Identified Population and Rationale - According to enrollment data listed in PowerSchool, Glenbrook North High School offers 16 sections of Guided Studies class for first semester in which 79 students are enrolled. Guided Studies is a class during the day where students can get homework done, see teachers, study, etc. There is a teacher in the classroom that can help them with their classwork, study skills, note taking, homework completion, etc. Usually the students enrolled in this class have a hard time getting their homework done after school, so it serves as a place during the day where they are monitored. These students also are ones who have lower GPAs than others in the school. After first semester was over, 23% of the students enrolled in Guided Studies were still getting two or more Ds or Fs on their report card as documented in PowerSchool. The data found in PowerSchool makes this a critical population to address. Extra intervention for these students is needed in order to help them increase these grades. The target population is those students who received two or more Ds or Fs on their first semester report card. These students are all involved a guided studies class for credit (.25) or no credit (guided studies can only be taken up to 3 times for credit) as written in the school profile. Eighteen students are included in the group that makes up the 23% that are getting two or more Ds or Fs. In order to run this program effectively, a sample size of ten students was identified based on their class schedule. Nine of these ten students agreed to participate, 7 males (one with an IEP) and 2 females, and ended up completing the intervention program.
Intervention This intervention consisted of a 6-week program given in four guided studies classes. The students involved were pulled from Guided Studies class for about 30-45 min once a week for the lesson. During the lessons, important aspects of executive functioning were discussed. Lessons will be edited from the Executive Functioning Curriculum from Rush Neurobehavioral Center (2010). The topics were based on the students answers to the pre-test, as to how knowledgeable they were on, and often they used different executive functioning skills related to their schoolwork. Topics included: materials management and setting up a student system, setting SMART goals, prioritization, breaking down long term projects, making a study plan, and decision making. Based on the pre-test I found that the students didnt have the skills necessary to even begin using executive functioning methods. They simply needed lessons on ways to organize, prioritize, and study, etc. because they essentially had nothing in their basket to pull from.
Results - To begin, a comparison was made between the students Semester 1 grades and 3 rd quarter grades, to determine of the students grades had improved based on the intervention. The graphs are below. Two students were able to move from Ds and Fs to no Ds or Fs at all, a decrease of 23%. One student was able to bring her 3 Ds to only one F, and continued getting help solely for that class she received an F in. The total amount of Ds for third quarter decreased by 5, however the total amount of Fs for third quarter increased by 2.
0 2 4 6 A C E G I First Semester Grades D's F's 0 1 2 3 4 5 A C E G I Third Quarter Grades D's F's Grades were not the only variable measured during the post-test. I also measured the students knowledge on, and how often they were using, the executive functioning skills discussed in the intervention. For example, one of the questions asked during the pre-test was how often they use different methods of studying for exams. Students were also asked if they were able to identify different methods of studying for exams. While 100% of students on the post-test indicated they could identify these methods, only 22% are using them all the time. For all of the six areas tested, students indicated that they improved on using the skills more often, some all the time, rather than not at all.
Recommendations In the future, I would recommend this curriculum to be integrated into the freshman guided studies classes. My idea would be to have the sections of guided studies broken up by grade level, and these lessons given to the freshmen. Four out of the nine students that participated were sophomores and above, and they never learned these different skills and methods to succeed at school. Giving the freshman these lessons right away can help them to build their toolbox at the beginning of their high school career. My second recommendation would be to hold students accountable and checking to see if they tried the skills learned each week. I didnt use a method to ensure skill implementation in their academics, and I believe this proved to be a little detrimental. Even though I gave the students different skills and methods to use, they were not held accountable to whether or not they actually used them each week. In the check in, I would want to find out if they were not using the skills, for whatever reason. If they were not using the skills taught, I would want to find something else that works for that student. References Endedijk, H., Denessen, E., & Hendriks, A. W. (2011). Relationships between executive functioning and homework difficulties in students with and without autism spectrum disorder: An analysis of student- and parent-reports. Learning & Individual Differences, 21(6), 765-770. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.016. Glenbrook North High School PowerSchool. (2014). Guided Studies (Data file). Retrieved from https://glenbrook225.powerschool.com/admin/sections/home.html. Langberg, J., Dvorsky, M., & Evans, S. (2013). What Specific Facets of Executive Function are Associated with Academic Functioning in Youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder?. Journal Of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(7), 1145-1159. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9750-z McGencey, S. (2011). The time is now: Creating opportunities for young children to succeed. National Civic Review, 100(4), 56-58. doi:10.1002/ncr.20088 Rabi, R., & Minda, J. (2014). Rule-Based Category Learning in Children: The Role of Age and Executive Functioning. Plos ONE, 9(1), 1-10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085316. Rush NeuroBehavioral Center. (2010). Executive Functioning Curriculum. Skokie, IL.
Non e of the time 11% Some of the time 22% Most of the time 45% All of the time 22% Post- I have used different methods to study for quizzes/tests based on the test. None of the time 45% Some of the time 44% Most of the time 11% Pre- I have used different methods to study for quizzes/tests based on the test.