This study was to classify a ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek at Skofielu Paik using the Rosgen classification system. We classifieu the stieam as a B4 stieam but encounteieu some of the pioblems with the system. The classification of a stream can also be used as a communication tool and to describe existing and continuous trends.
This study was to classify a ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek at Skofielu Paik using the Rosgen classification system. We classifieu the stieam as a B4 stieam but encounteieu some of the pioblems with the system. The classification of a stream can also be used as a communication tool and to describe existing and continuous trends.
This study was to classify a ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek at Skofielu Paik using the Rosgen classification system. We classifieu the stieam as a B4 stieam but encounteieu some of the pioblems with the system. The classification of a stream can also be used as a communication tool and to describe existing and continuous trends.
!"#$%&'$ The puipose of this stuuy was to classify a ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek at Skofielu Paik using the Rosgen classification system. Taking uata in the fielu anu fiom obseivation we classifieu the stieam as a B4 stieam with the Rosgen classification but encounteieu some of the pioblems with the system. To analyze the Rosgen system, we compaieu anu contiasteu it with the Nontgomeiy anu Buffington anu the Schumm classification systems to finu that the Nontgomeiy anu Buffington system alloweu the most iealistic chaiacteiization of the stieam while also pioviuing moie valuable infoimation about piocess anu evolution of the stieam. 2 I. Introduction a. Objectives The objective of this study was to classify Rattlesnake Creek using the Rosgen classification system by looking at broad geomorphologic characteristics and morphologically describing the stream and to analyze this method by comparing and contrasting it with the Schumm and the Montgomery and Buffington classification systems. By applying fundamental principles of fluvial geomorphology to collect data from the field we can classify the stream allowing us to recognize stability and the causes of instability through gaining a greater understanding of stream processes and evolution. This important information has major implications for flood control, the building of structures, stream management and restoration, and research. The classification of a stream can also be used as a communication tool and to describe existing and continuous trends. b. Study Area The Mission Creek watershed in Santa Barbara, California (as shown in Figure 1 below) starts north of downtown Santa Barbara in the transverse Santa Ynez Mountains range and extends south to the Pacific Ocean via the lagoon, also known as the old El Estero. Santa Barbaras has been characterized as having Mediterranean climate, having an average temperature of 60F and a mean monthly temperature ranging from 55F in the winters to 65F in the summers (Loiciga 35). A large part of the watershed is chaparral environment with mountain streams but the southern portion has been greatly developed into the downtown and residential areas of Santa Barbara. The Mission Creek watersheds primary tributary, Rattlesnake Creek, lies towards the east side of the watershed while Mission Creek lies towards the west side covering a drainage area of 8.2 km 2 , as shown in Figure 2 below (Keller 235). The reach of Rattlesnake Creek we studied was in Skofield Park, which is marked with a yellow star in Figure 2. Skofield Park lays on an ancient alluvial fan that is around 125,000 years old. It is the source of the debris flow that was responsible for depositing the boulders one can see at Rocky Nook Park. A landslide around 1000 years ago left a large scarp that is visible on the hillside. Rattlesnake Creek, the primary tributary of Mission Creek, runs through this park also. The channel is characterized by large boulders due to the proximity of Skofield Park to the source of the debris flow. Boulders exceeding stream competence suggest a debris flow origin during a previous period of valley filling, perhaps under a climatic regime much different than today (Best et al 46).
S )*+,%- . - The Mission Creek watershed is located on the southern side of the Santa Ynez Mountain Range, north of Santa Barbara, California. Source: Jake Sahl.
4 Figure 2 Mission Creek Watershed, with Rattlesnake Creek on the right in darker blue. The yellow star marks Skofield Park, the site of our study. Source: Jake Sahl.
S //0 1-$234# 0sing suiveying tools in the fielu we took measuiements of elevation changes along the thalweg anu acioss two cioss sections of the stieam using a hanu level anu measuiing iou. A measuiing tape was useu to measuie uistances anu a compass was useu to take beaiings, which alloweu us to make oui moiphologic map. To calculate bankfull, we fiist hau to ueteimine bankfull in the fielu using inuicatois such as scouiing maiks on tiees anu iocks, lichen on boulueis, anu wheie types of tiees giow. We measuieu the bankfull wiuth anu max bankfull uepth aftei ueteimining this anu calculateu the mean bankfull wiuth using the cioss section giaph to inteipolate bankfull uepths at a set inteival acioss the bankfull wiuth anu took theii aveiage. The entienchment iatio was too uifficult to calculate seeing that the stieam banks became steep anu coveieu with poison soak at 2x the maximum bankfull uepth, so in this case it is best to appioximate the entienchment iatio to be ~2.2. If one coulu measuie elevations up to 2x the maximum bankfull uepth though, they woulu uiviue the wiuth of the floou pione aiea by the bankfull wiuth. To calculate the slope we useu a lineai tienuline of the longituuinal piofile to appioximate the watei suiface giauient at bankfull. We useu the following equations to calculate the iest of the uata neeueu foi the Level 1 Rosgen classification: 567 8&$*39 :&;<=,>> 5*4$261-&; :&;<=,>> 7-?$2 @*;,3#*$A 9 B2&;;-> C-;+$26D&>>-A C-;+$2 B2&;;-> @>3?- 9 @>3?-6@*;,3#*$A To analyze the seuiment size anu tianspoit foi the Level 2 Rosgen classification we peifoimeu a pebble count of 1uu ianuom pebbles foi each of the cioss sections anu useu a numbei of equations using the elevation anu uistance measuiements. To finu the BSu anu B9u of each cioss section we cieateu giain size uistiibution giaphs telling us what the uiametei was of the giain sizes that Su% anu 9u% of the cumulative uistiibution was finei than. To calculate the flow cioss sectional aiea (A) anu the length of the wetteu peiimetei (P) we useu the cioss section giaphs to estimate the aiea below bankfull by finuing the aiea of iectangles anu tiiangles anu the lengths of each of these tiiangles siues to finu the length of theii hypotenuses using the Pythagoiean theoiem. To calculate the hyuiaulic iauius (R) we useu the equation: 8 9 !6E To estimate the Nanning ioughness coefficient (n) we useu a chait that uesciibeu the uiffeient types of stieams giving us a iange of n anu a noimal n.
6 To estimate the velocity anu uischaige of each cioss section we useu these equations: F&F+ 9 .6;G8 H6I @ .6H J 9 ! G F&F+ K'3;$*;,*$A -L,&$*3;M To calculate the total bounuaiy sheai stiess we useu the equation: ! b = " w gRS To calculate the maximum uischaige we useu two uiffeient methous: @2*->4# B%*$-%*& 7N&O 9 ! b /[0.06(" s -" w )g] B3#$& K.PQIM 1-$234 7N&O 9 .R K>3+K !b/0.163))/1.213
8 )*+,%- X Y Longituuinal Piofile of Rattlesnake Cieek.
b. Fluvial Processes In the reach we observed convergent flow causing scouring due to large roughness elements (LREs), such as large boulders, creating a forced pool. Divergent flow was observed in areas where deposition occurred, which were characterized by sand and clay sized particle bars forming near the edges of the streams current low water level. We also observed a low sinuosity as the stream oscillated vertically more than laterally and has a steep gradient. c. Channel Morphology This reach of Rattlesnake Creek is a mountainous boulder-bedrock channel that contains many large roughness elements (LREs). These LREs are major factors in the morphology of the stream as they control scouring and deposition. The LREs are too large to be moved by even extremely high flows indicating that they were brought there by a debris flow 1000 years ago. The morphology of the stream would be classified as step pool, with some forced pools, as boulders and cobbles form steps across the channel creating pools after them containing finer sediment that are relatively deeper than the rest of the channel.
y = u.uS24x + u.uu9 -1.uuu -u.Suu u.uuu u.Suu 1.uuu 1.Suu 2.uuu 7 . u u
d. Sediment Size and Transport Table 2 Data calculated for stream classification of Rosgen Level 2. C3'&$*3; @<3=*->4 E&%<S !T! . @<3=*->4 E&%<S :T: .
Flow Cross Sectional Area, A (m 2 ) 2.557 2.246 Length of Wetted Perimeter, P (m) 6.213 4.401 Hydraulic Radius, R (m) 0.4115 0.5104 D50 (cm) 5.000 5.000 D90 (cm) 44.000 44.000 Manning Roughness Coefficient, n 0.050 0.050 Slope, S 0.032 0.032 Average Velocity, v avg (m/s) 1.992 3.300 Discharge, Q (m 3 /s) 5.092 5.164 Density of Water, " w (kg/m 3 ) 1000 1000 Acceleration due to Gravity, g (m/s 2 ) 9.81 9.81 Total Boundary Shear Stress, ! b (N/m 2 ) 130.794 162.225 Density of Sediment, " s (kg/m 3 ) 2650 2650 D max , Shields Criteria (m) 0.135 0.167 D max , Costa Method (m) 0.248 0.296 Rosgen Level 2 Classification 4 4
1u Table 3 - Pebble count data for cross section A-A 1 . Pebble Count Cross Section A -A 1
/D0 7*#',##*3; &0 83#+-; B>&##*=*'&$*3; The Rosgen classification categoiizeu oui stieam as a B4 stieam. Though the Rosgen classification system is veiy easy to use anu fast, seeing as we all leaineu how to take the measuiements it iequiieu in one fielu tiip, it has some issues. In oui measuiements alone we founu uiffeiences between oui cioss sections values so it seems that it woulu be veiy uifficult foi anothei stuuy to iepiouuce the same iesults as we got. Foi example, oui wiuth to uepth iatios aie 1u.S24 foi cioss section A-A 1
anu 12.12S foi cioss section B-B 1 , which weie taken quite close to each othei. This technically classifies oui stieam into two uiffeient Level 1 classifications as the wiuth to uepth iatio of A-A 1 is <12 anu of B-B 1 is >12. The classification uoes pioviue a uecently iealistic chaiacteiization of the stieam though as the calculations foi the aveiage velocity anu sheai stiess piopeily iepiesenteu the fastei moving flow with gieatei sheai stiess is at the iiffle in cioss section B-B 1 , while the slowei moving flow with lessei sheai stiess is in the pool at cioss section A-A 1 . The classification fails when it comes to categoiizing the uominate beu mateiial type though as it was obviously bouluei anu cobble uominateu but oui pebble counts inuicateu that giavel was the uominant beu mateiial. While the Rosgen has it's uownfalls, oveiall it is a goou communication anu geneial oiganization tool, but one shoulu be weaiy about using it foi stieam management puiposes as it lacks analysis of piocesses, stability anu evolution of the stieam. "0 ]$2-% B>&##*=*'&$*3;# *0 13;$+3N-%A &;4 :,==*;+$3; The Nontgomeiy anu Buffington classification system foi mountain stieams places oui ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek as an alluvial ieach step pool. It chaiacteiizes the stieam as having cobble-bouluei as the uominant beu mateiial, being a veitically oscillatoiy beufoim pattein anu having uominant ioughness elements being steps, pools, banks anu boulueis. It also chaiacteiizes the stieams' uominant seuiment souice being uebiis flows anu seuiment stoiage elements being beufoims. This classification system steeis away fiom quantifying chaiacteiistics of the stieam anu insteau focuses on the qualitative chaiacteiistics though it uoes have some quantification. Foi example, "Step-pool, morphology generally is associated with steep gradients, small width to depth ratios, and pronounced confinement by valley walls 14 (Montgomery and Buffington 597). The step pool classification pioviues a veiy iealistic image of what the stieam looks like but also gives insights into the piocesses anu evolution of the stieam allowing us to pieuict futuie tienus. The Nontgomeiy anu Buffington classification system is maue only foi mountainous stieams, so theiefoie in this case is supeiioi to the Rosgen classification. ii. Schumm Schumm's classification is baseu on type of beu loau, channel pattein, anu stability as seen in Figuie 8. 0ui ieach of Rattlesnake Cieek has a small seuiment loau anu since it can't move the laigei clasts has a suspenueu loau, but the giauient is high anu the channel pattein geneially stiaight. The stability is high foi the stieam seeing that the velocity of the flow anu the stieam powei aie both low. These contiasting chaiacteiistics make the stieam extiemely uifficult to classify using this system anu impossible to pin hole the stieam into anyone of the 6 types.
1S '0 )>,F*&> )3%N &;4 E%3'-## Looking at the channel morphology allows us to understand the fluvial processes taking place in the reach. As stated in the fluvial processes section earlier, we observed convergent flow causing scouring due to large roughness elements (boulders) creating a forced pool. Divergent flow was observed in areas where deposition occurred, which were characterized by sand and clay sized particle bar. Scouring typically takes place after the steps create pools due to the increase flow velocity and gradient, while deposition occurs in lower flow regime areas of the stream as the stream power is not great enough to carry the sediment load due to the areas low velocity and low gradient. Overall, this step pool classified stream is more of a supply-limited system. Bedload studies in step-pool channels demonstrate complex relations between discharge and sediment transport; transport rates are dependent on seasonal and stochastic sediment inputs, flow magnitude and duration, and antecedent events. It was also suggested in 1992 by Warburton that there are three phases of sediment transport in step-pool channels: a low-flow flushing of fines; frequent high-flow mobilization of pool-filling gravel (also noted by Sawada et al.,1983); and less-frequent higher-discharge mobilization of step-forming grains. The formation of step pool spacing is dictated by low sediment supply and infrequent discharge capable of moving the coarsest sediment and the spacing corresponds to the maximum flow resistance, providing stability for a bed that would otherwise be mobile (Whittaker and Jaeggi, 1982; Abrahams et al, 1995) (Montgomery and Buffington 599). These processes drive the fluvial morphology and evolution of the stream and it is continuously changing due to them. D0 B3;'>,#*3;# In this study we classified a reach of Rattlesnake Creek at Skofield Park using the Level 1 and Level 2 Rosgen classification. In the process of classifying the stream we discovered the benefits and the downfalls of the Rosgen classification system as it provides a fast and easy means of classifying a stream, but lacks a comprehensive analysis of the streams processes and evolution making it a dangerous tool to use for stream management. Comparing it to the Schumm and the Montgomery and Buffington classification systems we found that Schumms oversimplification and lack of pairing options for characteristics made it impossible to classify our stream with the data we had collected. The Montgomery and Buffington system not only was easy to use but it provided a realistic description of the stream and gave us further insight into the processes controlling the morphology of the stream, proving itself to be the best classification tool for mountainous streams like Rattlesnake Creek reach at Skofield Park.
16 References Cited
Best, D. W., and E. A. Keller. "Sediment Storage and Routing in A Steep Boulder-Bed Rock-Controlled Channel." Proc. of Chaparral Ecosystems Research, University of California Davis. Santa Barbara: University of California, 1985. 185-95. Print. Loiciga, Hugo. Description of Study Area Geography 112 Environmental Hydrology reader. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara. 2012. 35. Print. Montgomery , David R. , and John M. Buffington . "Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins." Geologic Society of America Bulletin 109 (1997): 596- 611. gsabulletin.gsapubs.org. 5 March 2009.