He was an engraver by profession! a oor working-"lass #on$oner. He was a ra$i"al all %is life! oosing all for&s of aut%ority! rationalis& an$ &aterialis&. He rovi$e$ illustrations for 'ose% 'o%nson's e$ition of (ary Wollstone"raft's Original Stories
He was an engraver by profession! a oor working-"lass #on$oner. He was a ra$i"al all %is life! oosing all for&s of aut%ority! rationalis& an$ &aterialis&. He rovi$e$ illustrations for 'ose% 'o%nson's e$ition of (ary Wollstone"raft's Original Stories
He was an engraver by profession! a oor working-"lass #on$oner. He was a ra$i"al all %is life! oosing all for&s of aut%ority! rationalis& an$ &aterialis&. He rovi$e$ illustrations for 'ose% 'o%nson's e$ition of (ary Wollstone"raft's Original Stories
We know relatively little about Blakes life (1757-1827).
He was an engraver by rofession! a oor working-"lass #on$oner. He was a ra$i"al all %is life! oosing all for&s of aut%ority! rationalis& an$ &aterialis&. Blake for&e$ art of t%e sa&e "ir"le as Thomas Paine! Mary Wollstonecraft an$ William Godwin. Blake rovi$e$ illustrations for 'ose% 'o%nsons e$ition of (ary Wollstone"rafts Original Stories from Real Life (17)1). *n "ontrast to Wor$swort% %is genius went largely unre"ogni+e$ $uring %is lifeti&e. Wor$swort% t%oug%t Blake was &a$. Blake rea$ so&e of Wor$swort%s oetry an$ $i$nt t%ink &u"% of it. However! %is reutation %as risen al&ost "ontinuously sin"e %is $eat%. He is one of t%e few eole "onsi$ere$ a great artist an$ a great oet. ,ne of t%e very few w%o fully integrated %is two art for&s. Innocence & Experience -oti"e t%e (usually o&itte$) subtitle of The Songs of Innocence and of Experience. Shewing 1 the Two Contrary States of the Human Soul (17)/) - in inno"en"e we look at t%ings freshly - wit% e0erien"e our er"etion is darkened by a$ult fears an$ an0ieties (t%e effe"ts of alienation). We see t%e worl$ &ore $eely but we feel it &ore ainfully. 1%e "o&bination &ay lea$ to so&e higher truth. *nno"en"e "an be reorn at any oint in ti&e to rovi$e an alternative to t%e bitterness an$ oression w%i"% 20erien"e "riti3ues. 4or Blake t%e inno"en"e of a "%il$ "oul$ be suerior to t%e errors of a"3uire$ folly. But wit%out er"eiving t%e arren world of oppression t%e otentiality of *nno"en"e "annot be grase$. 1 shewing 5 (archaic) s%owing Melting !urfaces Blake in &any senses "onne"ts &ore "losely to &e$iaeval art t%an to %is "onte&oraries. His i"tures are mystic an$ Gothic (in t%e i"torial sense). His oe&s are 6illuminated 5 like &e$iaeval &anus"rits. His oetry %as &u"% &ore to $o wit% sermons t%an neo"lassi"al oetry. 7t t%e sa&e ti&e %is figures are &us"ular an$ &onu&ental like Michelangelos. His tetrameter 5 favoure$ in Songs 5 links t%is "olle"tion of oetry to %y&ns! nursery rhymes an$ allads. Blake la"es %i&self s3uarely in t%e popular tradition. Blake $esigne$ songs to look like a "%il$s i"ture-book. He $i$ t%is to su"ert t%e genre 5 to "%allenge t%ose writers w%ose intention was to s%ae an$ "ontrol "%il$rens &in$s t%roug% books of 6instru"tion an$ i&rove&ent. By "ontrast! %e ai&e$ to allow t%e "%il$ (an$ a$ult rea$er) instea$ to engage imaginati"ely with texts w%i"% were oen-en$e$ an$ un"ertain of referen"e. 1%is is Blakes 6infernal method (re"o&&en$e$ in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell) 8&elting aarent surfa"es away! an$ $islaying t%e infinite w%i"% was %i$($en)9. -oti"e t%at few of t%e illustrations si&ly s%ow w%at t%e oe&s t%ey a""o&any tell. :at%er t%ey enter into a $ebate t%is t%e& 5 ro&ting us t%e t%ing furt%er. Infant #oy * %ave no na&e * a& but two $ays ol$.-- W%at s%all * "all t%ee; * %ay a& assonance 'oy is &y na&e.-- pararhyme <weet =oy befall t%ee> ?retty =oy> <weet =oy but two $ays ol$. <weet =oy * "all t%ee@ 1%ou $ost s&ile! * sing t%e w%ile <weet =oy befall t%ee. We are all born inno"ent. However! w%et%er we re&ain inno"ent $een$s on %ow we are treate$. 1%e infant is t%e e&bo$i&ent of inno"ent %ainess but s%e nee$s su""our an$ reassuran"e bot% verbal (8<weet =oy befall t%ee>9) an$ non-verbal (eu%ony of t%e song an$ oetry). Here s%e re"eives bot% fro& t%e narrator. *s t%is =oyous inno"ent si&ly t%e la"k of "ruel e0erien"e of t%e worl$; *s it ossible to &aintain a "%il$like inno"en"e t%roug%out ones a$ult like; *f so is t%e birt% of t%is life-long =oyous inno"en"e t%e result of vital su""our an$ reassuran"e fro& a very young age; 1%e oe& is oen to interretation fro& t%e very title. Aoes it &ean. t%e =oy of a newborn baby; t%e =oy ro$u"e$ by a newborn baby; a baby "alle$ 6'oy; t%e infan"y (B origins) of %ainess; or $oes it &ean all t%is at t%e sa&e ti&e; -oti"e t%e level of reetition. =oy (0C)! * (0C)! t%ee (0/)! sweet (0/) 1%e oe& is al&ost %ynoti" in its si&li"ity! its li&ite$ range of language. -oti"e t%e long vowels an$ t%e $i%t%ongs en$ing in se&i-vowelsDgli$es (ese"ially $ark 6l). na&e (02)! a& (02) s%all (02)! "all (02)! befall (02)! w%ile! s&ile 1%is is t%e language of nursery r%y&es! rayer an$ in"antations - a tye of &agi"al blessing t%at t%e narrator re"ites or sings over t%e infant. Infant !orrow (y &ot%er groane$! &y fat%er wet! *nto t%e $angerous worl$ * leat@ Helless! nake$! iing lou$! #ike a fien$ %i$ in a "lou$. pararhyme <truggling in &y fat%ers %an$s! <triving against &y swa$$ling ban$s! Boun$ an$ weary! * t%oug%t best alliteration 1o sulk uon &y &ot%ers breast. assonance 7gain is t%is. t%e sorrow of a newborn baby; t%e sorrow ro$u"e$ by a newborn baby; t%e infan"y (B origins) of sa$ness; or $oes it &ean all t%is at t%e sa&e ti&e; *&&e$iately t%e infant is fearful of t%e future! oresse$ by t%e role of t%e fat%er! an$ finally %e settles $own into %yo"riti"al sulking. His negative e0erien"e of t%e worl$ lea$s to a rea"tion t%at "ontributes to t%e worl$s ills. *t is our er"etion of t%e worl$ an$ t%at of t%ose aroun$ us t%at &akes t%e worl$ safe or $angerous 5 inno"ent or "ruel. Here t%e infant re"eives an$ absorbs t%e erse"tives of its arents! fro& w%i"% it %as little "%an"e of es"aing. 1%e "%il$ is boun$ like ?ro&et%eus but it $oesnt %ave t%e energy or even t%e &otivation to break its bon$s t%roug% i&agination. *t takes on t%e $efensive role of a fien$ in a cloud. 1%e "lou$ %i$es t%e infants true nature fro& itself an$ its surroun$ings! allowing an$ for"ing it to &aintain its fien$is%ness. 1%e oe& appears fores%ortene$! unfinished. But t%is &akes it universal. *t is t%e start of so &any life stories t%at en$ in violen"e an$ ain. The Tyger Blakes est known oe& 5 wit% t%e ossible e0"etion of 6'erusale&. *t is rule$ by sy&&etry. sy&&etry between stan$as! sy&&etry between lines! an$ within lines 4or t%is very reason t%e asy&&etry between t%e first an$ last verse 5 6could being rela"e$ by 6dare 5 stan$s out. -oti"e t%at t%e oe& is &a$e u entirely of %uestions. Here again we "onfront Blakes a&biguity t%at for"es us to interret t%e oe& 5 we are not tol$ w%at to t%ink! our imagination is sti&ulate$. 4or instan"e! 6dread in line 12 is a contradictonym (like 6"leave or 6san"tion) 5 it %as two oosite &eanings (6fearful an$ 6fearso&e). <i&ilarly! 6to frame 2 "oul$ &ean B 6to shapeDmake! B 6to imagine or B 6to descrieDturn into a work of art. B 6to controlDrestrain *s t%e oe& asking about t%e nature of the god w%o %as &a$e su"% a beautiful! $ea$ly beast; *s t%e oe& asking about t%e nature of the poet w%o $aresDis able to $es"ribe su"% a erfe"t "reature; - 2lsew%ere Blake 5 like Eoleri$ge 5 suggests t%at t%e %u&an "reator (i.e. t%e oet) is si&ly a version of t%e $ivine "reator. Aoes t%e tiger reresent t%e untameale materials of t%e i&agination; Aoes t%e tiger reresent t%e in$o&itable in t%e natural worl$ outsi$e an$ t%e untameale desires and dri"es of t%e %u&an &in$; Ean t%ese urges an$ instin"ts be 6fra&e$ (B "ontrolle$! li&ite$); (u"% of Blakes oetry $es"ribes t%e erennial battle between t%e e0an$ing for"es of energy an$ t%e restri"tive! nu&bing $eat%-$ealing for"e of reason. How $oes t%e tyger of t%e i&agination "o&are wit% t%e tiger of *n$ian forests; W%y is t%ere su"% a &uxtaposition between t%e ta&e-looking! often smiling tiger Blake illustrates at t%e botto& of t%e age an$ t%e tiger of t%e oe&; 2 in most dictionaries you will find the transiti"e "er 'to frame someone( )e*g* Who Framed Roger Rabbit?+ meaning to faricate e"idence against someone )incriminar+* ,owe"er- the first recorded use of this "er was in ./.0 as part of 1! slang* Ean t%e artist really fra&e so&et%ing as %ysi"ally alive an$ t%ree-$i&ensional as a tiger in wor$s or ink; *n %isD%er fear of trying arallele$ by our fear of t%e beast in t%e $ark; 7re t%e stars aban$oning t%eir weaons or $efen$ing t%e&selves in t%e fift% stan+a; - if you auto&ati"ally t%oug%t t%e stars were %urling t%eir sears! noti"e t%e line fro& Blakes The Four oas! 81%e stars t%rew $own t%eir sears F fle$ nake$ away.9! w%i"% is una&biguous. Ao t%e stars re"ogni+e t%at t%ey cannot compete wit% t%e beast t%at 6burns brig%t; W%o is in control of t%e oe& 5 t%e artist! Go$! t%e tiger; W%o smiles; - if we only %a$ t%e oe& we woul$ say Go$ or t%e artist but in t%e i"ture it is t%e tiger w%o is s&iling. The Metaphorical 'Tiger( 1%e 6tyger is "learly not a real tiger in t%at %e is &a$e using very human apparatus 5 a furna"e! an anvil! a %a&&er an$ a "%ain. t%ose of a lacksmith. *s %e a sy&bol of t%e industrial re"olution; *s t%e tyger e3uivalent of 2rankenstein(s monster 5 a "reation t%at t%reatens to $estroy its &aker; *s t%e tyger t%e infantD"reation t%at t%reatens to $estroy its &ot%erD"reator; Blake saw artisan work 5 su"% as %is own 5 as "reative an$ fulfilling an$ t%e new kin$ of work resulting fro& t%e in$ustrial revolution as 3uite literally soul3 destroying. Was t%e tyger "reate$ by a ?ro&et%ean figure! "%allenging Go$ an$ t%e stars; *s t%e tyger t%e "reation of a (iltoni" <atan in t%e sa&e way as t%e #a&b (E%rist) is a "reation of Go$; Aoes t%e tyger reresent 4ren"% 'a"obinis&; - t%e 4ren"% :evolution an$ t%e 61error were $es"ribe$ wit% tiger si&iles in The Times on 7 'anuary 17)2 an$ 2C 'uly 17)H. *n 17)2 <a&uel :o&illy of t%e 4ren"% :eubli". 8,ne &ig%t as well t%ink of establis%ing a reubli" of tigers in so&e forest of 7fri"a.9 IHe $oesnt e0lain w%y t%e reubli"an tigers &ig%t live in 7fri"a>J Ben=a&in 4ranklin (17KC-17)K) wrote in an un$ate$ letter! 8* woul$ a$vise you! t%erefore! not to atte&t unchaining the tiger! but to burn t%is ie"e before it is seen by any ot%er erson.9 We $ont know w%o t%e letter was a$$resse$ to (?aine %as been suggeste$) but t%e &eta%or was "learly floating in t%e (-ew Histori"al) at&os%ere. Blakes brilliant "onte&orary George <tubbs ainte$ several versions of a w%ite %orse being atta"ke$ by a lion an$ Blake later wrote! 81%e tygers of wrat% are wiser t%an t%e %orses of instru"tion9! w%i"% see&s to al&ost anti"iate (ar0s! 8?%iloso%ers %ave &erely interrete$ t%e worl$@ t%e oint is to "%ange it9. The Tyger is also e"%oe$ in Leatss Easter! "#"$! 87 terrible beauty is born9. Mlti&ately! t%e tyger "an reresent anyt%ing t%at is fas"inating an$ $angerous. fro& revolution to se0ual assion to $rugs. - all t%ese t%ings "ause us to lose control. i.e. we are talking about subli&ity !ulimity 5 look out for 6subli&e an$ 6subli&ity in t%e wor$ $efinition e0er"ise. 2$&un$ Burke $istinguis%e$ between t%e subli&e an$ t%e beautiful in % &hilosophical In'uiry (1757). Beauty is asso"iate$ wit% brig%tness! s&oot%ness an$ s&allness !ulimity is asso"iate$ wit% t%e infinite! solitu$e! e&tiness! $arkness! terror! owerful e&otions! siritual an$ religious awe! an$ t%e gran$eur of nature. Theodicy 4 -ature! like a work of art! &ust in so&e way "ontain a reflection of its creator. 1%e tiger is strikingly beautiful yet also %orrifi" in its "aa"ity for violen"e. What kind of a God! t%en! "oul$ or woul$ $esign su"% a terrifying beast as t%e tiger; W%at $oes t%e un$eniable e0isten"e of evil an$ violen"e in t%e worl$ tell us about t%e nature of Go$; 1%e i&agery of fire wit% its si&ultaneous "onnotations of creation! purification! an$ destruction. 1%e seaker stan$s in awe of t%e tiger as a s%eer %ysi"al an$ aest%eti" a"%ieve&ent! even as %e re"oils in %orror fro& t%e moral implications of su"% a "reation@ for t%e oe& a$$resses not only t%e 3uestion of w%o could &ake su"% a "reature as t%e tiger! but w%o (ould erfor& t%is a"t. 1%is is a 3uestion of creati"e responsiility an$ of will! an$ t%e oet "arefully in"lu$es t%is &oral 3uestion wit% t%e "onsi$eration of %ysi"al ower. 1%e reeate$ use of wor$ t%e 6$are to rela"e t%e 8"oul$9 of t%e first stan+a intro$u"es a $i&ension of asiration an$ wilfulness into t%e s%eer &ig%t of t%e "reative a"t. 1%e erse"tive of e0erien"e in t%is oe& involves a so%isti"ate$ a"knowle$ge&ent of w%at is une0lainable in t%e universe. 1%e oen awe of The Tyger "ontrasts wit% t%e easy "onfi$en"e! in The Lam)! of a "%il$s inno"ent fait% in a benevolent universe. *n"i$entally! The Tyger was engrave$ on t%e ba"k of t%e copper plate on w%i"% The Lam) %a$ been et"%e$. -oti"e %owever t%e false $i"%oto&y. t%e #a&b &ay reresent t%e benevolent Go$ but %ow $oes t%e tiger reresent t%e retribution of a =ust Go$; H theodicy 5 t%e roble& of t%e e0isten"e of evil in a worl$ "reate$ by a benevolent! o&niotent Go$. The Tyger 1yger / > 1yger> burning brig%t alliteration *n t%e forests of t%e nig%t! assonance W%at i&&ortal %an$ or eye Eoul$ fra&e t%y fearful sy&&etry; alliteration! iam)ic tetrameter *n w%at $istant $ees or skies assonance! alliteration Burnt t%e fire of t%ine eyes; assonance ,n w%at wings $are %e aspire 5 ; W%at t%e %an$ $are sie+e 5 t%e fire; 6
7n$ w%at shoulder 8 ! F w%at art! Eoul$ twist t%e sinews ) of t%y %eart; assonance! iam)ic tetrameter 7n$ w%en t%y %eart began to beat! pararhyme! iam)ic tetrameter W%at dread 1K %an$; F w%at dread H feet; polysyndeton W%at t%e %a&&er; w%at t%e "%ain; polysyndeton *n w%at furna"e was t%y brain; W%at t%e anvil; w%at $rea$ gras polysyndeton Aare its $ea$ly terrors "las; alliteration W%en t%e stars t%rew $own t%eir sears 11 ! alliteration 7n$ watere$ %eaven wit% t%eir tears! alliteration! iam)ic tetrameter Ai$ %e s&ile %is work to see; alliteration Ai$ %e w%o &a$e t%e #a&b &ake t%ee; internal rhyme! iam)ic tetrameter 1yger> 1yger> burning brig%t alliteration *n t%e forests of t%e nig%t! assonance W%at i&&ortal %an$ or eye Aare fra&e t%y fearful sy&&etry; alliteration! iam)ic tetrameter / this spelling of 'tiger( was already old3fashioned* Blake presumaly chose it ecause it looks more mysterious* 5 to aspire 5 a. rise u! b. %ave a burning a&bition C Blake(s spelling of 'sei$e( 7 the hand that dare seize the fire could e a reference to Prometheus 8 shoulder 5 (in this context) strengt% ) sinews 5 &us"les! ten$ons 1K dread 5 a. fearful. b. fearso&e 11 threw down their spears 5 a. aban$on ones weaons. b. $efen$ oneself fro& on %ig% 2orm 1%e oe& is "o&rise$ of si0 3uatrains in r%y&e$ "oulets. Aoes t%e &eter i&itate t%e hammering beat of t%e s&it%y t%at is t%e oe&s "entral i&age or t%e unstoppale ad"ancing tiger; *t "ertainly i&itates nursery r%y&es. 1winkle! 1winkle! little star 'a"k be ni&ble! 'a"k be 3ui"k How * won$er w%at you are 'a"k! =u& over t%e "an$lesti"k -oti"e %ow Blake e0e"ts us to treat 6fire as two syllables in line C but as a &onosyllable in line 8.