.

2010


.
.

.
:

2818

971 2 6324 454 :
2010
. .

2 .......................................................................................
: 2 ........................................................
.1 3 .........................................................
.2 )16 ................................. (Core Principles
.3 )17 ...... (Off-and On-Site Supervision
: )36 ................................. (Risk Management
.1 36 ......................................................................
.2 42 .............................................................
.3 44 ..............................................
: )46 .... (Risk-Focused Supervision
.1 47 ............................................
.2 49 ......................................................................
.3 )57 ........ (Importance of Risk Assessment
: 64........................................................................

.
.

.


.
:

:
.1

.2

.3



.
.1

:
- )(Liquidity

.
.
:
.1

.2

.3

- )(Asset Quality

.

. .

 .
)
(.

.
- )(Risk Concentration

.


.
- )(Management

.
.
.

.

 - )(Systems & Controls

.

..


.
- )(Capital Adequacy

.

.

.
) (2
.

. .

 )(2
) (2 :
.Market Discipline
) (1
) (1 .
AAA
BB

.
Arbitrage



.
) (1 Diversification
.Operational Risk

.
) (2
.

.

 )(2

. ) (2
%8

) (2 .
Operational Risk
.
.
.

) (.

)(Standardized Approach

%100
.

%8 .
%20 %1.6
:

%8 x

 ) ( .

Rating Agencies .

:

AAA

A + to

BBB +

BB +

to AA-

A-

to BBB-

to B-

B-

20

50

100

150

100

) (

20

50

100

100

150

100

) (

20

50

80

100

150

50

AAA

A + to

BBB +

BB +

to AA-

A-

to BBB-

to BB-

BB-

20

50

100

100

150

)(

50

50

)(

100

100

100

.
.
.


.%20
%150 90
Venture Capital
.

 The Internal Ratings Based Approach

.

:

: .

: .

.
:

.Probability of default

.Loss given default

.Exposure at default

.Maturity of the transaction

 ) (Probability of Default


.

.
%2 100 .

. ) (A
%15 .

.

)(Loss Given Default

.
. :

%50 .

%75 .

%50 .%75

%40 .%50

 )(Exposure at Default


.
:


.

= %8

+
:
= x
:
= ) ( x
50
:
Selected Bench Mark Risk Weight Values for Corporate Exposure
20

15

10

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.03

PD%

125

588

482

331

246

192

125

100

81

70

45

29

19

14

BRW

 :
PD

BRW .
:BBB
.%75
RW = 75/50 X 100 = 150
= %12 = %8 x %150

. ) (2
:

.Basic Indicator Approach

.Standardized Approach

.Advanced Measurement Approach

:
)(
.
.
:


.

 %12
.%15
:
.

)(Supervisory Review Process

.

.
:
.1

.2

.3

.4

 :
.1

.2

.
.
.

.3

.4

. .

)(Market Discipline

.
.

.

 :
.1

.2

) . (.

.3

.4

.5

.6

.7

.8

.9

)(2

.

.
:

 .2 )(Core Principles
:
.
-


.
:
.1

.2

.3

.4

-

.

.

 -

.
:
.1

.2

.3

: .

:
.1

.2

.3

.3 )(Off-and On-Site Supervision

.
- )(Off-Site Supervision

.
.
.
.


.
.

.
- )(On-Site Supervision


.
.
CAMELS


.
.
)(Banks Rating System

.

.

 .

.
.
)(Camels

.

.
.
) (5-1 ) (1
.
) (5
.
.
.


.



.
.

.
.

.


.

)(Composite Rating

.
:
.
) (5-1 .
(Strong) 1

.
.

 .
.
.

(Satisfactory) 2
.
.
. .


.

(Fair) 3

.
.
.
1 .2
.
.
.
.

 (Marginal) 4


.

.
.

.
. .

(Unsatisfactory) 5


. .

.
.

)(CAMELS


.

 )(Capital Adequacy

.

.

.
:

:
.1

.2

.3

:

.

.4

.5

)(Asset Quality

.
.

.
:

:
.1

.
.

.2

:

.
.

.3

:


. .

.4

:


.

.5

 )(Management


.


.

.

:
.


.
:

:
.1

.

.

.2

.
.
.

.3

:

.
.

.4

.

.
.

.5

.
. .

)(Earnings



.

.
.
:

:
.1

.2

.
2
.

.3

.4

. 4
.

.5

. 5
.

 )(Liquidity


.

.

.
:

:
.1

.2

.
.
.

.3

.
3
.

.4

.5

. 5
.

)(Sensitivity to Market Risk

.


.

.
.
.

:
.1

.
.

.2

.

.
.

.3

.

.
.

.4

.

.
.

.5

.
.

)(IRR Concepts

.

.


.
.

.

. .

 )(Repricing Risk

.

.

) (Basic Risk

.
50

25 .

)(Yield Risk

.
30 200
50 .
)(Option Risk
.


.
%10 %10 30 .

 %8 .

%10 30 .
)(Disclosure of Ratings
CAMELS .

.

.
.

.

)(Discussion with Management

.
.


.


.

 .
.
.
: )(Risk Management
.


.
.
.1
:

Strategic Risk

Credit Risk

Liquidity Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Foreign Exchange Risk

Price Risk

Operational Risk

Regulatory Risk

 - )(Strategic Risk


.

.


.

..... .
.
- )(Credit Risk

.

.
.

.


.



.


.
.Stress Test

.
.
- )(Liquidity Risk

.
.

.


.


.
.
.


.
- ) (Interest Rate Risk

.
.
.

.

.


.
.
.

 - )(Price Risk


. .

.

.
.


.
- )(Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

.
.

.
.


.


.
.
- )(Operational Risk

.

.



.
.

.
.
- )(Reputation Risk


.


.
.


.
- )(Regulatory Risk
.

.
.


.
.2
- )(Risk Identification
.
.
:
.
.

 - )(Risk Measurement


.
.
- )(Risk Control


.Offsetting

.
.
- )(Risk Monitoring

.



.



.
.3
:
-



.


.


.

.

 -

.

.

.
-



.
.
.

.

.
-

.


.
.
.
.


.

.

.
: )(Risk-Focused Supervision


. /

.

.
Risk- Focused Approach .


.



.
Proactive .Reactive
.1


.
.
.

.
- )(Understanding the Institution

.

.

.

 - )(Sources of Information

:
)(Off-Site Reports



.

)(Management Information Systems

.


.
)(Discussion with Management
.

.

.


... .

.
)(Public Sources

.
.
.2

.

.

.

. :
- )(Avoidance of Risk

.

 - )(Transfer of Risk

.
- )(Acceptance of Risk


.

.

:
.1

.2

.3

.4


.


.

.

.


.
.

.
Risk Monitoring .
:
.1

.2

.3

)
(.


.
:
)(Management Process
.
)(Architecture
.
)(Integrity
.
)(Security

.
)(Availability
.

 )(The Risk Matrix

.
.
.

.
.


High Moderate .Low
)(High Risk


.
)(Moderate Risk

.
.

 )(Low Risk
.

.


.
.
)(Strong Risk Management

.
. .

.
)(Acceptable Risk Management
.

.

 )(Weak Risk Management

.
.

:
)(High Composite Risk

.


.
)(Moderate Risk

.
.
.

 )(Low Composite Risk

.

.
.
%35
%10
:

/ //

/ /

%35

%10

/ //

/ /
/ //

/ /

 .3 )(Importance of Risk Assessment

.

.

.
. :

) (.

.

.
.
.

 )(Supervisory Plan

.
.
:

.

.
.

)(Examination Program
:

)(Scope Memorandum
.
CAMELS
:

)(Entry Letter
.

.
)(Risk Management Rating
.5-1
.
.CAMELS
1 )(Strong
1
.


.

. .

.
.

2 )(Satisfactory
2
.

.

.
.
.

3 )(Fair
3
.
.

 .
.

4 )(Marginal

.
.
.


.
.
.

5 ) (Unsatisfactory

.


.
.



CAMELS
.



.

.

.

.
.

 :

.
.
.
.
.

). (OECD, 2004

) .(2006

.

.

.


) 2004 ( .


.

.


.


.

.
)
(
)
.(...
.


.
" " .



.

.

 -
) (OECD "

") .(OECD, 2004

.


.

.


) .(2006
1999
) (2006

) .(BIS, 2006

.

:
.1

.2

.3

.4

.5

(.

.6

.7

.8

) " "(.

.






.
:

.1

.
.2

.

.

.3

.4

.5

.


.

.6