In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld an immigration judge’s finding that the respondent was not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i) for being present without admission or parole. The Board found that the immigration judge did not err in crediting the respondent’s testimony that he was permitted to enter the United States after presenting a fraudulently obtained Slovenian passport, a copy of which was presented at the hearing. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld an immigration judge’s finding that the respondent was not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i) for being present without admission or parole. The Board found that the immigration judge did not err in crediting the respondent’s testimony that he was permitted to enter the United States after presenting a fraudulently obtained Slovenian passport, a copy of which was presented at the hearing. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld an immigration judge’s finding that the respondent was not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i) for being present without admission or parole. The Board found that the immigration judge did not err in crediting the respondent’s testimony that he was permitted to enter the United States after presenting a fraudulently obtained Slovenian passport, a copy of which was presented at the hearing. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
295 DEVONSHIRE, 6TH FLOOR Boston, MA 0211 00000 Name: STAMBOLLIU, SOKRAT U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Office of the Clerk 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 22041 DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel BOS P .0. Box 8728 Boston, MA 02114 A200-548-126 Date of this notice: 11/28/2011 Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Enclosure Panel Members: Pauley, Roger Sincerely, Donna Carr Chief Clerk I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Sokrat Stambolliu, A200 548 126 (BIA Nov. 28 2011) STAMBOLLIU, SOKRAT (A200 548126) 26 LONG POND ROAD PLYMOUTH, MA 02360 Name: STAMBOLLIU, SOKRAT U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Office of the Clerk 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 22041 DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - BOS P .0. Box 8728 Boston, MA 02114 A200-548-126 Date ofthis notice: 11/28/2011 Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in the above-referenced case. This copy is being provided to you as a courtesy. Your attorney or representative has been served with this decision pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1292.5(a). If the attached decision orders that you be removed from the United States or affirms an Immigration Judge's decision ordering that you be removed, any petition for review of the attached decision must be filed with and received by the appropriate court of appeals within 30 days of the date of the decision. Enclosure Panel Members: Pauley, Roger Sincerelv. DcnrtL CtYVLJ Donna Carr Chief Clerk I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Sokrat Stambolliu, A200 548 126 (BIA Nov. 28 2011) LJ.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals Falls Church, Virginia 2204 I File: A200 548 126 - Boston, MA Date: In re: SOKRA T ST AMBOLLIU a.k.a. Albert Kapllanaj IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Jeremiah Friedman, Esquire ON BEHALF OF DHS: Mama M. Rusher Assistant Chief Counsel CHARGE: NOV 2 8 20'1 Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), I&N Act [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A)(i)]- Present without being admitted or paroled The Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") appeals the decision of the Immigration Judge dated August 9, 2011, terminating these removal proceedings. The record will be remanded. We review Immigration Judges' findings of fact for clear error, but questions of law, discretion, and judgment, and all other issues in appeals, de novo. 8 C.F.R. 1003.1(d)(3)(i), (ii). There is clear error in a factual finding when we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made. Matter of R-S-H-, 23 I&N Dec. 629,637 (BIA 2003); see also United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948). The respondent, a native and citizen of Albania, testified that he entered the United States at Miami, Florida, while in possession of a fraudulently obtained Slovenian passport (I.J. at 3; Tr. at 3 7, 41 ). He also presented a copy of the fraudulent passport that he allegedly used to enter the United States (I.J. at 3; Exh. 3). While we recognize the DHS's concerns over the respondent's credibility, we are unable to find clear error in the Immigration Judge's explicit positive credibility finding (I.J. at 3). We are also satisfied that the respondent's credible testimony, coupled with the evidence presented, is sufficient to support a finding that the respondent is an alien who has been admitted to the United States, and, therefore, subject to removal on the grounds of removability set forth in section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1227, as opposed to the grounds of inadmissibility set forth in section 212 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1361; Matter ofQuilantan, 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010). As the DHS has not charged the respondent with removability under section 23 7 of the Act, termination of these removal proceedings was proper. Nonetheless, the respondent appears to be an alien who is present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws of this country. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to remand this matter to the Immigration Judge to provide the DHS the opportunity to lodge additional factual I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Sokrat Stambolliu, A200 548 126 (BIA Nov. 28 2011) A200 548 126 allegations and charges of deportability under section 237 ofthe Act. 1 See 8 C.F.R. 1003.30, 1240.1 0( e). If removability is established, the Immigration Judge should determine if the respondent is eligible for any form of relief from removal. We note that the Immigration's Judge's factual findings support a legal conclusion that the respondent has been admitted to the United States under the visa waiver program. As such, the respondent shall be removed from the United States, without referral to an Immigration Judge for a determination of deportability, once an immigration officer has determined that (1) the respondent has been admitted to the United States under the visa waiver program and (2) the respondent is deportable from the United States under one or more of the grounds of deportability listed in section 23 7 of the Act. 8 C. F. R. 21 7. 4(b )( 1). In this case, the record does not indicate that an immigration officer has made such a determination. Until such conditions are satisfied, we conclude that the DHS may continue to pursue the respondent's removal from this country in the course of these removal proceedings. Cf Matter of Kanagasundram, 22 I&N Dec. 963 (BIA 1999) (holding that, once an immigration officer denies an alien's application for admission into the United States under the visa waiver pilot program, proceedings "must" be commenced with a Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge (Form 1-863)). For the reasons set forth above, the following order is entered. ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Court for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision. 1 Should the DHS decline such an opportunity, termination of removal proceedings would be appropriate as the respondent has overcome the presumption that he entered the United States without inspection. 2 I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t Cite as: Sokrat Stambolliu, A200 548 126 (BIA Nov. 28 2011)
IN THE REMOVAL CASE OF STAMBOLLIU, SOKRAT
: . .;.:., UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT JFK FEDERAL BLDG., ROOM 320 BOSTON, MA 02203 CASE NO.: A200-548-126 -., RESPONDENT ' ORDERS is a memorandum of the Court's Decision and Orders entered on Au&) v 1 1; 7 a I) This memorandum is solely for the convenience of the parties. The oral or written Findings, Decision and Orders is the official opinion in this case. ( ) Both parties waived issuance of a formal oral decision in the case. The respondent was ordered REMOVED from the United States to ( } in absentia. Respondent's application for VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE was DENIED and respondent was ordered removed to , in the alternative to Respondent's application for VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE was GRANTED until upon posting a voluntary departure bond in the amount of $ to DHS within five business days from the date of this Order, with an alternate Order of removal to or Respondent shall present to DHS within ) thirty days ) sixty days from the date of this Order, all necessary travel documents for voluntary departure. Respondent's application for ASYLUM was ( ) granted ) denied ( ) withdrawn with prejudice. ( ) subject to the ANNUAL CAP under the INA section 207(a) (5). ( ) Respondent knowingly filed a FRIVOLOUS asylum application. Respondent's application for WITHHOLDING of removal under INA section 241(b) (3} was ( ) granted ( } denied ( ) withdrawn with prejudice. Respondent's application for WITHHOLDING of removal under the Torture Convention was ( ) granted ( ) denied } withdrawn with prejudice. Respondent's application for DEFERRAL of removal under the Torture Convention was ( ) granted ( ) denied ( ) withdrawn with prejudice. Respondent's application for CANCELLATION of removal under section ( ) 203 (b) of NACARA, ( ) 240A(a} } 240A(b) (1) ( ) 240A(b) (2) of the INA, was ( ) granted ( ) denied l withdrawn with prejudice. If granted, it was ordered that the DHS issue all appropriate documents necessary to give effect to this Responde.nt ( ). is ( )-is not subject to the ANNUAL CAP INA section 240A(e) . Respondent's application for a WAIVER under the INA section was ( ) granted ( ) denied ( } withdrawn or ) other ( ) The conditions imposed by INA section 216 on the repondent's permanent resident status were removed. Respondent.' s application for ADJUSTMENT of status under section of the ( } INA ( } NACARA ( } was ( l granted ( l denied ( } withdrawn with prejudice. If granted, it was ordered that DHS issue all appropriate documents necessary to give effect to this Order. CASE NUMBER: 200-548-126 RESPONDENT: STAMBOLLIU, SOKRAT Respondent's status was RESCINDED pursuant to the INA section 246. Respondent's motion to WITHDRAW his application for admission was J vrf Z I m m i g r a n t
&
R e f u g e e
A p p e l l a t e
C e n t e r
|
w w w . i r a c . n e t l I 4
., ) granted denied. If respondent fails to abide by any of the conditions directed by the district director of DRS, then the alternate Order of removal shall become immediately effective without further notice or proceedings: the respondent shall be removed from the United States to Respondent was ADMITTED as a until As a condition of admission, the respondent was bond .. ) without prejudice ordered to post a $ [ )<) Case was ()() TERMINATED ) with ( ) ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Respondent was orally advised of the LIMITATI9N on discretionary relief and consequences for failure to depart as ordered. [ ] If you fail to voluntarily depart when and as required, you shall be subject to civil money penalty of at least $1,000, but not more than $5,000, and be ineligible for a period of 10 years for any further relief under INA sections 240A, 240B, 245, and 248 {INA Section 240B{d)). [ ] If you are under a final order of removal, and if you willfully fail or refuse to 1) depart when and as required, 2) make timely application in good faith for any documents necessary for departure, or 3) present yourself for removal at the time and place required, or, if you conspire to or take any action designed to prevent or hamper your departure, you shall be subject to civil money penalty of up to $500 for each day under such violation. {INA section 274D(a)). If you are removable pursuant to INA 237{a), then you shall further be fined and/or imprisoned for up to 10 years. {INA section 243 {a) {1)). Other: Date: Aug 9, 2011 APPEAL: ) by MATTHEW J. D'ANGELO, Judge Respondent ) Both DUE BY: THIS WAS SERVED TO : rQ] DRS [ -] ALIEN DATE: BY: CERTIFICATE OF - _- ,- - B'W [ ] MAIL [ Yl PERSONAL SER:V.ICE rff Alien's ATT/REP [ ] ALIEN Qf:t,ft:er [ ] COURT STAFF [ l JUDGE,.. 'i _- c_ : -:_>: ....-. ,. ... , Y2 I m m i g r a n t