PIKs Bad 2AC

ADVOCATING OUR PLAN IS A VOTING ISSUE A. This is the worst possible negative argument if they can incorporate our plan into their advocacy then it ERASES the 1AC from the debate and fundamentally shreds our ground since every argument we have is dependent on our advocacy of the plan. B. Disproves the kritik if you can combine our plan and their alternative their link must be false our philosophical assumptions led us to conclude that our plan was a good idea since our plans not incompatible with their K the rest of their args are logically false. C. Impossible our 1AC articulates a point of how lifting the embargo , but their critique is of how nationalist assumptions of the plan so then either that kills any link ,or then kills any solvency D.This kills all affirmative offense because of how then all the Neg needs to do is read a PIK and they win the ballot of that basis \ E.PIK literally steal the 1AC and just add some philosophical prerequisite

Severance Perms Good

Reciprocal the neg gets to kick args that arent straight turned and in a world of conditionality, can kick everything, we should get to kick part of the aff as long as we prove they havent straight turned it. Its what you do, not what you justify all their reasons why severance is bad assume extreme examples, out example is reasonable though Neg flex neg needs to be able to change positions and rethink their strategies throughout the debate, we force that which leads to better debates

Reject the Arg not the team

k
First are Huddleston08 card acts as a we meet argument ,because of how its saying we were uniting the world so then the mindset they are critiquing I put the card up just in case I didnt extend this in the 2AC

Removing Sanctions now allows free flow of information which will create change for the better in Cuba. Huddleston, 08. former co-director of the Brookings Project on U.S. Policy Toward a Cuba in Transition, (Vicki, 3-10-08, Brookings, Cuba Embargos Usefulness has Run its Course, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2008/03/10-cuba-huddleston, 6/23/13, ND)
There can no longer be any doubt that our isolation of Cuba did not and cannot bring about the end of the revolution. What will bring about the revolution's demise are old age, illness and death. More important, the revolution will evolve as it loses its founding fathers and becomes increasingly less isolated from its neighbors though the Internet, television, travelers and the flow of information. But how fast and how far the revolution evolves depends upon U.S. policy. If we remove the barriers to communication, we will speed the forces of change. Just as was the case in Eastern Europe as a result of the Helsinki agreements, the Cuban people will be empowered by human contact, the free flow of information, and the support and encouragement of Americans and Cuban Americans from Florida to California. If U.S. policy can deal with Cuba -- not as a domestic political issue -- but as one sovereign state to another, then we will resume official diplomatic relations with the exchange of ambassadors and begin -- once again -- to talk about matters that affect the well being and security of both our countries, namely migration, anti-narcotics, health and the environment. Starting a dialogue will allow us to press Cuba's leaders to respect the principles that we and the region hold dear: human rights, rule of law and freedom. Removing the barriers to communications and to normal diplomatic relations are not concessions as some would claim. Rather, they are practical initiatives that will reduce the dependence of the Cuban people on the Cuban state by providing them with alternative sources of information and resources to improve their daily lives. More critically, a policy based on helping the Cuban people succeed would enable them to build civil society and begin a process of growing democracy from the bottom up. But the Bush administration is standing by its policy that Cuba must change first, tying any modification in our unilateral embargo to the end of the Castro regime. This does us and the Cuban people a disservice because it ties our policy to that of Ral Castro's. By waiting for the Cuban regime to act, we make policy initiatives that would bring about change, dependent on the actions of the Cuban government. The longer we wait the more likely that Cuba's new leaders will manage without us. In three to five years, Cuba, with help from foreign investors, will have exploited deep-sea oil and its sugar cane ethanol, adding billions to its annual revenues and making the island a net exporter of energy. Worse, the longer we wait, the slower the process of change. If we want to play a role in Cuba's future, we must act now to encourage change in Cuba, by the Cuban people.

This card is explaining how when we lift the embargo we are only meeting the neg FW/K so then if we win then PIKS being bad , then Nextly onto the PERM on the Matrydism Perm : Its the best form of solvency , oops on are fault for cross-x I misunderstood the question of Perm solvency Now lets get that cleared up Firstly are Wedgewood evidence is stating of how The Robbins Affair and how he was leading a rebellion , but he hung himself in order for his rebellion to gain full steam , and of how to gain full steam a Maytr was need. This is showing how the Perm solves , and once the Perm solves they lose all acess the Alt , which then kills all the Turns on the PIK because of how abusisve the PIK was and how then the ALT the one link they all have the goes away. The chance to be elevated to martyred status is immensely motivating, and creates unparalleled impetus to societal activism. It solves for any issue! Odon, Christina. "The Power of Martyrdom." New Statesman. N.p., 29 Mar. 2004. Web. 28 Mar. 2013.
Ziauddin Sardar, author of several studies of Islam, agrees: "The religious notion

of martyrdom is connected to the jihad, or struggle against oppression. Nowadays, when the jihad is the name given to the political struggle of the Palestinians, martyrdom is no longer only a religious concept but a political one as well ." Thus the martyrs of the jihad, ever since the first suicide bombers attacked the US base in Lebanon in 1983, straddle the worlds of Allah and Arafat. "They accuse us of being terrorists," said Sheikh Ibrahim Mudeiris in his Friday sermon at the Sheikh 'Ijlin Mosque in Gaza, broadcast by Palestinian Authority Television. "Terrorists, because when the Palestinian mother welcomes her martyred son, she wishes to receive him as a corpse. She does not want him to be alive." Within hours of the assassination of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Yasser Arafat hailed the killing as " a unifying death ". He was echoing the Christian tradition of canonisation - elevating ordinary humans to the status of saint or martyr - which has gained new impetus under Pope John Paul II, who has canonised more saints during his reign than all the previous popes together. What the leaders of the Catholic Church and the PLO are determined to tap into is the emotional energy that drives the ordinary to become extraordinary. Show a people that any one among them may be selected for a special challenge, and awarded a special status, and they will be galvanised into heroism . And united in the recognition that their collective has glorious potential.

Effective Martyrdom is five things: 1. Being the right person for the job my opponent is, hes voiced these complaints and is actively affected by the subject at hand 2. The audience must have a significant link to the subject the audience for this martyrdom is the debate community, they are by necessity linked to the subject at hand 3. It must be a last resort this debate has been happening for years with no forward momentum also refer back to the double bind set up in the first speech

4. The demands must be doable the theory objections made by my opponent arent totally unreasonable and no one ever said they were 5. It must be consistent with the rest of the campaign this is necessarily true because were martyring my opponent for his whole campaign were hoping to actually incite all of the theoretical changes he proposes.

CASE
Firstly extending the scenarios : Are first scenario of Diseases :The global pandemic that will occur because of how firstly are scenario outlined by are Falco13 where the SQ is not enough and are Quammen evidence is about this pandemic severity and how basis of the severity outweighs magnitude because of how then how can that be comparative than the impacts of the K We access are Diease impact because of how we first do not link towards their Lindsay evidence we are not trying to increase international trade , their evidence is much on the large scale we are only trying to gain access to the Cuban biotech , which the rest of the World has access to , which then shows how we do link towards their first turn Now secondly , they link towards are Zulakia Kritiking their discourse on the turn because of how then their view of Terror only makes wars goes towards the infinite cycle of then creating endless state of war and then that o/w all the impacts of the K because of how then any action not voting aff of the turn the creates and allow the endless state of war , which then o/w the impacts on probability and severity , on the basis of how probability 9/11 proves of how then We go towards war , when then it acts as an external offense for the AFF . The econ collaspse turn , we shall drop this , but going onto answering the Hegmony turn , we firstly attack the discourse of their Hegemony turn , that links into are Zulakia Kritik , because of how then the Beck06 because of how then the language and their view of terrorist makes war more and more inevitable