Slide Deck Ibm Sponsored Webcast With Cfo Publishing 06-21-11

How to Improve Closing, Consolidating and Financial Reporting Processes
Tom Willman
Global Practice Leader, Finance Advisory

The Hackett Group Pat Calitri Director, Financial Close Management, Presales IBM
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
The Journey to World-Class

How to Improve Closing, Consolidations and Financial Reporting Processes
Presented by: Tom Willman Global Practice Leader, Finance Advisory The Hackett Group
Agenda
Who is Hackett and What Do We Do? Select Metrics for World-Class Finance Organizations
Challenges and Leading Practices in Closing, Consolidations and Reporting
Page 3
How to Improve the Closing, Consolidations and Financial Reporting Processes
2011 The Hackett Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this document or any portion thereof without prior written consent is prohibited.
The Hackett Group difference: intellectual capital and implementation expertise that accelerates the time to sustainable benefit realization
We are the global leader in operations improvement strategies, implementation know-how, and SG&A agility We address both efficiency and effectiveness improvements to enable strategic business objectives Our insights are fact based, from over 5,000 benchmark studies and consulting engagements Our Best Practices Intelligence Center is a significant differentiator and enabler. It contains:
20,000+ performance metrics updated annually
1,700+ best practices across 95 business processes 1,000+ best practice-based process maps, requirements and configuration guides 1,000+ case studies, implementation examples and research
Hackett Value Grid
We deliver results through a global team of senior practitioners using a consistent methodology and best practice-based toolset
Hackett defines and enables sustainable world-class performance

Page 4
We know how the best do it, where they do it, and the benefit of doing it.
97%
of the Dow Jones Industrials Page 5
80%
88%
80%
of the DAX 30
49%
of the FTSE 100
35%
of the CAC 40
of the of the Dow Jones Fortune 100 and Financial Global Titans How to Improve the Closing, Consolidations Reporting Processes
The Hackett Group What do we do?
Hackett analyzes both efficiency and effectiveness performance drivers to identify WorldClass performers and assists our clients in achieving their improvement objectives
EFFECTIVENESS
VALUE
Hackett Value Grid
Agility / Scalability Alignment with business Supplier leverage Economic return Quality Access to information Working Capital Cost Cycle time Productivity Staffing
Strategic Business Enablement Effectiveness
SERVICE
Operating Excellence
EFFICIENCY
Efficiency
COST
Complexity Reduction
Technology leverage
Page 6
Agenda
Page 7
World-class finance organizations have shown superior ability to respond to risk and volatility
World-Class to Peer Gap
1.90%
1.70%
1.50% 1.50%
31%
1.40%
1.20% 0.90%
51%
1.28% 1.10%
1.00%
1.26% 1.22% 1.24% 1.17% 1.13% 1.16% 1.22% 1.10% 1.08%
0.72% 0.74% 0.73% 0.67% 0.61% 0.59% 0.60% 0.61% 0.63%
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Response to Sarbanes-Oxley act
Financial crisis & recession
Source: Hackett Finance Function Benchmark, 2011
Page 8
Efficiency: World-class organizations operate with fewer FTEs and lower cost within their Account-to-Report process(es)
FTEs per Billion of Revenue Process Cost as a Percent of Revenue
0.176%
0.096%
Peer Group
World Class
Source: Hackett Finance Benchmark
Page 9
Effectiveness: 28% of World-class companies close their books in fewer than 4 days
Closing Cycle Times World Class Companies
39%
28% 17%
<3 Days
<4 Days
<5 Days
Source: Hackett Finance Benchmark
Page 10
Agenda
Page 11
Todays Challenges
One Source Of the Truth
Data Quality & Consistency
Regulatory Requirements
(e.g., XBRL, IFRS)
People & Governance

Finances role & responsibilities / compliance
Efficiency & Effectiveness

Timeliness, Transparency
The role of finance is changing and executives are faced with increased need for fast and reliable information while meeting new regulatory requirements.
12
Page 12
Hackett Perspective Leading Practices

Holistic Approach
In our experience, to overcome the challenges in the financial close process, a holistic approach is required to address key impacts on process, people / governance and data.
Process
Option 2: Foundational HFM HFM 9.3 & Hyperion Planning 4.2
Users External Reporting Corporate Consolidations Area Accounting Company Accounting
People / Governance
Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure
Users Corporate Consolidations Area Accounting Company Accounting Users Senior Mgmt Area Accounting Corporate Consolidations
Data
Corporate CorporateScorecard Scorecard
Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure
Technology
PROPOSED SARA PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT
Login via workspace
Users External Reporting Corporate Consolidations Area Accounting Company Accounting Treasury
Users Corporate Consolidations Area Accounting Company Accounting External Reporting
CIO and Vice President
SVP and Corporate Controller
Hyperion Reports
Workspace
Smart View
Hyperion Reports
Hyperion Analyzer
Login via Excel on Share
Login via Web Reports
Login via Web Analyzer
External Reporting Area Financials Company Financials
Ad Hoc Analysis Cash Flow Report Schedules (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, M, & ENR)
MD&A Schedules M & S Ad Hoc Analysis
Mgmt Report Exhibits Other Internal Reports
Ad Hoc Analysis Dashboards
Manager ITSS
EMERsion Support
Manager FSLC
Accounting/POR
Business Requirements Policy and Procedure Data Validation User Acceptance COA Mappings
Group GroupScorecard Scorecard

Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure
hyperionplanning.na.saralee.com
CITRIX NASLCICTX001
CITRIX NASLCICTX005
hyperionfinmgmt.na.saralee.com
Planning User
Reports User
HFM User
PeopleSoft HR Data Manual Inputs Topside Adjustments FI entries (those not automated) Allocation Entry HFM ver 9.3 Entity / Exhibit / HL Project Actual Current/2 Yrs Prior Forecast Current/Prior Plan - Current / Prior Local Currency & USD
?
Forecast Plan
Topside Adjustments Eliminations
Planning ver 4.2 Project/Dept/Prospects Actual Current/2 Yrs Prior Forecast Current/Prior Plan - Current / Prior Local Currency & USD
Technical Support
Son of OMS
Functional On-shore 2 Resources
Functional Off-shore 3 Resources
Other Finance Systems Support
F5
hyperionreports.na.saralee.com
Excel Sales Model
HFM Enhancements
Cash Flow Detail - Cash Flow Statement Dimension Project Level & Product Line Dimension Process Management Additional Intercompany Processing / Reporting Validation Balanced Report Drill Back to Raw File Report reconciliation Excel Backlog Model
Forecast Data
GPS
1 On-shore FTE 1 Off-shore FTE
NASLCIHFM005 HFM Web\App Consolidation Server Hyperion-Finmgmt.na.saralee.com Windows 2003 Server NASLCIPHFM001 HFM 3.5.1.2 - DE HFM Web server1 Windows 2003 Server NASLCIPHFM002 HFM 3.5.1.2 - DE HFM Web server2
FUTURE Logical Apps (1 FTE) Aceva (1 FTE)

Actual Entity Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates
FDM (Transparent Data Load)
Actual Department Project Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates
Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure
Operation/Division Operation/Division Scorecard Scorecard

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure
Operation/Division Operation/Division Scorecard Scorecard

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure
Actual Entity Department Project Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates
Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPLN001 WebSphere 5.0.1 Planning 3.3.2
Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPRPT001 WebSphere 5.0.1 Reports 7.0.0.1
Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPRPT002 WebSphere 5.0.1 Reports 7.0.0.1 Cluster HFMPRODWEB
NASLCIHFM006 HFM web\App Maintenance server
Note: Schedules I, J, L, T, & Z will be created manually Review Security Options
JDE FX Rates
Liaison with IS Application Chg Mgmt Performance Monitoring
Application (Rules, Metadata) Data Integration Reporting User Security Training Application Enhancement Support future Hyperion Applications
Application (Rules, Metadata) Data Integration Reporting User Security Help Desk Coordination
NASLCIPHFM003 HFM App server1
NASLCIPHFM004 HFM App server2
Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure
Plant PlantScorecard Scorecard

Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure Performa Performa nce nce Measure Measure



All Planning, Reports, and HFM servers connect to HYPERION-SQL for Repository and/or Metadata.
Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPOLP001 Essbase 6.5.4.2 - US Foods Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPOLP004 Essbase 6.5.4.2 - Bakery Windows 2003 Server NASLCIPOLP005 HTM
Hyperion-SQL Server cluster is up in Mason NASLCCISQL01 NASLCCISQL02
Process Flows
Support Model with clearly defined Roles & Responsibilities
Cascading Metrics with Common Definitions
Technical Architecture
A holistic view provides a vision that integrates process improvement opportunities, supporting organizational changes and standard data definitions in addition to recommendations and an implementation path for the enabling technologies.
13
Page 13
World Class - Integrated Close

World Class companies are distinguished with four characteristics that set them apart from their peers
Demand
1. Effective delivery model & business partnering 2. Fast integrated processes
World Class companies make better use of fewer, more highly skilled people by optimizing their service delivery model
Controllers are business partners with prior business experience, at least 2/3 of their time is spent on value adding activities (optimizes demand) EPM Process cost is lower by 32% 60% leverage Shared Services for report production
World Class companies close quickly and analyze more

5 days to close the books , 1 to 3 days to produce Statutory and Management reports Allocations are based on predefined estimates and / or budgets, then reconciled periodically Process levers are pulled materiality policy, soft close, recurring journals, reduced reviews Published Financial Statements is not a re-key process
Supply
World Class companies focus on the vital few, key issues

3. Single view of the truth 4. On-line integrated systems and reporting
95%+ use common data definitions 78% report from a single data repository 59% less reports are produced overall Comprehensive policies and procedures exist and are used (e.g., intercompany)
World Class companies rely on robust, integrated technologies

Users have access to near real-time information and transparency to source data 70%+ of organizations use on-line integrated systems to enable EPM processes 75% of organizations expect greater automation in EPM in the next 2 years
Source: Hackett, Book of numbers 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and performance studies 2008
Page 14
World Class - Fast Integrated Processes

World Class companies close 50% quicker with first quartile companies taking less than three days. They achieve this through process improvement techniques and improved use of technology; with continuous improvement and metrics integrated into the process
Manual JEs per FTE
2,187
Process discipline and policies

Published closing calendar with enforced cut-off dates for transaction processing Standardized (and enforced) materiality levels Shift activities off peak
1,172
Simplification and reduction of complexity

Use few accounts (half of peers) with Thin ledger
Peer Group World Class
Simplify legal structures

Eliminate or simplify cost allocation
Legal Entities per Billion of Revenue

13.9
Use of existing tools and technology

Automation of journal entries and allocations Automation of cost allocations, if they cant be eliminated
Peer Group
8.1
World Class
Source: 2010 Hackett Finance Benchmark
Page 15
World Class - Single View of Truth & Integrated Systems

An overwhelming percentage of world class companies (greater than 95%) have common data definitions and coding standards critical to a successful A2R process and downstream EPM processes
Common (or enterprise) standard COA reinforced with established governance of data and COA
Common general ledger on a single platform integrated with sub-systems and data warehouse Documented definitions, usages, hierarchies, and processes (where data captured) Established governance (committees, COEs) with clear authority and decision framework
% of Companies Operating with Data Definitions and Standards

96% 80% 120%
Peer group
World Class
Integrated and Streamlined Technology

Front-end controls are automatically integrated into the process to detect /correct errors at the source
Use of a consolidation system to support multiple views (e.g., XBRL tagging) and report across entities and BUs Robust workflow with process monitoring
% of Reports Generated From Central Repository

78%
54%
144%
Automated reports from central repository
Peer group
World Class
Source: 2010 Hackett Finance Benchmark
Page 16
Closing Thoughts
Leading organizations focus relentlessly on driving process simplification and standardization in the face of increasing business and regulatory complexity
Leading companies continue to invest in the Close, Consolidations and Financial Reporting process which is the backbone they leverage to set themselves apart from their peers relative to business performance reporting and financial reporting
The building blocks of an efficient and effective enterprise close and consolidation provide broader organizational value through more reliable information and more business directed focus A single version of the truth and integrated systems are critical to successful, and flexible processes ; the adoption of enterprise-wide data standards and associated governance are necessary foundations
Page 17
Contact Information
The Hackett Group
World Headquarters Suite N500 1117 Perimeter Center West Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: +1 770 225 3600 Martin House 5 Martin Lane London EC4R 0DP Phone: +44 207 398 9100 Torhaus Westhafen Speicherstrasse 59 60327 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Phone: +49 69 900217 0 8, rue de Port Mahon 75002 Paris, France Phone: +33 1 53 43 0400 Strawinskylaan 3051G, 1077 ZX Amsterdam, The Netherlands Phone: +31 20 301 2210
Page 18
Tom Willman
Global Practice Leader, Finance Advisory Phone: +1 770 225 7286 twillman@thehackettgroup.com
How to Improve Closing, Consolidating and Financial Reporting Processes
Business Analytics software

2010 IBM Corporation
Agenda
Insights into the Integrated Financial Close Management Process
IBM Cognos FSR An Integrated CCR Solution
Current Problems with CCR Activities

Lack of unified platform for managing the financial close management steps
Finance professionals to labour through hundreds of manual and administrative checks Update and checking hundreds of offline spreadsheets Little or no visibility into the status of steps in closing process Waste of time in performing redundant data checks
Excessive overtime or missed compliance deadlines Close activities prove to be extremely inefficient and costly Inconsistent data from various subsidiaries multiple GL, ERP, and disparate transactional systems
Integrating the CCR process

Why companies invest in integrated CCR solutions
To make efficient and effective business decisions Strengthen the companies ability to provide timely and accurate data for better business decisions Obtain financial information in a controlled, auditable process Ensure data integrity and transparency needed to comply with various regulatory requirements Evaluating and limiting the risks of errors Obtain a single platform in order to enhance and monitor internal controls Automate the production of consolidated financials and external compliance reports
Advances in Disclosure Management Solutions
Automating the creation of internal and external reports

Provides a unified financial governance platform Provides a single version of the truth
Integration to source data GLs, ERP, financial consolidation, OLAP, spreadsheets, etc
Integrated XBRL tagging capabilities tagging is embedded in within the external reporting process Workflow and task management dashboard Enhanced Security control access to sensitive data Report Consistency ensure same numbers across separate reports with same data points
Why the need for Integrated CCR Solution

New disclosure requirements make is imperative to streamline and automate manual tasks in the close, consolidate & report process Companies constantly looking at improving the timing and quality of information in reports Follow best practise to embed compliance and controls into each step of the financial close process The need to maintain data integrity in a secure environment Enhance decision making flipping back and forth between data sources is inefficient and ineffective
Insights into the Integrated Financial Close Management Process

Addressing the broader enterprise focused role of finance

A broader enterprise focused role requires core Finance efficiency be in place to reliably support business insight and decision making
Demands on Finance Help drive enterprise cost reduction Improve access to and reduce cost of capital Support risk management Provide performance insight and anticipate Partner in strategy and value creation Business Insight Finance Capabilities Needed
Finance Efficiency
Source: IBM Institute for Business Value, The Global CFO Study 2010
The Close, Consolidate, Report Process

CLOSE First Mile Closing Process (Consolidation System)
Data Input & Changes
Collect From Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATE Consolidation Consolidation (Consolidation System)

Create single currencies
Minority interest holdings Intercompany eliminations Group closing adj. Management adjustments Allocations Advanced formula calculations Internal controls & compliance testing
REPORT Last Mile Reporting (Consolidation System)

Internal Reporting
Financial reporting adjustments Cash flow & other preparation External Reporting Financial statement preparation Publish quarterly, annual reports
First Mile Data quality and control system for collection and reconciliation
Closing Process (Accounting Processes)

Close Sub Ledgers and Systems Account Reconciliation Intercompany transactions Prepare journal entries: accruals & adjustments
Consolidation Financial consolidation and systems for processing and preparation

Last Mile Leveraging financial data trapped in the close process for reporting Certifying and publishing external documents
Reporting (Reporting Systems)

Financial reporting BI reporting systems
Compliance & Control
Risks of Manual MS-Office Reporting

A closer look at the current reporting process...
Editing, updating, and review of reports done in multiple versions of offline Excel spreadsheets, Word docs and PowerPoint slides MS Office tools not integrated into processes which leads to little visibility or auditability of data within Version control is a nightmare Pieces of data and analysis need to be shared across multiple reports for different audiences
Reviewers
Contributors
Not everyone has access to same files High risk of errors
Report data not integrated with source data

Approvers
Requires multiple manual updates of financial or operational data in tables and narrative commentary
Document Managers
Requires time-consuming checks to ensure data in up-to-date and to ensure integrity of data throughout the report(s) And little security Primary collaboration tool is unsecured email No central, collaborative solution for preparing reports No controls, audit trail or security over using MS Office & email Confidential information can be easily leaked
Report Consumers
28
Financial Close Process has a High Degree of Risk

Performance Reporting and Scorecarding Business Drivers Close, Consolidate, and Report Analyze & Optimize Plan, Forecast, and Control
Risk of Errors
Feature Integration to source data Variables in text Validation Rules Benefit No re-keying of data Consistency across the report Numbers always tie-out
Risk of Late Filing

Feature
User prior report as a template for the next period Automatically load new data
Benefit
No need to re-apply formatting
No need to re-key data
One version of the truth

Feature Security to view or edit each object Workflow controls access throughout the process Benefit Users only see the data they are supposed to see Users only see data when they are allowed to see it Feature
Start reviewing the final report sooner

Benefit To ensure that the right steps are being followed
Compliance Checklists
Audit Trail
To track who did what, and when they did it
Access to information is controlled
Increased confidence in the final report
Risk of Insider Leaks
Risk of Non-Compliance
The Last Mile

The Last Mile
Planning Modeling
Budgeting Forecasting
Consolidation Reporting
Monthly Reports, Quarterly Reports, Annual Reports, Internal Reports, Flash Reports
Manual processes dominates The Last Mile Bottlenecks in document creation Collaboration is tedious Copy and paste exercises with Word, Excel and e-mails back and forth Non-existent or minimal internal controls No detailed audit trail of activities and user modifications Many opportunities for data accuracy issues Limited flexibility
Manual Processes Repeated Each Period

30
IBM Cognos FSR An Integrated CCR Solution
Pat Calitri, Solutions Engineers, IBM

IBM Cognos FSR What it is

Key features:
Leverage the formatting capabilities of MS-Word & Excel as well as the calculation features of MS-Excel Dynamically driven from a central database Controlled access with full audit trail Workflow for report reviews and approvals Integrated XBRL tagging is part of the process, not an after-thought Automated Roll-Forward of XBRL Tags for subsequent periods
32
True Integrated Financial Governance

SOURCE SYSTEMS
REAL TIME
Excel Reports
Output Requirements
REAL TIME TRICKLE

COGNOS
Close Reports
TM1 Explorer
Financial Reports
EDGARready
Go Office
DIRECT TO FSR
IBM Cognos Controller

Built-in Financial Intelligence Deep Consolidation Functions Multi Jurisdictional GAAP Reporting Familiar Web & Excel User Interface Consolidation Workflow
260+ Working Reports Out of the Box
IBM Cognos Controller

Extend with:
Application Configuration Approach Financed Owned Rapid Time to Value
IBM Cognos TM1 IBM Cognos BI Performance Blueprints
Cognos Controller
Finance Consolidation Intelligence
PURPOSE BUILT directly into the solution and user interface Allows organizations to leverage CONSOLIDATION BEST PRACTICES Secure auditable closing
Single Application Approach - Adaptability and Flexibility

RICH APPLICATION FUNCTIONALITY out of the box Multiple Roll Ups (hierarchies) Data from disparate sources ADAPTABLE to changing business conditions and external requirements OWNED BY FINANCE low dependence on external consultants or IT = low total cost of ownership
Reporting, analysis, budgeting and information delivery

ON DEMAND REPORTS for understanding and certifying company consolidations BUILT-IN, standard financial and management performance reporting LEVERAGE Cognos BI & Planning tools for analysis, budgeting and broader reporting
Low Implementation Risk

FINANCE DRIVEN solution for rapid implementation NO CODING system design = low risk approach to system success
Sharing Information Across the Organization

Performance Reporting and Scorecarding Business Drivers Close, Consolidate, and Report Analyze & Optimize Plan, Forecast, and Control
Press Releases Annual Report Prospectus News Wire Releases
Board Books Flash Reporting Investor Relations
Internal Reporting
Management Reporting
Notes & Exhibits to Statutory Filings Proxy Statements Legal Statutory Reporting SEC Filings (10K, 10Q, etc.) CSR Reports Regulatory Reporting
Reporting to Federal, State and local agencies
36 36
Integrated Financial Governance Solution
Extending the Value of FSR Beyond External Reporting

Internal Reporting, including: Flash Reports Board Books Budget Books Other Internal Reporting Packages CEO/CFO Certification Process GAAP to IFRS Conversion Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting Enterprise Risk Management Reconciliation Management
Automate Manual Internal Reporting with Cognos FSR

A unified governance platform for automating internal management reporting processes
Integrate with any data source to ensure a single source of the truth
Document Managers
Use web templates to automate data collection from anywhere in the world Variables in text provide real time data updates within reports
Reviewers
IBM Cognos FSR

Contributors
Enhance controls and security with audit trail reporting and embedded approval checklists Workflow and task management tools provide greater visibility into every step of the process Create/update content once and automatically update that content across multiple reports Multi-author environment allows for collaboration in creating content-rich reports
Report Consumers
Approvers
Consolidations ERP Excel OLAP Web
User friendly and familiar interface of MS Office Business rules and embedded validation greatly reduce risk of errors Generate reports in multiple formats including PDF & Powerpoint, MS Word and more
Data Warehouse
Q&A
Tom Willman
Global Practice Leader, Finance Advisory

The Hackett Group
Pat Calitri
Director, Financial Close Management, Presales IBM

Slide Deck Ibm Sponsored Webcast With Cfo Publishing 06-21-11

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Slide Deck Ibm Sponsored Webcast With Cfo Publishing 06-21-11

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to Improve Closing, Consolidating and Financial Reporting Processes

Global Practice Leader, Finance Advisory

The Journey to World-Class

Challenges and Leading Practices in Closing, Consolidations and Reporting

Hackett Value Grid

Hackett defines and enables sustainable world-class performance

The Hackett Group What do we do?

Hackett Value Grid

Strategic Business Enablement Effectiveness

Challenges and Leading Practices in Closing, Consolidations and Reporting

1.26% 1.22% 1.24% 1.17% 1.13% 1.16% 1.22% 1.10% 1.08%

0.72% 0.74% 0.73% 0.67% 0.61% 0.59% 0.60% 0.61% 0.63%

Response to Sarbanes-Oxley act

Financial crisis & recession

Source: Hackett Finance Function Benchmark, 2011

Source: Hackett Finance Benchmark

Source: Hackett Finance Benchmark

Challenges and Leading Practices in Closing, Consolidations and Reporting

People & Governance

Efficiency & Effectiveness

Hackett Perspective Leading Practices

Login via workspace

Users Corporate Consolidations Area Accounting Company Accounting External Reporting

CIO and Vice President

SVP and Corporate Controller

Login via Excel on Share

Login via Web Reports

Login via Web Analyzer

External Reporting Area Financials Company Financials

Ad Hoc Analysis Cash Flow Report Schedules (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, M, & ENR)

MD&A Schedules M & S Ad Hoc Analysis

Mgmt Report Exhibits Other Internal Reports

Ad Hoc Analysis Dashboards

Group GroupScorecard Scorecard

Topside Adjustments Eliminations

Functional On-shore 2 Resources

Functional Off-shore 3 Resources

Other Finance Systems Support

Excel Sales Model

1 On-shore FTE 1 Off-shore FTE

FUTURE Logical Apps (1 FTE) Aceva (1 FTE)

Actual Entity Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates

FDM (Transparent Data Load)

Actual Department Project Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Operation/Division Operation/Division Scorecard Scorecard

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Operation/Division Operation/Division Scorecard Scorecard

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Actual Entity Department Project Trial Balance Local Currency FX Rates

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Performan Performan ce ce Measure Measure

Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPLN001 WebSphere 5.0.1 Planning 3.3.2

Windows 2000 Server NASLCIPRPT001 WebSphere 5.0.1 Reports 7.0.0.1

NASLCIHFM006 HFM web\App Maintenance server

Note: Schedules I, J, L, T, & Z will be created manually Review Security Options

Liaison with IS Application Chg Mgmt Performance Monitoring

NASLCIPHFM003 HFM App server1

NASLCIPHFM004 HFM App server2

Plant PlantScorecard Scorecard