You are on page 1of 4

Caste in Modern India

Girls in a village
Role of colonialism in India’s caste system
British rule in many ways sharpened and expanded the norms and conventions. In
many ways the colonists saw the system as a hierarchical and inflexible means of
perpetuating a Brahmin centered value system. This insistence played a big role in
making the country more caste-conscious. It can be argued that the initiative in this
was as much Indian as it was British. It is important, therefore, to understand India’s
recent international situation. It was then, and continues to be today, in the process of
adapting itself to a world that functions very differently from it’s own infrastructure,
namely a Western-dominated global market economy. It is expected that during a
period of such profound transition, a nation will do its best to assimilate to the norms
set by the world powers of that time. The world power was England and its norms
were founded on Western ideals.
In many ways representative government, more so in India that in any other part of
England’s non-white colonial rule, furthered the development of caste affinities in the
political arena. Nevertheless, for both the British and those in India, caste was used as
means to not only bridge many boundaries such as faith, region and economic status
but it was also used as a tool to exclude, subjugate and disempower others. This was
done in order for certain groups to gain advantage over others using the “divide and
conquer” approach. India is a country in which there are hundreds of different
cultures and languages: although this characteristic can be used to bring the nation
together in pride, it can also be used to gain political and economic advantages. In the
colonial quest for monetary exploitation, caste was used to create political allegiances
and create obstacles in the path of unity.
Caste in Modern India
1 of 4 5/13/2014 10:25 PM
Field Workers
Social Implications of the Caste System in Modern India: How
Perceptions have Changed
What does it mean in India today for a person to be a part of a caste or subcaste?
This question is very difficult to answer, as it is hard to come up with a single formula
to apply to all of the diverse Indian society.
In order to get a good idea of the changes in the perceptions about caste, we have to go
back to the period right before independence. Immediately preceding independence
caste became a subject of debate and more than one view emerged about its
importance in society. There were many, however here I will discuss the main two. The
first was the view of the colonial administrator that stated that caste was thriving
institution in India and it permeated almost every part of Indian life: thus making it
indispensable. The opposing view, held by many Indian intellectuals, was that that
caste was largely exaggerated by the colonial administration and that it was most
certainly on its way out of the system. They argued that the decline would be greatly
expedited by India’s independence. These arguments were greatly influenced by the
nationalist and colonialist attitudes that were prevalent at this stage in Indian history.
For the Indian intellectual it had become a matter of pride to dispute the colonial view
that caste was a distinct downfall of Indian culture. Thus began the "modern era."
Today if you asked a person who lives in the city what caste means to them, you would
get a very different response than that of a person who lives in a village. It can be
argued that in India’s emerging middle class, consisting of about 50-75 million people,
many would say that there is no longer such a thing as caste. However, it soon
becomes evident that though in many respects caste is diminishing, in many others it
is still an important part of Indian society. In the villages especially, caste dictates
marriage, rituals concerning birth and death as well as occupation which all in turn
have a large role in economic status. In this way the impact is tremendous although
subtle and varied.
Caste in Modern India
2 of 4 5/13/2014 10:25 PM
A village girl with her brother.
Role of Caste in Marriage
In 1963 C.T Kannan did a full length study on intercaste marriage. He states:
"Just 25 years ago the instances of intercaste marriage were very few; and those
individuals who dared to marry outside the caste had to undergo truly great
hardships. Today the situation is altogether different. Not only has the prevalence of
intercaste marriage become considerable, but even the difficulties the intercaste
couples have to face have become comparatively quite mild" (Kannan, 1963).

Kannan did a study of 200 intercaste marriages (and 50 inter-community marriages),
therefore, his study cannot provide us with any real statistical data. There are also
other drawbacks to his examination. He does not necessarily examine the tremendous
amount of variation that can make one intercaste marriage very different from
another. For example a marriage between two different Brahman subcastes is very
different than one between someone from a Brahman background and someone who
has a Shudra background.
Nevertheless, Kannan’s overall assessment does in many respects capture the trend in
India to remove the once extraordinarily stringent rules of marriage. Though by no
means has the concept of caste marriage been eradicated, its force is often times much
less prevalent than it once was.
Caste in Modern India
3 of 4 5/13/2014 10:25 PM
High caste Hindu wedding

History of the Caste System
Theories and Future Implications
Caste in Modern India
4 of 4 5/13/2014 10:25 PM