1. Relate what was discussed in class or the text to the screening.

The Godfather definitely started a sympathetic analysis of the mafia family. Not only did it revive
the genre, but it a view from the inside. We saw these people almost as everyday human beings going
there lives as influential and powerful people. Michael Corleone used that angle when describing to Kay
that his father was just like any other powerful man.
However, we also saw how a hero, a college boy bound for better horizons becomes as corrupt
as the family business. We have sympathy and contempt for the characters as in depending of the scene
they are both hero and villain.

2. Find a related article and summarize the content.
The article The Godfather, I and II: Patterns of Corruption by Anthony Ambrogio describes and
compare the Michaels journey into a life of organized crime in both films. Although, the articles main
argument is the comparison of Michaels corruption in films and how they actually parallel, its still a
great explanation of the same.
Michael begins to address the organization as a business, much like his father. Its contrasted in
Sonnys reactions as they are more emotional and get carried away. However, little by little, even
though the murders are necessary we a denigration in Michael as he slowly becomes emotional yet
calculative.
http://library.kean.edu:2048/login?url=http://library.kean.edu:2054/login.aspx?direct=true&Au
thType=cookie,ip,url,cpid&custid=keaninf&db=aph&AN=31286101&site=ehost-live&scope=site


3. Apply the article to the film screened in class.
Having seen all three Godfather films the article did point out the similarities in the story
between the first two films. However, for the sake of the exercise Ill concentrate only on the first film.
The article didnt really change my values, perception, or emotion about the film.
Ive always valued how the film describes step by step process Michael Corleone goes through
from Ivy League college wanting nothing to do with the family business to the Godfather.

4. Write a critical analysis of the film
The film is an elegant piece of film history. Michaels corruption is carefully written and played
out to the point where one could say, This could happen to me
Its clear that the film was product of a formally trained producer-director. The shots are
carefully planned and edited together. The story is rich and detailed, yet quick and exciting. Additionally,
its still refreshing to see the mafia family from the inside. Although we still have that today, like the
Sopranos, this film really set the tone for it.

CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM

1) (x) I have not handed in this assignment for any other class.

2) (x) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly
explain that in the paper.

3) (x) If I used any passages word for word, I put quotations around those words, or used
indentation and citation within the text.

4) (x) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in the
text of the paper.

5) (x) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally read.

6) (x) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in another way. I
cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography.

7) (x) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality.

8) (x) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research
and ideas used in my paper.

Name: ___Dennis Rojas____________________ Date: ____________________________