CIVIL PROCEDURE Course Outline

1. Introduction 1.1. Applicability of rules to civil and cri inal actions and special proceedin!s Definition of civil" cri inal actions and special proceedin!s Procedure and practice Procedure is t$e et$od or eans of conductin! liti!ation and %udicial proceedin!s Practice is t$e carryin! on of actions accordin! to t$e procedure prescribed by t$e Rules of Court

1.#.

1.&. Courts and t$eir %urisdiction La 'aval Dru! Corp v CA #&( ) *+ At,el v Concepcion Pro!ressive Asso Inc -R 1(.&*/ April 10" #//+

1.0. 1o, %urisdiction is obtained and e2ercised3 over persons over sub%ect over res 1.4. Procedure and substantive la, atter

#. -eneral Provisions for Ordinary Civil Actions #.1. 5ust be based on a cause of action 6$at is cause of action 'o splittin! of cause of action Read3 City of 7acolod v )an 5i!uel" #. ) +1. 8oinder and 8alandoni v 5artir9-uan:on" 1/# P +4. is%oinder of causes of action

;est of sin!le cause of action

Read3 8osep$ v 7autista" 1*/ ) 40/

#.#. Parties to civil actions 6$o are parties in interest Co petency of parties Indispensable and necessary parties 8oinder and is%oinder of parties Deat$ of party conse<uence of deat$ of party o )arsaba vs Vda dela ;orre 4.0 )CRA 01/ o -on:ales vs Pa!cor 0#. )CRA 4&&" 40/ ,$at counsel s$ould do on deat$ of party #.&. Venue of actions Real and personal actions
Read3 United Overseas 7an= P$ils. V Rose oore 5inin! > Develop ent Corp. 41+ ) 1#& ?#//*@

Actions a!ainst non9residents A!ree ent on venue #.0. Co ence ent of actions 1o, and ,$en dee ed co

enced

Read3 5a!aspi v Ra olete" 114 ) 1.& 5anc$ester Dev Corp v CA" 10. ) 4(# )un Insurance v Asuncion" 1*/ ) #*0

1eirs of t$e late Ruben Reinoso 8r versus CA" -R 'o. 11(1#1" 8uly 1+" #/11 6$en does court ac<uire %urisdiction over a caseA Effect of underpay ent of doc=et fees Rule is pay ent ay be allo,ed ,it$in reasonable ti e but ,it$in re!le entary period Bbut in several cases" bot$ CA and )C $ave caused t$e dis issal of cases for non9pay ent of doc=et fees.

&. Procedure in Re!ional ;rial Courts &.1. Applicable also to 5unicipal ;rial Courts &.#. Pleadin!s in !eneral Cinds of pleadin!s Dor al re<uire ents of pleadin!s Parts of a pleadin! Verification ,$en re<uired Dor al" not %urisdictional Cilusan9Olalia v CA 4#+ ) 04 ?#//*@

Verification by Counsel In9'9Out 7ur!er" Inc. v )c$,ani Inc. 4*4 ) 4&4 ?#//+@ Certification a!ainst foru 9s$oppin! in initiatory pleadin!s Definition of Doru )$oppin! ;o=io 5arine 5alayan Insurance Co pnay Inc. et.al v Valde: -R 'o. 14/1/* #+8an#//+ Counsel cannot si!n certification Di!ital 5icro,ave Corp. v CA -R 1#+44/ 1(5ar#/// Co9o,ner or Co9party ay si!n in be$alf of co9o,ners or co9 parties Cavila v 1eirs of Clarita Cavile 0// ) #44 ?#//&@

Distinction bet,een non9co pliance of verification and certification a!ainst non9foru s$oppin! re<uire ent )ari9sari -roup of Co panies" Inc. v Pi!las Ca ao 4(1 ) 4(. ?#//+@ 5edian Container Corp. v 5etropolitan 7an= > ;rust Co. 4(1 ) (## ?#//+@ )ubstantial re<uire ents of pleadin!s )ufficiency of alle!ations Ulti ate facts only Re itere v Eulo 1( ) #41 P$ilippine )toc= E2c$an!e v 5anila 7an=in! Corp. 44. ) &4# ?#//+@ ;ests of sufficiency of co plaint3

&

 Can %ud! ent be rendered if ad ittedA Al,ays rec=on a!ainst !rounds for dis issal Is bill of particulars applicableA Read P$ilippine 7an= of Co unications v ;ra:o 4// ) #0# ?#//(@ ;est of sufficiency of responsive pleadin! 'ot susceptible to su ary %ud! ent Does not a ount to confession of %ud! ent 5U); tender an issue 5ust specifically deny F aterial alle!ationsG lest t$ey be dee ed ad itted Defenses and ob%ections 5U); be pleaded eit$er in otion to dis iss or ans,er" else ,aived Alternative causes of action or defenses ay be pleaded even if inconsistent ,it$ eac$ ot$er Purpose of rule is to allo, for co plete ad%udication of any controversy

Counterclai s Rule on per issive and co pulsory counterclai s ;est to deter ine nature of counterclai Read3 'a arco v Dederation of United 'a arco Distributors Inc." 0. ) #&+ 5etals En!ineerin! v CA" #/& ) #*& &.&. Effect of failure to plead Order of default by otion only" court cannot motu proprio declare party in default Conse<uences of order of default %ud! ent by default" e2tent t$ereof li ited by relief prayed for need for presentation of evidence Rationale for order of default &.0. A endedH)upple ental Pleadin!s A end ent a atter of ri!$t before responsive pleadin! filed 7A Dinance v Co" ##0 ) 1(&

 'o li itation on e2tent of a end ent" even c$an!in! cause of action set out in ori!inal pleadin! Ri!$t to a end not affected by otion to dis iss or otion for su ary %ud! ent or even otion for %ud! ent on t$e pleadin!s ,$ic$ are not considered Fresponsive pleadin!G Rule ,$en so e but not all defendants filed responsive pleadin! 6$en issues %oined" substantial a end ents discretionary and sub%ect to t$erule t$at t$e cause of action is not substantially c$an!ed or t$e t$eory altered Planters Develop ent 7an= v LIC 1oldin!s > Develop ent Co. 04( ) &(( Eoun! v )y 4/& ) 141 ?#//(@ A end ent of t$e pleadin!s to confor to evidence presented durin! trial is allo,ed3 ,$en issues not raised by t$e pleadin!s are tried ,it$ t$e consent of t$e parties ,$en" even if ob%ected to" t$e court is satisfied no pre%udice ,ill befall t$e ob%ectin! party )upple ental pleadin!s not a atter of ri!$t Leobrera v CA 1*/ ) *11 ?1.+.@ Effect of a ended pleadin!s supersedes ori!inal pleadin! as a conse<uence" %udicial ad issions ade in ori!inal pleadin!s need to be offered in evidence. Read Director of Lands v CA" 1.( ) .0 &.4. Dilin! of responsive pleadin!s 6$at is responsive pleadin! Ans,er J 8udicial ad issions bindin! on party Read )antos v Lu bao 41. ) 0/+ ?#//*@ Read -ardner v CA 1&1 ) 4+4 Ans,er J 8udicial ad issions 'O; bindin! on party 7ill of particulars" otion to dis iss interrupt period to file responsive pleadin! Co pulsory counterclai or cross9clai s$ould be set up in responsive pleadin!. 1o,ever" it ay be set up anyti e t$ereafter ?but before

%ud! ent@ if o itted t$rou!$ oversi!$t" inadvertence or e2cusable ne!li!ence Re!le entary period to file responsive pleadin! interrupted by bill of particulars and otion to dis iss

&.(. Dilin! and service of pleadin!s and %udicial papers )ervice on counsel is andatory unless ot$er,ise ordered by court I proper service is ineffectual and does not bind party Read3 Cabili v 7adelles" ( ) 1./ )ervice of pleadin!s and court papers ?ot$er t$an %ud! ents" final orders and resolutions@ ay be done by substituted service if personal service and service by ail not successful )ervice of %ud! ents" final orders and resolutions ust be personal or by re!istered ail only ?or by publication ,$ere su ons is served by publication@ )ervice ust be on counsel as service on party not per itted 6$ere final order or %ud! ent not served on party or la,yer" said %ud! ent cannot beco e final or e2ecutory. &.*. )u ons Rules on service is strictly construed" $ence3 Dor actions in persona a!ainst residents" service ust be personal first t$en substituted if unsuccessful or publication if ,$ereabouts un=no,n or te porarily outside t$e country a!ainst non9residents" only personal service ,it$in t$e state can confer %urisdiction over t$e defendant Dor actions in re or <uasi in re a!ainst residents" sa e as above a!ainst non9residents" personal service outside t$e country" ,it$ leave of court" or publication ,it$ leave of court Dor actions a!ainst do estic %uridical persons" service only on t$ose enu erated in t$e statute is allo,ed Dor actions a!ainst forei!n %uridical entity" service ust be on resident a!ent" !overn ent re!ulator" or any of officers" a!ents ,it$in t$e country Venturan:a v CA 14( ) &/4 )a artino v Raon &+& ) ((0

Val onte v CA #4# ) .# Asiavest v CA #.( ) 4&. P$ila -en vs 7reva 00# ) #1* 7PI v )antia!o 41. ) &+.

&.+. Dis issal of action -rounds lac= of %urisdiction over person Read A i!o v CA" #4& ) &+# atter

lac= of %urisdiction over sub%ect pendentia litis

Read La 'aval v CA" #&( ) *+ Ilocos )ur Electric v 'LRC #01 ) &( Andaya v Abadia ##+ ) */4

Read Andersons -roup v CA. #(( ) 0#& Ra os v Peralta" #/& ) 01#

res %udicata Read Vda de Cru:o v Caria!a" 1*0 ) &&/ Read )an Loren:o v CA" #++ ) 114 Calalan! v IAC" 1.0 ) 410 Perpetual v Da%ardo" #&& ) *#/ City of Cebu v CA" #4+ ) 1*4 otion to dis iss no cause of action

Re edy in case of !rantin!Hdenial of

Order denyin! otion to dis iss is interlocutory" $ence proper re edy is to appeal after a decision $as been rendered Read3 Indiana Aerospace University v Co ission On 1i!$er Education" &4( ) &(* 7an!=o )ilan!an v CA" &(/ ) &## Eutin!co v CA" &+( ) +4 Order !rantin! otion to dis iss disposes of t$e case $ence" appeal under Rule 01 is applicable. &... Pre9trial Definition *

Anson ;rade Center v Pacific 7an=in!" -R 'o. 1*.... 1* 5ar #//. Interlinin! Corp. v P$ilippine ;rust Co. 0#+ ) 4+& ?#//#@ Espiritu v La:aro" -R. 'o.1+1/#/ #/ 'ov #//. Polanco v Cru:" -R. 'o. 1+#0#( 1& Deb #//. A.5. 'o. /&919/.9)C 5adrid v )pouses 5apoy" -R. 14/++* 10 Au! #//.

)ettin! for Pre9;rial

Dailure to $ave Pre9trial

Dailure of defendant to appear 6ill result in plaintiff presentin! $is evidence e2 parte and for t$e court to render %ud! ent t$ereon. ;$is is dissi ilar to default fro failure to plead ,$ere t$e sanction is for t$e court to render %ud! ent based on t$e co plaint )u ary %ud! ent or %ud! ent on pleadin!s possible if facts are discovered in pre9trial to ,arrant suc$ action Effect of Pre9trial Order &.1/. -eneral Rule3 7indin! on all parties" A.5. 'o. /&919/.9)C E2ception3 Read 1eirs of Reyes v CA" 41. ) #4/ ?#//*@

Discovery Co pulsory process ,$erein liti!ants are forced" by court rules or orders" to dis!or!e private infor ation to adverse party Purpose of discovery is to obtain =no,led!e of aterial facts ,it$in t$e =no,led!e of t$e adverse party or of t$ird partiesK obtain ad issions fro adverse parties and to inspect relevant docu ents" ob%ects and property. 6$at are discoverableA Li itations on discoverability 5odes of discovery Deposition function ,$en ay be availed of Pa%arilla v CA 4*/ ) &0* ?#//+@ de bene esse ?pendin! action@ perpetua rei e oria ?prior to action@ ,$o do you depose

 Interro!atories to parties effect of failure to serve ,ritten interro!atories Re<uests for ad ission )i e Darby E ployees Association v 'LRC 41/ ) #/0 Production and inspection of t$in!s E2a ination of persons Read Republic v )andi!anbayan" #/0 ) #1# Das arinas -ar ents v Reyes ##4 ) (## Ayala Land vs ;a!le 0(( ) 4#1 1yatt Industrial v Ley Construction -R 10*10& 5ar 1/" #//( )i e Darby v CA 41/ ) #/0 )ecurity 7an= v CA &#& ) &&/ )olidban= v -ate,ay -R 1(0+/4 April &/" #//+ a=e discovery ?Rule #.@

)anctions for refusal to

&.11.

;rial Order of trial Reverse trial ,$en co plaint is ad itted Read Eu v 5a!payo 00 ) 1(& Reverse trial also in cri inal cases

&.1#.

Consolidation ;est is co

on <uestions of fact or of la,

Active v CA" 1+1 ) **0 )uperlines v Victor" 1#0 ) .&.

consolidation of civil and cri inal cases consolidation of cases on appeal &.1&. De urrer to Evidence Concept of de urrer Effect of denial or !rant of de urrer to evidence 'epo uceno v Co elec" 1#( ) 0*#

&.10.

8ud! ent on t$e pleadin!s -enerally applicable ,$en t$ere is no tender of issue Denial in ans,er ay not a ount to tender of issue 5anufacturers v Diversified" 1*& ) &4*

&.14.

)u ary 8ud! ents Distin!uis$ed fro 1o,

%ud! ent on t$e pleadin!s

Ver!ara v )uelto 14( ) *4& Di an v Alu bres" #.. ) 04. otion for su ary %ud! ent is considered

1earin! on otion is only for deter inin! ,$et$er issues are !enuine or not" not to receive evidence on t$e issues set up in t$e pleadin!s otion is proven t$rou!$ affidavits" depositions and ad issions sub itted by ovant Propriety of su ary %ud! ent 'atalia v Valle:" 1*& ) 4&( -rand Dar s v CA" 1.& ) *0+ ay be eit$er party

5ovant &.1(.

8ud! ents Re<uire ents ,ritten and si!ned by %ud!e ust contain findin!s of facts and la, applied ust contain a dispositive portion filin! ,it$ cler= otion or otu proprio

filed ,it$ t$e cler= of court rendition rec=oned fro ust be served on parties ay be a ended before finality upon

entry upon finality entry deter ines prescriptive periods final %ud! ent not sub%ect to a end ent separability of %ud! ents

&.1*.

Re edies fro

%ud! ents ?sa e court" sa e case@ 1/

 'e, ;rial or Reconsideration DA5E' Draud as a !round ust be e2trinsic" not intrinsic. It is intrinsic ,$en done by a party durin! trial ?use of for!ed docu ents etc@" e2trinsic ,$en e ployed outside t$e court ?concealin! a ,itness or colludin! ,it$ a party@ accident and ista=e as !round ust be based on ,ell9 en!endered belief ordinary prudence could not !uard a!ainst e2cusable ne!li!ence as !round ,ill depend on circu stances 'e,ly discovered evidence ust be aterial and not discoverable durin! trial 7anco Dilipino v Ca pos (& ) 1+/ reconsideration

5otion for reconsideration '; distin!uis$ed fro !rounds results ,$en !ranted re edy ,$en denied ?appeal fro Relief fro %ud! ent ;ua:on v CA" #4( ) 14+ '; or reconsideration not available for lost re edy available only versus final %ud! ent distin!uis$ed fro !rounds ,$enH$o, invo=ed result ,$en !ranted re edy ,$en denied ?no ore appeal@ nota bene3 relate t$is rule ,it$ rule 0* re!ardin! ,ays to assail final %ud! ents &.1+. E2ecution of %ud! ents Only a final %ud! ent t$at disposes of t$e action is sub%ect to e2ecution Dinal %ud! ent versus final and e2ecutory %ud! ent Invest ent v CA 10* ) &&0 ;est of a final %ud! ent3 Does it leave so et$in! for t$e court to do ,it$ respect to t$e erits of t$e caseA E2ecution a atter of ri!$t ,$en %ud! ent final and e2ecutory" but only upon otion 11 t$e %ud! ent@

 %ud! ent beco es final by operation of la," i.e." ,$en no appeal $as been ta=en ,it$in t$e period provided by la, enforce ent of %ud! ent ?e2ecution@ is inisterial and andatory once it beco es final" sub%ect to certain e2ceptions e2ecution before finality of %ud! ent" only upon !ood reasons 7D Corp v Edsa )$an!rila" #.0 ) 1/. City of 5anila v CA" *# ) .+ Valencia v CA" 1+0 ) 4(1 discretionary e2ecutions" ,$en stayed

e2ecution before or after deat$ of %ud! ent obli!or ,ill depend on t$e nature of t$e %ud! ent" i.e. recovery of property v oney %ud! ents 0. APPEAL) 0.1. Concept of appeal !uard a!ainst %ud! ents of uns=illed and unfair %ud!es prevention as not a ri!$t but a 0.#. 6$o ay appeal uc$ as correction of ere privile!e" t$us ista=es ay be lost

0.&. 6$at are appealable ,$at are final %ud! ents ,$en does a %ud! ent or order beco e final final %ud! ents vs %ud! ents t$at are final and e2ecutory ,$at are not appealable and ,$y are t$ey notA test of final nature is ,$en it co pletely disposes of t$e case

0.0. 5odes of appeal ordinary appeal ?by 5;C to R;C R;C to CA

ere notice of appeal ,it$ court renderin! %ud! ent@

no e2tension of period to file notice of appeal interrupted by otion for '; or recon

1#

 if '; or recon denied" fres$ period to appeal 'eypes vs CA -R 1014#0 )ept 10" #//4 pay ent of doc=et fees second level of revie, revie, of %ud! ent in e2ercise of appellate %urisdiction R;C ?appellate %urisdiction@ to CA not a atter of ri!$tK discretionary on part of CA On! v ;atin!. 10. )CRA #(4 ust acco pany notice of appeal petition for revie, ?by filin! petition ,it$ CA under rule 0#@

appeal by certiorari ?filin! petition ,it$ )C@ appeal to t$e )C fro R;C on <uestions of la, only ?Rule 01@ U5C v Velasco .+ ) 404

ay be re anded to CA if involvin! <uestionof fact ?rule 4(" sec (@" not dis issed fro final order or resolution of CA or )7 ?rule 04@ but only on <uestions of la, appeal to )C not a atter of ri!$t ?Rule 04" sec (@ C$ees an v IAC" 1.& ) .& )u bin!co v CA" 144 ) #0

6$at is a <uestion of la,A petition for revie, on certiorari vs petition for certiorari 'e, Eor= 5arine v CA" #0. ) 01( Ebane: v CA" #4& ) 40/

0.4. 6$en does court lose %urisdiction relative to filin! of notice of appeal 5ay notice of appeal be contestedA Dis issed by courtA duty of court ,$en notice of appeal filed dilatory appeals 0.(. I proper appeals to CA fro R;C on <uestions of la, to )C via notice of appeal to CA on notice of appeal fro %urisdiction R;C decision rendered in appellate

1&

 t$e above odes ,ill erit dis issalK no transfer to correct court ,ill be allo,ed ?E2ception is ,$en appeal to )C on <uestions of la, and fact in ,$ic$ case" t$e case ,ill be re anded to CA@

4. PROVI)IO'AL RE5EDIE) 4.1. Preli inary Attac$ ent Cinds of attac$ ent preli inary !arnis$ ent levy on e2ecution At ,$at sta!e is preli inary attac$ ent !rantedA !rounds for attac$ ent e2clusive ay be !ranted e2 parte Onate v Abro!ar" #01 ) (4. Davao Li!$t > 6ater v CA" #/0 ) &0& )ievert v CA" 1(+ ) (.# Carlos v )andoval 0*1 ) #(( )pouses Eu v '!o Eee ;e -R 144+(+

4.#. Preli inary In%unction preceded by a *#9$our ;RO" #/9day ;RO ?R;C@ or a (/9day ;RO ?CA@ ,it$in ;RO" $earin! ust be conducted ay be !ranted at any sta!e of t$e proceedin! ay not be en%oined

re<uire ents for issuance coordinate body ay be a provisional re edy and t$e principal re edy itself

7acolod City 6ater District v Labayen 00( ) 11/ C$ina 7an=in! Corp v Co -R 1*04(. Estares v CA -R 100*44 7uyco v 7ara<uia -R 1**0+( ?Dece ber #1" #//.@ 1eirs of t$e late 87L Reyes v CA &&+ ) #+# 7roc=a v Enrile 1.# ) 1+# 5edina v -reenfield Develop ent -R 10/##+ 10

4.&. Receivers$ip 6$en is receiver appointedA ob%ect is preservation of property sub%ect po,ers of a receiver 'ational Invest ent and Develop ent Corp v 8ud!e A<uino 1(& ) 14& ;raders Royal 7an= v IAC #*& ) 4#1 4.0. Replevin nature of a replevin suit <uestion involved is one of possession but o,ners$ip ay be resolved if raised plaintiff ?clai @ and defendant ?counterclai @ can petition for replevin Ean! v Valde: 1** ) 101 Ado a v -atc$eco 00+ ) #.. Paat v CA #(( ) 1(* Citiban= v CA &/0 ) (*. 4.4. )upport pendete lite concept of support is t$at t$e applicant is entitled to it by reason of so e relations$ip ?say" arital or filial@ ,it$ t$e adverse party %ud! ent of support is never final" it can be a ended at any ti e as lon! as t$e obli!ation to support subsists Arts 1.0" 1.4" #/1" #/# of Da ily Code Reyes v Ines9Luciano -R 0+#1. La v C$ua -R 1&1#+( atter of liti!ation

(. )PECIAL CIVIL AC;IO') (.1. Interpleader Oca po v ;irona -R 10*+1# ?April (" #//4@ (.#. Declaratory Relief 14

;ano v )ocrates -R 11/#0. ?Au!ust 10" 1..*@ 5artelino v '15D Corp -R 1(/#/+ ?8une &/" #//+@ Velasco v Ville!as -R #014& ?Debruary 10" 1.+&@ (.&. Certiorari" Pro$ibition and 5anda us )ee distinctions bet,een certiorari as an appeal and certiorari as an ori!inal action ?supra@ ,rit of certiorari is territorial if issued by R;C" not if by CA certiorari to correct errors of %urisdiction and not errors of %ud! ent )ection 1." 1..1 Revised Rules on )u )ection 1." Rule on 6rit of A paro )ection 1." Rule on 1abeas Data )ection 10" Rule of Procedure in ) all Clai s Cases Circular #+9.1 7alba v Pea= Develop ent Inc -R 10+#++ ?Au!ust 1#" #//4@ 'e, Drontier )u!ar Corp v R;C of Iloilo -R 1(4//1 ?8anuary &1" #//*@ Ca utin v )ps Potente -R 1+1(0# ?8anuary #." #//.@ 7u!arin v Palisoc -R 14*.+4 ?Dece ber #" #//4@ Lalicon v Ver!ara #*( ) 41+ )ps 'isc$e v E<uitable9PCI 7an= -R 1(*0&0 ?Debruary 1." #//*@ David v Rivera 0#/ ) ./ ;an v Co elec -R *&144 ?8uly 11" 1.+(@ 5ayu!a v CA ?Au!ust &/" 1..(@ Cant 6on! et al v PC-- -R *.0+0 ?Dece ber *" 1.+*@ Uy Ciao En! v 'i2on Lee -R 1**(+&1 ?8anuary 14" #/1/@ 5atibay v -arcia ?8anuary #4" 1.+&@ Palo a v 5ora 0*/ ) *11 ary Procedure

(.0. Luo 6arranto 5unicipality of )an 'arciso v 5ende: #&. )CRA 11 ;arrosa v )in!son #&# ) 44& Lota v CA # ) *14 1(

(.4. E2propriation deter ination of aut$ority to e2ercise e inent do ain deter ination of %ust co pensation Republic v -in!oyan -R 1((0#. ?Dece ber 1." #//4@ 'ational Po,er Corp v 5anubay A!ro9Industrial -R 14/.&( ?Au!ust 1+" #//0@ Republic v CA and 1eirs of Cris )antos -R 10(4+* ?8uly #" #//#@ 8esus is Lord C$ristian )c$ool Doundation v City of Pasi! -R 14##&/ (.(. Doreclosure of Real Estate 5ort!a!e all parties in interest s$ould be %oined as necessary parties" i.e. ort!a!or as ,ell as second ort!a!ee or attac$in! creditor e<uity of rede ption instead of ri!$t of rede ption is re edy of debtor in t$e sa e case" in case of deficiency" t$e court ,ill render %ud! ent a!ainst debtor ,$ic$ %ud! ent A5 'o. ..91/9/49/ Act 'o &1&4 Li pin v IAC 1(( ) ++ 7PI Da ily )avin!s 7an= v )ps Veloso 0&( ) 1 (.*. Partition Di!uracion -erilla v Vda de Di!uracion -R 140&## ?Au!ust ##" #//(@ (.+. Dorcible Entry and Unla,ful Detainer Valdes v CA -R 1&#0#( Co v 5ilitar 01 ) 044 Unida v Urban -R 1440&# )pouses Calendacion v Larano -R 14+#&1 5ontene!ro v 5ontene!ro -R 14(+#. (... Conte pt An! v Castro -R ((&*1 ?5ay 14" 1.+4@ 1* ay be e2ecuted i ediately if debt is due upon

People v -odoy #0& ) (0 ?5arc$ #." 1..4@

1+