Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthening
Background
Example applications of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strengthening systems
Background
Finish (coating resin etc)
Bonding adhesive
Tg = 65 - 100C
Concrete substrate
The Performance of CFRP Strengthening During a Real Fire
Background
Background
Concrete Society Technical Report 55: Unless a rigorous analysis is undertaken it is sensible to neglect the strengthening from FRP in fire situations. Fire protection. Regulations may require the application of an over-coat layer, which has been tested on the fully-cured composite system
Background
Structural alterations FRP carrying permanent load, and must carry load during fire Fire protection?
Background
Background
Dalmarnock compartment fire tests Unique opportunity to assess CFRP Strengthening in a Real Fire
Installation of Strengthening
y x
FRP plate 1
1180
WINDOW
Installation
Intumescent Unprotected Gypsum Board
FRP plate 2
1360
FRP plate 3
1560
FRP NSM
1940
FRP NSM 2
2190
FRP NSM 3
2420
Installation
Intumescent
Intumescent
Unprotected
Unprotected
PLATES
Gyproc
NSM
Gyproc
Experimental Setup
Strain gauges, Thermocouples
y x
7Pt
1180
WINDOW
Experimental Setup
7Mt
7Nt
FRP plate 1 FRP plate 2 FRP plate 3 FRP NSM 1 FRP NSM 2 FRP NSM 3
6Pt
1360
6Nt* 5Nt
6Mt
5Pt*
1560
5Mt
4Pt
1940
4Mt
3Pt
2190
3Mt
2Pt
2420
2Nt
2Mt
y x
1180
WINDOW
Experimental Setup
7M
7P
7N
FRP plate 1 FRP plate 2 FRP plate 3 FRP NSM 1 FRP NSM 2 FRP NSM 3
1360
6P
(Dead Gauge)
6M
1560
5P
5N
5M
1940
4P
4N
4M
2190
3P
3N
3M
2P
2420
2N
2M
750
750
Other instrumentation: -gauges on top of slab -gauges on top of slab -gauges against adjoining wall Thermocouples through slab depth Thermocouples within compartment (gas phase)
The Performance of CFRP Strengthening During a Real Fire
Results
Results
Results
Gas-phase temperatures
1000
WINDOW
900
FRP plate 1 FRP plate 2 FRP plate 3
800 700
Temperature (C)
600 500 400 300 200 TC-12-2 100 0 0 5 10 Time (mins) 15 20 TC-14-2 TC-17-2
Results
Results
Fibres on floor (resin burnt off)
WINDOW
Results
Mostly debonded. Resin mostly burnt off.
WINDOW
Results
Gypsum board intact. Plate and adhesive visually sound.
WINDOW
Results
Bonding adhesive burnt away from beneath and to sides, leaving fibre in FRP exposed.
WINDOW
Results
Intumescent layer intact; FRP and adhesive in place.
WINDOW
Results
Gypsum board sound. FRP and adhesive visually sound.
WINDOW
Results
FRP Plates Bondline Temperatures
450
WINDOW
400 350 300 Temperature (C) 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 10 20 30 Time (mins) 40
50
60
Results
NSM FRP Bondline Temperatures
350
WINDOW
200
150
100
50
0 0 10 20 30 Time (mins) 40 50 60
Results
FRP Plates Bondline Temperatures
NSM FRP Bondline Temperatures
350 Unprotected 300 Intumescent Gypsum Board
450 400 350 300 Temperature (C) Unprotected Intumescent Gypsum Board
200
150
100
50
0
0 0 10 20 30 Time (mins) 40 50 60
10
20
30 Time (mins)
40
50
60
Results
5000
FRP plate 1 FRP plate 2 FRP plate 3
4500 4000 3500 Strain ( strain) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 10 20 30 40
50
60
Results
5000 4500 4000 3500 Strain (strain) 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (min) The Performance of CFRP Strengthening During a Real Fire Unprotected Intumescent Gypsum Board
Results
3500
FRP plate 1 FRP plate 2 FRP plate 3
50
60
Results
NSM Plates - Central Strain Gauge Readings 5000 4500 4000 3500 Strain (strain) Unprotected Intumescent Gypsum Board
10
20
30 Time (min)
40
50
60
-500
Ongoing Work
Further analysis of complete strain and thermal dataset Characterisation of properties of materials used Modelling of composite strengthened slab (thermal strains in concrete) Thermal analysis
Conclusions
During a real fire, the glass transition temperature of the adhesive is exceeded. Gypsum board can be used to insulate the FRP, but further research is required before it can be reliably designed The integrity of NSM strengthening is superior to plate FRP strengthening during a fire.
Acknowledgements
BASF Construction