Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted to
Shahin Akhter
University of Information Technology & Science (UITS !angladesh
Submitted by
%eeds:
$uman needs are material items people need for survival, such as food, clothing and some from of housing. &ntil the Industrial 'evolution, the vast ma(ority of the world)s population struggled for access to basic human needs.
.ants:
*hile the basic needs of human survival are important in the function of the economy, human wants are the driving force which stimulates demand for goods and services. In order to curb the economic problem, economists must classify the nature and different wants of consumers, as well as prioriti%e wants and organi%e production to satisfy as many wants as possible.
/hoice:
The economic problem fundamentally revolves around the idea of choice, which ultimately must answer the problem. +ue to the limited resource available business must determine what to produce first to satisfy demand. ,onsumers are considered the biggest influences of this choice and the goods which they want must also fit within there budgets and purchasing power parity. The basic economic problem is that resources are scarce relative to the purposes to which they could be put. -s a result choices have to be made about how to use resources. The basic economic problem is thus fre uently referred to as .scarcity and choice). - resource regarded as any feature of our environment that helps to support our well/being.
3.
If we were to take stock of the world)s existing bundle of resources we would find that there are sever limitations to its ability to meet our infinite wants.
Scarcity:
4carce resources can be broken down into four key ingredients5 land, labour, capital and enterprise. 6and includes all natural resources7 labour includes all physical and mental effort7 capital includes machinery and other items that go into further production7 and enterprise is the art of combining the other three factors in the production process. 4carcity can be seen as resulting from the lack of availability in resources, from peoples insatiable wants, or from a combination of the two.
You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose. .... +r. 4euss Every economy must answer three basic uestions5 what goods and services to produce, how to produce them, and for whom to produce them. 'emember that resources (land, labor, capital, entrepreneurship) are scarce or limited. *e cannot have everything7 we must make choices. *hich ones are best" 8or allocative efficiency we should choose the combination of goods and services that creates the most value or utility. Every choice bears a cost. *e cannot choose one option without forfeiting another. 4uppose the choice is to produce either a bag of potato chips or a tube of lipstick. If we choose the potato chips, we lose the lipstick. If we choose the lipstick, we lose the chips. To an economist, true costs are what we must sacrifice or give up to get something. In this case, the cost of the potato chips is the lost lipstick, and the cost of the lipstick is the lost bag of chips. The professional (argon calls these opportunity costs. 9pportunity costs are the value that must be sacrificed or given up. They also are the value of our next best alternative or opportunity. *hy" Every time we make a choice, what we sacrifice is our next best alternative.
'ational decision makers will compare the relative values of potential goods and services. 9r, in the (argon of economics, they compare the benefits and opportunity costs of that choice.
3o0 to 4roduce2
This means who will do the production and which methods of production will be used. 4hould the economy use a system that is labour intensive and there by ensures everyone has a (ob who wants one or should we use more efficient methods of production that involve the use of machines even if this means fewer (obs" Waste not, want not. ...anonymous proverb To reach our production/possibilities curve (11,) we must get the most we can from our limited resources. If we waste resources or use them inefficiently, we will produce less than we possibly could and drop inside or beneath our 11,. In other words, we need to produce with technical efficiency. That is, we need to use the least/cost methods of production. &sing :; of resources to produce what could have been made with :< of resources is throwing away the potential output we could have gotten from the wasted resource. *hat method is best" There is no so single answer. It will depend upon the particular good and particular resources in uestion. $owever, the best methods almost always will involve significant specialization. *e are very speciali%ed producers. 8or example, I speciali%e in economic lectures. I produce lectures, earn income from doing so, and use my income to trade for goods and services produced by others. This speciali%ation makes us all interdependent. *e need others to produce the goods that we do not make ourselves. *hy do we choose to speciali%e and trade with others rather than being self/ sufficient" 4imple. 4peciali%ation and trade raise our standard of living. *e reap gains from specialization and trade for two ma(or reasons. 8irst, speciali%ation allows us to practice and learn to become more proficient. If we spread our time and effort trying to play all sports, we never become expert in any one. If we speciali%e in baseball we can practice baseball skills repetitively.
The practice helps us improve. The saying !practice makes perfect# certainly exaggerates, but practice does make us better. 4econd, speciali%ation allows us to take advantage of our particular talents. 1eople differ. 4peciali%ation allows us to concentrate on what we do best. 4ome of this is obvious. If -nnie excels at cleaning and 6aurie at cooking7 it makes intuitive sense that -nnie should speciali%e in cleaning and 6aurie in cooking. If -nnie can then trade some of her cleaning efforts to 6aurie in return for 6aurie)s cooking, both women should gain. This means who will consume the goods and services after they been produce/ how will it be decided who receives them= should an economy be geared to provide goods and services to every person as e ually as possible or should those who work hard get more" *hat is the best method of distributing products to ensure the highest level of wants are met" In a free market economy, the producers of products determine social needs through the use of market signals. The most common of these signals is demand for products. It is often easily visible by what is known as demand/ pull inflation, increases in the price of wanted goods due to a lack of supply and the purchaser>s willingness to pay more for the product to guarantee himself access to it. This sends a signal to producers of the good that they can maximi%e their profits by allocating further resources to producing the good being demanded as opposed to other possible products.
1roduction is pursued in a manner which ensures the least waste and maximi%es efficiency, as to therefore maximi%e profit. The consumers, those for whom the goods are produced, are catered to by the producers, and are generally anyone who has goods=currency to exchange for the products they desire.
Improving the policy environment for growth 1romoting trade Infrastructure development, rural development and building skilled workforces -ddressing the environmental challenges to growth including management of fresh water resources.
"#
1) WH ! !" P#"$%C&'
by producing the needed goods or services in the most efficient (E least expensive per unit produced) means possible, and heavy investment in research and development to improve efficiency will generally pay off handsomely. 8or whom to produce // simply put, for those who want something enough to pay for it. There is an underlying assumption of the -@I6ITF to pay, and of course the socialist=communist theorists of the world uickly (ump on this and claim that this is the great GfailureG of capitalism because it disenfranchises the poorer classes. @ut that is simply ignorance of the true beauty of the capitalist system // in the capitalist system, there are $&CE profits to be made by finding ways to produce goods and services so efficiently that even the poorest can afford them. This is due to the simple fact that historically the poor outnumber the wealthy by factors of 0H, 3H, or ;H to one. *hen producing goods or services for the poor one must make considerably less profit on a per/unit basis, but this apparent GshortfallG is more than made up for in volume.
Solution in #i:ed Economy the first two are determined based on supply and demand. *hen there is more demand for something than there is available supply of it, the profit margin for producing that thing increases and mixed
investments will be made to increase production, producing profits for the investors. $owever, it will be to the investor>s benefit to not produce an excess, as this would result in there being more supply than demand, which depresses the price and destroys the profits. *hat goods should be produce and in what uantities, bow should they be produce, how should they be distributed among the population and how much should be invested to bring about economic growth are all decided by the basic planning authority. This method of solving the central problems through the use of economic planning had been adopted in the former communist countries such as 4oviet 'ussia, 1oland etc. 8or whom to produce // simply put, for those who want something enough to pay for it. There is an underlying assumption of the -@I6ITF to pay, and of course the socialist=communist theorists of the world uickly (ump on this and claim that this is the great GfailureG because it disenfranchises the poorer classes. @ut that is simply ignorance of the true beauty of the capitalist system // in the mixed system, there are $&CE profits to be made by finding ways to produce goods and services so efficiently that even the poorest can afford them. This is due to the simple fact that historically the poor outnumber the wealthy by factors of 0H, 3H, or ;H to one. *hen producing goods or services for the poor one must make considerably less profit on a per/unit basis, but this apparent GshortfallG is more than
); P a$$ed Eco$om%&
4roblems
1. WH ! !" P#"$%C&'
Solution in 4lanned Economy In this method, the solution of the various basic problems is not achieved through the free working of demand for and supply of goods and factors. @ut to solve this problems, Covernment sets up a central planning authority which has been called by several names such as planning commission, planning ministry or planning board. *hat goods should be produce and in what uantities, bow should they be produce, how should they be distributed among the population and how much should be invested to bring about economic growth are all decided by the basic planning authority. This method of solving the central problems through the use of economic planning had been adopted in the former communist countries such as 4oviet 'ussia, 1oland etc. There are thus to steps in the process of distribution. The first is the distribution money incomes can be earned either by doing world for by landing the services of one)s properties such as land, capital and houses. Dext step in the distribution process is the sharing of goods and services between different individuals or consumers.
*e have only indicated here that there are three main methoHds of solving the basic problems. $ow these basic problems are solved by a capitalist economy, mixed economy and centrally planned economy socialist economy.