The document summarizes the results of the 2014 East Coles Corporate Performance Research. It found that the top performing sector for companies in the ASX Top 100 was health care, followed by banks and basic materials. The worst performing sectors were consumer discretionary, metals & mining, and consumer staples. For the Next 100, the best performing sectors were other financial services, miscellaneous consumers, and IT&T, while the worst were industrials, health care, and metals & mining. The research also assessed company performance based on categories like strategy, management effectiveness, and shareholder value, finding both strengths and areas for improvement.
Original Description:
Snippets from the 2014 East Coles Corporate Performance Research
The document summarizes the results of the 2014 East Coles Corporate Performance Research. It found that the top performing sector for companies in the ASX Top 100 was health care, followed by banks and basic materials. The worst performing sectors were consumer discretionary, metals & mining, and consumer staples. For the Next 100, the best performing sectors were other financial services, miscellaneous consumers, and IT&T, while the worst were industrials, health care, and metals & mining. The research also assessed company performance based on categories like strategy, management effectiveness, and shareholder value, finding both strengths and areas for improvement.
The document summarizes the results of the 2014 East Coles Corporate Performance Research. It found that the top performing sector for companies in the ASX Top 100 was health care, followed by banks and basic materials. The worst performing sectors were consumer discretionary, metals & mining, and consumer staples. For the Next 100, the best performing sectors were other financial services, miscellaneous consumers, and IT&T, while the worst were industrials, health care, and metals & mining. The research also assessed company performance based on categories like strategy, management effectiveness, and shareholder value, finding both strengths and areas for improvement.
search found that Health Care was the top sector for the ASX Top 100 in terms of overall performance, followed by Banks then Basic Materials. The worst sector was Consumer Dis- cretionary, with Metals & Mining and Consumer Staples not far behind. Other Financial Services was the best performed sector in the Next 100, followed by Misc Con- sumers then IT&T. The worst sector was Industri- als, then Health Care and Metals & Mining. The slow down in Chinese growth is no doubt respon- sible for Metals & Mining languishing at the bottom of both league tables, and it is not surprising to see both Consumer sectors at the bottom of the Top 100. Clarity of Strategy was the best performed catego- ry within with ASX Top 100, followed by Effectiveness of CEO and Access to Manage- ment. Its worth noting that the latter category is with respect to upper man- agement. The worst cate- gories were Access to Management (excluding CEO/CFO), Investment Desirability and Capital Management. In terms of the Next 100, the best performed catego- ry was Access to Man- agement, followed by Effectiveness of CEO then Clarity of Strategy. The worst performed cate- gory was Credibility, then Investment Desira- bility and Shareholder Value Focus. Interesting- ly both the ASX Top 100 and Next 100 are well satisfied with the perfor- mance of the CEOs, the access to senior manage- ment and the clarity of the strategies. The Top 100 would like to see more access to middle and low- er management and better capital management, whilst the Next 100 lack credibility and require better shareholder value focus. Interestingly both indices were somewhat lacking in Investment Desirability. Best Sectors & Performance Categories Methodology & Data Sample A wide range of types and sizes of fund managers are polled on 22 manage- ment / investment charac- teristics of Australian companies. All ASX 200 companies are assessed and rated, with buy and sell side respondents scor- ing the companies they have responsibility for via our online mechanism or Excel. Respondents score each stock out of 10 in each performance category and an average is taken to derive each score. Buy side respondents are broken down into 4 tiers based on size, with signifi- cant samples taken from each tier. The Australian reported on the primary results of this Research which are also available on Bloom- berg at COLE<GO>}. M a r k e t