1995SCMR762

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Abdu !adeer C"aud"r# and Saeem Ak"tar$ %%
M&'AMMA( )*+AS MA*),---Petitioner
.ersus
M)/)S0R+ 12 )/03R)1R$ 4153R/M3/0 12 PA,)S0A/ t"rou6" Se7retar#$
)samabad and anot"er---Respondents
Civil Petition No. 768-L of 1993, decided on 11th May, 1994.
( On aeal f!o" the #$d%"ent of the &ede!al 'e!vice (!i)$nal, *+la"a)ad a++ed in ,eal No.
6(L- of 1984-.
Constitution of Pakistan 81979:---
----,!t. .1.(3----Civil +e!vant ---/%!adation and fi0ation of +enio!ity---Civil +e!vant 1a+
initially !e"oved f!o" +e!vice )$t 1a+ !ein+tated )y 'e!vice (!i)$nal---*nte!venin% e!iod
)et1een !e"oval and !e-in+tate"ent 1a+ t!eated a+ leave of the 2ind d$e to civil +e!vant---Civil
+e!vant 1a+ Ot con+ide!ed fo! $%!adation, a+ he 1a+ at that ti"e o$t of +e!vice 1hile official+
of hi+ dea!t"ent 1e!e allo1ed )enefit of $%!adation f!o" +ecified date---Civil +e!vant3+
!e!e+entation 1a+ not acceted and hi+ aeal )efo!e 'e!vice (!i)$nal did not )ea! f!$it---Leave
to aeal 1a+ %!anted to con+ide! the contention that o!de! of !e"oval f!o" +e!vice havin% )een
+et a+ide, civil +e!vant 1a+ dee"ed to )e in +e!vice and a+ +$ch he 1a+ entitled to )enefit of
$%!adation of o+t f!o" +ecified date.
Ch. M$+hta4 Ma+ood, ,dvocate '$!e"e Co$!t and 'h. Ma+ood ,2hta!, ,dvocate-on-5eco!d
fo! Petitione!.
Ne"o fo! 5e+ondent+.
6ate of hea!in%7 11th May, 1994.
1R(3R
SA*33M A,'0AR$ %;---(he etitione! +ee2+ leave to aeal a%ain+t the #$d%"ent of the
&ede!al 'e!vice (!i)$nal 1he!e)y hi+ aeal 1a+ di+"i++ed.
.. (he etitione! 1hile 1o!2in% a+ a 5e%i+t!ation *n+ecto!85e%i+t!a!, *nd$+t!ial 5e%i+t!ation
Office, 9eha!i, 1a+ !e"oved f!o" +e!vice )y o!de! dated 16-.-198.. (hi+ o!de! 1a+ +et a+ide )y
the (!i)$nal and the etitione! 1a+ !ein+tated )y o!de! dated 3-4-1989, )$t it 1a+ left oen to the
!e+ondent+ to initiate f!e+h di+cilina!y !oceedin%+ and to dete!"ine a+ to ho1 the inte!venin%
e!iod co$ld )e t!eated. &!e+h !oceedin%+ 1e!e acco!din%ly ta2en and the etitione! 1a+ fo$nd
%$ilty of inefficiency. :e 1a+ cen+$!ed )y o!de! dated 17-9-1789 and the inte!venin% e!iod
f!o" 16-.-198. to 17-4-1989 1a+ t!eated a+ leave of the 2ind d$e to hi".
3. ;y Notification dated ..-<-1986 i++$ed )y the =+ta)li+h"ent 6ivi+ion, 5e%i+t!ation
*n+ecto!+85e%i+t!a!+ and 'tati+tical *nve+ti%ato!+ (;P'-16- 1e!e $%!aded to ;P'-17 and 13.
official+ 1e!e allo1ed )enefit of $%!adation to ;P'-17 )y notification dated .9-<-1986. (he
etitione! 1a+ not con+ide!ed fo! $%!adation a+ he 1a+ at that ti"e o$t of +e!vice. ,fte! hi+
!ein+tate"ent the etitione! "ade !e!e+entation )efo!e the 6i!ecto!->ene!al, 5e%i+t!ation, on
.6-9-1989 fo! hi+ $%!adation to ;P'-17. ;y notification dated 13-1-1991 the etitione! 1a+
$%!aded to ;P'-17 1.e.f. ..-11-199?. On 1?-.-1991 the etitione! !e!e+ented )efo!e
!e+ondent No.. fo! hi+ $%!adation f!o" the d$e date. (he!eafte!, !e!e+entation 1a+ "ade to
the 'ec!eta!y, =+ta)li+h"ent 6ivi+ion on 1?-8-1991 th!o$%h !oe! channel fo! hi+ $%!adation
and fi0ation of +enio!ity acco!din%ly. (he etitione!3+ !e!e+entation 1a+ not acceted, 1hich
1a+ conveyed )y lette! dated 1?-11-1991. (he etitione! then filed aeal )efo!e the (!i)$nal,
1hich 1a+ di+"i++ed )y the i"$%ned #$d%"ent.
4. (he lea!ned co$n+el fo! the etitione! contended that a+ the o!de! of !e"oval f!o" +e!vice had
)een +et a+ide and the etitione! !e"ained in +e!vice, he 1a+ entitled to )enefit of $%!adation of
o+t 1.e.f .9-<-1986. (he 4$e+tion !e4$i!e+ con+ide!ation. Leave i+ %!anted.
,,.8M-.1.78' Leave %!anted.