You are on page 1of 5

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, successful business innovations and creative activities are increasingly recognized as key
drivers of economic development. Creativity takes difference forms at different times and in
different places. From vision to create new products, business models or process to recognition
system for teams to take experiment, or even as simple as free expression and acceptance of
different points of view, can contribute to successful growth driven business innovations. Take
Oticons case for example, the change of company direction and structure, the redefinition of
company human value and result from the implementation of the strategy are the essential keys to
its success. Furthermore, this essay is going to discuss the possibility of success when approach is
introduced to organizations from different cultural background, followed by discussion on insights
and learning derived from the case study as well as the challenges to meet in real life.

THREE ISSUES IN RELATION TO INNOVATION
After reading Oticons case, three issues in relation to innovation are identified as interesting or
significant in relation to the concept of innovation.
CHANGE OF COMPANY DIRECTION AND STRUCTURE
It took more than determination and courageousness when Kolind drafted plans to transform Oticon
to the spaghetti organization. In fact, it is his clear vision and understanding of the necessity of
Oticon as an organization to design a new way of running businesses that made him want to create
a disorganized organization. This change completely shifted the company from its attachment to
tradition to a more creative, faster and more cost-effective organization type.
To understand Oticons organizational creativity, it is essential to identify the creative process, the
creative situation, the creative outcome and the way in which each of these components interacts
with the others. The elimination of departments, managerial & supervisory positions, and the
concept of budgets, was the first step to implement the strategy for change as well as to meet the
new vision of the organization. Without the traditional job titles and descriptions, employees are
encouraged to join different projects with more degree of freedom. The mix of expertise is to move
the organization from technological orientation to a knowledge orientation so that it would help
transforming the business to knowledge-based service business. IBMs successful transform from a
technology based manufacturing company to todays knowledge-based service business would be
another good example of business innovations.
However, even the best innovation takes time to show significant result. At the beginning of Oticons
transform, employees did not welcome the loss of routine and clear authority relationships or find
the resultant uncertainty easy to adjust. Managers had difficulties to accept the loss of power base,
information monopoly and status symbols. Moreover, in order to maintain project leader positions,
managers now need to compete for the best staff. For some employees, they also had difficulties to
find a role in the project team. Oticons response was loud and clear: ACCEPT THE NEW
ARRANGEMENT OR LEAVE. Such determination prompted the carry on with the innovation which
leads to its big success in a few years time.
REDEFINITION OF COMPANY HUMAN VALUE
To make the changes work, the company believes all its employees would act responsible and the
company chose to treat them like adults. In other words, one aspect of this transform is about
decentralization of power. Adults do not have to be told when to come to work and go home, or to
be constantly reminded of the fact on about company rules or practices. Employees would feel more
belonged, respected, recognized, and show more willingness to participate with company activities.
Employees are more dedicated and efficient. The best of all is that employees are able to see the
new arrangements worked better than the old ones. In 1991, Oticon launched the revolutionary new
hearing aid MultiFocus which was sunk back in the 1980s due to technical and communication
problems.
With the redefinition of company human value, communication becomes the center of the new
approach to work. Face to Face dialogue replaced memos as the acceptable mode of
communications whereas computers are for the purpose of information sharing. The project-based
approach is to change the way people perceive work. No more corridors or individual offices, no
more paper files where everyone has the access to projects information, salaries or even company
financial stats. The efficient teamwork and project management skills are therefore enhanced.

THE RESULT - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRATEGY
Since the transformation started at 8am on 8 August 1991, it only took the company 3 years to show
some real results. By 1994, Oticons market share increased from 8% in 1990 to 12% in 1993. 15 new
products have been launched, sales increased by 20% when the market had begun shrinking by 5%
per year. Such success is by no accident. Before the implementation of this new approach, Oticon
divided work into divisions/departments which fragmented its view of the customer. Also, the
company intended to comfortably continue investing into the direction that has been proven to be
right in the past. However, Kolind realized the need to learn and accept the fact that no longer the
company is in charge, but the customer. He seeks for the opportunities and sees it and grasped.
After the huge success in 1995, Kolind sensed the danger of the company to slip back into a
traditional departmental organizational form. He exploded the organization uncharacteristically,
again, as he believes to keep a company alive, one of the jobs of top management is to keep it
disorganized. And time proves Kolind is right again. In the following few years, not only the
subsidiaries but many supplies have replicated the arrangements in headquarter. Even after Kolinds
resignation, the company operates better than ever.

WOULD THIS STILL BE A GOOD APPROACH WHEN INTRODUCED TO BEIJING?
Oticons approach can certainly be replicated in Beijing, or any other places in the world. However, it
should not be blind to cultural sensitivity.
The Chinese economy has been shifting quickly from a predominantly industrial agricultural model of
production, to one where the services sector is more in evidence. Nonetheless, Chinas overall
economic status and global positioning remains in debate. As the capital of China, Beijing has been
the political center of China over centuries. The theories of creativity personality is more popular in
China hence not everybody would be open to creative acts. People value the organization hierarchy
and believe it is the most efficient way to run a business. Employees would have a more difficult
time with adjusting the loss of routine and clear authority relationships. With the high pressure to
achieve and do more for less, it is possible that one may fail to get the support of key personnel in
the organization. Furthermore, when it comes to dealing with external parties, the disorganization
may slow down the communication as external parties would not know who would be the best
person to liaison.
With the high labor turnover rate in Beijing, it would not be in the best interest of shareholders to
openly share company information such as financial stats or project details.

INSIGHTS AND LEARNING
Innovation and creativity is more than curiosity. It also takes skills, freedom of expression,
collaborative effort and knowledge to succeed. Technology based companies such as Apple, Google,
YouTube, motor vehicle giant BMW, as well as traditional insurance company Allianz are all pioneers
when it comes to innovation and being creative.
Google adapted the same spaghetti organization style and toss against wall, see if sticks strategy
when it comes to product development. Google encourages its engineers to spend one fifths of their
time on new ideas. With the launch of their new social media Google Plus, it becomes more and
more important mainly because of the implications of social search. If someone looks for a review on
the Canon camera the first search results that show up are of people sharing a review on G+. In
2006, Google decided to acquire YouTube which was the vision to create a Video download service
for FREE. The intense focus on providing the best and most comprehensive experience for users
interested in uploading, watching and sharing videos. By the time Google finalized the purchase,
Youtube has created key partnerships with various Music and Broadcast players in the industry.
As mentioned earlier, Beijing is a city respect the value of tradition and more adaptable to
organization hierarchy. Instead of changing the business entirely, it is recommended for companies
to adapt innovation approach that would increase growth more suitable and appropriated.
Insurance business is an old and traditional business, particularly the personal liability insurance
business; there was the feeling that there were no innovations possible. The reframing the
opportunity space is what Allianz chose to challenge. The personal liability business was a major
sector of Allianz business, which made Allianz far the leader in the insurance market with significant
price premium. Competitors intend to gain more market share by lower prices and cheapened
services through telesales and outsourcing arrangements in low-cost countries. Such behavior forced
the market into the wrong direction. What Allianz chose to do is to rethink the market segment by
looking at the demand landscape in new ways. For business in China, particular in Beijing, the
innovation is not necessarily be as dramatic as in Oticons case, but more importantly should be able
to meet business requirements and needs. To understand the demand landscape
The success of BMW is how it goes far beyond its habitual technology domain and into brand
management, design, and new business models. BMW has developed a strategic blueprint for action
of cars ranging from the BMW brand, the MINI brand to the Land Rover brand to meet its market
demand. The blueprint described is the companys world-class brand management system, i.e: how
the company adopted an entire new model of branding for the MINI than the success model it used
for the BMW brand. They targeted different market segment for the MINI brand than for the BMW
brands. This is another good example where innovation does not necessarily come from technology
but the brand management and perfectly applicable to traditional business without changing the
business throughout.
Finally, I would like to use Apple as an example to discuss more on innovation and creativities. When
iPod was initially introduced in 2001, Steve Jobs combined the innovative design, easy-to-use
interface, excellent performance and made the iPod experience one of a kind. In the following ten
years time, the introduction of Nano, Shuffle, iTouch, iPhone has proved the legendary innovation
Steven Job and people around him manifested. Apples innovation is well known as first and
foremost driven by inner conviction.
This conviction is about changing how consumers live around music or entertainment.
Before the introduce of iPod and iTune, we listen to music on the radio, watch music videos on TV,
purchase CDs and cassette tape which is played on Walkman or stereos. However, the iPod
phenomenon has changed the way we find out about music, the way we select music, purchase
music, listen to music, store music and discard music. How we manage music in our daily life has
been completely changed. Similar to Oticons case, in order to fulfill the fundamental customer
needs and satisfactory, Apple decided to develop a notion to change consumer landscape. Back in
2001, there were innovators who started download music from Napster. Apple saw the potential
with internet along with how music demand is changing and develop their own idea how to
transform the entire experience for consumers. Apple did not stop with the success of iPod, they
continued introducing revolutionary products such as Nano or iTouch to market in order to
maximize user experience with matching technology and product quality. Apple now is one of the
largest music retailers in the US. In the process, Steve Jobs reframes Apple from a computer
company, to a music company. With the introduction of iPhone, Apple dominated the mobile phone
market with its innovative design, easy-to-use interface, and excellent performance product. Do you
remember what the second or the third bestselling mobile phones were when iPhone was
introduced? According to Erich Joachimsthalers explanation, when you achieve customer
advantage, the comparison is irrelevant. People have absorbed and assimilated the iPod into their
lives. it is not about how much the product is different from competitors. It is how your product fits
into the everyday life of consumers.
With the shift of management of existing large, vertically-integrated enterprises towards the need to
be innovative, entrepreneurial and creative to fit in the global business environment, it is essential
to understand the concept of innovation and creative activities and apply with the consideration of
culture differences.
CONCLUSION
Innovation and creativity is not about products or solutions solely. It is linked to various forms of
organization. It is about creating transformational changes in the way people work in the form of
solution, technology or even a new business model. The relationship between thinking and doing
can be explained in relation to specific industries, forms of production as well as culture difference.
While responses to the question of whether innovation and creativity was important to Chinese
business today tended to generate pro forma answers along the lines of of course, the actual
priority and implantation remained obscure, depending on the business needs and market
condition.

REFERENCE
Florida R L, (2002) The rise of the creative class : and how it's transforming work, leisure, community
and
everyday life (Basic Books, New York, NY)
Henry, J., & Mayle, D. (2002). Managing Innovation and Change (2 ed.). London: Sage.
Joachimsthaler, E. (2007). Hidden in Plain Sight: How to Find and Execute Your Company's Next Big
Growth Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Beyond productivity : information technology, innovation, and creativity.
Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press.
Nigel, K. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Perrin, G. D. (2010). Innovation and Creativity. International Journal of Instructional Technology and
Distance Learning, 1-2.
Peters, T., & Rodabaugh, K. (1998). Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. The
Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 27-28.
Pratt, A. C. (2008). Innovation and Creativity. London: Sage.
Proctor, T. (2010). Creative problem solving for managers; Developing skills for decision making and
innovation (3 ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
Thompson, L. (2003). Improving the creativity of organizational work groups (Vol. 17). Academy of
Management Excutive.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational
strategies. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.

You might also like