Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13
2. Fundamental assumptions
In the theoretical treatment it is formally assumed that the
filaments in the yarn are close-packed in the sense of occupy- For a cylindrical filament of initial radius bo subjected to
ing the whole volume of space within the yarn boundary, combined axial extension in the ratio A and torsion T (in
and that the density of material at all points is equal to the radians per unit stretched length), the axial tension f (in the
3 14
R U B B E R MODELS OF Y A R K S A i i D C O R D S : C O N T I N U U M THEORY
absence of lateral pressure) and couple m are given by (Rivlin of the filament axis, at any given radial position r. To obtain
and Saunders 1951) the total axial force and couple about the yarn axis it is
necessary to refer the local stresses to a fixed set of axes,
which may conveniently be a cylindrical system (r, 8, z ) ,
where the z axis corresponds to the direction of the yarn
axis (figure 1). For a simple tensile stress t , inclined at an
3. Model 1. Lateral pressure neglected Introducing the value of t,, from (8), and converting to the
variable ol by means of (6), we obtain
3.1. Geonietuicalparaiiieievs
Zm
The model will be considered to be in the form of a cylinder
of radius ro in the unstrained stare. This is subjected to an
Fl = J tl cosz x 27i
--
$2
sin
cos3 x
ct
dol =
27i
-
+2Jo
tl tan olda (10)
axial extension in the ratio A, and to a torsion about the
axis of amount $, measured in radians per unit stretched where the upper limit of integration is the filament angle E,,,
length. From the condition for constancy of volume the at the yarn surface. On substituting the value of tl from (4)
yarn radius r,,, in the stretched state is given by and utilizing ( 7 ) this becomes
The constant is determined from the boundary condition variable LY through (6), and subsequently eliminate $ from
that t2 = 0 at the yarn surface, i.e. when a = an,. Integration the final expression by means of (14). The result of these
subject to this condition yields operations is
4
= cl(: (sec2 + 1) -
A,
cot2 a:,(sec a, - 1)
2 2 7
- ( C ' ( A ~ sec2 n,, i-- cos n,) - A, sec2 nIn- - cos a,,, r
A, hc2 i
F2 = ~0r~12nid~. (30)
Introducing the value of ti - f 2 from (21) into (29): and where h, is the extension ratio in the direction of the filament
making use of (7), we thus obtain axis. This is identical with the corresponding expression for
fg, for model 1, obtained from equations (4) and (8). Since
the state of strain at each value of r is the same for both
models it follows that the stress components fez are identical,
at all values of Y. The total couple in the case of model 2
is therefore the same as for model 1, and is represented by
equation (19).
Comparison of (31) a i t h the corresponding expression (11) 5. Energy method
for model 1 shous the former to direr only by the additional
5.1. Introdiiction
term t2. The integral (31) may therefore be expressed as the
sum of t\so parts, namely The two preceding treatments were both dependent on a
direct analysis of the state of stress within the yam. In this
F2 = F, + Fp (32) section an alternative and simpler method of approach, based
where Fl is seen to be identical with the quantity which has on energy considerations, is given. This involves the cal-
already been evaluated in the case of model 1, and is culation of the total energy of the system, for a specified
represented by equation (16), and Fp is an additional term state of strain, and the derivation of the axial force and
representing the effect of the lateral pressure. This term is couple by differentiation of the energy with respecr to the
given by length and angular variables.
riii
To avoid excessive mathematical detail, only the principal
Fp= 2 7 [
-0
r2rdr. (33)
steps in the argument will be presented.
;
diminishes.
parameter a,, is
F 5 1.41
- 3hc secZa, I- A, cot2 a,(sec4 aln - 1)
2 ,,
1
a, - h,-
3
cot' a, log sec' a,,,
16
- 6 sec a, T - cot' a,(sec3 K, - 1)). (42)
3 J
The result is
M
--
w03 -
1i
C1 2h,'12 cot a, sec' am--X,*/7C O ~ ~ X , ( S-~ IC) ~ ~ ,
4 8
L .-
, cot a, cos a, - ?p cot: a,(sec a,, - 1))
A,
i C2
ih7'"
c2
cot a, cos2 E,, - X 2C ~ cot3
/~ E, log sec7 a, Tan K~
- - >. .
--.
-0,4/ -..
I
30 02 -0.4 0.6 0.8 13
tan ffim 1
Figure 3. Dependence of axial tension on torsion, for various -2
values of yarn axial extension. C1 = 1 '0,C2 = 0. 1, model 1 00 0.2 0.4 0.6 08 IO
(equation (15)); 2, model 2 (equation (321, with (15) and (35)); Radial oosition rlrm
3. solid rod (equation (2)).
Figure 4. Variation of component of tensiie stress normal to
yarn axis with radial position, for two valnes of axial extension.
curves for the solid rod of equal radius, derived from CI = 1 .O, C2 = 0,CL, = 45". 1, model 1. (from equations (4)
equation (2). At small values of axial extension the difference and (8)); 2, model 2 (from equations (29) with (21) and (7) for
between model 1 and model 2 is slight, but with higher axial tl - i? and (28) for t z ) ; 3, solid rod (equation (45)).
extensions the difference increases, and the behaviour of
model 2 appioximates to that for a solid rod. This change- 7 . Discussion
over is particularly apparent because for model 1 the tension,
at constant axial length, increases with increase of torsion, 7.1. Comparison of models 1 and 2
whereas in a solid rod it decreases. Although the equations for model 2 are considerably more
complex than those for model 1, the difference between these
two models can be understood in physical terms rather
6.3. Disrribiiiion of novmal stress simply. Since the state of strain is the same in both, the
The distribution of the tensile stress across the end surface condition for volume incompressibility requires that the
of the cylindrical assembly, for a particular value of the respective stresses at any point shall differ only by the
torsion, is shokvn in figure 4. Comparison of the curves for equivalent of a superimposed hydrostatic pressure. The
the two models shows the effect of the lateral pressure term stress system in model 2 is thus equivalent t o that in model 1,
in reducing the tensile stress-an effect which is zero at the together with a hydrostatic pressure whose value is a function
surface of the yarn and builds up to a maximum at the of radial position. This additional pressure produces an
centre. The difference between the two sets of curves gives extra term in the stress, which has the effect of reducing the
the value of the lateral stress t2. In the case of model 1 the total axial tension. Since a hydrostatic pressure has no
resultant stress is positive (i.e. tensile) over the whole section, component of shearing stress, the coupie about the axis,
for all values of A,. This is a direct consequence of the which is derived from the tangential stress component tg:, is
neglect of all stress components except the tensile stress unaffected; this couple is therefore the same for both models.
along the filament axes. For model 2, on the other hand, It has been shown in S 5 that the energy method is fully
The stress becomes negative in the central region, for suf- consistent with model 2, but not with model 1. The reason
ficiently small values of the axial extension. for this difference is that, while both the energy method and
Figure 4 gives also the radial stress distribution for a solid model 2 are logically self-consistent, this is not true of
rod in torsion. The relevant formula, expressed in terms of model 1. While it may be convenient in certain cases to
strained. instead of initial radial position, is (Rivlin 1949) ignore the lateral pressure between filaments, this is not
logically permissible, since a filament under axial tension
cannot be maintained in a curved (e.g. helical) form without
the presence of a lateral pressure. In terms of stress com-
ponents, it is seen from equation (24) that a finite value of
319
RUBBER MODELS OF YARNS AND C O R D S : COiVTlhUUM THEORY
the circumferential stress component teg necessarily implies with the value of F , previously calculated (equation (15) with
a finite value of the radial stress component t r y . However, C2 0). Thus
if we put t2 = t3 = 0 in equations (23) we find that t g g
remains finite while t r y vanishes. F"
-- - - bo'
I - A& - cos3 a,)
6 YO' A, (2iA:) cot2 iy,(l - COS (51)
Fl - U,,)'
7.2. Relevance to textile yarn theories The factor bo2/ro2is of the order of the reciprocal of the
Despite its defects, model 1 is not without interest, because number of filaments, hence it tends to zero as this number
it corresponds with a type of theory frequently applied to is increased indefinitely. The remaining expression continues
textile yarns. A more rigorous type of theory, comparable to be finite. Its behaviour at small twists can be examined
with model 2, has indeed been worked out by Hearle (195X), by expanding the trigonometrical functions in terms of
but this treatment is limited t o small strains. tan r,. Writing tan a, = f we obtain
The consideration of the energy method, and the demon-
stration by an example that this method is equivalent to the
inclusion of lateral pressure, is also significant in relation to
textile yarn theories, for it offers the possibility of treating For variations of A3 (in the range h, > 1) the effect is greatest
problems whose solution by the stress-analysis method might when h, = I,for which (5Ia) becomes
be impractical, on account of the mathematical difficulties.
The method has in fact been applied recently to the develop-
ment of a large-strain theory of the properties of textile
yarns (Treloar and Riding, to be published).
Couple about axis
Appendix The couple about the axis is affected by (i) the reduction
Eijiect of torsion and bending of filaments of tensile force in the filament due to filament torsion,
To avoid undue complexity, the effects of torsion and (ii) the couple about the filament axis due directly to filament
bending of the filaments on the axial force and total couple torsion and (iii) the couple due to curvature of the filament
will be calculated for the case C2 = 0. These effects are, axis (bending moment). Each of these effects will be con-
however, not sensitive to the precise form of the stored- sidered separately.
energy function. Also, for simplicity, the analysis will be
based on mode! 1. (i) Couple due to effect offilanient torsion on tension in filament
The effect o f f " in equation (46) on the tangential stress
Axial force component tg, is (from (S), (46) and (47))
For the case C2 = 0 the tensile force in the direction of j7rr2b04cos E sin = - +Clho2h-
1 sin3
. LY cos3 r .
-c
LY
the filament axis (equation (2)) may be written re.-' =
Y2
(52)
By the application of (1 6) the corresponding contribution
M' to the total couple about the axis is
where f" represents the effect of the torsion in the filament,
neglected in the original treatment. The torsion 'T is equal
to the tortuosity of the corresponding helix (Treloar 1956)
and is given by
1 .
'T =- sin z cos r. (47)
r
(48)
With the introduction of h, through (7), the contribution of
this additional term to the total axial force, on the basis
of equation (9), becomes (55)
As with equation (51) the correction involves the factor
bo2,ro2. Expanding in terms of r we obtain
(ii) Couple clue to couple about filament axis extension the couple M” initially exceeds MI,however small
The couple arising from the couple about the filament axes the ratio bo/ro,though its absolute magnitude decreases in
is obtained by simple addition of the components of the the ratio (bo/ro)’.
couple in each filament. The couple in a single filament is,
from (3) with (47), (iii) Couple due to bending of filaments
1 . The bending moment g in a filament subjected to combined
n i = .;iC1rbo4 = TC b - sin a cos r. (56) extension and curvature has already been examined (Wilson
l o r
and Treloar 1961). The result, for the case C, = 0, is
Each filament occupies an area (nbo’,’h, sec a ) sec r or
;rbo2h, in the section norma! to the yarn axis. The com-
ponent of the couple in a single filament in the direction of
the yarn axis being m cos x , the total couple about the yarn
axis due to the couples in the filament is therefore where b is the radius of the filament in the strained state,
and p is the radius of curvature. For a helix of radius r and
angle a, p = risin2 a. Hence,
(57)
or
M” = Z~Clbo’h,’ ’ro Cot a,(l - COS .
)
,
E (58) This is the couple acting about a n axis perpendicular to the
Hence principal plane of curvature, i.e. about an axis inclined at a n
angle +a - r to the yarn axis. The component of this
couple about the yarn axis is g sin r. This acts on an area
ab’ sec x of the section normal t o the yarn axis. The couple
A;’ ’cot a, (1 - cos a,) about the yarn axis, per unit area of section, at the radial
position r, is therefore
h,l 2 tan u.,~ 4A,-5 2 - cos a,)
cot3 c~,~{(i - (sec x,n - 1))’
(59)
gsinr
--
a b 2 sec ci
1 (
- ?C,
- A’ +- (t)
b2 - cos U. sin3 E . (62)
Expanding in po\\ers of t,
M”
_ _-- bo’ t -2t3 - . . . Putting b2 = bo2/A, and introducing (7), we obtain for the
M, roz t - X,-3(- +
t 13 - -:% t5 + . . .)’ (594 total couple about the axis
The behaviour of this ratio requires more careful examina-
tion. For large values of A, there is no difficulty: we have the
approximation
which gives on integration
M“‘ = nClbo’ro cot a,
The correction thus varies as bo2ilyo2,as in case (i). However,
when A, approaches unity the situation is less simple. Thus
for the case A, = 1
.[.
x XL1 ‘(sec rm - 1) - +
X,I ‘(1 - cos u.,~)
X.-5’
2
,
sin4 a,
(64)
li
.
3 22