INTRODUCTION
STRUCTURE:
in the broadest sense any material object that is able to sustain loads (forces) may be called a structure (3, p.11).
This includes objects in nature such as land and water, animals and plants, in the universe such as stars, planets, solar systems and galaxies, as well as man-made objects
such as buildings, bridges, vehicles, furniture, appliances etc.
the OBJECT, defined by its SHAPE and the MATERIAL it is made of, and the LOADING the object is subjected to.
The shape of an object is its visible representation: it is what we see.
The material of an object is often not visible at first view and may reveal itself only through its colour and surface texture. By touching an object texture and weight (loading)
of its material can be experienced.
In order to understand structure in its essence and its totality we must first consider shape, material and loading in turn and than combine them to form an integrated whole:
structure.
We will be concentrating on building structure, but while looking at buildings and the structures that make them stand up we should always be aware that buildings form
only one part of the world of structure.
In order to be universally valid our investigation must address itself to the much wider context of structure: much can be gained and learned from observing and
understanding the basic principles which govern structure in nature and its organisation in other technological fields often leading to insight and subsequent improvement of
structures utilised in building.
In order to obtain such insight and then to be able to draw parallels with buildings we must first look out for those basic properties and attributes of shape, material, loading
and structure which are common to a wide range of different structures and subsequently identify them.
For this analytical process to occur and for the outcome to be understood we must first agree on a common terminology. That is a clearly identifiable, recurring set of
definitions of those recognisable properties and attributes which are common and valid to all structures.
TERMINOLOGY
BUILDING STRUCTURE, a specific type of structure, encloses and protects space from drastic changes in shape while resisting loads exerted on it by the elements of
nature (wind, snow and earthquake), by the gravitational pull of the earth and by other influences such as temperature.
That space usually accommodates people, animals, plants and goods.
BUILDING is a part of the built environment which is relatively independent in its function and appearance.
STRUCTURE is that part of a building that provides the support function in order to safeguard the overall functioning of the building.
It consists of a STRUCTURAL CONTINUUM, a BOUNDARY which borders the continuum and SUPPORTS. Supports can be placed within the continuum or at the
boundary.
Depending on the complexity of make-up, the structure can be an ELEMENT STRUCTURE, a UNIT STRUCTURE, an AGGREGATE STRUCTURE or a COMPOSITE
STRUCTURE.
The CONTINUUM is that part of a structure that encloses (interior) space and is directly subjected to LOADING by external loads.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (2 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
Stresses are channelled through the object and through its elements into the structural MATERIAL which reacts to stressing with SHAPE-CHANGE.
At the SUPPORTS these stresses are collected and channelled into forces which are then transmitted through the supports to the ground or to another supporting medium
where they are resisted by opposite forces activated by the supporting medium.
In the case of an aggregate and composite structure the continuum is bordered by a BOUNDARY. The boundary makes up the extreme limits of the continuum and may
consist of one or more structure elements.
A STRUCTURE ELEMENT is the smallest part of a structure which when connected to other structure elements makes up a continuum, a boundary or a support of that
structure.
(an example for an element in a continuum is a single beam in a series of floor beams).
According to the make-up of the structure we differentiate between the following levels:
ELEMENT STRUCTURE is a structure that consists of one structure element only. (eg. a single board providing a small bridge between two parts of a building; a single
rope for lifting goods).
Element structure consists of an element which is simultaneously its continuum, boundary and its support(s).
AGGREGATE STRUCTURE is any assembly of structure units. (eg. a house made up of walls, floors and roof).
Aggregate structure consists of a continuum made up of structure units, a boundary and supports.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (4 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
COMPOSITE STRUCTURE is any assembly of identical or different aggregate structures (eg. a cluster of houses).
Composite structure consists of several continua, each of which may be bordered by a boundary, a composite boundary encloses these continua, supports may be
arranged at composite or at aggregate boundaries or, alternatively, continua may be directly supported.
SUPPORT-FUNCTION is the very purpose of structure namely to accept forces and moments through loads, to transform, transport, and to transmit them (to the ground).
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (6 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
STRUCTURAL QUALITY is the integration of those essential properties of a structural system that are required for it to fulfil it's support-function.
STRUCTURAL (SUPPORTING) BEHAVIOUR is the expression of structural quality of a structure system for a set of given loads and other influences. Structural quality is
determined at the conceptual design stage while structural behaviour is principally determined at the engineering design phase of structural design.
Consideration of structural quality during design of a building requires knowledge of structure systems.
For the architect, knowledge of structure systems is essential as it enables him to conduct the conceptual design of a building in a comprehensive and adequate manner.
Structural behaviour involves determination of loads and their intensities and choice of materials for construction.
This is essentially the domain of the structural engineer.
At a more general level, however, a basic understanding of structural behaviour is required from the architect in order to become an active participant in the structural
design process rather than a passive bystander.
Quality and behaviour of a structure forming a building cannot be isolated from each other but are intimately connected. Therefore, co-operation of the architect and
engineer-designers is imperative during the conceptual design stage so that a building structure emerges, that is both, in tune with the overall architectural concept and
safe and economical to construct and to use.
At a subsequent stage, the morphological approach can also be utilised for design synthesis: the systematic, conceptual design of structure systems (2).
In the present context, the morphological approach is an analytical tool that assists in the conceptual understanding of structural systems. As such it is a means to an end
and as any such tool dependent on understanding of its operation and use.
Prerequisite for it's use is systematic and rigorous application of logical steps.
For practical purposes, the morphology can also be used to produce an organized OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURE SYSTEMS as is shown in the latter part of this paper.
The aim in observing buildings, structures and objects is immediate, conscious perception of the natural and built environments and development of the ability to recognise
structural systems by deduction from the appearance of a particular building/object.
During this stage photographs and sketches are important aids as well as information on a range of previous structural solutions for similar applications.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (7 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
The aim is qualitative recognition of principal structural behaviour of a chosen system -its structural quality- based on the study of equilibrium, and development of the
student's ability to recognise and to understand structural quality in its essence.
Qualitative knowledge of principle load/force distribution ie. internal forces and torques/moments (stresses) within structural elements in response to loading is required.
This stage normally concludes the extent of structural knowledge required from the architect and, shared with the engineer, it becomes the stepping stone for the next
stage, which is normally conducted by the engineer:
The aim is quantitative determination of essential values for load-bearing, stressing, and shape-change of a structure system based on studies of equilibrium and changes
in shape dependent on types of loading. Subsequent aim is the development of the student's capability to assess the influences of parameter changes on stressing and
shape-changing of structural systems.
At this stage diagrams which illustrate quantitative changes in stress levels and deformations in response to changes in load intensity, and loading type and cross-sectional/
material properties are required.
The morphological approach directed at a particular field of study helps to discover the intrinsic "structure" of this field in its totality. This is done by observing and analysing
a representative range of existing samples in a systematic, logical and reproducible manner:
The first step is to establish the field of investigation, in our case STRUCTURE.
The second step is to identify a recurring set of recognisable principle attributes called PARAMETERS and the range of their possible VARIATIONS by observation and
analysis of a representative range of existing examples (eg. buildings).
The most convenient method to establish and display a morphology is a MORPHOLOGICAL TABLE, which is a matrix where parameters are listed in order of hierarchy in
a column to the left and their corresponding variations in rows to the right.
PARAMETERS VARIATIONS
The third step is to check the validity of established parameters and variations by identification of an arbitrary range of new samples.
This is also known as the ANALYSIS FUNCTION of the morphology.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (8 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
The fourth step is to create an entire range of structures, including known and hitherto unknown structures, by selectively combining different variations from all parameters
in a series of successive steps.
This process is known as the SYNTHESIS FUNCTION of the morphology and as such utilised for creative development of structure systems during the conceptual design
stage of a building. (this paper does not deal with the fourth step)
In previous investigations of STRUCTURE we identified principle attributes (PARAMETERS), namely OBJECT, (SHAPE, MATERIAL) and LOADING.
We will now investigate how they relate to each other and show their VARIATIONS.
1. SHAPE
(for background information on the following including a detailed analysis of shape ("form") see (8, p.14ff) and (9))
SHAPE GENERATION
Every object is characterised by the process through which it was created. Every object is in a state of change.
Dynamic Shapes are objects whose shape varies rapidly (eg. waterfall, cloth). Static Shapes are objects whose shape varies only very slowly (eg. mountain, building).
Change of shapes in NON-LIVING NATURE (eg. the evolution of landmasses on earth by folding and faulting of the earths crust, by volcanic activity; erosion of
rock, mountains)
Evolutionary shape-changes in LIVING NATURE (eg. evolutionary development of species; growth and decay of microbes, plants, animals and man).
Shape generation by HUMAN ACTIVITY (shaping, forming of materials for objects which serve man in this quest for dominance of his environment eg.
tools, machines, buildings, vehicles).
Geometric description of most shapes is difficult, if not impossible, due to their complexity.
Only the simpler, regular shapes can be readily described (eg. sphere, cone, cube).
Objects in living nature are usually described by shape characteristics of a specific species.
However, for the purpose of this study, a different definition of proportion is more practical.
An object that is relatively large in one dimension (length) and relatively small in both other dimensions (width and height) is termed ONE
DIMENSIONAL. It extends into a linear direction, it is LINEAR.
An object that is relatively large in two dimensions (length and width) and relatively small in the third is termed TWO-DIMENSIONAL. It extends into a surface
(area), it is SURFACE.
An object that is relatively large in all three dimensions (length, width and height), or if little difference can be seen between all dimensions of the object, is
termed THREE-DIMENSIONAL. It extends into three-dimensional space, it is SPATIAL.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (10 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
A three dimensional object that is infinitely small so that its proportions are not visible to the eye is termed POINT. Point implies that there is no visible extension in any
dimension. A relatively very small spatial object that is in an assembly with other, much larger objects is often idealised and called POINT.
Transition between one-, two- and three-dimensional proportions is often not clear cut:
a one-dimensional object can grow into a two-dimensional one by extension of the second dimension or vice-versa.
a two-dimensional object can grow into a three-dimensional one by extension of the third dimension or vice-versa.
Objects which are of different size, but of similar proportions do not change their proportion.
CURVATURE OF OBJECTS
LINEAR OBJECTS can be straight, angular or curved in one plane, or angular or curved in space
SURFACE OBJECTS can be plane, single curved, folded and double curved (domical =
synclastic or saddle = anticlastic).
COMPOSITE OBJECTS
Any one-, two- or three-dimensional object can be combined with other objects. Any object can also
be composed of one-, two- or three-dimensional elements
ELEMENT OBJECTS
An object that is composed of more than one unit object is called an AGGREGATE OBJECT. Each one of its units may be one-, two- or three-dimensional.
An object that is an assembly of aggregate objects is termed COMPOSITE OBJECT. These aggregates may be one-, two- or three-dimensional.
EXAMPLES
Hammer Overall 1-D UNIT
Elements1-D and 3-D
Chair Overall 3-D UNIT
Elements2-D and 3-D
Balloon Overall 3-D UNIT
Elements1-D, 2-D and 3-D
Block of Overall 3-D UNIT
Stones Elements1-D, 2-D and 3-D
Aeroplane Overall 3-D AGGREGATE
Units 2-D and 1-D
Elements2-D and 1-D
Multistorey Overall 3-D AGGREGATE
Building Units 3-D
Elements 2-D and 1-D
We can now summarize the criteria (parameters) pertaining to SHAPE -which are valid for all shapes of objects without exception- in form of a
MORPHOLOGICAL TABLE:
PARAMETER VARIATIONS
Having analysed the morphology of shape we can now consider the next principle parameter:
2. MATERIAL
Transitions between these states are often undefined, such as between solid and liquid states of ductile materials such as metal or water(ice).
All materials can be subdivided into two groups depending on their capacity to sustain loading (stresses) as well as on the magnitude of shape-change when elements
made from these materials are loaded:
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (16 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
Solid materials are usually shape-resistant, while granulose, plastic, liquid and gaseous substances are usually non-shape-resistant.
Rigidity or "stiffness" of solid materials depends on their stress/deformation characteristic (eg. the magnitude of shape-change under a given loading) and also on the
proportions of the element-object, it's "slenderness" (eg. for one-dimensional objects: thin and long against thick and short).
Depending on the type of stress the material is subjected to we distinguish between tensile-, bending-, shear- or torsional stiffness.
Depending on the relative permanence of shape-change in a solid material the stress/deformation characteristic of that material may either be called ELASTIC or PLASTIC.
Elastic materials are those which deform under stress, but recover from this shape-change in time. Plastic materials are those which, when stressed, do not recover from
shape changes but remain in a permanently deformed state.
Depending on the time/deformation/failure characteristic of solid materials when under stress (eg. the degree of shape-change in relation to the duration of load application
at failure) we distinguish between BRITTLE and DUCTILE materials.
Rigid materials can resist AXIAL STRESSES such as compression and tension as well as NORMAL STRESSES such as shear and bending.
Examples are steel in the form of rolled or cold formed section or plate, masonry, brick, concrete, timber and the range of products derived from them.
Non-rigid (flexible) materials can resist mainly tensile stresses and to a lesser extent shear. Examples are steel in the form of wire, cable or thin sheet; cellulose, animal
hair, plastic or glass in the form of fibre-rope or woven fabric.
Granular, liquid and gaseous material substances are normally non-shape resistant they can, however, withstand loading (stresses) when they are subjected to uniform
Non-material substances such as electrical energy, magnetism and gravitational attraction and repulsion between masses can also transmit forces. Examples are atoms
and solar systems.
3. LOADING SYSTEMS
Loads, such as weight, wind, snow, earthquake, temperature, acting on a composite structure, such as a house, create stresses in an aggregate structure, such as a timber
frame, which subsequently create stresses in its elements, such as posts, beams, studs etc., and these, in turn, create material stresses at a molecular level.
External forces are caused by loads (ACTIONS) which are resisted at the supports (REACTIONS).
Stresses act in different directions depending on the load application and on the proportion of the object or element: STRESS DIRECTION.
TORSION leading to twisting of the object/element which is associated with circumferential necking
SHEAR leading to a local compression or indent on the object/element accompanied by sliding along perpendicular planes of the element/
object.
Object or element stresses are rarely of only one type (eg. tension only).
Stressing of a component usually involves a range of composite stresses acting in different directions and with different intensities. Ref.(4) (sections 2.3 - 2.6) gives
examples of the range of multi axial stressing of objects and elements.
4. STRUCTURE SYSTEM
Under the influence of load an object, defined by its shape and material, becomes a STRUCTURE.
In this study we are concerned with abstract models of structures: STRUCTURE SYSTEMS.
Structure system may refer to ELEMENT STRUCTURE, UNIT STRUCTURE, AGGREGATE STRUCTURE or to COMPOSITE STRUCTURE.(we defined these types
previously).
The parameters used to describe the shape of an object are identical to the ones used to describe the shape of a structure system:
We identify a STRUCTURE ELEMENT primarily through its PROPORTION and STIFFNESS regardless whether the element is part of either continuum, boundary or
support .
By morphological combination of four variations of proportion (point, linear, surface, spatial) with two variations for stiffness (rigid and non rigid or flexible) altogether seven
useful element combinations result:
POINT
(stiffness does not apply)
RIGID LINEAR -
NON-RIGID LINEAR
RIGID SURFACE -
NON RIGID SURFACE
RIGID SPATIAL -
NON RIGID SPATIAL
Depending on their shape and stiffness, these elements can be subjected to different stresses acting in different stress directions.
Structure elements are useful common identifiers when analysing or studying structure systems and their behaviour under load.
a CONTINUUM (surface) which is bordered by a BOUNDARY with both, continuum and/or boundary requiring SUPPORT.
STABILITY refers to the ability of an element, unit or aggregate to limit shape-changes which are associated with loading to safe and (visually and practically) acceptable
limits.
It is the fundamental responsibility of the designer of structural systems to ensure stability of the proposed structure under all expected loading conditions.
Unfortunately many architects do not possess adequate structural knowledge to resolve their designs in terms of stability and proposed buildings are often unstable under
certain loads which the architect did not consider. In such cases it becomes the engineers task to correct these shortcomings. Models are convenient aids to stability
studies and their use should be propagated during study and in professional practice.
Stability is fundamental to all building design considerations and must forms part of the basic structural knowledge required by the architect.
ELEMENT STABILITY refers to resistance of a slender, rigid structural element (eg. strut or slab/sheet) against buckling deformation, or to stability of a flexible cable by
prestress or weight.
UNIT STABILITY refers to stability of a structural unit (eg. post and beam system, linear cable system etc.) against falling over/larger deformations. Three basic methods
are available for ensuring lateral stability of simple, linear assemblies:
introduction of additional diagonal bracing, shear planes or rigid joints.
AGGREGATE STABILITY refers to stability of a complete (three-dimensional) assembly. Lateral bracing, shear plans in walls and roofs are typical provisions for simple
assemblies.
We can now summarise all parameters and their variations, those relating to MATERIAL, LOADING and STRUCTURE which we just discussed as well as SHAPE which
we considered earlier in the combined MORPHOLOGICAL TABLE OF STRUCTURE.
PARAMETER VARIATIONS
SHAPE:
MATERIAL:
MATERIAL TYPE solids: such as timber, metals (steel, aluminium etc.), plastics,
masonry and brickwork,concrete, glass, composites;
gaseous: eg. air; liquids: eg. water, oil etc.
and their combinations
LOADING SYSTEM:
STRUCTURE SYSTEM:
TYPE OF SUPPORT point, line (rigid linear, non rigid linear), surface (rigid surface,
non rigid surface)
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (34 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
Subsequently we can also demonstrate the practical use of the morphological table by establishing an OVERVIEW OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS.
In order to create the range of structural systems for buildings we utilise a convenient classification based on the predominant element type which makes up the continuum
of the system.
Discontinuous elements
Any combination of the elements above (eg. tensegrity systems: RL and NRL)
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (35 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
In establishing the criteria for the following classification spatial (three dimensional) elements were omitted. The reasons for this omission are predominantly of a practical
nature:
rigid solid elements, such as bricks or stone (masonry) are mainly found in historical structures, non-rigid spatial elements, such as living cells, are mainly found in natural
structures.
Both these areas were considered to be peripheral when dealing with contemporary building and were eliminated for the sake of brevity and clarity.
It must also be emphasised that for this classification neither boundary nor support elements were considered. This exclusion is valid because of the large number of
possible variations of boundary and support for most structural continua. Furthermore it is both boundary and support, who, when varied or manipulated, lead to variations
in shape of the structure using the same continuum and can therefore be considered to be variables.
7.11 with rigid linear/non rigid linear elements: continuos strut: (prestressed) column,
cable truss, arch, frame
discontinuous and continuous strut:
(prestressed) cable truss, arch, frame
(linear tensegrity)
7.12 with rigid linear/rigid (plane) surface elements: skin/frame (box) beam,
column, arch, frame
7.13 with rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: strut supported (prestressed) membranes
(surface tensegrities): (box) beam, column,
arch, frame,
skin/frame (non-prestressed) (box) beam,
column, arch, frame
7.14 with non rigid linear/rigid surface elements: cable/skin structures
7.15 with non rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: cable reinforced membranes
7.21 with rigid linear/non rigid linear elements: continuous strut: (prestressed) cable truss grid
discontinuous and continuous strut:
(prestressed) cable truss grid
(linear tensegrity)
7.22 with rigid linear/rigid (plane) surface elements:
skin/frame plate/slab, folded surface, shell
7.23 with rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: strut supported (prestressed) membranes
(surface tensegrities):
plate/slab air structure/tent,
folded surface air structure/tent,
curved surface air structure/tent (shell),
skin/frame (non-prestressed) structures
(as above)
7.24 with non rigid linear/rigid surface elements: cable/skin plate/slab,
folded surface,
curved surface (shell)
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (49 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
7.25 with non rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: cable reinforced membrane
7.31 with rigid linear/non rigid linear elements: continuos strut: cable truss
discontinuous and continuous strut:
cable truss (tensegrity)
7.32 with rigid linear/rigid (plane) surface elements:skin/frame (box) beams,
bridges, towers
7.33 with rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: strut supported membranes
(surface tensegrities):
(box) beams,
bridges, towers
skin/frame structures
7.34 with non rigid linear/rigid surface elements: cable/skin structures
7.35 with non rigid linear/non rigid surface elements: cable reinforced membranes
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The previous pages outlined a rigorous approach to the organization of structure systems and their shape based on the morphological method . An overview of possible
STRUCTURE SYSTEMS illustrates the wide range that are available to the creative designer.
Current building construction practice utilises only a very narrow range of these possibilities.
The predominant reason for this situation is lack of knowledge by the architectural and engineering professions about the range of alternative structural systems, their
structural behaviour and how to best integrate them into building design.
The morphological approach to the conceptual design of structure systems has been proven a successful tool in architectural training and teaching courses conducted by
the author at the University of New South Wales and internationally over the past 17 years.
Current trends world-wide point to a far wider variety of structures than during the past history of building. Major changes in approach to design and in the practice of
building are now happening that will determine future directions for our professions in the next century.
The technological progress made in associated fields, such as motorcar, ship, aircraft and spacecraft design and manufacture continues to influence construction practice
and the range and depth of technological knowledge required from architects have increased accordingly.
file:///D|/BREEZE/Kuliah/Web%20Site/The%20Morphology%20of%20Structure.htm (50 of 51)28/08/2009 12:08:43
The Morphology of Structure
Architects and engineers must face these challenges. Prerequisite is adequate training in conceptual design of building structures based on systematic, logical and
reproducible methods.
Awareness of the full range of available shape and design options and better knowledge of structure systems will enable architects to design better buildings and will
hopefully lead to a more appropriate, more adaptable and richer built environment and to economical buildings.
REFERENCES
1. ZWICKY, Fritz "The Morphological Method of Analysis and Construction"
Courant Anniversary Volume, 1948.
2. NORRIS, K.W. "The Morphological Approach to Engineering Design",
Proc. of the Conference on Design Methods, Pergamon/MacMillan, 1963
3. OTTO, Frei (Ed.) "Tensile Structures" Vol.2., M.I.T.Press, 1969
(first published in German by Ullstein Fachverlag, Berlin, 1966)
4. JUNKERS, K.P. "Einteilung der Konstruktionen" Diploma thesis,
Faculty of Architecture, University of Stuttgart, 1973
5. SEDLAK, Vinzenz "A Morphology of Folded Surface Structures"
Report on the RIBA Research Award, London, 1975.
6. SEDLAK, Vinzenz "The Morphology of Structures",
Lecture notes, School of Architecture, University of NSW, 1976-1985.
7. SEDLAK, Vinzenz "On Structural Morphology" unpublished paper presented
at the ANZAScA Conference "Environmental Control", Melbourne, 1977
8. OTTO, Frei; SCHAUR, Eda "Form-Force-Mass"
IL 21, Institute for Lightweight Structures, University of Stuttgart, 1979
9. OTTO, Frei "Form"
Concepts Vol.1 SFB 230, University of Stuttgart/University of Tübingen, 1984.
10. SEDLAK, Vinzenz "The Morphology of Structure", Proceedings LSA’86 First International
Conference on Lightweight Structures in Architecture, University of NSW, 1986 pp1164-1187