and volumes, construction materials and age. The symptoms manifested by the pavement
as it ages or fails are determined by the distress types that are present, which include:
76
1. Alligator {fatigue) cracking
2. Block cracking
3. Distortions
4. Longitudinal and transverse cracking
5. Patching and utility cut patching
6. Rutting and depressi ons
7. Weathering and raveling
Update
A more detailed description of each distress type is available in the MTC distress manual
2

Figure 1 illustrates the definitions of the pavement condition categories. The "fair" category
includes roads with both non-load related {weathering and raveling) and load related {e.g.
alligator cracking) distresses. Si nce these di stresses are markedly different, the treatments
assigned are also correspondingly different, and the costs associated with them. Generally,
roads with load-related will requi re higher costs for repairs. The two categories are identified
by II {non-load related) and Ill {load related). The StreetSaver program will assign the
appropriate treatments and costs to roads identified with each category. Best management
practices for the maintenance of a pavement network typically include maintaining the overall
PCI in the high 70's to mid 80's. However these values can vary by jurisdiction due to prevailing
local conditions and the availability of sufficient long-term f unding.
Condition Category
11/111
IV
I
v
Pavement Condition
Poor
Very Poor
PCI Category
100
70
50
25
0
Figure 1. Pavement Condition Categories
2
Pavement Condition Index Distress Identification Manual for Asphalt and Surface Treatment Pavements, Metropolitan Transportation
Commission, Third Edition, April 2012.
77
Update
The photos in Figure 2 illustrate roads with a range of PCis.
Figure 2. Examples of Roads with Different PCis
The City's average PCI is 63 and this is considered to be a network that is in "Fair" condition. In
the 2007 PMP Update the PCI was 74, meaning the average PCI has lowered about 2 points per
year, which is expected if no significant funding was available in the intervening six years ..
However, the average PCI does not completely describe the road network; Table 1 is a summary
of the PCI by functional class. The most important roadways, arterials and collectors, both have
a PCI of 67. If adequate funding is provided to these roadways, their PCI's may rise over 70 to
the "Good" category, reducing the need for costly rehabilitation later on.
Table 1. Pavement Network and Condition Summary (2013)
I
Functional Centerline Lane
No. of %of the
Class Miles Miles
Management Network Average PCI
Sections (by area)
Arterial 4.47 10.20 31 23.6 67
Collector 3.68 7.35 29 13.7 67
Residential
16.71 33.43 139 54.5 61
or Local
Other 1.95 3.90 18 8.2 63
Total 26.81 54.89 217 100
63 (network
average)
78
Update
Table 2 shows the distribution of pavements by functional class and condit ion category. Almost
ninety percent (88.4%) are in fair to good condition, with the remainder in poor to very poor
condition. Since the largest percentage of pavement sections {61.9%) are in the " Fair" category,
the network has the ability to drastically improve if adequate funding brings up these sections
to the "Good" category.
70-100 10.0 3.2 9.4 3.8 26.5
50-69 11.1 10.0 37.8
3.0
61.9
25-49 2.4 0.5 3.5
0.7
7.1
79
Update
Figure 3 presents the same information as Table 2, but in a graphical format. This better
illustrates the fact that residentials comprise the majority of the road system.
Appendix A contains the PCI listing for all streets in the City, listed by Street Name and by
current PCI (descending}.
60 .------------------------------------
so +---------------------

-;; 40
<II
Very Poor (V)
...
ct
....
c
<II
E
<II
30
c.
Poor (IV)
Fair (11/111)
20
Good (I)
10
0.7
0
Arterials Collectors Resi dentials Ot her
Functional Classification
Figure 3. PCI Breakdown by Functional Class
80
Maintenance Practices
Update
Historically, the City has not utilized a preventive maintenance program such as crack seals or
slurry seals when the pavements are in good condition. However, when the pavement
condition deteriorates to poor conditions, overlays and reconstruction have been performed.
These are considered "rehabilitation or reconstruction." In addition, base repairs are commonly
used as preparatory work prior to overlays.
In this report, the analysis assumes that the City will be implementing a preventive
maintenance program. The decision tree in the StreetSaver program provides for the most
effective and realistic maintenance treatments for each group of roads by functional class and
condition category and is shown in Appendix B.
"Pay Now or Pay MORE Later"
Figure 4 illustrates that pavement maintenance follows the old colloquial saying of "pay now or
pay more later." History has shown that it costs much less to maintain roads in good condition
than to repair roads that have failed. By allowing pavements to deteriorate, roads that once
cost $3.50/square yard to slurry seal may soon cost as much as $67.00/square yard to
reconstruct. In other words, delays in repairs can result in costs increasing as much as 19-fold.
The costs shown in the chart below are actual data from recent bid tabs from the City as well as
those from surrounding cities.
The pavement deterioration curve shown by the red line describes how pavements deteriorate
over time. In general, arterials will be expected to have a service life of 20 years, while those for
residential roads may exceed 30 years. This will be longer for the few PCC pavement sections in
Carmel.
81
Pavement Condition
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very Poor
Update
%of Pavement Life
Figure 4. Costs of Maintaining Pavements over Time
82
Budget Needs
Update
Once the pavement condition has been determined, and the appropriate maintenance
treatments assigned in the decision tree, then it is possible to determine the funding needs for
the City's maintained roads. Simplistically, the StreetSaver program seeks to answer the
questions:
If funding is not a constraint, how much money is needed to bring the pavement condition
to a state of good repair? And maintain it at that level over the next 15 years?
Therefore, based on the principle that it costs less to maintain roads in good condition than
those in bad condition, StreetSaver will develop a maintenance strategy that will improve the
overall condition of the roads and then maintain it at that level. The condition of each road
determines the appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation treatment and cost from the
decision tree. For example, if Ocean Ave has a PCI of 45, and the appropriate treatment is an
overlay, then the area of the pavement section is multiplied by the unit cost and the total
treatment cost determined. Additional maintenance treatments over the next 15 years will also
be applied (e.g. slurry or rubberized crack seal) to preserve it.
Using this process, the entire road network for the City was evaluated in this fashion and
summed. This results in maintenance needs of approximately $16.9 million over the next fifteen
years. An annual 5% inflation factor was assumed. If the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea follows the
funding strategy recommended by the program, the average PCI will increase to the high 80's
by the end of 15 years. The results of the budget needs analysis are summarized in Table 3.
In essence, the funding level or maintenance needs determined illustrates the level of
expenditures required to raise the pavement condition to a network PCI in the high 80's and
also eliminates the maintenance backlog. Of the $16.9 million in maintenance needs,
approximately $5.2 million (about 31%) is programmed for preventive maintenance, while the
rest is allocated for more costly rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments. Again, preventive
maintenance includes treatments such as slurry seals, while rehabilitation includes overlays and
reconstruct ion.
Note that in this analysis, the total funding needed is "front-loaded" i.e. it is less expensive to
repair the streets in the first year than in subsequent years due to the effect of inflation.
Therefore, the majority of the funding is allocated within the first four years of the analysis
period. Due to the nature of the City's pavement network, we do see some additional large
allocations necessary between the years 2022 to 2024.
8
3

Table 3. Results of Funding Needs
Budget ($-Thousands)
3,718 916 771 592
Rehabi litation ($-Thousands)
3,563 859 720 523
Preventive Maintenance
($-Thousands)
155 I 57 I 51 I 69 I
Treated PCI
74 74 75 75
Untreated PCI 61 59 56 52
Rehabil itation ($-Thousands)
669 1,789 1,270 120
($-Thousands)
782 347 252 I 503 I
Treated PCI
I
80
I
85
I
88
I
87
I Untreated PCI 36 33 30 28
2013 Pavement Management Program Update
1,217 I 562 I 653 I 456
650 I 384 I 486 I 294
567 I 178 I 167 I 162
77 77 77 77
49 46 43 39
40 315 0 I
11,682
796 I 539 I 610 I
5,235
87
I
87
I
87
25 21 18
11
84
Budget Scenarios
Having determined the 15-year maintenance needs of the City's street network, the next step
in developing a cost-effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is to conduct several
"what-if" analyses. Using the StreetSaver budget scenario module, the impacts of various
budget "scenarios" can be evaluated. Simplistically, this module seeks to answer the following
questions:
If we have funding constraints, what is the most cost-effective way to spend the funds
available? What are the consequences on the PCI and unfunded backlog? What streets will
be prioritized for repairs? When will they be repaired?
The program determines the effects of the different funding scenarios on pavement condition
index {PCI) and deferred maintenance {unfunded backlog). By examining the effects on these
performance measures, the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and
maintenance strategies become clear. The following scenarios were performed:
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level- This scenario shows the consequences to the street
network at the current funding level {$634,000 per year and $200,000 per year after 2022). The
City's current budget of $634,000 is sufficient to maintain the PCI in the low 60's for the next 9
years. However, after 2022 when the budget decreases to $200,000, the PCI begins a rapid drop
every year until reaching a low of 52 by the year 2028. The unfunded backlog will grow to $22.7
million, or six times what it is now.
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PC/ -At a funding level of $12.2 mi llion over 15 years, this
scenario shows the funding required to maintain the average network PCI condition (currently
63} so that the pavement network does not deteriorate any further as a whole. In addition, the
deferred maintenance or unfunded backlog will increase from $3.7 million today to $16.5
million by 2028, a more moderate 4.5-fold increase.
Scenario 3: Unconstrained Funding- The City will require approximately $17.1 million over 15
years to improve the pavement network to its optimal PCI of 85, and eliminate any deferred
maintenance. This scenario is similar to the Needs Budget, but tries to evenly distribute the
costs over the analysis period at the expense of a higher project cost ($0.2 million more). This
scenario is basically a more realistic approach to the Budget Needs.
Note: Deferred maintenance consists of pavement maintenance that is needed, but cannot be
performed due to lack of funding. It is also referred to as the unfunded backlog. More detailed
results of the budget needs and scenarios can be found in Appendix C and D.
8
5
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level
City of Carmel- by-the-Sea
The current City budget is $634,000 per year until the year 2022, and $200,000 thereafter for a total budget of $6.9 million. The loss of
Measure D funding after 2022 results in the pavement network's dramatic decline in PCI from the low 60's to 52 by 2028. Of the total
budget available, approximately $5.5 million is required for rehabilitation. By 2028, 41.3% of the network will be in the "Very Poor"
condition category (currently 4.4%), requiring expensive reconstruction to rehabilitate. Additionally, the unfunded backlog will increase
over six-fold from $3.7 million to $22.7 million by 2028, shown below in Table 4 & Figure 5.
634 634 634 634 634 634 634 634
Rehabilitation ($-Thousands)
511 539 576 560 502 498 485 499
($-Thousands)
123 95 58 74 132 136 149 135
Deferred Maintenance
($-Thousands)
2,862 3,173 3,248 3,369
I
4,479
I
4,567
I
4,671
I
4,722
Overall PCI 65 64 64 63 I 64 I 64 I 64 I 64
II
634 200 200 200 200 200 200 6,906
502 145 152 148 159 108 151 5,535
($-Thousands)
132 55 48 52 41 92 49 1,371
($-Thousands)
5,904 8,535 9,992 10,106
I
9,368
I
15,872
I
22,723
Overall PCI
64 62 61 59 I 57 I 54 I 52
8
6
- Deferred Maintenance
25,000

"' "C
:; 20,000
I
"'
h:!
o:>
h:!
:I
0
s:.
I
-

--

....
c
15,000
I
CIJ
u
c
111
c
CIJ
'E 10,000
;;
I
::2:
"C
CIJ
I - - --
4,479 4,557 4,1:>/l '1, I LL
...
...
5,000 CIJ
-
CIJ
0
'
-
- -
- - - - -
0 I
-
I
-
I
-
I
-
I
-
I
--
I
-
I
-
I
-

'<!" 1.1) \.0 I' 00 en 0 .-i
.-i .-i .-i .-i .-i .-i N N
0 .....
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'+-- 0
3:
N N N N N N N N
Year

-
-
I
-
I
N
N
0
N
I
90
22,723
-
80

J."J,O/ L
-
60
9.992
10,106
......... ,.. ..... I I
t 50
40
-
- - - - -
30
- - - - - -
20
- - - - - -
'
10
--
I
--
I
--
I
--
I
--
I
--
I 0
M '<!"
1.1) \.0 I' 00
N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N
Figure 5. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1 (Current City Funding Level}
Nichol s Consulting Engineers, Chtd 14
8
7

a
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PCI
The City's pavement network is currently in the "Fair" condition category as a whole with an average PCI of 63. If the City wishes to
maintain the network at the current condition, then $12.2 million over the next 15 years is required. However, the unfunded backlog will
continue to increase from $3.7 million to $16.5 million. Tables 5 and Figure 6 show the details below.
Table 5. Summary of Results for Scenario 2
I 689 I 582 I 577 I 608 I 627
19 782 736 598 417 416 416 419
($-Thousands)
145 34 66 91 165 161 192 208
($-Thousands)
I
3,332
I
3,409
I
3,465
I
3,519
I
4,647
I
4,759
I
4,898
I
5,000
Overall PCI
I 63 I 63 I 63 I 63 I 63
637 835 819 749 1,051 1,714 1,505 I
12,175
430 666 458 427 861 1,570 1,115 I
9,330
($-Thousands)
207 169 361 322 190 144 390 I
2,845
($-Thousands)
I
6,218
I
8,385
I
9,672
I
9,784
I
8,784
I
11,027
I
16,498
Overall PCI I
63 I 63 I 63 I 63 I 63 I 63 I 63
8
8

18,000
v;- 16,000 I
c::
0
14,000 I 63 63 63 63
E
.S 12 000
- .,
- -
I
Qj
10.000 I
8,000
c::
"(ij
6,000 I
::E
"C

4,000
I .,. --
...

.:>t "i'UJ
Qj
-
Qj
2,000 tl
- Ill
I
0
0 I I

-.r 1./'l \.0
.... .... ....
0 ....
0 0 0
- 0
3
N N N
63 63 63 63 63 63
--
, ___
-- - - - -
A I A "7
'' ;co
4 R!R 5.000 r-"1
..J,J.J...;,J
- -
I 1----l/111
.... PCI

63 63 63 6-3 63 {63H 70
60

nnso2

I
I , . 40
I .J.--.4. :d
--
1:31 -I 30
- - - - -
-I 20
111111 I I I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I :
0
r--. 00 en 0 .... N (Y') -.r 1./'l \.0 r--. 00
.... .... .... N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N
Year
Figure 6. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2 (Maintain Current PCI)
8
9

u
Scenario 3: Unconstrained Funding
If the City had an unconstrained budget and wished to improve the network PCI to its optimal condition of approximately 85, $17.1 million
will be required. This scenario is different from the Needs Budget on page 10 because the Needs Budget "front loads" all the work to the
beginning of the analysis period to save on long term costs ($0.2 mill ion less). Simi lar to the Needs Budget it will eliminate the unfunded
backlog or pavement maintenance that is needed, but cannot be performed due to lack of funding. Additionally, almost all (96.7%) of the
pavement sections would be in the "Good" category and nothing below the " Fair" category. Tables 6 and Figure 7 show the details below.
Table 6. Summarv of Results for Scenario 3
1,180 1,195 1,197 1,198 1,200 1,197 1,186 I 899
Rehabil itation ($-Thousands)
1,068 1,148 1,123 1,122 1,008 983 757 I 690
($-Thousands)
112 I 47 I 74 I 76 I 192 I 214 I 429 I 209
($-Thousands)
I
2,316
I
2,034
I
1,864
I
1,471
I
1,288 I 804 I 377 I 0
Overall PCI
I 78 I 77
Budget {$-Thousands)
1, 018 1,191 1,190 1,298 1,221 733 1,196 I
17,099
669 1,001 1,002 1, 102 0 482 706 I
12,861
I I
I I I
{$-Thousands)
349 190 188 196 1,221 251 490
4,238
{$-Thousands)
I
0
I
1,181
I
1,809
I
1,282 I 0 I 0 I 0
I
Overall PCI
I
79
I
81
I
83
I
85
I
86
I
85 I 85
9
0

u
41000 1 -:>
7
nn
77
iii' 3 500 I -
:t
/4
'0 I
c
Rl
-

3000 I -
-
-- 0 I
.J:
..
1 ...
.5 2 500
</). I
1 21000 11
I
21034
I
1.864
QJ
-
...... .......
..
. 5 1,500

-, -- -
I

1
1
000 I -
-----

...
QJ
-
Ql

0
0

.:t U') \.0
"'
00 0'1 0 .-i
.-i .-i .-i .-i .-i .-i N N
0 '-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'+- 0

N N N N N N N N
Year
-
79

1
1
HS1
-
0
I
I I
N m
N N
0 0
N N

QL__Q.;;;L,- 90

1- 80
1- 70
1- 60
t 50 2
11809
-
40

30
--
1- 20
I I
t :0
0 0 0
I I I I I
.:t
U') \.0
"'
00
N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N
Figure 7. PCI vs. Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3 (Unconstrained}
91
Summary
Figure 8 (below) illustrates the change in PCI over time for the three different budget scenarios.
Scenario 1, the Current City Funding Level ($634,000, then $200,000 after 2022) has negative
consequences for the road network after 2022 since the amount of funding is insufficient to
maintain the current PCIIevels. Prior to 2022, Scenario 1 provides sufficient funding to keep the
PCI fairly steady around the low 60's, but after the loss of MeasureD funds the PCI will continue
to decline without adequate funding. This decline will drop the pavement to a PCI of 52 by the
end of 2028, near the threshold of the " Poor" category where pavements require more costly
rehabilitation measures to fix. In Scenario 2, the current PCI of 63 ("Fair") is maintained at a
cost of $12.2 million over 15 years. In Scenario 3, it will take $17.1 million to raise the pavement
network to its optimal condition of 85 ("Good") by 2028 .
.,._Scenario 1 (Current City Funding Level ) ...-scenario 2 (Maintain Current PCI of 63)
.,._Scenario 3 (Unconstrained)
90 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
40
~ - '
"<!" lfl 1.0 r-.. 00 0"1 0 .-t N M "<!" lfl 1.0 r-.. 00
0
....
.-t .-t .-t .-t .-t .-t N N N N N N N N N
.._
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<lJ
~
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
co
Year
Figure 8. Pavement Condition Index by Scenario by Year
92
Scenario 1 (Current City Funding Level)
Scenario 3 (Unconst rained)
Scenario 2 (Maintain Current PCI of 63)
Figure 9. Deferred Maintenance by Scenario by Year
Figure 9 illustrates the change in unfunded backlog or deferred maintenance for the three
different budget scenarios. The deferred maintenance in Scenario 1 (Current City Funding Level)
will increase to $22.7 million by 2028 (a 6-fold increase), which is the largest unfunded backlog
of the three scenarios. Scenario 2 (Maintain the Current PCI of 63) will result in a deferred
maintenance of $16.5 million by 2028 (over 4-fold increase), more moderate than Scenario 1. In
the case of Scenario 3 (Unconstrained Funding), the deferred maintenance disappears
completely as the pavement network has been optimally maintained.
Figure 10 below illustrates the changes in the pavement condition under the three scenarios.
Currently, 26.5% of the network is in the "Good" condition category and the majority is in the
"Fair" category. Only 11.5% is in the "Very Poor" or "Poor" condition categories. Under Scenario
1 (Current City Funding Level), it is projected that the amount of the network in the "Good"
condition category will increase to 49.8%, but with a huge shift to the Very Poor category of
41.3% (a 9-fold increase). These will lead to costly rehabilitation repairs beyond routine
maintenance. For Scenario 2 (Maintain Current PCI of 63), 70.1% will be in the "Good" condition
category (a 3-fold increase), with also a large shift to "Very Poor" 26.9. In the case of Scenario 3
(Unconstrained Funding), the percentage of the network in the "Good" condition category will
increase dramatically to 96.7% with nothing in the "Poor" or "Very Poor" categories.
20
93
Poor
7.1%
Fai r
2.9%
Very Current Condition
(2013)
Poor
2028 Condition Scenario 2
(Maintain Current PCI of 63)
Fair
2028 Condition Scenario 1 (Current City
Funding Level)
0.4%
2028 Condition Scenario 3
(Unconstrained Funding)
3.3% ____ --::;;
Figure 10. Pavement Condition Changes for Each Scenario
94
Conclusions
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea has a substantial investment in its road network, which is
estimated to have a replacement cost of approximately $37.6 million. Overall, the roads are in
"Fair" condition with an average PCI of 63. Most of the cities roads (88.4%) are in the "Good" to
"Fair" condition categories. However, at the City's existing budget, the average PCI of the
network is expected to begin decreasing after 2022 when Measure D funding stops and the
budget falls to $200,000/year. After this point, the PCI begins declining and will reach 52 by
2028, right on the threshold of the "Poor" category.
If sufficient funding is unavailable for road maintenance and repair, the average PCI is expected
to decrease and the deferred maintenance or unfunded backlog will increase. The higher
backlog will result in increased future costs as more capital intensive treatments (such as
reconstruction) will increase, since repairs are deferred until less expensive treatments (such as
surface seals or overlays) are no longer feasible or effective.
The analyses indicate that the City needs to spend $16.9 million (mostly at the beginning of the
analysis period) in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation over the next fifteen years, in
order to essentially eliminate the unfunded backlog. By doing so, roads can be maintained in
"Good" condition with on-going preventive maintenance.
a. Pavement Funding
The City's current funding level for pavements is estimated to be approximately $634,000/year
for 9 years then drop to one-third or $200,000/year after 2022. At this budget level, the
network PCI will decrease to 52 by 2028. In addition, the percentage of roads in the "Very Poor"
condition will increase to 41.3% (from 4.4% in 2013). The unfunded backlog will also increase
drastically, from $3.7 million to $22.7 million. Clearly, this funding level is inadequate after the
year 2022.
It is recommended that the City, as a minimum, consider increasing pavement expenditures to
$814,000 per year to at least maintain the network condition at the low-60s. This will allow the
City to preserve and improve pavements in the "Good" category.
It should be noted that a significant unknown is the future cost of rehabilitation; with the
recent volatility in oil prices, we would recommend that the City carefully monitor future
construction costs and be ready to adapt to large increases if necessary. The graph below
illustrates the changes in the Asphalt Price Index (source: Caltrans) since 1999. As can be seen,
asphalt prices have been extremely volatile since 2007.
95
800
700
600
"C
..: 500
Cll
u
400
...
] 300
Q.
.:t 200
100
0
Caltrans Ashphalt Price
Index
Figure 11. Asphalt Price Index (1999-2013, Caltrans)
Finally, NCE also recommends that the City continue with a strong and well-funded preventive
maintenance program. This is necessary to maintain the roads that are in good condition
(currently 26.5% in 2013) and avoid increasing the unfunded backlog even more.
In light of the substantial financial commitment that is required to maintain and/or improve
road conditions and the increase in construction costs, it is recommended that the City consider
extending Measure D beyond 2022 as a minimum.
b. Pavement Maintenance Strategies
The City's pavement maintenance strategies include seals, overlays and reconstruction. Since a
quarter of pavements are in "Good" condition, it is important to preserve good pavements.
Crack sealing, one of the least expensive treatments, can keep moisture out of pavements and
prevent the underlying aggregate base from premature failures. Life-ext ending surface seals,
such as slurry seal and cape seals, are also cost-effective for pavements currently in good
condition.
Therefore, we recommend that the City maintain the efforts in current preventive maintenance
program as outlined in the decision tree i.e. rubberized crack seals and slurry seals, while at the
same time, rehabilitate the streets in less favorable conditions.
96
c. Re-inspection Strategies
Since the City pavement network was updated in 2007, it is highly recommended to re-inspect
soon. In order to monitor future pavement performance and on-going maintenance needs, it is
recommended that arterial and collector roads in the network be re-inspected every two years,
and residential roads every four to five years.
d. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
The maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree and the associated unit costs should be
reviewed and updated annually to reflect new construction techniques/repairs and changing
costs so the budget analysis results can be reliable and accurate.
e. Next Steps
To summarize, we recommend that the City undertake the following steps:
Continue to fund the current preventive maintenance strategies as aggressively as
possible.
Direct staff to determine additional funding sources.
Consider alternative maintenance treatments as technology changes.
Update the pavement management system regularly.
97
APPENDIX A
Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.
98
Section Description Inventory
99
Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the City's pavement sections. It
lists the street and section identifiers, limits, functional class, surface type, number of lanes, lengths,
widths, areas and projected 2013 PCI.
All of the City's pavement sections are included in the report. The report is sorted alphabetically by
Street Name and Section I D. The field descriptions in this report are listed below:
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Street Name Street Name- The name of the street as indicated by street signs in the field.
Street ID
Street Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the street. Generally, the
street name is truncated to six characters. The Street ID should be unique for each street.
Section ID
Section Identification- A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the section number. The
Section ID must be unique for each section of one street.
From Beginning limit of the section.
To Ending limit of the section.
#of Lanes Number of travel Ia nes.
Length (ft) Length of the section in feet.
Width (ft) Average width of the section in feet.
Area (sqft) Area of the section in square feet.
FC Functional Classification (A= Arterial, C =Collector, R =Residential).
ST
Surface Type (AC = AC Pavement, 0 = AC Overlay of AC Pavement, AC/PCC = AC Overlay of PCC
Pavement, PCC = PCC Pavement, ST = Surface treatment over gravel base/subgrade).
PCI
Average PCI for the section. The value is projected for 2013 and is based on the last calculated
PCI (i.e. from inspection or maintenance data).
1
0
0
City of Carmel -by-the-Sea 2013 PMP Update Draft
Section Description Inventory {Sorted by PCI}
Street Name StreetiD
Section
From To
#of l ength W1dth Area
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID lanes (ft) (ft) (sqft)
10TH AV 10THAV 040 JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 2 234 16 3,744 R A 9/1/2012 100
12TH AV 12THAV 030 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 445 21 9,345 R A 10/1/2013 100
1STAV 1STAV 0408 CARPENTER ST l080S ST 2 233 23 5,359 R A 9/1/2012 100
2ND AV 2NDAV 070A CARPENTER ST l080S ST 2 233 23 5,359 R A 9/1/2012 100
3RDAV 3RDAV 050D SANTA RITA ST GUADALUPE ST 2 259 20 5,180 R A 9/1/2012 100
3RDAV 3RDAV 060B LOBOSST MONTEREYST 2 202 24 4,848 R A 10/1/ 2013 100
4THAV 4THAV 060A TORRES ST SANTA FEST 2 243 21 5,103 R A 10/1/ 2013 100
4THAV 4THAV 060B SANTA FEST SANTA RITA ST 2 253 21 5,313 R A 9/1/2011 100
5THAV 5THAV 012 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 230 31 7,130 c A 10/1/2007 100
7THAV 7THAV 050A GUADALUPE ST FOREST ST 2 259 16 4,144 R A 10/112013 100
DEL MARAV DELMAR 010 OCEAN AV TURN AROUND 2 141 81 11,421 A A 12/612012 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 010 VISTAAV 2NDAV 2 929 25 23,225 R A 91112011 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 031 4THAV 5THAV 2 474 30 14,220 0 A 9/1/2010 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 032 5THAV OCEAN AV 2 536 30 16,080 0 A 10/112013 100
ESCOLLE WAY ESCOLL 010 PERRY NEWBERRY WAY TURN AROUND 2 147 15 2,205 R s 9/ 1/ 2008 100
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 0208 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 467 26 12,142 R A 9/ 1/2012 100
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 030A 5THAV 6THAV 2 440 20 8,800 R A 91112011 100
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 040B 7THAV MOUNTAIN VIEWAV 2 433 23 9,959 R A 101112013 100
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 060 OCEANAV 8THAV 4 896 58 51,968 A A 6/1/2011 100
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 070 8THAV 10TH AV 2 925 42 38,850 c 0 10/112013 100
LAUSEN DRIVE LAUSEN 010 RIORD SHARP RD BEND/ CITY LIM 2 538 30 16, 140 c A 9/112011 100
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 021 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 482 25 12,050 0 0 10/1/ 2013 100
LOBOS ST LOBOS 020 2NDAV 4THAV 2 897 24 21 ,528 R A 9/ 1/2011 100
LOBOS ST LOBOS 010B 1ST AV 2NDAV 2 389 23 8,947 R A 101112013 100
MISSION ST MIS ION 020 3RDAV 4THAV 2 415 32 13,280 R A 101112007 100
OCEANAV OCEAN 010 DEL MARAV SAN ANTONIO AV 2 495 80 39,600 A A 6/1/2012 100
SANTA FE ST SANTFE 0126 2ND AVE CITY LIMIT 2 715 23 16,445 R A 101112013 100
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 010A CITY LIMITS 2NDAV 2 590 30 17,700 R A 101112013 100
SANTE FEST SANTFE 050 OCEAN AV 8THAV 2 906 18 16,308 R 0 9/ 1/2012 100
TORRES ST TORRES 040 OCEANAV 8THAV 2 875 23 20, 125 R A 9/ 1/ 2012 100
TORRES ST TORRES 010A CITY LIMITS 2ND AVE 2 703 18 12,654 R A 9/ 1/2011 100
TORRES ST TORRES 030A 4THAV 5TH AV 2 449 20 8,980 R A 10/1/2013 100
SAN CARLOS ST SA NCAR 041 6TH AVE OCEAN 2 152 42 6,384 A
p
8/21/2007 97
FC {Functional Class}: A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST {Surface Type} : A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment Page 1/7
1
0
1
2013 PMP Update Draft Nichols Consulting Engi neers, Chtd.
Section Description Inventory (Sorted by PCI)
Street Name Street 10
Section
From To
#of Length Width Area
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID Lanes (ft) (ft) (soft)
CAMINO DEL MONTE CMDMNT 010 CITY LIMIT 2ND STREET 2 200 23 4,600 A 0 8/ 27/ 2007 96
CAMINO DEL MONTE CMDMNT 020 3RD AV JUNIPEROAV 2 915 30 27,450 A A 8/27/2007 96
DOLORES ST DLORES 090 FRANCISCAN WY CITY LIMIT 2 197 25 4,925 R A 8/23/2007 96
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 20 CAMINO DEL MONTE 2ND AVE 2 146 37 5,402 c A 8/2712007 96
MISSION ST MISION 040 OCEAN AV 8TH AV 2 792 32 25,344 0 A 812312007 96
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 020 CAMINO REAL DOLORES ST 2 1,092 21 22,932 c A 812212007 96
13TH AV 13THAV 030 48 FT W/0 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPERO AV 2 630 22 13,860 A 0 8/ 23/2007 95
6TH AV 6THAV 010 MONTE VERDE ST LINCOLN ST 2 215 33 7,095 0 A 812412007 94
8THAV 8THAV 035 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 529 33 17,457 A A 812812007 94
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 022 5TH AVE OCEAN AVE 2 611 30 18,330 0 A 812112007 94
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 010 SCENIC RD CAMINO REAL 2 914 21 19,194 c A 8/2212007 94
N CAMINO REAL NCMNRL 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 855 23 19,665 R s 8122/2007 93
OCEAN AV OCEAN 050 CARPENTER ST CITY LIMITS 2 341 35 11,935 A A 812812007 93
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 030 BLKA3 S/END SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,035 30 31,050 A A 9/112008 93
2NDAV 2NDAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV N CAMINO REAL 2 484 23 11,132 R s 812212007 92
FOREST RD FOREST 010 MOUNTAIN VIEW 7TH AVE 2 536 23 12,328 R A 8/2312007 92
3RDAV 3RDAV 040 TORRES ST SANTA FEST 2 269 27 7,263 A A 8127/2007 91
6THAV 6THAV 025 MISSION ST JUNIPERO AV 2 216 33 7,128 0 A 812412007 91
6TH AV 6THAV 030 JUNIPEROAV TORRESST 2 218 33 7, 194 c A 8/ 28/2007 91
7THAV 7THAV 040 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 425 33 14,025 0 A 8/24/ 2007 91
CASANOVAST CASNVA 040 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,146 23 26,358 R s 812212007 91
11TH AV 11THAV 040 JUNIPEROAV EAST END 2 658 18 11 ,844 R A 8/23/2007 90
SAN CARLOS ST SANCAR 060 8TH AV 11TH AV 2 1.415 42 59,430 A A 8/21/2007 90
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 010 OCEANAV 8THAV 2 865 25 21,625 A A 9/1/2008 90
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,243 25 31 ,075 R s 8/ 22/2007 89
OCEAN AV OCEAN 040 JUNIPEROAV CARPENTER ST 2 1,262 30 37,860 A
p
8/ 28/ 2007 89
3RDAV 3RDAV 020 MISSION ST JUNIPERO AV 2 224 28 6,272 R s 8/21/2007 88
MISSION ST MIS ION 070 13TH AV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 587 28 16,436 R s 8/2312007 88
N CARMELOAV NCMELO 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 745 25 18,625 R s 8/22/2007 88
13TH AV 13THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST 48 FT W/0 SAN CARLOS ST 2 648 23 14,904 R s 812312007 87
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 020 OCEAN AV 9THAV 2 905 25 22,625 R s 812212007 87
MISSION ST MISION 030 4THAV OCEANAV 2 968 32 30,976 0 A 8/21/ 2007 87
TORRES ST TORRES 060 285FT N/0 11TH AV 11TH AV 2 285 16 4,560 R A 8/23/ 2007 87
- - -
FC (Functional Class): A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST (Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 2/7
1
0
2
Section Description Inventory {Sorted by PCI)
Street Name Street 10
Section
From To
#of l ength Width Area
FC ST PCI Date PCI
10 lanes (ft} (ft) (sqft}
11TH AV 11THAV 030 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 446 23 10,258 R s 8/2312007 86
2NDAV 2NDAV 030 N. CASANOVA STREET MONTE VERDE STREET 2 382 18 6,876 R A 8122/2007 86
CARMELOAV CMELO 010 4THAV OCEAN AV 2 605 23 13,915 R s 8/22/2007 86
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 050 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,253 25 31,325 R s 8121/2007 86
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 030 2ND AV 3RDAV 2 475 28 13,300 c A 812712007 85
N CASANOVA ST NCASNV 010 2NDAV SOUTN END 2 750 23 17,250 R s 8/22/2007 85
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 070 11TH AV 13TH AV 2 945 42 39,690 A A 8/21/2007 85
7THAV 7THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 887 23 20,401 R s 8124/ 2007 84
1CAMINO REAL CMNRL 01 0 4TH AV OCEAN AV 2 681 23 15,663 R s 8/22/2007 84
DOLORES ST DLORES 060 10TH AV 12TH AV 2 789 23 18,147 R s 8/21/2007 84
TORRES ST TORRES 010B 2ND AVE 3RD AVE 2 387 18 6,966 R s 8/27/2007 84
2ND AV 2NDAV 060 SANTA FE ST CARPENTER ST 2 731 32 23,392 A s 8127/2007 83
3RD AV 3RDAV 030 JUNIPERO AV TORRESST 2 245 27 6,615 A A 8/2712007 83
8TH AV 8THAV 040 JUNIPERO AV MOUNTAIN VIEW AV 2 877 23 20, 171 R s 8/23/2007 83
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 080 10TH AV RIORD 2 1,665 30 49,950 c A 8/28/ 2007 83
RIORD RIORD 010 JUNIPEROAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 305 30 9,150 A A 8/28/2007 83
2NDAV 2NDAV 040 MID BLK W\0 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 753 20 15,060 R A 812712007 82
CARMELO AV CMELO 020 OCEAN AV 9TH AV 2 1,365 23 31 ,395 R s 8/22/2007 82
CASANOVAST CASNVA 010 4THAV OCEAN AV 2 835 23 19,205 R s 8/22/2007 82
JUNI PERO AV JUNPRO 050 4THAV OCEAN AV 4 1,075 58 62,350 A A 8/ 2812007 82
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV MTVIEW 010 JUNIPEROAV SANTA FE ST 2 450 23 45,655 R s 8/28/2007 82
SANTE FE ST SANTFE 060 8TH AV SOUTH END 2 408 18 7,344 R s 8/23/ 2007 82
TORRES ST TORRES 050 8THAV 285 FT N/0 11TH AV 2 1,270 20 25,400 R s 8123/2007 82
1ST AV 1STAV 030 JUNIPERO AV (WEST END) SANTA RITA ST 2 633 23 14,559 R s 8/24/2007 81
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 040 12TH AV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,050 25 26,250 R s 8/22/2007 81
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 020 8THAV BLKA3 S\END 2 1,420 23 32,660 A A 9/1/2008 81
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 040 SANTA LUCIA AV CITY LI MIT 2 832 30 24,960 c A 9/1/2008 81
TORRES ST TORRES 020 3RDAV 4TH AV 2 428 30 12,840 c s 8/24/2007 81
6TH AV 6THAV 020 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 502 33 16,566 0 A 8/24/2007 80
6TH AV 6THAV 040 TORRES ST GUADALUPE ST 2 705 20 14,100 R s 8/28/2007 80
CASANOVAST CASNVA 020 OCEANAV 9THAV 2 1,389 25 34,725 R s 8/22/2007 80
DOLORES ST DLORES 070 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,340 23 30,820 R s 8/21/2007 80
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 040 8TH AV 9TH AV 2 458 30 13,740 R s 8/21/2007 80
FC (Functional Class): A-Arteri al, C-Col lector, R-Resi dential
November 2013
ST (Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, $-Surface Treatment
Page 3/7
1
0
3
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea 2013 PMP Update Draft
Section Description Inventory {Sorted by PCI)
Street Name Street ID
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID Lanes (ft) (ft) (sqft)
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 030 DOLORESST RIORD 2 866 25 21,650 c A 8/22/2007 80
3RDAV 3RDAV 060A CARPENTER ST L060S ST 2 236 24 5,664 R s 8/27/2007 79
4THAV 4THAV 030 LINCOLN ST DOLORES ST 2 251 27 6,777 c s 8/24/2007 79
4THAV 4THAV 050 JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 2 214 21 4,494 c s 8/24/2007 79
CASANOVAST CASNVA 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,243 25 31 ,075 R s 8/22/2007 79
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 015 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 455 25 11,375 R s 8/28/ 2007 79
10TH AV 10THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 30 27,360 R s 8/23/2007 78
.10TH AV 10THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 461 26 11,986 R s 8/23/ 2007 78
2NDAV 2NDAV 0706 L060SST MONTEREYST 2 200 23 4,600 R s 8/27/2007 78
4THAV 4THAV 040 DOLORESST JUNIPEROAV 2 681 25 17,025 c s 8/28/2007 78
4THAV 4THAV 060C SANTA RITA ST GUADALUPE ST 2 188 21 3,948 R s 8/28/2007 78
9THAV 9THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 26 23,712 R s 8/23/2007 78
9THAV 9THAV 040 MID 6LK 'MO TORRES ST EAST END 2 279 20 5,580 R s 8/ 23/2007 78
DOLORES ST DLORES 050 8THAV 10TH AV 2 915 23 21,045 c s 8/21/2007 78
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 040 8THAV 9THAV 2 435 25 10,875 R s 8/21/2007 78
RIDGEWOOD RD RDGWOD 010 JUNIPEROAV RIORD 2 1 ' 117 23 25,691 R s 8/20/2007 78
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 020 BTHAV 11TH AV 2 1,358 22 29,876 c s 8/22/2007 78
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 020 3RDAV 5THAV 2 922 30 27,660 R s 8/28/2007 78
2NDAV 2NDAV 020 N CAMINO REAL N. CASANOVA STREET 2 774 23 17,802 R A 2/1/1997 77
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 040 3RDAV 4THAV 2 452 58 26,216 A 0 8/21/2007 77
PALOU AV PALOU 010 NORTH END MONTE VERDE ST 2 761 18 13,698 R s 8/22/2007 77
TORRESST TORRES 0306 STH AV OCEAN AV 2 620 20 12,400 R s 8/24/ 2007 77
4THAV 4THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV CASANOVAST 2 874 21 18,354 R s 812212007 76
4THAV 4THAV 020 CASANOVA ST MID 6LK E\0 MONTE VERDE ST 2 382 21 8,022 R s 8/22/2007 76
BTHAV 8THAV 010 SCENIC RD SAN ANTONIO AV 2 220 33 7,260 c s 8/24/2007 76
9THAV 9THAV 030 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 216 30 6,480 c s 8/28/2007 76
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 011 CITY LIMITS 2ND AVE 2 645 30 19,350 A c 8/27/2007 76
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 012 2ND AVE 3RD AVE 2 460 30 13,800 c c 8/ 27/2007 76
FRANCISCAN WAY FRANCN 010 DOLORES ST SANTA LUCIA AV 2 912 21 19,152 R s 8/22/ 2007 76
LOPEZ AV LOPEZ 010 NORTH END 4THAV 2 695 23 15,985 R s 8/2212007 76
MISSIONST MIS ION 050 BTHAV 10TH AV 2 854 32 27,328 c s 8123/2007 76
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 915 20 18,300 R s 8/22/2007 76
SAN CARLOS ST SA NCAR 030 3RDAV 5THAV 2 770 42 32,340 A 0 8/21/2007 76
FC {Functional Class): A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST (Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, $-Surface Treatment
Page 4/7
1
0
4
2013 PMP Update Draft
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
VIZCAINO VIZCAN 010 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV FLANDERS WAY 2 762 18 13,716 R s 8/ 20/ 2007 76
10THAV 10THAV 030 DOLORES ST JUNIPEROAV 2 729 26 18,954 c s 8/23/ 2007 75
1STAV 1STAV 020 MISSION ST JUNIPEROAV 2 239 16 3,824 R s 8/21/2007 75
7THAV 7THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 482 33 15,906 0 s 8/24/2007 75
9THAV 9THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 447 32 14,304 R s 8/28/2007 75
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 030 OCEAN AV 8THAV 2 912 30 27,360 0 s 8/22/2007 75
PINE RIDGE WAY PNRIDG 010 FOREST RD TURN AROUND 2 141 23 3,243 R A 8/ 20/ 2007 75
SANTE FEST SANTFE 030 3RDAV 5TH AV 2 906 23 20,838 R s 8/ 27/ 2007 74
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 050 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,245 30 37,350 c s 8/2112007 73
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 060 12TH AV 125 FT S/0 SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,332 23 30,636 R s 8/21/2007 73
5THAV 5THAV 030 TORRES ST GUADALUPE ST 2 685 20 13,700 R s 8/28/2007 72
CARMELOAV CMELO 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,362 25 34,050 R s 8/ 22/2007 72
MISSION ST MISION 060 10THAV 13TH AV 2 1,338 23 30,774 R s 8/23/ 2007 72
N SAN ANTONIO AV NSANAN 010 2NDAV 4TH AV 2 726 23 16,698 A s 8/22/ 2007 72
SAN CARLOS ST SA NCAR 042 6TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 475 42 19,950 A
p
8/21 /2007 72
STERLING WAY STRLNG 010 PERRY NEWBERRY WAY TURN AROUND 2 145 25 3,625 R s 8/20/2007 72
13TH AV 13THAV 010 SCENIC RD MONTE VERDE ST 2 882 26 22,932 R s 8/23/2007 71
1ST AV 1STAV 040A SANTA RITA ST CARPENTER ST 2 500 23 11,500 R s 8/24/ 2007 71
1ST AV 1STAV 040C LOBOS ST MONTEREYST 2 179 23 4,117 R s 8/24/ 2007 71
LINCOLN ST LIN COL 060 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,258 25 31,450 R s 8/21/ 2007 71
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV MTVIEW 020 SANTA FEST FOREST RD 2 587 23 13,501 R s 8/28/2007 71
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 030 11TH AV SAN LUCIAAV 2 1,270 22 27,940 c s 8/22/2007 71
12TH AV 12THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 683 30 20,490 R s 8/23/2007 70
5THAV 5THAV 040 GUADALUPE ST CITY LIMITS 2 610 23 14,030 R s 8/23/2007 70
6THAV 6THAV 050 GUADALUPE ST EAST END 2 503 20 10,060 R s 8/ 28/2007 70
MISSION ST MISION 010 ALTAAV 2NDAV 2 1,368 23 31,464 R s 8/21/ 2007 70
SAN CARLOS ST SA NCAR 010 ALTAAV 2NDAV 2 1,362 23 31,326 R s 8/21/ 2007 70
5THAV 5THAV 025 JUNIPEROAV TORRESST 2 219 37 8,103 c A 8/24/2007 69
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 010 ALTA ST CAMINO DEL MONTE 2 1 ' 115 23 25,645 R s 8/21 /2007 69
SANTE FEST SANTFE 040 5TH AV 6THAV 2 449 23 10,327 R s 8/27/2007 69
8THAV 8THAV 030 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 640 33 21 ' 120 0 s 8/28/2007 68
-- - - ------- -
Page 5/7
1
0
5
Section
From To
#of Length W1dth Area
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID Lanes (ft) (ft) (SQft)
DOLORES ST DLORES 020 2NDAV 4THAV 2 882 23 20,286 R s 8/22/2007 68
FLANDERS WAY FLANDR 010 VIZCAINO CRESPIAV 2 216 23 4,968 R s 8/20/2007 68
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 020A 3RDAVE 4TH AVE 2 436 26 11,336 R s 8/28/ 2007 68
OCEANAV OCEAN 030 MONTE VERDE ST JUNIPEROAV 4 1,380 64 88,320 A s 8/29/2007 68
3RDAV 3RDAV 010 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 468 23 10,764 R s 8/21/ 2007 67
I MONTEREY ST MONTRY 010 NORTH END 2NDAV 2 650 20 13,000 R s 8/24/2007 67
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 015 OCEANAV 8THAV 2 908 22 19,976 c s 8/22/2007 67
1ST AV 1STAV 010 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 705 20 14,100 R s 8/21/2007 66
LOBOSST LOBOS 010A CITY LIMITS 1STAV 2 256 23 5,888 R s 8/24/2007 66
SAN CARLOS ST SANCAR 050 OCEAN AV BTH AV 2 860 36 30,960 A
p
8/21/2007 66
5THAV 5THAV 020 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 430 22 9,460 c s 8/24/2007 65
STHAV STHAV 020 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 875 33 28,875 R s 8/ 28/ 2007 65
DOLORES ST DLORES 080 SANTA LUCIA AV FRANCISCAN WY 2 327 25 8,175 R s 8/23/2007 65
FOREST RD FOREST 020 7TH AVE. OCEAN AVE 2 600 23 13,800 R s 8/23/2007 65
FRASER WAY FRASER 010 CAMINO REAL CASANOVAST 2 240 16 3,840 R s 8/28/2007 65
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 020 3RDAV OCEANAV 2 1,528 30 45,840 A c 8/27/2007 64
CARMELOAV CMELO 040 12TH AV SANTA LUCIAAV 2 825 25 20,625 R s 8/22/2007 63
CRESPI AV CRESPI 010 MOUNTAIN VIEWAV FLANDERS WAY 2 695 18 12,510 R s 8/23/2007 63
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 0308 6THAV OCEAN AV 2 175 20 3,500 R s 8/28/2007 63
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 030 OCEANAV 8THAV 2 909 30 27,270 0 s 8/21/2007 63
OAK KNOLL WAY OAKNOL 010 FOREST RD TURNAROUND 2 250 16 4,000 R s 8/20/2007 63
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 010 4THAV OCEANAV 2 576 22 12,672 A s 8/22/2007 63
STHAV 5THAV 011 MONTE VERDE ST DELORES ST 2 400 31 12,400 c s 812412007 62
7THAV 7THAV 030 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 222 33 7,326 0
p
8/27/2007 62
STH AV STHAV 050 FOREST RD TURNAROUND 2 135 16 2,160 R s 8/ 23/2007 62
MONTEREY ST MONTRY 020 2NDAV SOUTH END 2 681 20 13,620 R s 8/24/ 2007 62
SAN CARLOS ST SANCAR 080 13THAV SANTA LUCIAAV 2 707 23 16,261 c s 8/21/2007 62
LINCOLN ST UN COL 010 1STAV 2ND AV 2 553 23 12,719 R s 8/21/2007 61
RIORD RIORD 020 SANTA LUCIAAV SOUTH CITY LIMIT 2 1,310 52 68,120 A A 8/28/2007 61
SANTA FEST SANTFE 012A 3RDAVE 2ND AVE 2 446 23 10,258 R s 8/27/2007 60
11TH AV 11THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 676 23 15,548 R s 8/23/2007 58
ALTAAV ALTAAV 010 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPERO AV 2 530 23 12,190 R s 8/20/2007 57
SAN CARLOS ST SA NCAR 020 2ND AV 3RDAV 2 447 20 8,940 R s 8/27/ 2007 56
--- ----
Page 6/7
1
0
6
Section Description Inventory (Sorted by PCI}
Section
From To
# of Length Width Area
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID Lanes Jft) (ft) _{qft)
2NDAV 2NDAV 050 JUNIPEROAV SANTA FEST 2 461 23 10,603 R s 8/27/2007 55
3RDAV 3RDAV 050B GUADALUPE ST CARPENTER ST 2 246 20 4,920 R s 812712007 55
3RDAV 3RDAV 050C SANTA FEST SANTA RITA ST 2 236 20 4,720 R s 8/27/2007 55
LINCOLN ST LIN COL 015 2NDAV MID BLK S/0 3RD AV 2 610 23 14,030 R s 8/ 21/ 2007 53
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 020 4THAV OCEANAV 2 1,060 25 26,500 0 s 8/22/ 2007 52
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 010 CITY LIMITS 2NDAV 2 632 27 17,064 R s 8/28/2007 50
PERRY NEWBERRY WY PRYNBY 010 4THAV 6THAV 2 876 23 20,148 R s 8/27/2007 50
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 030 5THAV OCEANAV 2 620 25 15,500 R s 8/28/2007 49
VALLEY WAY VALLEY 010 N CITY LIMITS E CITY LIMITS 2 365 24 8,760 R s 8/27/2007 49
VISTAAV VISTA 010 DOLORES ST JUNIPERO AV 2 708 20 14,160 R s 8/20/ 2007 49
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 040A OCEANAV 7THAV 2 492 23 11 ,316 R s 8/28/2007 48
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 0108 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 456 30 13,680 R s 8/28/2007 48
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 040 OCEANAV MOUNTAIN VIEWAV 2 650 20 13,000 R s 8/28/2007 47
OCEANAV OCEAN 020 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 1,000 25 25,000 A
p
8/ 29/2007 46
LADERA DRIVE LADERA 010 RIORD TURNAROUND 2 1,033 23 23,759 R s 8/ 20/ 2007 42
7THAV 7THAV 0508 FOREST ST CITY LIMITS 2 224 16 3,584 R s 8/23/2007 30
DOLORES ST DLORES 040A OCEAN AV 7THAV 2 482 30 14,460 0
p
8/21/2007 24
DOLORES ST DLORES 0408 7TH 8THAV 2 381 30 11 .430 0
p
8/21/2007 24
- ~
-
FC (Functional Class}: A-Arteri al, C-Coll ector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST (Surface Type}: A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 7/7
1
0
7
City of Carmel- by-the-Sea
Section Description Inventory {Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
10TH AV 10THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 30 27,360 R s 812312007 78
10TH AV 10THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 461 26 11 ,986 R s 812312007 78
10TH AV 10THAV 030 DOLORESST JUNIPEROAV 2 729 26 18,954 c s 812312007 75
10TH AV 10THAV 040 JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 2 234 16 3,744 R A 91112012 100
11TH AV 11THAV 01 0 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 25 22,800 R s 8123/2007 72
11TH AV 11THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 676 23 15,548 R s 812312007 58
i11TH AV 11THAV 030 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 446 23 10,258 R s 812312007 86 I
11TH AV 11THAV 040 JUNIPEROAV EAST END 2 658 18 11,844 R A 8123/2007 90 i
12TH AV 12THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 30 27,360 R s 812312007 73
12TH AV 12THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 683 30 20,490 R s 812312007
70 I
12TH AV 12THAV 030 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 445 21 9,345 R A 101112013 100
13TH AV 13THAV 010 SCENIC RD MONTE VERDE ST 2 882 26 22,932 R s 8/23/ 2007 71
13TH AV 13THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST 48 FT W/0 SAN CARLOS ST 2 648 23 14,904 R s 8/2312007 87
13TH AV 13THAV 030 48 FT WI O SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 630 22 13,860 A 0 812312007 95
1STAV 1STAV 010 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 705 20 14,100 R s 8121 12007 66
1STAV 1STAV 020 MISSION ST JUNIPERO AV 2 239 16 3,824 R s 8/21/2007 75
1ST AV 1STAV 030 JUNIPERO AV (WEST END) SANTA RITA ST 2 633 23 14,559 R s 812412007 81
1ST AV 1STAV 040A SANTA RITA ST CARPENTER ST 2 500 23 11,500 R s 8/24/ 2007 71
1STAV 1STAV 0408 CARPENTER ST L080S ST 2 233 23 5,359 R A 9/ 1/2012 100
1ST AV 1STAV 040C L080S ST MONTEREYST 2 179 23 4,117 R s 812412007 71
2NDAV 2NDAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV N CAMINO REAL 2 484 23 11 ,132 R s 812212007 92
2NDAV 2NDAV 020 N CAMINO REAL N. CASANOVA STREET 2 774 23 17,802 R A 2/1/1997 77
2NDAV 2NDAV 030 N. CASANOVA STREET MONTE VERDE STREET 2 382 18 6,876 R A 812212007 86
2NDAV 2NDAV 040 MID 8LK \fl/\0 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 753 20 15,060 R A 8/2712007 82
2NDAV 2NDAV 050 JUNIPEROAV SANTA FEST 2 461 23 10,603 R s 8/27/ 2007 55
2NDAV 2NDAV 060 SANTA FEST CARPENTER ST 2 731 32 23,392 A s 8/27/2007 83
2ND AV 2NDAV 070A CARPENTER ST L080SST 2 233 23 5,359 R A 911/2012 100
2NDAV 2NDAV 0708 L080SST MONTEREYST 2 200 23 4,600 R s 812712007 78
3RDAV 3RDAV 010 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 468 23 10,764 R s 8/21/2007 67
3RDAV 3RDAV 020 MISSION ST JUNIPERO AV 2 224 28 6,272 R s 8/2112007 88
3RDAV 3RDAV 030 JUNIPEROAV TORRESST 2 245 27 6,615 A A 812712007 83
3RDAV 3RDAV 040 TORRES ST SANTA FEST 2 269 27 7,263 A A 8/27/ 2007 91
3RDAV 3RDAV 0508 GUADALUPE ST CARPENTER ST 2 246 20 4,920 R s 8/27/2007 55
-- -
November 2013 ST {Surface Type) : A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 1/7
1
0
8
Section Description Inventory (Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date
ID Lanes (ft} (ft) (sqft)
PCI
3RDAV 3RDAV 050C SANTA FEST SANTA RITA ST 2 236 20 4,720 R s 8/27/ 2007 55
3RDAV 3RDAV 050D SANTA RITA ST GUADALUPE ST 2 259 20 5,180 R A 9/ 1/2012 100
3RDAV 3RDAV 060A CARPENTER ST L090S ST 2 236 24 5,664 R s 8/27/2007 79
3RDAV 3RDAV 0609 LOBOS ST MONTEREY ST 2 202 24 4,848 R A 10/1/2013 100
4THAV 4THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV CASANOVAST 2 874 21 18,354 R s 8/22/2007 76
4THAV 4THAV 020 CASANOVA ST MID 9LK E\ 0 MONTE VERDE ST 2 382 21 8,022 R s 8/22/2007 76
4THAV 4THAV 030 LINCOLN ST DOLORES ST 2 251 27 6,777 c s 8/24/ 2007 79
4THAV 4THAV 040 DOLORES ST JUNIPERO AV 2 681 25 17,025 c s 8/ 28/ 2007 78
4THAV 4THAV 050 JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 2 214 21 4,494 c s 8124/ 2007 79
4THAV 4THAV 060A TORRES ST SANTA FEST 2 243 21 5,103 R A 10/1/2013 100
4THAV 4THAV 0609 SANTA FEST SANTA RITA ST 2 253 21 5,313 R A 9/1/201 1 100
4THAV 4THAV 060C SANTA RITA ST GUADALUPE ST 2 188 21 3,948 R s 8/28/2007 78
5THAV 5THAV 011 MONTE VERDE ST DELORES ST 2 400 31 12,400 c s 8/24/2007 62
5TH AV 5THAV 012 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 230 31 7, 130 c A 10/1/ 2007 100
5THAV 5THAV 020 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPERO AV 2 430 22 9,460 c s 8/24/2007 65
5THAV 5THAV 025 JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 2 219 37 8, 103 c A 8/24/2007 69
5THAV 5THAV 030 TORRES ST GUADALUPE ST 2 685 20 13,700 R s 8/2812007 72
6THAV 6THAV 010 MONTE VERDE ST LINCOLN ST 2 215 33 7,095 0 A 8124/2007 94
6THAV 6THAV 020 LINCOLN ST MISSION ST 2 502 33 16,566 0 A 8/2412007 80
6THAV 6THAV 025 MISSION ST JUNIPEROAV 2 216 33 7, 128 0 A 8/24/2007 91
6TH AV 6THAV 030 JUNIPEROAV TORRESST 2 218 33 7,194 c A 8/28/ 2007 91
6TH AV 6THAV 040 TORRES ST GUADALUPE ST 2 705 20 14,100 R s 8/28/ 2007 80
6THAV 6THAV 050 GUADALUPE ST EAST END 2 503 20 10,060 R s 8/28/ 2007 70
7THAV 7THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 887 23 20,401 R s 8/24/2007 84
7TH AV 7THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 482 33 15,906 0 s 8124/2007 75
7THAV 7THAV 030 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 222 33 7,326 0
p
8/2712007 62
7THAV 7THAV 040 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 425 33 14,025 0 A 812412007 91
7THAV 7THAV 050A GUADALUPE ST FOREST ST 2 259 16 4,144 R A 10/1/2013 100
7THAV 7THAV 0508 FOREST ST CITY LIMITS 2 224 16 3,584 R s 8/ 23/ 2007 30
8THAV 8THAV 010 SCENIC RD SAN ANTONIO AV 2 220 33 7,260 c s 8/24/ 2007 76
FC (Functional Class): A-Art erial, C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013
ST (Surface Type) : A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment Page 2/7
1
0
9
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea 2013 PMP Update Draft
Section Description Inventory (Sorted by Street Name}
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
ID Lanes (fti {ft} (sqft}
8THAV 8THAV 030 MONTE VERDE ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 640 33 21 ,120 0 s 8/28/2007 68
8TH AV 8THAV 035 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 529 33 17,457 A A 8/28/2007 94
8THAV 8THAV 040 JUNIPEROAV MOUNTAIN VIEW AV 2 877 23 20,171 R s 8/23/2007 83
8THAV 8THAV 050 FOREST RD TURN AROUND 2 135 16 2,160 R s 8/ 23/2007 62
9THAV 9THAV 010 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2 912 26 23,712 R s 8/ 23/ 2007 78
9THAV 9THAV 020 MONTE VERDE ST DOLORES ST 2 447 32 14,304 R s 8/28/ 2007 75
:9TH AV 9THAV 030 DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 2 216 30 6,480 c s 8/28/2007 76
9THAV 9THAV 040 MID BLK W\0 TORRES ST EAST END 2 279 20 5,580 R s 8/23/2007 78
ALTAAV ALTAAV 010 SAN CARLOS ST JUNIPEROAV 2 530 23 12,190 R s 8/20/2007 57
CAMINO DEL MONTE CMDMNT 010 CITY LIMIT 2ND STREET 2 200 23 4,600 A 0 8/27/2007 96
CAMINO DEL MONTE CMDMNT 020 3RDAV JUNIPEROAV 2 915 30 27,450 A A 8/ 27/ 2007 96
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 010 4THAV OCEANAV 2 681 23 15,663 R s 8/22/ 2007 84
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 020 OCEANAV 9TH AV 2 905 25 22,625 R s 8/22/2007 87
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1.243 25 31 ,075 R s 8/22/2007
89 1
CAMINO REAL CMNRL 040 12TH AV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,050 25 26,250 R s 8/22/2007 81
CARMELOAV CMELO 010 4THAV OCEANAV 2 605 23 13,915 R s 8/2212007 86
CARMELOAV CMELO 020 OCEANAV 9THAV 2 1,365 23 31 ,395 R s 8/ 22/2007 82
CARMELOAV CMELO 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,362 25 34,050 R s 8/ 22/ 2007 72
CARMELO AV CMELO 040 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 825 25 20,625 R s 8/ 22/2007 63
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 011 CITY LIMITS 2ND AVE 2 645 30 19,350 A c 8/27/2007 76
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 012 2ND AVE 3RDAVE 2 460 30 13,800 c c 8/27/2007 76
CARPENTER ST CRPNTR 020 3RDAV OCEANAV 2 1,528 30 45,840 A c 8/27/2007 64
CASANOVAST CAS NVA 010 4THAV OCEANAV 2 835 23 19,205 R s 8/22/2007 82
CASANOVAST CAS NVA 020 OCEANAV 9THAV 2 1,389 25 34,725 R s 8/ 22/2007 80
CASANOVAST CAS NVA 030 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,243 25 31,075 R s 8/ 22/ 2007 79
CASANOVAST CASNVA 040 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,146 23 26,358 R s 8/22/ 2007 91
CRESPI AV CRESPI 010 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV FLANDERS WAY 2 695 18 12,510 R s 8/23/2007 63
DEL MARAV DELMAR 010 OCEAN AV TURN AROUND 2 141 81 11 ,421 A A 12/6/2012 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 010 VISTAAV 2NDAV 2 929 25 23,225 R A 9/1/201 1 100
DOLORESST DLORES 020 2NDAV 4THAV 2 882 23 20,286 R s 8/2212007 68
DOLORES ST DLORES 031 4THAV 5THAV 2 474 30 14,220 0 A 9/112010 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 032 5THAV OCEANAV 2 536 30 16,080 0 A 10/1/2013 100
DOLORES ST DLORES 050 8THAV 10TH AV 2 915 23 21 ,045 c s 8/21/2007 78
FC (Functional Class}: A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST (Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0 -AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 3/7
1
1
0
Section Description Invent ory (Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
DOLORESST DLORES 060 10TH AV 12TH AV 2 789 23 18,147 R s 8/21/2007 84
DOLORES ST DLORES 070 12TH AV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,340 23 30,820 R s 8/21/ 2007 80
DOLORES ST DLORES 080 SANTA LUCIAAV FRANCISCAN WY 2 327 25 8,175 R s 8/ 23/ 2007 65
!DOLORES ST DLORES 090 FRANCISCAN WY CITY LIMIT 2 197 25 4,925 R A 8/23/2007 96
DOLORES ST DLORES 040A OCEANAV 7TH AV 2 482 30 14,460 0
p
8/21 /2007 24
DOLORES ST DLORES 040B 7TH 8THAV 2 381 30 11,430 0
p
8/21/2007 24
ESCOLLE WAY ESCOLL 010 PERRY NEWBERRY WAY TURN AROUND 2 147 15 2,205 R s 9/1/2008 100
FLANDERS WAY FLANDR 010 VIZCAINO CRESPIAV 2 216 23 4,968 R s 8/20/2007 68
FOREST RD FOREST 010 MOUNTAIN VIEW 7TH AVE 2 536 23 12,328 R A 8/ 23/2007 92
FORESTRD FOREST 020 7TH AVE. OCEAN AVE 2 600 23 13,800 R s 8/23/ 2007 65
FRANCISCAN WAY FRANCN 010 DOLORES ST SANTA LUCIA AV 2 912 21 19,152 R s 8/22/2007 76
FRASER WAY FRASER 010 CAMINO REAL CASANOVAST 2 240 16 3,840 R s 8/28/2007 65
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 010 CITY LIMITS 2NDAV 2 632 27 17,064 R s 8/28/2007 50
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 015 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 455 25 11,375 R s 8/28/2007 79
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 020A 3RD AVE 4TH AVE 2 436 26 11,336 R s 8/28/ 2007 68
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 020B 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 467 26 12,142 R A 9/ 1/ 2012 100
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 030A 5THAV 6THAV 2 440 20 8,800 R A 9/112011 100
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 030B 6THAV OCEAN AV 2 175 20 3,500 R s 8/28/2007 63
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 040A OCEANAV 7THAV 2 492 23 11,316 R s 8/28/2007 48
GUADALUPE ST GUADLP 040B 7THAV MOUNTAIN VIEWAV 2 433 23 9,959 R A 10/1/2013 100
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 010 ALTAST CAMINO DEL MONTE 2 1 ' 115 23 25,645 R s 8/21/2007 69
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 20 CAMINO DEL MONTE 2ND AVE 2 146 37 5,402 c A 8/27/2007 96
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 030 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 475 28 13,300 c A 8/27/2007 85
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 040 3RDAV 4THAV 2 452 58 26,216 A 0 8/21 /2007 77
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 050 4THAV OCEANAV 4 1,075 58 62,350 A A 8/28/2007 82
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 060 OCEAN AV 8TH AV 4 896 58 51,968 A A 6/1/201 1 100
JUNIPEROAV JUNPRO 070 8THAV 10TH AV 2 925 42 38,850 c 0 10/1/2013 100
JUNIPERO AV JUNPRO 080 10TH AV RIORD 2 1,665 30 49,950 c A 8/ 28/ 2007 83
LADERA DRIVE LADERA 010 RIORD TURNAROUND 2 1,033 23 23,759 R s 8/20/ 2007 42
LAUSEN DRIVE LAUSEN 010 RIORD SHARP RD BEND/CITY LIM 2 538 30 16,140 c A 9/112011 100
LINCOLN ST LIN COL 010 1STAV 2NOAV 2 553 23 12,719 R s 8/21 /2007 61
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 015 2NDAV MID BLK S/0 3RO AV 2 610 23 14,030 R s 8/21/2007 53
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 021 4TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 482 25 12,050 0 0 10/1/2013 100
-- ----- --- -
November 2013 ST {Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0 -AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 4/7
1
1
1
2013 PMP Update Draft Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.
Section Description Inventory (Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
LINCOLN ST LIN COL 022 5TH AVE OCEAN AVE 2 611 30 18,330 0 A 8/21/2007 94
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 030 OCEAN AV 8TH AV 2 909 30 27,270 0 s 8/21/ 2007 63
LINCOLN ST LIN COL 040 8THAV 9THAV 2 458 30 13,740 R s 8/ 21/ 2007 80
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 050 9THAV 12TH AV 2 1,245 30 37,350 c s 8/21/2007 73
LINCOLN ST LINCOL 060 12THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,258 25 31 ,450 R s 8/21 /2007 71
LOBOS ST LOBOS 020 2NDAV 4THAV 2 897 24 21,528 R A 9/1/2011 100
LOBOS ST LOBOS 010A CITY LIMITS 1STAV 2 256 23 5,888 R s 8/24/2007 66
LOBOS ST LOBOS 0108 1ST AV 2NDAV 2 389 23 8,947 R A 10/1/2013 100
LOPEZ AV LOPEZ 010 NORTH END 4THAV 2 695 23 15,985 R s 8/22/2007 76
MISSION ST MISION 010 ALTAAV 2NDAV 2 1,368 23 31,464 R s 8/21/ 2007 70
MISSION ST MIS ION 020 3RDAV 4THAV 2 415 32 13,280 R A 10/1/2007 100
MISSION ST MIS ION 030 4THAV OCEAN AV 2 968 32 30,976 0 A 8/21 /2007 87
MISSION ST MISION 040 OCEANAV 8TH AV 2 792 32 25,344 0 A 8/23/2007 96
MISSION ST MISION 050 8THAV 10TH AV 2 854 32 27,328 c s 8/ 23/2007 76
MISSION ST MISION 060 10TH AV 13TH AV 2 1,338 23 30,774 R s 8/23/ 2007 72
MISSION ST MIS ION 070 13THAV SANTA LUCI A AV 2 587 28 16,436 R s 8/23/ 2007 88
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 915 20 18,300 R s 8/22/2007 76
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 020 4THAV OCEAN AV 2 1,060 25 26, 500 0 s 8/22/2007 52
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 030 OCEANAV BTHAV 2 912 30 27,360 0 s 8/2212007 75
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 040 8THAV 9THAV 2 435 25 10,875 R s 8/ 21/2007 78
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 050 9TH AV 12TH AV 2 1,253 25 31,325 R s 8/21/ 2007 86
MONTE VERDE ST MNTVRD 060 12THAV 125 FT S/0 SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,332 23 30,636 R s 8/21/2007 73
MONTEREYST MONTRY 010 NORTH END 2NDAV 2 650 20 13,000 R s 8/24/2007 67
MONTEREYST MONTRY 020 2NDAV SOUTH END 2 681 20 13,620 R s 8/24/2007 62
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV MTVIEW 010 JUNIPEROAV SANTA FEST 2 450 23 45,655 R s 8/28/2007 82
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV MTVIEW 020 SANTA FEST FOREST RD 2 587 23 13,501 R s 8/28/2007 71
N CAMINO REAL NCMNRL 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 855 23 19,665 R s 8/ 22/2007 93
N CARMELOAV NCMELO 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 745 25 18,625 R s 8/22/ 2007 88
N CASANOVA ST NCASNV 010 2NDAV SOUTN END 2 750 23 17,250 R s 8/22/2007 85
N SAN ANTONIO AV NSANAN 010 2NDAV 4THAV 2 726 23 16,698 A s 8/2212007 72
OAK KNOLL WAY OAKNOL 010 FOREST RD TURNAROUND 2 250 16 4,000 R s 8/20/2007 63
OCEAN AV OCEAN 010 DELMARAV SAN ANTONIO AV 2 495 80 39,600 A A 6/1/2012 100
OCEAN AV OCEAN 020 SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 2
- ---- L_
1,000 25 25,000 A
p
8/ 29/2007 46
FC {Functional Class) : A-Arterial , C-Collector, R-Residential
November 2013 ST {Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, $-Surface Treatment
Page 5/7
1
1
2
Nichol s Consulting Engineers, Cht d.
Sect ion Description Inventory (Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
OCEAN AV OCEAN 030 MONTE VERDE ST JUNIPERO AV 4 1,380 64 88,320 A s 8/29/2007 68
OCEAN AV OCEAN 040 JUNIPERO AV CARPENTER ST 2 1,262 30 37,860 A
p
8/ 28/2007 89
OCEAN AV OCEAN 050 CARPENTER ST CITY LIMITS 2 341 35 11,935 A A 8/28/2007 93
PALOUAV PALOU 010 NORTH END MONTE VERDE ST 2 761 18 13,698 R s 8/22/2007 77
PERRY NEWBERRY WY PRYNBY 010 4THAV 6TH AV 2 876 23 20,148 R s 8/27/2007 50
PINE RIDGE WAY PNRIDG 010 FOREST RD TURNAROUND 2 141 23 3,243 R A 8/20/2007 75
RIDGEWOOD RD RDGWOD 010 JUNIPERO AV RIO RD 2 1 ' 117 23 25,691 R s 8/20/2007 78
RIORD RIORD 010 JUNIPEROAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 305 30 9, 150 A A 8/28/2007 83
RIORD RIORD 020 SANTA LUCIA AV SOUTH CITY LIMIT 2 1,310 52 68, 120 A A 8/28/2007 61
SAN ANTONIO AV SAN AN 010 4TH AV OCEAN AV 2 576 22 12,672 A s 8/22/2007 63
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 015 OCEANAV 8TH AV 2 908 22 19,976 c s 8/22/2007 67
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 020 8TH AV 11TH AV 2 1,358 22 29,876 c s 8/22/2007
78 1
SAN ANTONIO AV SANAN 030 11TH AV SAN LUCIAAV 2 1,270 22 27,940 c s 8/22/2007 71
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 010 ALTAAV 2NDAV 2 1,362 23 31, 326 R s 8/21/2007 70!
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 020 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 447 20 8,940 R s 8/27/2007 56
SAN CARLOS ST SANCAR 030 3RDAV 5TH AV 2 770 42 32,340 A 0 8/ 21/ 2007 76
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 041 6TH AVE OCEAN 2 152 42 6,384 A
p
8/21/2007 97
SAN CARLOS ST SANCAR 042 6TH AVE 5TH AVE 2 475 42 19,950 A
p
8/21/2007 72
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 050 OCEANAV 8TH AV 2 860 36 30,960 A
p
8/21 /2007 66
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 060 8THAV 11TH AV 2 1,415 42 59,430 A A 8/21/2007 90
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 070 11TH AV 13TH AV 2 945 42 39,690 A A 8/21/2007 85
SAN CARLOS ST SAN CAR 080 13THAV SANTA LUCIA AV 2 707 23 16,261 c s 8/21/2007 62
SANTA FE ST SANTFE 012A 3RD AVE 2ND AVE 2 446 23 10,258 R s 8/27/ 2007 60
SANTA FE ST SANTFE 01 28 2ND AVE CITY LIMIT 2 715 23 16,445 R A 10/1/ 201 3 100
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 010 SCENIC RD CAMINO REAL 2 914 21 19,194 c A 8/ 22/ 2007 94
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 020 CAMINO REAL DOLORES ST 2 1,092 21 22,932 c A 8/22/2007 96
SANTA LUCIA AV SANLUC 030 DOLORES ST RIO RD 2 866 25 21,650 c A 8/22/2007 80
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 020 3RD AV 5TH AV 2 922 30 27,660 R s 8/28/2007 78
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 030 5THAV OCEAN AV 2 620 25 15,500 R s 8/28/2007 49
SANTA RITA ST SANRIT 040 OCEAN AV MOUNTAIN VIEW AV 2 650 20 13,000 R s 8/28/ 2007 47
SANTA RI TA ST SANRIT 01 0A CITY LIMITS 2ND AV 2 590 30 17,700 R A 10/1/ 2013 100
SANTA RI TA ST SANRIT 010B 2NDAV 3RDAV 2 456 30 13,680 R s 8/28/ 2007 48
SANTE FE ST SANTFE 030 3RDAV 5TH AV 2 906 23 20,838 R s 8/27/2007 74
- -- ---
FC (Functional Class): A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residenti al
November 2013 ST {Surf ace Type): A-AC, C-AC/ PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treat ment
Page 6/7
1
1
3
Ci t y of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Section Descript ion Invent ory (Sorted by Street Name)
Section
From To
FC ST PCI Date PCI
.SANTE FEST SANTFE 040 5THAV 6TH AV 2 449 23 10,327 R s 8/27/2007 69
SANTE FE ST SANTFE 050 OCEAN AV 8TH AV 2 906 18 16,308 R 0 9/1/2012 100
SANTE FEST SANTFE 060 8THAV SOUTH END 2 408 18 7,344 R s 8/23/2007 82
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 010 OCEAN AV 8THAV 2 865 25 21,625 A A 9/1/ 2008 90
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 020 8TH AV BLKA3 SIEND 2 1,420 23 32,660 A A 9/ 1/ 2008 81
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 030 BLKA3 S/END SANTA LUCIA AV 2 1,035 30 31 ,050 A A 9/1/2008 93
SCENIC ROAD SCENIC 040 SANTA LUCIA AV CITY LIMIT 2 832 30 24,960 c A 9/1 /2008 81
STERLING WAY STRLNG 010 PERRY NEWBERRY WAY TURN AROUND 2 145 25 3,625 R s 8/20/2007 72
TORRES ST TORRES 020 3RDAV 4THAV 2 428 30 12,840 c s 8/24/2007 81
TORRES ST TORRES 040 OCEANAV 8THAV 2 875 23 20, 125 R A 9/1/2012 100
TORRES ST TORRES 050 8THAV 285FT N/0 11TH AV 2 1,270 20 25,400 R s 8/ 23/2007 82
TORRES ST TORRES 060 285FT N/0 11TH AV 11TH AV 2 285 16 4,560 R A 8/23/ 2007 87
TORRES ST TORRES 01 0A CITY LIMITS 2ND AVE 2 703 18 12,654 R A 9/1/2011 100
TORRESST TORRES 0108 2ND AVE 3RDAVE 2 387 18 6,966 R s 8/27/2007 84
TORRES ST TORRES 030A 4TH AV 5THAV 2 449 20 8,980 R A 10/1/2013 100
TORRESST TORRES 030B 5TH AV OCEANAV 2 620 20 12,400 R s 8/24/2007 77
VALLEY WAY VALLEY 010 N CITY LI MITS E CITY LIMITS 2 365 24 8,760 R s 8127/2007 49
VISTA AV VISTA 010 DOLORES ST JUNIPEROAV 2 708 20 14, 160 R s 8/20/ 2007 49
VIZCAINO VIZCAN 010 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV FLANDERS WAY 2 762 18 13,716 R s 8/20/2007 76
- -------
FC (Functional Class): A-Arterial, C-Collector, R-Residenti al
November 2013 ST (Surface Type): A-AC, C-AC/PCC, 0-AC/AC, P-PCC, S-Surface Treatment
Page 7/7
114
APPENDIXB
115
Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
116
Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree that exists in the
database. The decision tree forms the basis for all of the budgetary computations that are included in
this volume. Changes to the decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All
pavement treatment unit costs relevant to the street types in the database were updated.
The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation
activities. Each line represents a specific combination of functional classification and surface type.
The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category I -Very Good. All
preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to sections in Condition Category I where
the PCI 70. Sections with PCI values less than 70 are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II
through V.
In the preventive maintenance category (PCI ;;::: 70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate
treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment description consists of three parts: 1) a
CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment, and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts allow
the user to specify one of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior
maintenance history of the section.
1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent type of preventive
maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals).
2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive and less frequent
preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals or slurry seals. For example, a
crack seal can be specified on a 3-year cycle with a slurry seal specified after 5 years.
3. The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration treatment (such as
an overlay) to be performed after a specified number of surface treatments. For
example, after a certain number of successive slurry seals, an overlay can be specified
instead of another sl urry seal.
Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II through V (PCIIess than 70).
Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification, surface type, and condition
category.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Functional Class Functional Classification identifying the branch number.
Surface Surface Type identifying the branch number.
Condition Category Condition Category (I through V).
Treatment Type First Row {Crack Treatment) indicates localized treatment (e.g. crack sealing).
Second Row (Surface Treatment) indicates surface t reatment (e.g. slurry sealing).
Thi rd Row {Restoration Treatment) indicates surface restoration (e.g. overlay).
117
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment
Name of treatments from the "Treatment Descriptions" report.
Yrs. Between Crack Seals First Row- number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the first
row (i.e. CRACK treatment).
Yrs. Between Surface Seals Second Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the
second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment).
Number of Sequential Seals Number of t imes that the treatment application in the second row (i.e. SURFACE treatment)
will be performed prior to performing the treatment application in the third row.
Note that the treatments assigned to each section should not be blindly followed in preparing a street
maintenance program. Engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied to ensure
that the treatment is appropriate and cost effective for the section.
1
1
8
CITY OF CARMEL
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/0112013
Functional Class Surface Condition Category
Treatment Type Treatment
Cost/Sq Yd, Yrs Between Yrs Between #of Surface
e x e p ~ Seal Crack Seals SurfaceS als Seals before
Cracks 1n LF: e Overlay
Arterial AC 1- Very Good
Crack Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00 99
Surface Treatment SLURRY SEAL
$3.50
4
Restoration Treatment THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)
$17.50
2
II - Good, Non-Load Related
THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
$23.50
Ill- Good, Load Related
$25.50
IV- Poor
THICKAC OVERLAY(2.51NCHES)
$34.00
V - Very Poor
RECONSTRUCTSTRUCTURE(AC)
$130.50
AC/AC 1- Very Good
$0.00 99
$3.50
4
Restoration Treatment MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (1.5")
$20.00
2
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
$26.00
Ill - Good, Load Related
$28.00
IV- Poor
MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5")
$37.50
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC)
$130.50
AC/PCC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00 99
$3.50
4
Restoration Treatment MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (1 .5") $20.00
2
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $26.00
Ill - Good, Load Related
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $28.00
IV- Poor
MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5") $37.50
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCTSTRUCTURE(AC)
$130.50
PCC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
$1.10 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00
99
II- Good, Non-Load Related
DO NOTHING
$0.00
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV- Poor
PANEL REPLACEMENT $31.00
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (PCC)
$198.00
t Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
1
1
9
CITY OF CARMEL
Functional Class Surface
Arterial ST
Criteria:
Condition Category
1- Very Good
Ill -Good, Load Related
IV - Poor
V- Very Poor
Treatment Type
Crack Treatment
Surface Treatment
Restoration Treatment
Treatment
DO NOTHING
SLURRY SEAL
DO NOTHING
DO NOTHING
2
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
$0.00
$3.50
$0.00
$0.00
$25.50
$28.00
$130.50
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
#of Surface
Yrs Between Yrs Between Seals before
Crack Seals Surface Seals overlay
99
4
99
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
0
CITY OF CARMEL
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
Treatment Type
Treatment
Cost/Sq Yd. Yrs Between Yrs Between #of Surface
except Seal Crack Seals Surface Seals Seals before
Cracks rn LF: Overlay
Collector AC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment
DO NOTHING
$0.00 99
Surface Treatment
SLURRY SEAL
$3.50
4
Restoration Treatment THIN AC OVERLAY(1.51NCHES}
$17.00
3
II - Good, Non-load Related
THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
$22.50
Ill - Good, load Related
THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
$24.00
IV- Poor
THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES}
$31.50
V- Very Poor
$92.00
AC/AC 1- Very Good
$0.00 99
$3.50
4
Restoration Treatment Mill & THIN AC OVERLAY (1.5"}
$19.50
3
II -Good, Non-load Related
Mill & THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
$25.00
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
$26.50
IV- Poor
MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5"}
$35.00
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC}
$92.00
$0.00 99
$3.50
4
Mill & THIN AC OVERLAY (1.5"}
$19.50
3
Mill & THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
$25.00
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2')
$26.50
IV- Poor
Mill & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5"}
$35.00
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC}
$92.00
PCC 1- Very Good
Crack Treatment RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
~ C _
$1 .00
)C
$0.00
RECONSTRUCT PCC
$80.00
..
r1"
(]
3
'I ....__._.. -- ----
II- Good, Non-load Related
DO NOTHING
,.
$0.00
-- ~ J . .
Ill- Good, load Related
DO NOTHING
-- ~ ~ ~ ~
$0,00
I
DO NOTHING
--
IV - Poor
~
$0.00
- - -- -'-
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT PCC
('' ~
$80,00
Criteria:
3
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
1
CITY OF CARMEL
Collector ST
Criteria:
Condition Category
1- Very Good
IV- Poor
V- Very Poor
Treatment Type
Crack Treatment
Surface Treatment
Treatment
DO NOTHING
SURFACE SEAL
DO NOTHING
DO NOTHING
4
Cosi/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
$0.00
$3.50
$0.00
$0.00
$24.00
$26.00
$92.00
Decision Tree
Printed: 11 /01 /2013
#of Surf ace
9
4
99
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
2
CITY OF CARMEL
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
Functional Class Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment
Cost /Sq Yd, Yrs Between Yrs Between #of Surface
Seal Crack Seals Surface Seals Seals before
Cracks 1n LF: Overlay
Residential/Local AC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Surface Treatment SLURRY SEAL $3.50 4
Restoration Treatment THIN AC OVERLAY(1 .5 INCHES) $15.50 3
II- Good, Non-Load Related THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $20.50
Ill- Good, Load Related THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $22.00
IV - Poor THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES) $29.00
V- Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $67.00
AC/AC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Surface Treatment SLURRY SEAL $3.50 4
Restoration Treatment MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (1.5") $18.00 3
II- Good, Non-Load Related MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $23.00
Ill- Good, Load Related MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2") $24.50
IV - Poor MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5') $32.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $67.00
AC/PCC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00
_ ....
-=-=-
- ..lC

$0.75
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THIN OVERLAY $5.04
--L.....:::....::xr--.r -
-
3
--
II - Good, Non-Load Related CHIP SEAL WITH CRO ---- _JC $1.50
Ill - Good, Load Related CHIP SEAL WITH CRO
"'
-]c_: $1.50
IV- Poor MILL AND THIN OVERLAY

$5.04
V- Very Poor RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC)
=- Jr
$27.00
PCC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL ___ - JC $1 .00
---

$0.00
Restoration Treatment RECONSTRUCT PCC
--

$80.00
If :..

3
II - Good, Non-Load Related RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $40.00
Ill - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING
=---_j[___
$0.00
IV- Poor DO NOTHING
-
,l.
$0.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT PCC
-

$80.00
,.- Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria:
5
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
3
CITY OF CARMEL
Residential/local ST
Criteria:
1- Very Good
IV Poor
V- Very Poor
Treatment Type
Crack Treatment
Surface Treatment
Treatment
DO NOTHING
SURFACE SEAL
DO NOTHING
DO NOTHING
THIN AC OVERlAY (2")
THIN AC OVERlAY (2")
6
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
#of Surface
Cost/Sq Yd, Yrs Between Yrs Between Seals before
except Seal Crack Seals Surface Seals overlay
c racks in LF:
$0.00 9
n ~ 4
~ . 0 0 99
$0.00
~ 2 . 0 0
2 ~ 0 0
6 ~ 0 0
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
4
CITY OF CARMEL
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
Functional Class Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment
Cost/Sq Yd, Yrs Between Yrs Between #of Surface
Seal Crack Seals Surface Seals Seals before
Cracks m LF: Overlay
Other AC 1- Very Good
$0.00 99
$3.50 4
Restoration Treatment THIN AC OVERLAY(1.5 INCHES)
$15.50
3
$20.50
$22.00
IV- Poor
THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5 INCHES)
$29.00
V- Very Poor
$67.00
AC/AC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00 99
$3.50
4
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (1.5") $18.00
3
$23.00
$24.50
IV- Poor
MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5")
$32.00
V- Very Poor
$67.00

$0.00

- ..:J
_(r $0.75
Restoration Treatment MILL AND THICK OVERLAY

$5.85
SLURRY SEAL
1[
$0.75
Ill -Good, Load Related
MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
L
$5.85
IV- Poor
MILL AND THICK OVERLAY
"'1TTI
$5,85
-:J
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT SURFACE (AC) -_{L $27.00
PCC 1- Very Good Crack Treatment
RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
$1 .10 5
$0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING
$0.00
99
DO NOTHING
$0.00
DO NOTHING
$0.00
IV - Poor
PANEL REPLACEMENT
$27.50
V- Very Poor
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (PCC) $175.00
Criteria:
7
MTC StreetSaver
1
2
5
CITY OF CARMEL
Other ST
Criteria:
Condition Category
1- Very Good
IV- Poor
V- Very Poor
Treatment Type
Crack Treatment
Surface Treatment
Treatment
DO NOTHING
SURFACE SEAL
DO NOTHING
DO NOTHING
8
Cost/Sq Yd.
except Seal
Cracks in LF:
$0.00
$3.50
$0.00
$0.00
$22.00
$24.00
$67.00
Decision Tree
Printed: 11/01/2013
#of Surface
9
4
100
MTC StreetSaver
126
APPENDIXC
127
Budget Needs Reports
128
Budget Needs Reports
The purpose of this module is to answer the question: If the City hod all the money in the world, what
sections should be fixed and how much will it cost? Based on the Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R)
decision tree and the PCis of the sections, the program will then select a maintenance or rehabilitation
action and compute the total costs over a period of five years. The Budget Needs represents the "ideal
world" funding levels, while the Budget Scenarios reports in the next section represent the most "cost
effective" prioritization possible for the actual funding levels.
A budget needs analysis has been performed. The summary results from the analysis are shown below.
An interest rate of 5% and an inflation factor of 5% were used to project the costs for the next fifteen
years. This report shows the total fifteen-year budget that would be required to meet the City's
standards as exemplified in the M&R decision tree.
Budget Needs reports included in this volume are listed below:
).> Projected PCI/Cost Summary
Preventative Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
? Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
129
Budget Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary
130
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary
This report summarizes and projects the City's network PCI values over a five-year period, both with and
without treatments applied. These costs are based on those in the M&R decision tree. It also projects
the costs over a five-year period.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Year Year in the analysis period.
PCI Treated Projected network average PCI with all needed treatments applied.
PCI Untreated Projected network average PCI without any treatments applied.
PM Cost Total preventive maintenance treatment cost .
Rehab Cost Total rehabilitation treatment cost.
Cost The budget required for each year in the analysis period to meet the City's standard as
shown on the M&R decision tree.
Total Cost Total budget required over a fifteen-year period.
131
CITY OF CARMEL
Needs- Projected PCI/Cost Summary
Inflation Rate= 5.00 % Printed: 11/01/2013
Year PCI Treated PCI Untreated PM Cost Rehab Cost Cost
-- ----
__ .,..____ ---------
2014 74 61 $155,027 $3,562,925 $3,717,952
2015 74 59 $57,019 $859,029 $916,048
2016 75 56 $51,127 $720,136 $771 ,263
2017 75 52 $68,638 $522,620 $591,258
2018 77 49 $566,673 $650,093 $1,216,766
2019 77 46 $178,178 $384,418 $562,596
2020 77 43 $166,779 $486,494 $653,273
2021 77 39 $161,958 $294,057 $456,015
2022 80 36 $781,671 $668,745 $1,450,416
2023 85 33 $347,027 $1,788,703 $2,135,730
2024 88 30 $251,669 $1,270,344 $1 ,522,013
2025 87 28 $503,141 $119,724 $622,865
2026 87 25 $796,140 $40,201 $836,341
2027 87 21 $539,239 $314,854 $854,093
2028 87 18 $610,296 $0 $610,296
%PM PM Total Cost Rehab Total Cost Total Cost
30.94% $5,234,582 $11,682,343 $16,916,925
--------------- - ---
Criteria: MTC 5treet5aver
551008
132
Budget Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
133
Needs- Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each preventive maintenance treatment type, quantity of pavement affected,
and total costs over the five-year period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next
five years.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of preventive maintenance treatments needed.
Year Year in the analysis period (i.e. 2013, 2014, 2015, etc) .
Area Treated Quantities in linear feet (Rubberized Crack Seal) or square yard (Slurry Seal, Thi n AC Overlay).
Cost Maintenance treatment cost.
134
CITY OF CARMEL
Needs - Preventive Maintenance
Treatment/Cost Summary
Inflation Rate = 5.00 % Printed: 11/01/2013
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
2014 89.57 sq. yd. $99
2018 78.79 sq. yd. $106
2020 9.17 sq. yd. $14
2022 67.51 sq.yd. $110
2026 56.62 sq.yd. $112
2028 46.14 sq. yd. $101
Total 347.8 $542
SLURRY SEAL
2014 44,262.67 sq.yd. $154,928
2015 15,514.22 sq.yd. $57,019
2016 13,248.67 sq. yd. $51 t 127
2017 16,939 sq. yd. $68,638
2018 133, 166.56 sq. yd. $566,567
2019 39,885.44 sq.yd. $178,178
2020 35,553.22 sq.yd. $166,765
2021 32,884.67 sq.yd. $161 ,958
2022 139,118.33 sq.yd. $719,436
2023 46,661.22 sq.yd. $253,365
2024 44,141.78 sq.yd. $251,669
2025 41 ,333.44 sq. yd. $247,440
2026 104,759.33 sq.yd. $658,497
2027 81,702.11 sq.yd. $539,239
2028 59,180.89 sq.yd. $410,125
Total 848,351.56 $4,484,951
THIN AC OVERLAY(1 .5 INCHES)
2022 2,402. 78 sq.yd. $62,125
2023 3,450 sq.yd. $93,662
2025 8,543 sq.yd. $255,701
2026 4,376.11 sq.yd. $137,531
2028 5,774.22 sq. yd. $200,070
Total 24,546. 11 $749,089
Total Quantity 873,245.46 $5,234,582
SS1007
135
Budget Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
136
Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each rehabilitation treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total
costs over the five-year period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next five
years.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of rehabilitation treatments needed.
Year Year in the analysis period (i .e. 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017).
Area Treated Quantities in square yard.
Cost Rehabilitation treatment cost.
137
CITY OF CARMEL
Needs- Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Inflation Rate = 5.00 % Printed: 11/01/2013
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY (2.5") 2017 5,093.33 sq.yd. $221 ,107
Total 5,093.33 sq.yd. $221 ,107
-
MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY (2") 2014 10,189.56 sq.yd. $277,184
Total 10,189.56 sq.yd. $277,184
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (PCC) 2014 2,876.67 sq. yd. $503,417
Total 2,876.67 sq.yd. $503,417
THIN AC OVERLAY (2") 2014 58,376.22 sq. yd.
$1,377,303
2015 18,940.11 sq.yd. $476,950
2016 17,852.89 sq.yd. $509,407
2017 10,852.33 sq.yd.
$301 ,513
2018 21 ,938.67 sq.yd. $650,093
2019 12,550 sq.yd.
$384,418
2020 13,522.56 sq.yd.
$453,005
2021 8,448.78 sq. yd. $294,057
2022 18,266.56 sq. yd. $653,306
2023 47,148.89 sq.yd. $1,788,703
2024 32,432.11 sq.yd. $1 ,270,344
2025 2,916.67 sq.yd. $119,724
2027 2,513.89 sq.yd. $113,768
Total 265,759.67 sq.yd. $8,392,591
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 2014 15,844.22 sq.yd. $1 ,061 ,566
2015 5,431 .11 sq.yd. $382,079
2016 1,573.33 sq.yd. $116,219
Total 22,848.67 sq.yd, $1 ,559,864
THICKAC OVERLAY(2.51NCHES) 2014 7,568.89 sq.yd. $257,343
2016 2,878.33 sq.yd. $94,510
2020 735 sq.yd. $33,489
2022 360.33 SQ.yd. $15,439
Total 11 ,542.56 sq. yd. $400,781
PANEL REPLACEMENT 2014 2,777.78 sq.yd.
$86,112
2026 814 sq.yd.
$40,201
2027 3,440 sq.yd.
$201,086
Total 7,031 .78 sq.yd. $327,399
Total Cost $11,682,343
SS1010
138
Scenarios 1-3
139
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level
Cost Summary Report
Nichol s Consulting Engineers, Chtd.
140
CITY OF CARMEL
Scenarios- Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 11/04/2013
Scenario: 1. Existing Budget (2013)
Preventative
Year PMAmt Budget Rehab i I itatio n Maintenance Surpl us PM Deferr ed Stop Gap
2014
19% $634,000 II $94,701 Non- $122,671 $0 $2,862,423 Funded $0
Ill $5,390
Project
Unmet $22,394
IV $410,498
Project $0
v $0
Total $510,589
Project $0
2015
14% $634,000 II $108,817 Non- $90,993 $0 $3,172,783 Funded $0
Ill $388,300
Project
Unmet $7,081
IV $41,396
Proj ect $0
v $0
Total $538,513
Project $0
2016
8% $634,000 II $68,796 Non- $51,127 $0 $3,247,594 Funded $0
Ill $83,275
Project
Unmet $2,793
IV $424,355
Project $0
v $0
- - __ _,_
Total $576,426
Project $0
2017
10% $634,000 II $38.492 Non- $68,638 $0 $3,368,770 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $876
IV $521 ,269
Project $0
v $0

Total $559,761
Project $0
2018
20% $634,000 II $0 Non- $130,702 $0 $4,478,658 Funded $0
Ill $11 ,731
Proj ect
Unmet $1,328
IV $490,744
Project $0
v $0

Total $502,475
Project $0
2019
20% $634,000 II $43,781 Non- $136,007 $0 $4,566,803 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $29,749
IV $453,919
Project $0
v $0
-
__ :.., .
Total $497,700
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
MTC StreetSaver
SS1034
141
Year PM Amt Budget Rehabilitation
2020
20% $634,000 II $94,553
Ill $0
IV $390,717
v $0
Total $485,270
Project $0
2021
20% $634,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $461,277
v $37,543

Total $498,820
Project $0
2022
20% $634,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $501,711
v $0
__
Total $501,711
Project $0
2023
20% $200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $145,436
v $0

Total $145,436
Project $0
2024
20% $200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $151 ,576
v $0
Total $151,576
Project $0
2025
20% $200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $148,315
v $0
_ ___
Total $148,315
Project $0
2026
20% $200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $96,378
v $63,103

Total $159,481
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventative
Maintenance
Non- $148,320
Project
Project $0
Non- $134,770
Project
Project $0
Non- $131,999
Project
Project $0
Non- $54,195
Project
Project $0
Non- $47,974
Project
Proj ect $0
Non- $51 ,476
Project
Project $0
Non- $39,244
Project
Project $0
2
SS1034
Surplus PM
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$756
Deferred Stop Gap
$4,671,326 Funded $0
Unmet $17,089
$4,722,051 Funded $0
Unmet $2,832
$5,903,906 Funded $0
Unmet $4,144
$8,534,616 Funded $0
Unmet $19,218
$9,991 ,954 Funded $0
Unmet $51 ,445
$10,106,454 Funded $0
Unmet $21 ,118
$9,367,549 Funded $0
Unmet $5,573
MTC StreetSaver
142
Preventative
Year PM Amt Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2027
20% $200,000 II $108,105 Non- $91 ,190
Ill $0
Project
IV $0
Project $0
v $0
Total $108,105
Project $0
2028
20% $200,000 II $0 Non- $48,460
Ill $0
Project
IV $0
Project $0
v $151,198
~ ~
Total $151,198
Project $0
Summary
Functional Class Rehabll 1tat 1on Prev Maint.
'
Artenal $1 ,783,091 $783,862
Collector $1 ,216,683 $273,392
Other $173,801 $101 ,794
Residential/Local $2,361,801 $188,718
---
Grand Total $5,535,376 $1 ,347,766
! ________ --
---------- ---- -------
Scenarios Criteria: 3
SS1 034
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $15,871,605 Funded $0
Unmet $21,043
$0 $22,723,343 Funded $0
Unmet $77,875
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $2,457
$0 $28,620
$0 $32,701
$0 $220,782
-
-
$0 $284,559
-------
MTC StreetSaver
143
CITY OF CARMEL
Scenarios- Network Condition Summary
Interest: 5% Inflation: 5% Printed: 11/04/2013
Year Budget PMAmt Year Budget PM Amt Year Budget PM Amt
2014
$634,000 19% 2015
$634,000 14%
2016
$634,000 8%
2017
$634,000 10%
2018
$634,000 20%
2019
$634,000 20%
2020
$634,000 20% 2021
$634,000 20%
2022
$634,000 20%
2023
$200,000 20% 2024
$200,000 20%
2025
$200,000 20%
2026
$200,000 20% 2027
$200,000 20%
2028
$200,000 20%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated W1th Selected Treatment
2014 61 65
2015 59 64
2016 56 64
2017 52 63
2018 49 64
2019 46 64
2020 43 64
2021 39 64
2022 36 64
2023 33 62
2024 30 61
2025 28 59
2026 25 57
2027 21 54
2028 18 52
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category
Condition in base year 2014, prior to applyi ng treatments.
Cond1t1on Artenal Collector Res/Loc Other Total
10.0% 3.2% 9.4% 3.8% 26.5%
11 / 111 11 .1% 10.0% 37.8% 3.0% 61 .9%
IV 2.4% 0.5% 3.5% 0.7% 7.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.7% 4.4%
Total 23.6% 137% 54.5% 8.2% 100.0%
Condition in year 2014 after schedulable treatments applied.
Cond1t1on Arteri al Collector Res/Loc Ot her Tot al
14.2% 3.8% 9.6% 4.3% 31 .8%
11 / 111 9.4% 10.0% 37.8% 2.8% 60.0%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.7% 4.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.4% 4.1%
Total 236% 13.7% 54.5% 8.2% 100.0%
Scenari os Criteri a: MTC StreetSaver
SS1035
144
CITY OF CARMEL
Cond1t1on Arlena! Collector
I 17.3% 10.5%
11 /111 6.3% 0.0%
IV 0.0% 0.0%
v 0.0% 3.2%
Total 23.6% 13.7%
Scenarios Criteria:
Res/Loc
23.7%
0.4%
0.1%
30.3%
54.5%
2
SS1035
Other
4.8%
0.4%
0.0%
2.9%
8.2%
Printed: 11/04/2013
Total
56.3%
7.2%
0.1%
36.4%
100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
145
Scenario 2: Maintain the Current PCI
Cost Summary Report
146
CITY OF CARMEL
Scenarios -Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Infl ation: 5.00% Printed: 11/01/2013
Scenario: 2. Maintain Current PCI (63)
Preventati v e
Year PMAmt Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
2014
$145,000 $164,500 II $18,965 Non- $145, 171 $0 $3,331,546 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $25,396
IV $0
Project $0
v $0
Total $18,965
Project $0
2015
$33,500 $816,500 II $188,339 Non- $33,576 $0 $3,409,380 Funded $0
Ill $191, 152
Project
Unmet $7,081
IV $402,023
Project $0
v $0
==-
-----
Total $781,514
Project $0
2016
$61 ,000 $801,500 II $105,455 Non- $65,781 $0 $3,465,127 Funded $0
Ill $168,393
Project
Unmet $2,481
IV $461,749
Project $0
v $0

.--.---
Total $735,597
Project $0
2017
$90,000 $717,000 II $0 Non- $90,508 $0 $3,519,035 Funded $0
Ill $11 ,172
Project
Unmet $0
IV $587, 118
Project $0
v $0

-

Total $598,290
Project $0
2018
$164,000 $582,500 II $0 Non- $164,791 $0 $4,646,712 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $1 ,943
IV $416,908
Project $0
v $0
-
Total $416,908
Project $0
2019
$160,500 $576,500 II $0 Non- $160,765 $0 $4,758,923 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $32,346
IV $415,560
Project $0
v $0
--- . .....,._ ---
Total $415,560
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
MTC StreetSaver
SS1034
147
Year PM Amt Budget Rehabil i tat i on
2020
$192,000 $610,000 II $94,553
Ill $0
IV $321,345
v $0

Total $415,898
Project $0
2021
$199,000 $628,000 II $0
[II $0
IV $418,645
v $0

Total $418,645
Project $0
2022
$191,000 $638,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $430,227
v $0
- --=-
Total $430,227
Project $0
2023
$164,500 $835,500 II $0
Ill $0
IV $666,230
v $0
Total $666,230
Project $0
2024
$350,000 $820,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $457,621
v $0
Total $457,621
Project $0
2025
$307, 500 $750,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $426,881
v $0
---- =-----=- -=
Total $426,881
Project $0
2026
$168,000 $1,051 ,500 II $0
Ill $0
IV $96,378
v $764,412
....__ . - __ . .,._ "'
Total $860,790
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventative
Maintenance
Non- $192,007
Project
Project $0
Non- $207,864
Project
Project $0
Non- $207,090
Project
Project $0
Non- $168,988
Project
Project $0
Non- $361,143
Project
Project $0
Non- $322,424
Project
Project $0
Non- $189,991
Project
Project $0
2
SS1034
Surplus PM
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Deferred Stop Gap
$4,897,890 Funded $0
Unmet $17,667
$5,000,164 Funded $0
Unmet $3,794
$6,218,392 Funded $0
Unmet $5,772
$8,385,353 Funded $0
Unmet $16,968
$9,672,091 Funded $0
Unmet $55,330
$9,784,348 Funded $0
Unmet $21 ,118
$8,784,281 Funded $0
Unmet $5,573
MTC StreetSaver
148
Preventat i ve
Year PMAmt Budget Rehabilitat ion Maintenance
2027
$111,000 $1 ,715,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2028
$357,000 $1,506,500 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
I Summary
FunctiOnal Cl ass
Artenal
Collector
Other
Res1denhai/Local
- ------
Grand Total
_I ___
---- -
Scenarios Criteri a:
$0 Non-
$0
Project
$113,768
Project
$1,456,435
$1 ,570,203
$0
$0 Non-
$0
Project
$0
Project
$1 ' 114,898
-
$1 , 114,898
$0
Rehabilitation
----
$1 ,922,757
$1,264,590
$242,893
$5,897,987
$9,328,227
----
3
SS1034
$144,303
$0
$390,381
$0
Prev Mamt.
$1,459,035
$531 ,316
$175,066
$679,366
$2,844,783
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $11 ,027,328 Funded $0
Unmet $25,325
$0 $16,497,858 Funded $0
Unmet $27,686
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $6,020
$0 $22,118
$0 $29,972
$0 $190,371
$0 $248,480
---
MTC StreetSaver
149
CITY OF CARMEL
Year Budget PM Amt Year Budget PMAmt Year Budget PMAmt
2014
$164,500 $145,000
2015
$816,500 $33,500
2016
$801,500 $61 ,000
2017
$717,000 $90,000
2018
$582,500 $164,000
2019
$576,500 $160,500
2020
$610,000 $192,000
2021
$628,000 $199,000
2022
$638,000 $191,000
2023
$835,500 $164,500
2024
$820,000 $350,000
2025
$750,000 $307,500
2026
$1 ,051 ,500 $168,000
2027
$1,715,000 $111 ,000
2028
$1,506,500 $357,000
2014 61 63
2015 59 63
2016 56 63
2017 52 63
2018 49 63
2019 46 63
2020 43 63
2021 39 63
2022 36 63
2023 33 63
2024 30 63
2025 28 63
2026 25 63
2027 21 63
2028 18 63
Percent Network Area by Funct1onal Class and Condit ion Category
Condition in base year 2014, prior to applying treatments.
Cond1t10n Artenal Collector Res/Lac Other Total
10.0% 3.2% 9.4% 3.8% 26.5%
11/111 11 .1% 10.0% 37.8% 3.0% 61 .9%
IV 2.4% 0.5% 3.5% 0.7% 7.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.7% 4.4%
Total 23.6% 13.7% 54.5% 8.2% 1000%
Condition in year 2014 after schedulable treat ments appli ed.
I 11.0% 3.2% 9.4% 4.3% 28.0%
11 / 111 10.1% 10.0% 37.8% 2.8% 60.8%
IV 2.4% 0.5% 3.5% 0.7% 7.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.4% 4.1%
Total 23,6% 13.7% 54.5% 82% 1000%
Conditi on in year 2028 after schedulable treatments applied.
Scena1i os Criteri a: MTC StreetSaver
SS1035
150
CITY OF CARMEL
Condition
II I Ill
v
Total
Scenarios Criteria:
Artenal Collector
22.0% 11.3%
1.6% 0.0%
0.0% 2.4%
23.6% 13.7%
Res/Loc
31 .6%
0.8%
22.0%
54.5%
2
SS1035
Other
5.3%
0.4%
2.5%
8.2%
Printed: 11/01/2013
Total
70.1%
2.9%
26.9%
100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
151
Scenario 3: Unconstrained
Cost Summary Report
152
CITY OF CARMEL
Scenarios- Cost Summary
Interest: 5.00% Inflation: 5.00% Printed: 11/ 01/ 2013
Scenario: 3. Unconstrained
Preventat ive
Year PMAmt Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
2014
11% $1 ,200,000 II $148,826 Non- $11 2,421 $0 $2,315,667 Funded $19,592
Ill $508,272
Project
Unmet $0
IV $410,498
Project $0
v $0
Total $1 ,067,596
Project $0
2015
4% $1,200,000 II $209,250 Non- $46,547 $0 $2,033,556 Funded $4,676
Ill $477,038
Project
Unmet $0
IV $461,805
Project $0
v $0

Total $1 ,148,093
Proj ect $0
2016
4% $1 ,200,000 II $115,609 Non- $74,417 $0 $1,863,696 Funded $1 ,353
Ill $44,646
Project
Unmet $0
IV $526,128
Project $0
v $437,028

Total $1 ,123,411
Proj ect $0
2017
5% $1 ,200,000 II $0 Non- $76,180 $0 $1,471 ,298 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $0
IV $522,620
Project $0
v $598,954
.....
Total $1 ' 121 ,574
Project $0
2018
15% $1 ,200,000 II $0 Non- $191,888 $0 $1 ,287,524 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $0
IV $650,093
Project $0
v $357,427
...
Total $1 ,007,520
Project $0
2019
15% $1 ,200,000 II $0 Non- $213,826 $0 $804,279 Funded $3,037
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $0
IV $384,418
Project $0
v $598,084
:-.. - -: - -::::-..-_----4--
Total $982,502
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
MTC 5treet5aver
551034
153
Year PM Amt Budget Rehabil i tati on
2020
15% $1 ,200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $486,494
v $270,956
- ~ - . . : : . . - - - . . . . -
Total $757,450
Project $0
2021
14% $1 ,200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $294,057
v $395,630
..... . . . . . . : : : : = . . ; : = ; : : . ~
Total $689,687
Project $0
2022
15% $1 ,200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $668,745
v $0
_ ............. ~ - - . -
Total $668,745
Project $0
2023
15% $1 ,200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $1 ,001,131
v $0
Total $1 ,001 ,131
Project $0
2024
15% $1,200,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $1 ,002,350
v $0
Total $1 ,002,350
Project $0
2025
15% $1,300,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $1 , 102,449
v $0
--- .... ----
Total $1 ,102,449
Project $0
2026
15% $1 ,300,000 II $0
Ill $0
IV $0
v $0
Total $0
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria:
Preventative
Maintenance
Non- $428,701
Project
Project $0
Non- $209,160
Project
Project $0
Non- $348,819
Project
Project $0
Non- $190,040
Project
Project $0
Non- $187,679
Project
Proj ect $0
Non- $195,895
Project
Project $0
Non- $1 ,221,399
Project
Project $0
2
SS1 034
Surplus PM
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Deferred Stop Gap
$376,790 Funded $0
Unmet $0
$0 Funded $0
Unmet $0
$0 Funded $0
Unmet $0
$1 ,181,178 Funded $7,857
Unmet $0
$1,809,429 Funded $9,753
Unmet $0
$1 ,281 ,788 Funded $998
Unmet $0
$0 Funded $0
Unmet $0
MTC StreetSaver
154
Preventative
Year PM Amt Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
2027
15% $1 ,300,000 II $0 Non- $250,513 $0 $0 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $0
IV $113,768
Project $0
v $368,488
~ ~ = =
Total $482,256
Project $0
2028
15% $1,300,000 II $0 Non- $489,991 $0 $0 Funded $0
Ill $0
Project
Unmet $0
IV $0
Project $0
v $706,083
: = = ~ ~
Total $706,083
Project $0
Summary
Funded Unmet
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Main! Stop Gap Stop Gap
Arterial $1 ,711,809 $1 ,308,842 $0 $0
Collector $1,445,387 $738,092 $1 ,473 $0
Other $1 ,083,287 $355,945 $5,733 $0
Residential/Local $8,620,364 $1 ,834,597 $40,060 $0
~ ~ ~
---- -
Grand Total : $12,860,847 $4,237,476 $47,267 $0
--- -- -- - ------------------ - -
Scenarios C1iteria: 3
SS1034
MTC StreetSaver
155
CITY OF CARMEL
Year Budget PM Amt Year Budget PMAmt Year Budget PM Amt
2014 $1,200,000 11%
2015 $1 ,200,000 4%
2016 $1,200,000 4%
2017 $1,200,000 5% 2018
$1 ,200,000 15% 2019 $1 ,200,000 15%
2020
$1 ,200,000 15%
2021
$1 ,200,000 14%
2022 $1,200,000 15%
2023
$1 ,200,000 15%
2024 $1 ,200,000 15% 2025 $1 ,300,000 15%
2026
$1,300,000 15%
2027
$1,300,000 15%
2028 $1,300,000 15%
2014 61 67
2015 59 69
2016 56 70
2017 52 72
2018 49 74
2019 46 76
2020 43 78
2021 39 77
2022 36 79
2023 33 81
2024 30 83
2025 28 85
2026 25 86
2027 21 85
2028 18 85
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category
Condition in base year 2014, prior to applying treatments.
10.0% 3.2% 9.4% 3.8% 26.5%
II I Ill 11 .1% 10.0% 37.8% 3.0% 61 .9%
IV 2.4% 0.5% 3.5% 0.7% 7.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.7% 4.4%
Total 23.6% 13.7% 54.5% 8.2% 100.0%
Cond1t1on Artenal Collector Res/Lac Other Total
18.6% 4.4% 9.5% 4.3% 36.9%
11 / 111 5.0% 9.3% 37.8% 2.8% 54.9%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.7% 4.1%
v 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.4% 4.1%
Total 23.6% 13.7% 54.5% 8.2% 100.0%
Scena1ios Criteria: MTC StreetSaver
SS1035
156
CITY OF CARMEL
Condition Arterial Col lector
20.7% 13.7%
11/111 2.9% 0.0%
Total 236% 13.7%
Scenarios Criteria:
Res/Loc
54.0%
0.4%
54.5%
2
SS1035
Other
8.2%
0.0%
8.2%
Printed: 11/01/2013
Total
96.7%
3.3%
100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
157
AppendixD
158
Scenario 1: Current City Funding Level - Sections Selected For Treatment
159
Sections Selected for Treatment
This report summarizes a list of prospective streets eligible for maintenance or rehabilitation as selected
by the StreetSaver program. This list is for budgeting and planning purposes only, it does not represent a
final list of streets needed to be worked on. Final decision for section selection will be based on field
review by City Staff.
1
6
0
CITY OF CARMEL
Scenarios -Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 5.00% Inflati on: 5.00% Printed: 11/04/2013
Year Budget PMAmt Year Budget PM Amt Year Budget PM Amt
2014 $634,000 19%
2015
$634,000 14%
2016 $634,000 8%
2017 $634.000 10% 2018 $634,000 20%
2019 $634.000 20%
2020 $634,000 20% 2021 $634,000 20% 2022 $634,000 20%
2023 $200,000 20% 2024 $200,000 20% 2025 $200,000 20%
2026 $200,000 20% 2027 $200,000 20% 2028 $200,000 20%
Street Name Begin Location End Location St reet ID Section ID FC Surf ace PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Year : 2014
OCEAN AV JUNIPEROAV CARPENTER ST OCEAN 040 A PCC 88 $99 5,710,108 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
Treatment Total $99
nH AV DOLORESST SAN CARLOS ST 7THAV 030 0 PCC 100 $0 0 PANELREPLACEMENT
.. DOLORES ST 7TH 8THAV DLORES 0408 0 PCC 100 $0 0 PANEL REPLACEMENT
OCEAN AV SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST OCEAN 020 A PCC 100 $86,112 18,828 PANEL REPLACEMENT
**SAN CARLOS ST OCEAN AV 8THAV SAN CAR 050 A PCC 100 $0 0 PANELREPLACEMENT
Treatment Total $86,112
JUNIPEROAV 3RDAV 4THAV JUNPRO 040 A AC/AC 100 $75,736 16,959 MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY
(2")
3RDAV TORRES ST SANTA FEST 3RDAV 040 A AC 100 $18,965 20,146 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
ESCOLLEWAY PERRY NEWBERRY TURN AROUND ESCOLL 010 R ST 100 $5,390 11 ,704 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
WAY
GUADALUPE ST 6TH AV OCEAN AV GUADLP 030B R ST 100 $9.334 14,095 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
SAN ANTONIO AV OCEANAV 8THAV SA NAN 015 c ST 100 $57,709 16,341 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
Treatment Total $91 ,398
11THAV JUNIPEROAV EAST END 11THAV 040 R AC 86 $4.606 22,837 SLURRY SEAL
13TH AV 48 FTW/0 SAN JUNIPERO AV 13THAV 030 A AC/AC 87 $5,390 42,275 SLURRY SEAL
CARLOS ST
2NDAV N. CASANOVA STREET MONTE VERDE STREET 2NDAV 030 R AC 85 $2.674 26,902 SLURRY SEAL
5THAV DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 5THAV 012 c AC 90 $2.773 28,096 SLURRY SEAL
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1
MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
SS1026
1
6
1
St reet Name
6THAV
6THAV
7TH AV
8TH AV
CAMINO DEL MONTE
CAMINO DEL MONTE
FORESTRD
JUNIPEROAV
OCEAN AV
RIORD
SAN CARLOS ST
SANTA LUCIA AV
SANTA LUCIA AV
SCENIC ROAD
SCENIC ROAD
TORRES ST
RIO RD
Year : 2015
SAN CARLOS ST
JUNIPEROAV
SAN ANTONIO AV
SAN CARLOS ST
SCENIC ROAD
4THAV
6THAV
Begin Location
MISSION ST
JUNIPEROAV
SAN CARLOS ST
SAN CARLOS ST
CITY LIMIT
3RD AV
MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAMINO DEL MONTE
CARPENTER ST
JUNIPERO AV
8THAV
SCENIC RD
CAMINO REAL
OCEAN AV
BLKA3 S/END
285FT N/0 11TH AV
SANTALUCIAAV
3RDAV
4THAV
4TH AV
11TH AV
8TH AV
SANTA FEST
MONTE VERDE ST
** - Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Cri teria:
End Location
JUNIPERO AV
TORRES ST
JUNIPERO AV
JUNIPERO AV
2ND STREET
JUNIPERO AV
7TH AVE
2ND AVE
CITY LIMITS
SANTA LUCIA AV
11TH AV
CAMINO REAL
DOLORES ST
8TH AV
SANTA LUCIA AV
11TH AV
SOUTH CITY LI MIT
5THAV
OCEAN AV
OCEAN AV
13TH AV
BLK A3 S\END
SANTA RITA ST
LINCOLN ST
St reet 10
6THAV
6THAV
7THAV
8THAV
CMDMNT
CMDMNT
FOREST
JUNPRO
OCEAN
RIORD
SAN CAR
SANLUC
SANLUC
SCENIC
SCENIC
TORRES
RIORD
SAN CAR
JUNPRO
SAN AN
SA NCAR
SCENIC
4THAV
6THAV
Section 10
025
030
040
035
010
020
010
20
050
010
060
010
020
010
030
060
020
030
050
010
070
020
0608
010
2
SS1026
FC Surface PCI
0 AC 87
C AC 88
0 AC 87
A AC 85
A AC/AC 87
A AC 85
R AC 87
C AC 89
A AC 86
A AC 82
A AC 83
C AC 87
C AC 89
A AC 86
A AC 88
R AC 85
Cost
$2,772
$2,798
$5,455
$6,789
$1 ,789
$10,675
$4,795
$2,101
$4,642
$3,559
$23,112
$7,465
$8,918
$8,41 0
$12,075
$1,774
A AC 100 $257,343
Treatment Total
Year 2014 Total
A AC/AC 100
Treatment Total
A AC 100
A ST 100
A AC 100
A AC 100
Treatment Total
R AC 92
0 AC 87
$257,343
$633,260
$105,644
$105,644
$185,492
$41,396
$108,817
$97,164
$432,869
$2,170
$2,898
Rating Treatment
22,456 SLURRY SEAL
36,637 SLURRY SEAL
22,455 SLURRY SEAL
36,339 SLURRY SEAL
41 ,611 SLURRY SEAL
36,070 SLURRY SEAL
22.148 SLURRY SEAL
28,473 SLURRY SEAL
36,032 SLURRY SEAL
52,488 SLURRY SEAL
37,227 SLURRY SEAL
28,698 SLURRY SEAL
28,455 SLURRY SEAL
36.018 SLURRY SEAL
34,209 SLURRY SEAL
23,577 SLURRY SEAL
17,297 THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5
INCHES)
16,212 MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY
(2")
17,198 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
14,570 SLURRY SEAL
21 ,390 SLURRY SEAL
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
2
Street Name
DOLORES ST
DOLORESST
DOLORES ST
GUADALUPE ST
JUNIPEROAV
LAUSEN DRIVE
LINCOLN ST
LOBOS ST
MISSION ST
MISSION ST
TORRES ST
Year: 2016
CARPENTER ST
3RDAV
5TH AV
5THAV
OCEAN AV
SAN CARLOS ST
SCENIC ROAD
10THAV
1STAV
2NDAV
3RDAV
DEL MARAV
GUADALUPE ST
OCEAN AV
Begin Location
VISTAAV
4THAV
FRANCISCAN WY
5THAV
OCEANAV
RIORD
5TH AVE
2NDAV
3RDAV
OCEAN AV
CllY LIMITS
CllY LIMITS
MI SSION ST
MONTE VERDE ST
SAN CARLOS ST
MONTE VERDE ST
13TH AV
SANTA LUCIA AV
JUNIPEROAV
CARPENTER ST
CARPENTER ST
SANTA RITA ST
OCEAN AV
4TH AVE
DELMARAV
- Treatment from Project Selection
End Locat ion Street ID
2ND AV DLORES
5TH AV DLORES
CllY LIMIT DLORES
6TH AV GUADLP
8TH AV JUNPRO
SHARP RD BEND/CilY LAUSEN
LIM
OCEAN AVE LINCOL
4TH AV LOBOS
4TH AV MISION
8TH AV MISION
2ND AVE TORRES
2ND AVE
JUNIPEROAV
DELORESST
JUNIPEROAV
JUNI PEROAV
SANTALUCIAAV
CllY LIMIT
TORRES ST
LOBOS ST
L080SST
GUADALUPE ST
TURN AROUND
5TH AVE
SAN ANTONIO AV
CRPNTR
3RDAV
5THAV
5THAV
OCEAN
SAN CAR
SCENIC
10THAV
1STAV
2NDAV
3RDAV
DELMAR
GUADLP
OCEAN
Section ID
010
031
090
030A
060
010
022
020
020
040
010A
01 1
020
011
020
030
080
040
040
0408
070A
050D
010
0208
010
3
SS1026
FC Surface PCI
R AC 92
0 AC 91
R AC 87
R AC 92
A AC 91
C AC 94
0
R
R
0
R
A
R
c
c
A
Treatment Total
Year 2015 Total
AC/PCC 100
Treatment Total
ST 100
ST 100
ST 100
ST 100
C ST 100
C AC 100
Treatment Total
R AC 92
R AC 92
R AC 92
R AC 92
A AC 91
R AC 92
A AC 91
Cost
$9,484
$5,807
$2,012
$3,594
$21 .221
$6,591
$7.485
$8,791
$5.423
$10,349
$5,168
$90,993
$629,506
$66,371
$66,371
$16,904
$39.494
$30,131
$302,938
$51.792
$68,796
$510,055
$1 ,606
$2,298
$2,298
$2,221
$4,897
$5,206
$16,979
Rating Treatment
14,570 SLURRY SEAL
16,761 SLURRY SEAL
21.433 SLURRY SEAL
14,570 SLURRY SEAL
27,481 SLURRY SEAL
21,375 SLURRY SEAL
21 ,397 SLURRY SEAL
14,570 SLURRY SEAL
21,019 SLURRY SEAL
20,880 SLURRY SEAL
14,570 SLURRY SEAL
15,604 MILL & THIN AC OVERLAY
(2")
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
26,173 SLURRY SEAL
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
26,173 SLURRY SEAL
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
3
Street Name
SANTE FEST
TORRES ST
Year: 2017
CARPENTER ST
8THAV
CRESPI AV
JUNIPEROAV
LINCOLN ST
LINCOLN ST
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV
OAK KNOLL WAY
SANTA FEST
12TH AV
3RDAV
4THAV
7TH AV
DOLORES ST
GUADALUPE ST
JUNIPEROAV
LINCOLN ST
L080S ST
SANTA RITA ST
SANTA FEST
TORRES ST
STHAV
Begin Location
OCEAN AV
OCEAN AV
3RDAV
FORESTRD
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV
2NDAV
1ST AV
12TH AV
SANTA FEST
FOREST RD
3RDAVE
SAN CARLOS ST
L080S ST
TORRES ST
GUADALUPE ST
STHAV
7THAV
8THAV
4TH AVE
1STAV
CITY LIMITS
2ND AVE
4THAV
JUNIPEROAV
** - Treatment from Proj ect Selection
Scenarios Criteria:
End Location
8THAV
8THAV
OCEANAV
TURN AROUND
FLANDERS WAY
3RDAV
2NDAV
SANTA LUCIA AV
FOREST RD
TURN AROUND
2ND AVE
JUNIPEROAV
MONTEREY ST
SANTA FEST
FOREST ST
OCEAN AV
MOUNTAIN VIEW AV
10TH AV
5TH AVE
2NDAV
2NDAV
CITY LIMIT
STHAV
TORRESST
Street ID
SANTFE
TORRES
CRPNTR
8THAV
CRESPI
JUNPRO
LINCOL
LINCOL
MTVIEW
OAKNOL
SANTFE
12THAV
3RDAV
4THAV
7THAV
DLORES
GUADLP
JUNPRO
LINCOL
LOBOS
SANRIT
SANTFE
TORRES
STHAV
Section ID
050
040
020
050
010
030
010
060
020
010
012A
030
0608
060A
050A
032
0408
070
021
0108
010A
0128
030A
4
SS1026
025
FC Surface PCI
R AC/AC 93
R AC 92
Treatment Total
Year 2016 Total
A AC/PCC 100
Treatment Total
R ST 100
R
c
R
R
R
R
R
ST
AC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
Treatment Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
R AC 92
R AC 92
R
R
0
R
c
0
R
R
R
R
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC/AC
AC/AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
Treatment Total
92
92
92
92
91
93
92
92
92
92
C AC 100
Cost
$6,993
$8,629
$51' 127
$627,553
$221,107
$221 ' 107
$6,668
$38,619
$38,492
$39.264
$97,087
$41 ,678
$12,348
$31 ,667
$305,823
$4.208
$2,183
$2,298
$1,866
$7,240
$4,484
$17,490
$5,425
$4,028
$7,969
$7,404
$4,043
$68,638
$32,831
Rating Treatment
13,216 SLURRY SEAL
13,876 SLURRY SEAL
13,430 MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY
(2.5")
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
18,641 SLURRY SEAL
12,586 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
13,215 SLURRY SEAL
11 ,607 THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5
INCHES)
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
4
Street Name
Year: 2018
OCEAN AV
12TH AV
13THAV
1ST AV
3RDAV
4THAV
DOLORES ST
FRASER WAY
LINCOLN ST
MONTE VERDE ST
13TH AV
3RDAV
5THAV
6THAV
7THAV
8THAV
CAMINO DEL MONTE
CAMINO DEL MONTE
DOLORESST
JUNIPERO AV
JUNIPEROAV
OCEAN AV
OCEANAV
RIORD
SAN CARLOS ST
Begin Location
JUNIPEROAV
MONTE VERDE ST
SCENIC RD
LINCOLN ST
MONTE VERDE ST
SANTA RITA ST
SANTA LUCIA AV
CAMINO REAL
9THAV
12TH AV
48FT W/OSAN
CARLOS ST
TORRES ST
DOLORES ST
JUNIPEROAV
DOLORES ST
SAN CARLOS ST
CITY LIMIT
3RDAV
7TH
3RDAV
CAMINO DEL MONTE
SAN ANTONIO AV
CARPENTER ST
JUNIPEROAV
OCEANAV
** -Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria:
End Location
CARPENTER ST
SAN CARLOS ST
MONTE VERDE ST
MISSION ST
DOLORES ST
GUADALUPE ST
FRANCISCAN WY
CASANOVAST
12TH AV
125FT S/0 SANTA
LUCIAAV
JUNIPEROAV
SANTA FEST
SAN CARLOS ST
TORRES ST
SAN CARLOS ST
JUNIPEROAV
2ND STREET
JUNIPEROAV
8THAV
4THAV
2ND AVE
MONTE VERDE ST
CITY LIMITS
SANTA LUCIA AV
8THAV
Street ID
OCEAN
12THAV
13THAV
1STAV
3RDAV
4THAV
DLORES
FRASER
LIN COL
MNTVRD
13THAV
3RDAV
5THAV
6THAV
7THAV
8THAV
CMDMNT
CMDMNT
DLORES
JUNPRO
JUNPRO
OCEAN
OCEAN
RIORD
SAN CAR
Section ID
040
020
010
010
010
060C
080
010
050
060
030
040
012
030
030
035
010
020
0408
040
20
020
050
010
050
5
SS1026
FC Surface PCI
Treatment Total
Year 2017 Total
A PCC 90
Treatment Total
R ST 100
R
R
R
R
R
R
c
R
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cost
$32,831
$628,399
$106
$106
$66.416
$74,331
$45,704
$34,890
$11,731
$26,499
$12,447
$131,154
$99,303
A AC/AC 88 $6,552
A
c
c
0
A
A
A
0
A
c
A
A
A
A
AC
AC
AC
PCC
AC
AC/AC
AC
PCC
AC/AC
AC
PCC
AC
AC
PCC
91
89
90
93
85
88
85
93
91
88
91
85
84
91
$3,434
$3,371
$3,401
$743
$8,252
$2,175
$12,976
$1 ,158
$12,393
$2,554
$11,818
$5,642
$4,326
$14,635
Rating Treatment
5,531 .111 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
11 ,578 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
11 ,547 THINACOVERLAY(2")
11,515 THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
13,496 THIN AC OVERLAY (2"}
33,508 SLURRY SEAL
25,417 SLURRY SEAL
23,385 SLURRY SEAL
30,455 SLURRY SEAL
55,939 SLURRY SEAL
30.141 SLURRY SEAL
33,153 SLURRY SEAL
29,970 SLURRY SEAL
55,939 SLURRY SEAL
25.417 SLURRY SEAL
23,465 SLURRY SEAL
25,417 SLURRY SEAL
29,933 SLURRY SEAL
44,780 SLURRY SEAL
25,417 SLURRY SEAL
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
5
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street 10 Secti on 10 FC Surface PCI Cost Rati ng Treatment
SAN CARLOS ST 8THAV 11TH AV SAN CAR 060 A AC 83 $28,093 30,643 SLURRY SEAL
SANTA LUCIAAV SCENIC RD CAMINO REAL SANLUC 010 c AC 87 $9,073 23,570 SLURRY SEAL
Year 2018 Total $633,177
Year: 2019
11TH AV SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 11THAV 010 R ST 100 $77,598 11,035 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
12TH AV SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 12THAV 010 R ST 100 $93,118 11,015 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
2NDAV MID BLK W\0 LINCOLN MISSION ST 2NDAV 040 R AC 100 $43,781 10,872 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
ST
8THAV SAN ANTONIO AV MONTE VERDE ST 8THAV 020 R ST 100 $98,274 11 ,021 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
CARMELOAV 9THAV 12TH AV CMELO 030 R ST 100 $1 15,887 11 ,019 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
DOLORES ST 2NDAV 4THAV DLORES 020 R ST 100 $69,042 11 ,031 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
2NDAV N. CASANOVA STREET MONTE VERDE STREET 2NDAV 030 R AC 86 $3,413 20,755 SLURRY SEAL
JUNIPERO AV 4THAV OCEANAV JUNPRO 050 A AC 91 $30,947 24,207 SLURRY SEAL
JUNIPERO AV OCEAN AV 8THAV JUNPRO 060 A AC 89 $25,794 25,658 SLURRY SEAL
RIORD SANTALUCIAAV SOUTH CITY LIMIT RIORD 020 A AC 90 $33,811 27,789 SLURRY SEAL
SAN ANTONIO AV 4THAV OCEAN AV SAN AN 010 A ST 91 $6,290 22,609 SLURRY SEAL
SAN CARLOS ST 3RDAV 5THAV SAN CAR 030 A AC/AC 91 $16,052 24,207 SLURRY SEAL
SAN CARLOS ST 11THAV 13TH AV SAN CAR 070 A AC 91 $19,700 24,207 SLURRY SEAL
Year 2019 Total $633,707
Year: 2020
SAN CARLOS ST 6TH AVE OCEAN SAN CAR 041 A PCC 94 $14 8,324,848 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
Treatment Total $14
1ST AV LOBOS ST MONTEREY ST 1STAV 040C R ST 100 $14,713 10,387 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
FLANDERS WAY VIZCAINO CRESPIAV FLANDR 010 R ST 100 $17,754 10,453 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
MISSION ST ALTAAV 2NDAV MIS ION 010 R ST 100 $1 12,440 10,537 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
MISSION ST 4THAV OCEANAV MISION 030 0 AC 100 $94,553 10,546 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
MISSION ST 8THAV 10TH AV MISION 050 c ST 100 $105,798 12,225 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6
MTC StreetSaver
SS1026
1
6
6
Street Name
N SAN ANTONIO AV
SANTE FEST
11TH AV
6THAV
CARPENTER ST
DEL MARAV
DOLORES ST
ESCOLLEWAY
GUADALUPE ST
LAUSEN DRIVE
OCEAN AV
OCEAN AV
SAN ANTONIO AV
SANTA LUCIA AV
SCENIC ROAD
TORRES ST
3RDAV
Year: 2021
1ST AV
8THAV
JUNIPEROAV
MISSION ST
SAN ANTONIO AV
STERLING WAY
Begin Locati on
2NDAV
5THAV
JUNIPEROAV
MISSION ST
CITY LIMITS
OCEANAV
FRANCISCAN WY
PERRY NEWBERRY
WAY
6THAV
RIORD
DEL MARAV
MONTE VERDE ST
OCEANAV
CAMINO REAL
8THAV
285 FT N/0 11TH AV
JUNIPEROAV
SANTA RITA ST
MONTE VERDE ST
ALTA ST
10TH AV
11TH AV
PERRY NEWBERRY
WAY
Scenarios Criteria:
End Location
4THAV
6THAV
Street 10
NSANAN
SANTFE
EAST END 11THAV
JUNIPERO AV 6THAV
2ND AVE CRPNTR
TURN AROUND DELMAR
CITY LIMIT DLORES
TURN AROUND ESCOLL
OCEAN AV GUADLP
SHARP RD BEND/CITY LAUSEN
LIM
SAN ANTONIO AV OCEAN
JUNIPERO AV OCEAN
8THAV SANAN
DOLORES ST SANLUC
BLK A3 S\END SCENIC
11TH AV TORRES
TORRES ST
CARPENTER ST
SAN CARLOS ST
CAMINO DEL MONTE
13TH AV
SAN LUCIAAV
TURN AROUND
3RDAV
1STAV
8THAV
JUNPRO
MIS ION
SAN AN
STRLNG
Section 10
010
040
040
025
011
010
090
010
0308
010
010
030
015
020
020
060
030
040A
030
010
060
030
010
7
SS1 026
FC Surface PCI
A ST 100
R ST 100
R
0
A
A
R
R
R
c
A
A
c
c
A
R
Treatment Total
AC
AC
AC/PCC
AC
AC
ST
ST
AC
AC
ST
ST
AC
AC
AC
Treatment Total
85
85
91
89
86
90
90
91
89
91
91
85
90
83
A AC 100
R
0
R
R
c
R
Treatment Total
Year 2020 Total
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
Treatment Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cost
$69,618
$36,905
$451,781
$6,173
$3,715
$10,085
$5,953
$2.567
$1 ,150
$1,825
$8,41 2
$20.638
$46,028
$10,41 1
$11,951
$17,021
$2,377
$148,306
$33,489
$33,489
$633,590
$43,152
$79,248
$96,227
$115,473
$113,575
$13,602
$461,277
Rating Treatment
17.559 SLURRY SEAL
17,395 SLURRY SEAL
23,054 SLURRY SEAL
24,436 SLURRY SEAL
16,882 SLURRY SEAL
14,522 SLURRY SEAL
14,522 SLURRY SEAL
20.432 SLURRY SEAL
24,436 SLURRY SEAL
21,532 SLURRY SEAL
20,175 SLURRY SEAL
21 ,075 SLURRY SEAL
26,466 SLURRY SEAL
17,864 SLURRY SEAL
12,898 THICK AC OVERLAY(2.5
INCHES)
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
7
Street Name
STHAV
STHAV
STHAV
6THAV
7THAV
CARPENTER ST
FOREST RD
JUNIPEROAV
LINCOLN ST
MISSION ST
MISSION ST
SAN CARLOS ST
SCENIC ROAD
7THAV
Year: 2022
OCEAN AV
4THAV
4THAV
4THAV
STHAV
LOPEZAV
MONTE VERDE ST
PALOU AV
SANTE FEST
10THAV
Begin Location
MONTE VERDE ST
SAN CARLOS ST
JUNIPERO AV
MONTE VERDE ST
SAN CARLOS ST
3RDAV
MOUNTAIN VIEW
8THAV
5TH AVE
3RDAV
OCEANAV
13THAV
SANTA LUCIA AV
FOREST ST
JUNIPEROAV
SAN ANTONIO AV
CASANOVAST
DOLORES ST
TORRES ST
NORTH END
2NDAV
NORTH END
3RDAV
JUNIPERO AV
-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria:
End Location
DELORES ST
JUNIPEROAV
TORRES ST
LINCOLN ST
JUNIPERO AV
OCEAN AV
7TH AVE
10TH AV
OCEAN AVE
4TH AV
8TH AV
SANTA LUCIAAV
CITY LIMIT
CITY LIMITS
CARPENTER ST
CASANOVAST
MID BLK E\0 MONTE
VERDEST
JUNIPEROAV
GUADALUPE ST
4THAV
4THAV
MONTE VERDE ST
5TH AV
TORRES ST
Street ID
STHAV
5THAV
STHAV
6THAV
7THAV
CRPNTR
FOREST
JUNPRO
LINCOL
MIS ION
MISION
SAN CAR
SCENIC
7THAV
OCEAN
4THAV
4THAV
4THAV
5THAV
LOPEZ
MNTVRO
PALOU
SANTFE
10THAV
Section ID
011
020
025
010
040
020
010
070
022
020
040
080
040
OSOB
040
010
020
040
030
010
010
010
030
8
SS1026
040
FC Surface PCI
C ST 93
C ST 93
C AC 91
0 AC 85
0 AC 84
A AC/PCC 91
R AC 84
C AC/AC 90
0 AC 85
R AC 86
0 AC 86
C ST 93
C AC 90
Cost
$6,786
$5,177
$4.435
$3,883
$7,675
$25,084
$6,746
$21 ,259
$10,031
$7,267
$13,869
$8,899
$13,659
R ST 100 $37,543
A
R
R
c
R
R
R
R
R
Treatment Total
Year 2021 Total
PCC 92
Treatment Total
ST 100
ST 100
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
100
100
100
100
100
100
$37,543
$633,590
$110
$110
$72,313
$31 ,606
$72,667
$53,977
$62,979
$72,100
$53,969
$82,100
TreatmentTotal $501,711
R AC 89 $2,152
Rating Treatment
17,918 SLURRY SEAL
17,918 SLURRY SEAL
15,336 SLURRY SEAL
16,568 SLURRY SEAL
16,923 SLURRY SEAL
21 ,956 SLURRY SEAL
16,847 SLURRY SEAL
17,128 SLURRY SEAL
16,571 SLURRY SEAL
16,429 SLURRY SEAL
16,385 SLURRY SEAL
17,918 SLURRY SEAL
17,573 SLURRY SEAL
3,607 RECONSTRUCT
STRUCTURE {AC)
5,395,342 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
9,535 THIN AC OVERLAY {2")
14,045 SLURRY SEAL
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
8
Street Name
3RDAV
4THAV
5THAV
6THAV
7THAV
DOLORES ST
DOLORES ST
DOLORES ST
JUNIPERO AV
JUNIPEROAV
JUNIPERO AV
LINCOLN ST
OCEAN AV
SAN CARLOS ST
SANTA LUCIAAV
Year: 2023
2NDAV
8THAV
2NDAV
8THAV
RIORD
SAN ANTONIO AV
Year: 2024
10TH AV
4THAV
Begi n Location
TORRESST
SANTA FEST
DOLORESST
JUNIPERO AV
DOLORESST
VISTAAV
4THAV
7TH
2ND AV
3RDAV
CAMINO DEL MONTE
9TH AV
SAN ANTONIO AV
OCEANAV
SCENIC RD
SANTA FEST
SCENIC RD
End Location
SANTA FEST
SANTA RITA ST
SAN CARLOS ST
TORRES ST
SAN CARLOS ST
2NDAV
5THAV
8THAV
3RDAV
4THAV
2ND AVE
12TH AV
MONTE VERDE ST
8THAV
CAMINO REAL
CARPENTER ST
SAN ANTONIO AV
Street 10
3RDAV
4THAV
5THAV
6THAV
7THAV
DLORES
DLORES
DLORES
JUNPRO
JUNPRO
JUNPRO
LIN COL
OCEAN
SA NCAR
SANLUC
2NDAV
8THAV
N. CASANOVA STREET MONTE VERDE STREET 2NDAV
FOREST RD TURN AROUND 8THAV
SANTA LUCIA AV SOUTH CITY LIMIT RIORD
4TH AV
DOLORESST
LINCOLN ST
OCEAN AV
JUNIPEROAV
DOLORES ST
SAN AN
10THAV
4THAV
Scenarios Criteria:
Section 10
040
0608
01 2
030
030
010
031
0409
030
040
20
050
020
050
010
060
010
030
050
020
010
030
030
9
SS1026
FC Surface PCI
A AC 90
R AC 87
C AC 89
C AC 91
0 PCC 92
R AC 87
0 AC 87
0 PCC 92
C AC 90
A AC/AC 90
C AC 88
C ST 94
A PCC 90
A PCC 90
C AC 87
A
c
R
R
A
A
c
c
Treatment Total
Year 2022 Total
ST
ST
Treatment Total
100
100
AC 88
ST 90
AC 90
ST 89
Treatment Total
Year 2023 Total
ST
ST
100
100
Cost
$4,174
$3,053
$4,097
$4,134
$902
$13,345
$8,171
$1 ,408
$7,642
$15,063
$3,104
$21.461
$14,365
$17,789
$11 ,029
$131,889
$633,710
$112,899
$32,537
$145,436
$4,149
$1 ,304
$41 ,097
$7,645
$54,195
$199,631
$89,192
$31,891
Rating Treatment
23,266 SLURRY SEAL
14,831 SLURRY SEAL
19,292 SLURRY SEAL
25,01 9 SLURRY SEAL
52,077 SLURRY SEAL
14,831 SLURRY SEAL
15,167 SLURRY SEAL
52,077 SLURRY SEAL
16,736 SLURRY SEAL
23,266 SLURRY SEAL
19,395 SLURRY SEAL
15,191 SLURRY SEAL
23,266 SLURRY SEAL
23,266 SLURRY SEAL
19,345 SLURRY SEAL
16,206 SLURRY SEAL
12,544 SLURRY SEAL
23,371 SLURRY SEAL
21,109 SLURRY SEAL
MTC StreetSaver
1
6
9
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface PCI Cost Rating Treatment
9THAV DOLORES ST SAN CARLOS ST 9THAV 030 c ST 100 $30,493 10,054 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
3RDAV JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 3RDAV 030 A AC 91 $4,191 18,967 SLURRY SEAL
ESCOLLE WAY PERRY NEWBERRY TURNAROUND ESCOLL 010 R ST 90 $1 ,397 11 ,852 SLURRY SEAL
WAY
JUNIPERO AV 4THAV OCEAN AV JUNPRO 050 A AC 89 $39,497 23,458 SLURRY SEAL
TORRES ST 285FT N/0 11TH AV 11TH AV TORRES 060 R AC 85 $2,889 14,306 SLURRY SEAL
Year 2024 Total $199,550
Year : 2025
4THAV JUNIPEROAV TORRES ST 4THAV 050 c ST 100 $22,205 9,596 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
LINCOLN ST 8THAV 9THAV LIN COL 040 R ST 100 $62,667 8,262 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
TORRESST 3RDAV 4THAV TORRES 020 c ST 100 $63,443 9,605 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
1STAV CARPENTER ST LOBOS ST 1STAV 0408 R AC 85 $3.565 13,738 SLURRY SEAL
SAN CARLOS ST 3RDAV 5THAV SAN CAR 030 A AC/AC 88 $21,511 24,051 SLURRY SEAL
SAN CARLOS ST 11TH AV 13TH AV SAN CAR 070 A AC 88 $26,400 24,051 SLURRY SEAL
Year 2025 Total $199,791
Year: 2026
OCEAN AV JUNIPERO AV CARPENTER ST OCEAN 040 A PCC 93 $112 5.200,606 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
Treatment Total $112
CARPENTER ST 2ND AVE 3RDAVE CRPNTR 012 c AC/PCC 100 $96,378 6,736 MILL & THICK AC OVERLAY
(2.5")
7THAV DOLORESST SAN CARLOS ST 7THAV 030 0 PCC 92 $1 ,097 44.762 SLURRY SEAL
CARPENTER ST CITY LIMITS 2ND AVE CRPNTR 011 A AC/PCC 88 $13,514 22,906 SLURRY SEAL
DOLORES ST 7TH 8TH AV DLORES 040B 0 PCC 92 $1 ,711 44,762 SLURRY SEAL
SCENIC ROAD 8THAV BLKA3 S\END SCENIC 020 A AC 87 $22,810 23,533 SLURRY SEAL
- Treatment from Project Selection 10
MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:
SS1026
1
7
0
Street Name Begin Location
3RDAV SANTA FEST
Year: 2027
SANTA LUCIA AV CAMINO REAL
2ND AV SANTA FEST
2NDAV CARPENTER ST
5THAV JUNIPERO AV
CARPENTER ST 3RDAV
N SAN ANTONIO AV 2NDAV
SCENIC ROAD SANTA LUCIA AV
Year: 2028
SAN CARLOS ST 6TH AVE
3RDAV JUNIPEROAV
7THAV GUADALUPE ST
JUNIPEROAV 2NDAV
JUNIPERO AV 8THAV
11TH AV SAN CARLOS ST
**- Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria:
End Location
SANTA RITA ST
DOLORES ST
CARPENTER ST
LOBOSST
TORRES ST
OCEAN AV
4THAV
CITY LIMIT
OCEAN
TORRESST
FOREST ST
3RDAV
10TH AV
JUNIPEROAV
Street ID
3RDAV
SANLUC
2NDAV
2NDAV
5THAV
CRPNTR
NSANAN
SCENIC
SAN CAR
3RDAV
7THAV
JUNPRO
JUNPRO
11THAV
Section ID
050C
020
060
070A
025
020
010
040
041
030
050A
030
070
030
11
SS1026
FC Surface PCI Cost Rating Treatment
R ST 100 $63,103 2,826 RECONSTRUCT
STRUCTURE (AC)
Year 2026 Total $198,725
c AC 100 $108,105 7,688 THIN AC OVERLAY (2")
A ST 91 $17,154 15,303 SLURRY SEAL
R AC 82 $3,930 12,851 SLURRY SEAL
c AC 87 $5,942 15,224 SLURRY SEAL
A AC/PCC 88 $33,615 21 ,815 SLURRY SEAL
A ST 85 $12,245 19,114 SLURRY SEAL
c AC 87 $18,304 15,630 SLURRY SEAL
Treatment Total $91 ,190
Year 2027 Total $199,295
A PCC 94 $20 5,634,282 RUBBERIZED CRACK SEAL
Treatment Total $20
A AC 90 $5,094 17,361 SLURRY SEAL
R AC 82 $3,191 12,239 SLURRY SEAL
c AC 87 $10.241 14,886 SLURRY SEAL
c AC/AC 85 $29,914 15,466 SLURRY SEAL
R ST 100 $151,198 2,563 RECONSTRUCT
STRUCTURE (AC)
Treatment Total $151 ' 198
Year 2028 Total $199,658
Grand Total $6,883,142
MTC StreetSaver

Receive and File The 2013 Pavement Management Program Update Report 12-03-13

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Receive and File The 2013 Pavement Management Program Update Report 12-03-13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

66

You might also like