SL/<\

r
r
-:
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE AT GR:BOMBAY
nn.Pv
4potimPID/wkiastActipiwi
SPECIAL CASE NO.
S

ca
Esnu u vt4

vis
\i-eivIrk

p\/-17 CAA S
CERTIFIED COPY OF FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS :
12- n h s - h-rnA--g4_
0 2_14_, ILI
ii
\ k,
/
44 r
4/07/14
M33/14
CORAM :- H. H. J. MR. D.P. SURANA
in MPID 1/14
Adv. Panicker with Adv. Sawpnil Amre for applicant /
NSEL present.
SPP Adv.Avhad for state present.
Adv. Bhanushali for R-2 to 8 present.
Adv. Karnik for intervenor present.
All the advocates in one voice submitted that they
have no objection to sell the property described in Exh.F
annexed to the application MA 33/14.
Adv. Karnik and Adv. Panicker made statement
that this property is not attached by CA ereas, SPP
submitted that he want to confirm about status of
properties from EOW and CA.
Irrespective of fact whether property...is secured or
attached by EOW and CA or not, everybody has
consented for the sale of the property.
In the case property is secured and attached by
EOW / CA then EOW / CA and in the case they have not
secured and attached the property then monitoring and
C.R.No.36
MA 33/14 in MPID 1/14...
auction committee appointed by FMC to give the
proposal as to in what manner they will proceed to
auction the property.
All the advocates in one voice agreed that they
don't have any objection if the sale proceed of the
property is deposited in NSEL / ESCROW account.
Adjd for the proposal from either CA or monitoring and
uction committee appointed by FMC.
SPP shall communicate the order to CA, Adv
rnik agreed to supply the copy to the committee,
posal to be submitted within 3 weeks.
Adjd to 23/7/2014.
Judge
Certified to be True Copy
Datcd this
d:iy of
17.
C r f )3 Court,
cr. Eonly.