. XXXV . 4 . 1423-1437 - 2011.

UDK 930.85(497)

: 14. 4. 2011.

, , . ,
. , .
, , . ,

.
: , , , ,
,

sanjalazarevic7@gmail.com
: - (. . 147013) ,
.

1424
.
(Gayatri
Chakravorti Spivak)

,
(Spivak, 2003).
, , , ,
, , , . , , (Gandhi 2008). ,
,
,

. ,
, , ( ) , ,
. , (Milica Baki-Hayden), , , (Vesna Goldsworthy);

(Boidar Jezernik)
(Larry Wolf),
,

. :
;

, ?
, . .
-

1425
,


( 2006, 51).
,
. , , ,
/ . , ,
,
, .

, , , ,
(1999). , . , . , , , . , ,
, ,
. , ,
, , ,

.

, , , ,
( 2008, 29). , -

1426

, . ,
, .
, , , , . ,


,
.
, ,
,
, .
, . ,

, , , , , , . .
-
,
.
,

(- 2010, 12122). ,
. ,
,
.

, . , -

1427
,
, ,
, , ,
, .
,
. , ,
,
,
: , .

(Gandhi 2008).
.
, ,
, (Ashcroft, Griffiths, Tiffin 2009, 12).

,
, .
, ,
.
,

, .

a -

1428
, , . ,
, ,
. ,
, a .

, .
, , , ,

.
, , ,
, , , . , , , , , ,
(Said 2008, 16).
,
, ,
, .
,
, , ,
. -
, , , , . ,
,
, , .
,
. -

1429
, ,
, .
, , , .

,
.

, . , ,
. ,
. ,
. . ,
. , , , , .
, ,
, , ( 2006,
161).
, ,
. ,

. 1
1

, , : ,

1430
, , ,
,

, , , , . / .
,
, . , , , , , ,
,
. , .
(Zanini 2002, 25). , , , , , .
,
, , . , ,
. , ,
, .
, , .
,
. (Van Genep 2005). ,
(Turner 1974).

1431
, , , , . ,
.
(Huddart 2004. 18). ,
.

, , , , .
,
, , , , , , ,
.2 , : . , -

.
, ,

, .
.
: ,
,
, . ,

.
2

Madeleine Scheichter, Liminal and hybrid aspects of intersemiotic, Dostupno na:

www.inst.at/trans/16Nr/01_2/schechter16.htm+Liminality+and+hybridity+as+heuristi
c+cultural+models

1432


. , , , ,
(Byron), (Rebbecca West) .

.
, .
, ,
, .
,

. ,


.
( 2006, 1924). , , , ,
. ,
. , , ,
.

,
.

. -

1433
.
(Baba 2004).
.
, . ,
.
,
,
. ,
, , .
,
. , ; , (BakiHayden 2006). , ,

,
. , ,
.

. . /, / .
, ,
, .

, ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
. -

1434
.
,
.
,
,
,
. , ,
. , , ,

, , , . , , ,
,

. , ,
, , .
, .
, , . , . ,
, , ,
.
, , ,
, , , . , . ,

. .

1435

,
,
. , , . ,
, , ,
, (Muri and Jezernik
2008, 8). , , , . ,
. --, , , . , , ,
.


. ,


, , .
/; /; /; /; / . , .
, .
, ,

. , . -

1436
;
,
,
.
, .

.
, , , , , , .

Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 2009. The empire writes back.
Routledge, London and New York.
Baba, Homi. 2004. Smetanje kulture. Beograd: Beogradski krug.
Baki Hayden, Milica. 2006. Varijacije na temu Balkan. Beograd: Filip Vinjii.
orevi, Jelena. 2008. Postkolonijalna teroija diskursa. Godinjak Fakulteta politikih nauka u Beogradu 2 (2): 2945.
Gandi, Lila. 2008. Edvard Said i njegovi kritiari. Polja LIII (452): 6480.
Goldsvorti, Vesna. 2005. Izmiljanje Ruritanije: imperijalizam mate. Beograd: Geopoetika.
Huddart, David. 2004. Homi Bhabha. New York: Routledge.
Jezernik, Boidar. 2007. Divlja Evropa: Balkan u oima putnika sa Zapada. Beograd:
Biblioteka XX vek.
, . 2006 , , : : 1547.
-, . 2010. .
97: 11828.
, . 2006 (, ). , ,
: 16170.
Muri Rajko and Boidar Jezernik. 2007. The Balkans in/and Europe. In Europe and
its Other, edited by Boidar Jezernik, Rajko Muri and Alenka Bartulovi,
3354. Ljubljana: Oddelek za etnologijo in kulturno antropologijo, Filozofska
fakulteta.
Said, Edvard. 2008. Orijentalizam. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Spivak, Gajatri akravorti. 2003. Kritika postkolonijalnog uma. Beograd: Beogradski
krug.
Turner, Victor. 1974. Dramas, fields and metaphors: Symbolic action in human
society. Itaca: Cornell University press.
Todorova, Marija. 1999. Imaginarni Balkan. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Van Genep, Arnold. 2005. Obredi prelaza. Beograd: Srpska knjievna zadruga.
, . 2006. , , , : 5161.
Zanini, Pjero. 2002. Znaenja granice. Beograd: Clio.

1437
Sanja Lazarevi-Radak, Beograd

ON THE BORDER BETWEEN ORIENT AND OCCIDENT:

POSTCOLONIAL THEORY AND
LIMINALITY OF THE BALKANS
Summary
Image studies which focus on inventing the Balkans as Other in European literature, beginning with travel accounts, dealing with political studies and various fiction had experienced unusual popularity in the last twenty years. Through the analysis
of colonial discourse, Balkan came into a focus of image studies where its liminal position was marked. Recently, it is recognized as subject to criticism, primarily pointed
to non-European areas as Asia and Africa. As one of the main analytical terms that
postcolonial critics use, liminality is able to point out all complexity of geosimbolical
position of the Balkans. The discourses on liminality, not only focus on specific feature of the Balkan, they are the way to fraim it within postcolonial theory and analyse
the share of syncretism, hybridity, to research the consequences of discoursive mimicry. Considering all that is said, the purpose of this research is questioning postcolonial theory and its share in the understanding textual representations on the Balkans as
symbolically border area.
Key Words:

Balkan, image studies, postcolonial theory, hybridity, border, liminality.