Asad, Tadal. Genealagies
Oe & Peligion: Viseagl ine £
Es, Peagans of of Power
mw ChorigRanity ane| “ol
Lal 4 Law Yaltimeve, MD.
Juans bgtin> Univ. Press,
(14
1 0h THE CONSTRUCTION
OF RELIGION AS
AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL
caTEGORY
In much nineteath-century evolutionary thought, religion was
considered to bean ety human condition from which modera law,
science, and polities emerged and became detached. In thi centory|
‘most anthropolog’sts have abandoned Victorian evolutionary ideas,
sae any have challenged the eationalis notion that religion issimply
2 primitive and therefore outmoded form of the istttions we now
eeounter in ese form (av, polite, scence) in modern if For
these twentieth-century anthropoiogs, religion is not an archaic
‘mode of cientie thinking, nor of anyother secular endewce we ale
today itis, on the contrary, a distinctive space of human practice and
belt which cannot be reduced fo any otber. From this seems 10
fallow that he exence of religion is at to Be confused with, sy the
‘wince of politic although in many societies the wo may OvrAp
sau be intertwined,
Ina characteristcally subtle passage, Louis Dumont has told us
that medieval Chrtendom war one such compost society
Ill take it for grad hat change in elation entail achangein
whatever seed. If throughour ou hon ligion har developed
{to lege exten, with ome otherinfluencer ply) a even
soil values an has given bith by aciipariy, a i were 30 2"
tonomous word of poll inattwtons and speculation, then sey
religion il wil have changed in ee proces. Of some important
mn Cte nga tien eh ae
‘Shao meee8 GENEALOGIES
ant vile change we mall ar, bat, Lub we arnt sare
fhe chang inte very rte of elgon sed by ay Bren
inva stoi Everyone know lien woes
mater of he groups os become amas fe in
Fringe, dim praia as many events and sa
‘lon Bcifwegon osmere thar this chage coated with he
tit of he modern Sa she proportion no sch scan
Ssihepreion one Lerwepos efor: medical pion
Cinageaccsk-tomhintngatne Macey ot ey
‘nc remem indi a on albembrang pe
Sn became one song ocr apparent el comrsns of
Sichk pica bor. Eating nyo
I prtapeeven wil cote gon or piloxophyy he ne
Miembraingcomidersion iwete beady Yeon hello
{ocuteoneni oricloy these peon wll with ta ier
ne coniguion of wei wich atonal lions,
polis) aescingy apnea ch rinse
Tapendia soy 7m emphnsa i erga
According to this view, medieval religion, pervading or encompassing,
other categories, is nevertheless analy identifiable. Tis this fact
thar makes posible to sy that lion has the sme exence today a+
iehad inthe Middle Ages, ithough is scil extension and function
‘were differen in the ewo epochs, Yer the insistence that eligon has
fn autonomous esence=nor to be confused withthe essence of c=
‘nce, oof politics, or of common sense—invites us co define igo
{like any estence) a transhistorical apd taneculeutl phenomenon
Te may bea happy accent that this effort of defining eligion co
‘verges with the liberal demand in on time thai be kep quite sep
from polis, lw ane cience—spaces in whichvacetie of powet
tnd reason aeiclate our datinetively modern ie, This definition is
once part ofa strategy (or secular hiberas ofthe confinement, and
(or libetal Christians) ofthe defense ofeligion
Yer thie separation of religion from power is « modern Westera
norm, the prodct of niu post Reformation history. Te ape
ro understand Muslim traditions by insisting tat in them religion and
polities (wo essences modern society tries to Keep conceptually 29d
pretclly apart) are coupled must, sm my view, lead to Faure, APS
fnoat dubious, such attempts encourage Us to take up an prior pos
Relpion san Ania Cary 39
tion in which religions discourse in the politic) aren ie cen a8 4
isguise for polite power
In what follows I want to examine the ways in which the the-
‘rei earch fr an essence of religion invites us te sepatate icon.
‘eprally from the domain of power I shall do this by exploring &
univenalist definition of religion offered by an eminent antheopoto
is: Clifford Geeta “Religion 2 Calural System. I stese that
{hiss not primarily citial review of Gertz’ ideas on eeligon if
that had teen my sim T would have adresed myself eo the eae
‘corps ois writings on eligon in Indonesia ant Mororco, My in
tention in this chapter isto try to dentify some athe historical hits
‘tha have produced our concept of elgion a the Concept ofa teas
historical essence and Geert article merely starting pone.
{tis part of my basic argument hat socal Wentifable forms,
preconditions, and effect of what was regarded 4 elgin in te me
ieval Christian epoch were quite diferent fro those so considered
in modern socery.Lwant to get at this well-known fact whl eying to
‘Hida simple rominalsm. What we cll reigious power was dif.
“These divergences are symptoms of Me Tact that cpitive ques
snap hander sn eg ra
‘enetn mat fora Hone i pc cig obey
‘Serioumind fezecy ine leraitdoe harhriesreprsetnon” esc,
Religion asa Anshrplapinl Cagory
tions ae mixed up in this account with communicative ones, ad tis
makes it difficlt to ingize into rhe ways in which dacourse and
‘undentaning are connected in socal practic, To begin with we might
53,384 numberof writers have done, hat aaynibal sno an oS
‘vent that serves to carey meaning but aset of lationsips between
objects or events uniquely Brought together as complexes ors cor
‘eptiehaving at once an intellectual, instrumental, an! emotions!
significance If we define symbol along thee lines» number of
‘questions can be raised about the conitions chat explain how such
‘completes and concepts come to be former, and in particule how
{hei formation i elated to varieties Of pracice. Hill censor ap
Vygotaky was able o show how the development ofchldeen'intellect
is dependent onthe internalization of soil speech.” This means that
the Ormation of whac we have here called “symbols” (complexes
‘concept i conditioned bythe soc relations in which the growing,
«childs involved—ty the social activities that he o hes permitted
«encoraged or obliged ro undertake—in which other symbols opeech
snnsignificant movements are crucial. The conditions Scanive sn
‘nondscursive) shat explain how symbols come tobe constructed, ad
‘ov some of them are established a natural oe aithoitatie a oppor
‘ocshen, chen been an mporantobict of athropologiaingury.
Temnst be stesed that cis not a matter of srging the study ofthe
‘origin and function of symbole in addition vo thee meaning such
slistinetion is noe relevane here. What i bing argued that the mt
thontaive seams of representationeldincoures is dependent on the
4+ Yay mae il acl ine denen ts
scr tegen, pins ol tue ene sgh
Sonne Upemth citer ca dce-emn a ee
CE allngrn op 3) ead ofthe ne conattionberween
‘tonnes wha sue tes gaa oe
tcl incon conga cpanel Ce eee
‘Seyteommanaie aay hr ow pce ean ct aves
‘AE tee nan gece rnc) one gears
Tae pment ht nl pe Sar ee
epee et ele oy“
Sather Set A iver wa hen ch ry Li
3 Thin ft prenatal et ater ef
nett es ia ea pea Wy es