In the Court of District Judge, Peshawar

Transfer application No._____ of 2010

In the matter titled as:
Munir Hussian Versus Pakistan Engineering Counsel
Case/ Suit o! ""/#, institution$ #%/%/&''( original institution$ ##/&/&''" ne)t date$
Munir Hussian son of Wazir Khan,
Resident of o!se No."#, $!hallah %ehram &'ad,
(!t side Kohati )ate, *esha+ar
Plaintiff/ *++licant
Versus
1) Pakistan Engineering Counsel,
&ttat!r, &-en!e ./ast0, )1 #22, Islama'ad
20 3ep!t4 Re5istrar *a,istan /n5ineerin5 6o!nsel,
7ni-ersit4 To+n, *esha+ar
80 )o-ernment of *a,istan thro!5h 3ep!t4 &ttorne4 )eneral,
*esha+ar i5h 6o!rt, *esha+ar
90 )o-ernment of NW:* .no+ K*K0 thro!5h 6hief ;ecretar4,
*ro-incial ;ecretariat, *esha+ar
#0 *!'lic at lar5e
Defendants/ ,es+ondents
Application for the Order of
transferring the titled suit
Respectf!ll4 ;he+eth:
The &pplicant2 *laintiff h!m'l4 s!'mits as !nder:
10 That the a'o-e titled matter is pendin5 in the 6o!rt of ;!n'al Naseer <!d5e
:amil4 6o!rt =III, *esha+ar, +herein ne>t date of hearin5 has 'een fi>ed for.
20 That the s!it of the *laintiff2 &pplicant on its 'are per!sal +o!ld re-eal that the
same has 'een filed on 11.02.200? and the relief.s0 in the shape of 3eclaration
and *ermanent In@!nction ha-e 'een so!5ht a5ainst the 3efendants to the effect
that defendant is responsi'le for +asta5e of :i-e.#0 precio!s 4ears as the4 +itho!t
an4 @!st reasons and ca!se ref!sed the re5istration of the &pplicant2 *laintiff and
th!s the *laintiff has recei-ed a serio!s dama5es to his career etc.
80 That after compl4in5 +ith all the codal formalities for affectin5 the ser-ice !pon
the 3efendants, the defendant attended the 6o!rt and thereafter +illf!ll4
disappeared hence placed e>1parte on 1A.11.200A.
90 That +hile the proceedin5s +ere !nder+a4 and the &pplicant2 *laintiff 5ot his
e-idence recorded, the 3efendants once a5ain in order to f!rther the a5onies of
the &pplicant2 *laintiff appeared and filed an application for settin5 aside />1parte
proceedin5s on 2A.08.2010.
#0 That +hile hearin5 the ar5!ments !pon the application and proceedin5s +ith the
case the learned <!d5e has treated the &pplicant2 *laintiff in a -er4 p!erile and
+anton manner and has e>tended !n+arranted rela>ation to the 3efendant.

?0 That not onl4 the attit!de of the learned <!d5e +o!ld reflect that she has 5ot a
clear inclination in fa-or of the Respondents and has man4 a times 5i-en the
Respondent a clear carte 'lanche to pla4 +ith the process of the 6o!rt. %esides
the pre-io!s order dated 0#.0#.2010 of the Bearned <!d5e, *esha+ar is an
e>ample of the same +here'4 she afforded an !n+arranted rela>ation to the
Respondent No.1 and accepted his 'adl4 time 'arred application for settin5 aside
e>1parte proceedin5s.
A0 That in the present circ!mstances of the case, the applicant has 'een left +ith no
tr!st !pon the Bearned <!d5e mentioned a'o-e and it is apprehended that the
mentioned @!d5e ma4 ca!se to the &pplicant a fatal 'lo+.
It is therefore most h!m'l4 pra4ed that on acceptance of this application,
the a'o-e cited matter ma4 ,indl4 'e transferred form the 6o!rt of ;!n'al Naseer
to an4 other @!d5e of tr!st+orth4 stat!re. &n4 other relief not specificall4 as,ed
for ma4 also 'e 5ranted if deemed @!st, fit and appropriate in the circ!mstances of
the case.
Applicant/ Plaintif
Thro!5h
6o!nsel
Afdavit
It is solemnl4 affirmed on oath that the contents of this application are tr!e and correct
and nothin5 contained therein is false.
De+onent