Economic integration is the unification of economic policies between different states through the partial or full abolition of tariff and non-tariff restrictions on trade taking place among them prior to their integration. This is meant in turn to lead to lower prices for distributors and consumers with the goal of increasing the combined economic productivity of the states. There are varying levels of economic integration, including preferential trade agreements (PTA), free trade areas (FTA), customs unions, common markets and economic and monetary unions. The more integrated the economies become, the fewer trade barriers exist and the more economic and political coordination there is between the member countries. By integrating the economies of more than one country, the short-term benefits from the use of tariffs and other trade barriers is diminished. At the same time, the more integrated the economies become, the less power the governments of the member nations have to make adjustments that would benefit themselves. In periods of economic growth, being integrated can lead to greater long-term economic benefits; however, in periods of poor growth being integrated can actually make things worse.
DEFINITION OF 'ECONOMIC INTEGRATION'
An economic arrangement between different regions marked by the reduction or elimination of trade barriers and the coordination of monetary and fiscal policies. The aim of economic integration is to reduce costs for both consumers and producers, as well as to increase trade between the countries taking part in the agreement.
2
1.2 BENEFITS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
The ultimate aim of economic integration is to increase trade across the world. There are many other advantages associated with this concept. Some of these are:
1. Progress in trade.
All countries that follow economic integration have extremely wide assortment of goods and services from which they can choose. Introduction of economic integration helps in acquiring goods and services at much low costs. This is because the removal of trade barriers reduces or removes the tariffs entirely. Reduced duties and lowered prices save a lot of spare money with countries which can be used for buying more products and services.
2. Ease of agreement.
When countries enter into regional integration, they easily get into agreements and stick to them for long periods of time.
3. Improved political cooperation.
Countries entering economic integration form groups and have greater political influence as compared to influence created by a single nation. Integration is a vital strategy for addressing the effects of political instability and human conflicts that might affect a region.
4. Opportunities for employment.
The various options available in economic integration help to liberalize and encourage trade. This results in market expansion due to which high amount of capital is invested in a countrys economy. This creates higher opportunities for employment of people from all over the world. They thus move from one country to another in search of jobs or for earning higher pay. 5. Beneficial for financial markets. 3
Economic integration is extremely beneficial for financial markets as it eases firm to borrow finances at low rate if interest. This is because capital liquidity of larger capital market increases and the resultant diversification effect reduces the risks associated with high investment.
6. Increase in Foreign Direct Investments.
Economic integration helps to increase the amount of money in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Once firms start FDI, through new operations or by merger, takeover, and acquisition, it becomes an international enterprise. Thus economic integration is a win-win situation for all the firms, people and the economies involved in the process. Is has become a preferred strategy for most countries of the world.
4
1.3 LEVELS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
Levels of Economic Integration There are about five additive levels of economic integration impacting the global landscape: Free trade. Tariffs (a tax imposed on imported goods) between member countries are abolished or significantly reduced. Each member country keeps its own tariffs in regard to third countries. The general goal is to develop economies of scale and comparative advantages, which promotes economic efficiency. Custom union. Sets common external tariffs among member countries, implying that the same tariffs are applied to third countries. Custom unions are particularly useful to 5
level the competitiveness playing field and address the problem of re-exports (using preferential tariffs in one country to enter another country). Common market. Factors of production, such a labor and capital, are free to move within member countries, expanding scale economies and comparative advantages. Thus, a worker in a member country is able to move and work in another member country. Economic union. Monetary and fiscal policies between member countries are harmonized, which implies a level of political integration. A further step concerns a monetary union where a common currency is used, such as with the European Union (Euro). Political union. Represents the potentially most advanced form of integration with a common government and were the sovereignty of member country is significantly reduced. Only found within nation states, such as federations where there is a central government and regions having a level of autonomy.
6
1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
Economic integration refers to the coordination of national economic policies as a means of boosting international trade, market activity and general cooperation among economies. Formal international economic unions are a recent phenomenon, but former International Monetary Fund economic counselor Michael Mussa traces the roots of global economic integration to the medieval era. Despite the fact that the general aim of making trade flourish remains the same, particular objectives of economic integration agreements have changed to correspond to modern political and economic circumstances.
INCREASE OF TRADE When foreign products are subject to tariffs, exporters either have to accept the extra cost of trade or make do with a lesser volume of exported products. A basic element of economic integration policies is the abolition of part of the extra fees or even the full amount of them, making trade cheaper and giving exporters a bigger incentive to do business with integrated economies.
ALLOWING CONSUMERS TO SPEND MORE Economic integration reduces or eliminates customs duties, which in turn results in cheaper imported products for consumers. This way, the purchasing power of consumers grows, and with it, activity in the market. The public can start buying more imported products or spend former duty expenses on other products or services. In addition, goods that are not produced in sufficient quantities in one country can be imported and distributed in the market with low cost. 7
MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL Movement of capital refers to the transfer of business or individual assets among countries. The benefits of capital movement is the investment in new markets, leading to their eventual development. Economic integration removes barriers to foreign investors, minimizing or abolishing extra tax, while advanced integration policies, such as a monetary union, can even eliminate the cost of currency exchange. Movement of capital is recognized as an essential element of economic integration by associations such as the European Union and the Caribbean Community.
ECONOMIC COOPERATION
The concepts of economic cooperation and equitable economic development are the basis of economic unions. When economies within the integrated area encounter problems, it is the duty of other members to help, not only as a moral obligation, but because a failing economy can have serious effects in the whole integration process. For this reason, European Union countries have offered to bail out the troubled economies of Greece, Ireland and Portugal, while the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Vision 2020 declaration stresses the importance of "equitable economic development" among member states.
8
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
Regional economic integration is a process in which neighboring states enter into an agreement in order to upgrade cooperation through common institutions and rules. The objectives of the agreement could range from economic to political to environmental, although it has typically taken the form of a political economy initiative where commercial interests are the focus for achieving broader socio-political and security objectives, as defined by national governments. Regional integration has been organized either via supranational institutional structures or through intergovernmental decision-making, or a combination of both. Past efforts at regional integration have often focused on removing barriers to free trade in the region, increasing the free movement of people, labour, goods, and capital across national borders, reducing the possibility of regional armed conflict (for example, through Confidence and Security-Building Measures), and adopting cohesive regional stances on policy issues, such as the environment, climate change and migration. Intra-regional trade refers to trade which focuses on economic exchange primarily between countries of the same region or economic zone. In recent years countries within economic- trade regimes such as ASEAN in Southeast Asia for example have increased the level of trade and commodity exchange between themselves which reduces the inflation and tariff barriers associated with foreign markets resulting in growing prosperity.
9
2.2 ADVANTAGES OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
Regional economic integration refers to the agreement amongst countries within a certain geographic area for reducing and ultimately removing tariff barriers, making sure there is better flow of services or goods through the respective nations. The following article takes a look at the benefits of regional economic integration.
1. Enhanced political cooperation
Several nations usually have a much larger political influence as compared to the influence that each individual country would have. This kind of integration is a vital strategy for addressing the issues of political instability and conflicts that might affect that particular region. Moreover, improved political cooperation due to regional economic integration is also vital for handling the economic and social challenges linked to globalization.
2. Creates trade
Member countries in a regional economic integration agreement have a wider choice of services and goods that were previously unavailable. They can also easily acquire products at lower costs following the removal or lowering of tariffs. This encourages more trade amongst member nations. Actually, the extra money got from purchasing cheaper products may be useful for buying even more goods and services.
3. Employment prospects
Since economic integration encourages trade liberation, market expansion and more increased investment to member nations, it creates employment prospects. People can be able to migrate from one nation to another for finding new jobs or earning higher pay. Industries 10
that require mainly unskilled labor usually shift their production processes to the low wage nations within the regional cooperation.
4. Encourages economic growth
Economic integration not only leads to creation of new and better technology, but it also encourages economic growth. As the respective countries trade freely, their GDP increases and therefore improves their economies.
Nevertheless, regional economic integration usually requires that member nations give up their control over key policies such as trade, fiscal and monetary policies.
11
2.3 TYPES OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Economic cooperation or integration may take any one or a combination of any of the following forms: (i) Economic Union, (ii) Customs Union, (iii) Free Trade Area, (iv) Sectoral or Partial Integration, (v) Preferential Trading, (vi) Long-term Trade Agreements. These different forms of integration visualise different degrees of economic cooperation in the descending order. (I) ECONOMIC UNION An Economic Union is a case of absolute integration. It implies complete economic integration of a group of countries. There is, thus, free mobility of factor resources and commodities in such a union. The economic activities and policies (fiscal, monetary and general) of the member nations are perfectly harmonised, coordinated and collectively operated. Benelux (Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg) and the European Common Market (ECM) are such economic unions. An economic union is, therefore, commonly referred to as a common market.
(II) CUSTOMS UNION A Customs Union involves a common external tariff against non-member countries, while within the union itself there is unrestricted free trade. From the customs union gradually, complete economic union is evolved. For instance in the case of ECM, the Rome Treaty (1958) laid the basis of a customs union of the six member countries, leading finally to an economic union by 1970.
(III) FREE TRADE AREA A Free Trade Area involves the abolition of all trade restrictions within the group, but each individual country in the group is free to maintain any sort of relation with the non-member countries. Countries in a free trade area have, thus, no common external tariffs to maintain. 12
The European Free Trade Association (EFTA), 1959, and the Latin American Free Trade Association (LAFTA) serve as examples of such free trade areas.
(IV) SECTORAL OR PARTIAL INTEGRATION A Sectoral of Partial Integration refers to the establishment of a common market in a given product or products. The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), 1952, is such a sectoral integration by which members of the "Inner Six" have created a common market in coal and steel products within their territories.
(V)PREFERENTIAL TRADING Preferential Trading is a sort of trading technique involving various measures for promoting trade among the members of the group. Generally, agreements may be entered into to ensure to each contracting party a favoured treatment as compared to others. Such an agreement is usually referred to as the most- favoured nation agreement. It may relate to commerce, industry and navigation, or it may relate either to commodities or merely to customs duties. Ordinarily, the most-favoured nation clause is bilateral in operation. The trade liberalisation programme of the OEEC can be regarded as an example of preferential trading. In 1950, the Code of Liberalisation was adopted by the members of the OEEC in order to increase intra-European trade.
(VI)LONG-TERM TRADE CONTRACT The Long-term Trade Contract is a type of bilateral arrangement, either in a single product or many products of trade between any two nations. Its minimum duration may be an year or more. For instance, India had once entered into a trade agreement with Japan for the supply of iron ore for a period of five years. Such an agreement tends to stabilise the export of a given product or products of the country concerned. 13
2.4 STAGES OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION:
As international trade and investment levels continue to rise, the level of economic integration between various groups of nations is also deepening. The most obvious example of this is the European Union, which has evolved from a collection of autarkical nations to become a fully integrated economic unit. Although it is rare that relationships between countries follow so precise a pattern, formal economic integration takes place in stages, beginning with the lowering and removal of barriers to trade and culminating in the creation of an economic union. These stages are summarized below.
Basic Elements of the Stages of Economic Integration Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Zero tariffs between member countries and reduced non-tariff barriers Customs Union (CU) FTA + common external tariff Common Market (CM) CU + free movement of capital and labour, some policy harmonization Economic Union (EU) CM + common economic policies and institutions 14
FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS The first level of formal economic integration is the establishment of free trade agreements (FTAs) or preferential trade agreements (PTAs). FTAs eliminate import tariffs as well as import quotas between signatory countries. These agreements can be limited to a few sectors or can encompass all aspects of international trade. FTAs can also include formal mechanisms to resolve trade disputes. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an example of such an arrangement. Aside from a commitment to a reciprocal trade liberalization schedule, FTAs place few limitations on member states. Although FTAs may contain provisions in these areas if the signatory countries agree to do so, no further harmonization of regulations, standards or economic policies is required, nor is the free movement of capital and labour a necessary part of a free trade agreement. FTA signatory countries also retain independent trade policy with all countries outside the agreement. However, in order for an FTA to function properly, member countries must establish rules of origin for all third-party goods entering the free trade area. Goods produced within the free trade area (and subject to the agreement) may cross borders tariff-free, but rules of origin requirements must be met to prove that the good was in fact produced in the exporting country. In the absence of rules of origin, third-party countries seeking trade access to the FTA area will choose the path of least resistance the country where they face the lowest opposing tariff in order to gain effective entry to the entire FTA region.
CUSTOMS UNION A customs union (CU) builds on a free trade area by, in addition to removing internal barriers to trade, also requiring participating nations to harmonize their external trade policy. This includes establishing a common external tariff (CET) and import quotas on products entering the region from third-party countries, as well as possibly establishing common trade remedy policies such as anti-dumping and countervail measures. A customs union may also preclude the use of trade remedy mechanisms within the union. Members of a CU also typically negotiate any multilateral trade initiative (such as at the World Trade Organization) as a 15
single bloc. Countries with an established customs union no longer require rules of origin, since any product entering the CU area would be subject to the same tariff rates and/or import quotas regardless of the point of entry. The elimination of the need for rules of origin is the chief benefit of a customs union over a free trade area. To maintain rules of origin requires extensive documentation by all FTA member countries as well as enforcement of those rules at borders within the free trade area. This is a costly process and can lead to disputes over interpretation of the rules as well as other delays. A CU would result in significant administrative cost savings and efficiency gains. In order to gain the benefits of a customs union, member countries would have to surrender some degree of policy freedom specifically the ability to set independent trade policy. By extension, because of the increased importance of trade and economic measures as foreign policy tools, customs unions place some limitations on independent foreign policy as well.
COMMON MARKET A common market represents a major step towards significant economic integration. In addition to containing the provisions of a customs union, a common market (CM) removes all barriers to the mobility of people, capital and other resources within the area in question, as well as eliminating non-tariff barriers to trade, such as the regulatory treatment of product standards. Establishing a common market typically requires significant policy harmonization in a number of areas. Free movement of labour, for example, necessitates agreement on worker qualifications and certifications. A common market is also typically associated whether by design or consequence with a broad convergence of fiscal and monetary policies due to the increased economic interdependence within the region and the effect that one member countrys policies can have on other member countries. This necessarily places more severe limitations on member countries ability to pursue independent economic policies. 16
The principal advantage of establishing a common market is the expected gains in economic efficiency. With unfettered mobility, labour and capital can more easily respond to economic signals within the common market, resulting in a more efficient allocation of resources.
ECONOMIC UNION The deepest form of economic integration, an economic union adds to a common market the need to harmonize a number of key policy areas. Most notably, economic unions require formally coordinated monetary and fiscal policies as well as labour market, regional development, transportation and industrial policies. Since all countries would essentially share the same economic space, it would be counter-productive to operate divergent policies in those areas. An economic union frequently includes the use of a common currency and a unified monetary policy. Eliminating exchange rate uncertainty improves the functioning of an economic union by allowing trade to follow economically efficient paths without being unduly affected by exchange rate considerations. The same is true of business location decisions. Supranational institutions would be required to regulate commerce within the union to ensure uniform application of the rules. These laws would still be administered at the national level, but countries would abdicate individual control in this area.
17
3.1The European Union (EU) The European Union (EU) is a politico-economic union of 28member states that are primarily located in Europe. The EU operates through a system of supranational independent institutions and intergovernmental negotiated decisions by the member states. Institutions of the EU include the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, the European Council, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank, the Court of Auditors, and the European Parliament. The European Parliament is elected every five years by EU citizens. The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the European Economic Community (EEC), formed by the Inner Six countries in 1951 and 1958, respectively. In the intervening years, the community and its successors have grown in size by the accession of new member states and in power by the addition of policy areas to its remit. The Maastricht Treaty established the European Union under its current name in 1993 The latest major amendment to the constitutional basis of the EU, the Treaty of Lisbon, came into force in 2009. The EU has developed a single market through a standardised system of laws that apply in all member states. Within the Schengen Area, passport controls have been abolished. EU policies aim to ensure the free movement of people, goods, services, and capital, enact legislation in justice and home affairs, and maintain common policies on trade, agriculture, fisheries, and regional development. The monetary union was established in 1999 and came into full force in 2002. It is currently composed of 18 member states that use the euro as their legal tender. Through the Common Foreign and Security Policy, the EU has developed a role in external relations and defence. The union maintains permanent diplomatic missions throughout the world and represents itself at the United Nations, the WTO, the G8, and the G-20. With a combined population of over 500 million inhabitants, or 7.3% of the world population, the EU in 2012 generated a nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of 16.584 trillion US dollars, constituting approximately 23% of global nominal GDP and 20% when measured in terms of purchasing power parity, which is the largest economy by nominal GDP and the second largest economy by GDP (PPP) in the world. In 2012, the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. 18
Member states There are 28 sovereign states constitute the union. Through successive enlargements, the Union has grown from the six founding states Belgium, France, West Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands to the current 28. Countries accede to the union by becoming party to the founding treaties, thereby subjecting themselves to the privileges and obligations of EU membership. This entails a partial delegation of sovereignty to the institutions in return for representation within those institutions, a practice often referred to as "pooling of sovereignty To become a member, a country must meet the Copenhagen criteria, defined at the 1993 meeting of the European Council in Copenhagen. These require a stable democracy that respects human rights and the rule of law; a functioning market economy; and the acceptance of the obligations of membership, including EU law. Evaluation of a country's fulfilment of the criteria is the responsibility of the European Council No member state has ever left the Union, although Greenland (an autonomous province of Denmark) withdrew in 1985. The Lisbon Treaty now contains a clause providing for a member to leave the EU. There are six countries which are recognized as candidates for membership: Albania, Iceland, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Turkey However, on 13 June 2013, Iceland's Foreign Minister, Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson, informed the European Commission that the newly elected government intended to "put negotiations on hold". Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo are officially recognised as potential candidates, but none have submitted a membership application. Due to the lack of recognition by five of the 28 EU member states, the European Commission refers only to "Kosovo*", with an asterisked footnote containing the text agreed to by the BelgradePristina negotiations" This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence." Four countries forming the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) (that are not EU members) have partly committed to the EU's economy and regulations: Iceland (a candidate country for EU membership), Liechtenstein and Norway, which are a part of the single market through the European Economic Area, and Switzerland, which has similar ties through The relationships of the European microstates, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and the Vatican include the use of the euro and other areas of co-operation.
19
CONSTITUTIONAL NATURE The classification of the European Union in terms of international or constitutional law has been much debated, often in the light of the degree of integration that is perceived, desired, or expected. Historically, at least, the EU is an international organisation, and by some criteria, it could be classified as a confederation; but it also has many attributes of a federation, so some would classify it as a (de facto) federation of states. For this reason, the organisation has, in the past, been termed sui generis (incomparable, one of a kind), though it is also argued that this designation is no longer
GOVERNANCE The European Union has seven institutions: the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Council, the European Central Bank, the Court of Justice of the European Union and theEuropean Court of Auditors. Competencies in scrutinising and amending legislation are divided between the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union while executive tasks are carried out by the European Commission and in a limited capacity by the European Council (not to be confused with the aforementioned Council of the European Union). The monetary policy of the eurozone is governed by the European Central Bank. The interpretation and the application of EU law and the treaties are ensured by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The EU budget is scrutinised by the European Court of Auditors. There are also a number of ancillary bodies which advise the EU or operate in a specific area.
20
3.2 NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA)
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States, creating a trilateral rules-based trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994. It superseded the Canada United States Free Trade Agreement between the U.S. and Canada. NAFTA has two supplements: the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC). In terms of combined purchasing power parity GDP of its members, as of 2013the trade bloc is the largest in the world as well as by nominal GDP comparison.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act made some changes to the Copyright law of the United States, foreshadowing the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994 by restoring copyright (within NAFTA) on certain motion pictures which had entered the public domain.
ENVIRONMENT Securing U.S. congressional approval for NAFTA would have been impossible without addressing public concerns about NAFTAs environmental impact. The Clinton administration negotiated a side agreement on the environment with Canada and Mexico, the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), which led to the creation of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) in 1994. To alleviate concerns that NAFTA, the first regional trade agreement between a developing country and two developed countries, would have negative environmental impacts, the CEC was given a mandate to conduct ongoing ex post environmental assessment of NAFTA In response to this mandate, the CEC created a framework for conducting environmental analysis of NAFTA, one of the firstex post frameworks for the environmental assessment of trade liberalization. The framework was designed to produce a focused and systematic body of evidence with respect to the initial hypotheses about NAFTA and the environment, such as 21
the concern that NAFTA would create a "race to the bottom" in environmental regulation among the three countries, or the hope that NAFTA would pressure governments to increase their environmental protection mechanisms. The CEC has held four symposia using this framework to evaluate the environmental impacts of NAFTA and has commissioned 47 papers on this subject. In keeping with the CECs overall strategy of transparency and public involvement, the CEC commissioned these papers from leading independent experts.
AGRICULTURE From the earliest negotiation, agriculture was (and still remains) a controversial topic within NAFTA, as it has been with almost all free trade agreements that have been signed within the WTO framework. Agriculture is the only section that was not negotiated trilaterally; instead, three separate agreements were signed between each pair of parties. The Canada U.S. agreement contains significant restrictions and tariff quotas on agricultural products (mainly sugar, dairy, and poultry products), whereas the MexicoU.S. pact allows for a wider liberalization within a framework of phase-out periods (it was the first North South FTA on agriculture to be signed).
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE NAFTA established the CANAMEX Corridor for road transport between Canada and Mexico, also proposed for use by rail, pipeline, and fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure. This became a High Priority Corridor under the U.S. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.
IMPACT ON MEXICAN FARMERS In 2000, U.S. government subsidies to the corn sector totalled $10.1 billion. These subsidies have led to charges of dumping, which jeopardizes Mexican farms and the country's food self-sufficiency. Other studies reject NAFTA as the force responsible for depressing the incomes of poor corn farmers, citing the trend's existence more than a decade before NAFTA's existence, an increase in maize production after NAFTA went into effect in 1994, and the lack of a measurable impact on the price of Mexican corn due to subsidized corn coming into Mexico from the United States, though they agree that the abolition of U.S. agricultural subsidies would benefit Mexican farmers. According to Graham Purchase in Anarchism and 22
Environmental Survival, NAFTA could cause "the destruction of the peasant cooperative village holdings by corporate interests, and threatens to completely reverse the gains made by rural peoples in the Mexican Revolution
TRADE BALANCES The US goods trade deficit with NAFTA was $94.6 billion in 2010, a 36.4% increase ($25 billion) over 2009. The US goods trade deficit with NAFTA accounted for 26.8% of the overall U.S. goods trade deficit in 2010. The US had a services trade surplus of $28.3 billion with NAFTA countries in 2009 (the latest data available). In a study published in the August 2008 issue of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, NAFTA has increased U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico and Canada even though most of this increase occurred a decade after its ratification. The study focused on the effects that gradual "phase-in" periods in regional trade agreements, including NAFTA, have on trade flows. Most of the increase in members agricultural trade, which was only recently brought under the purview of the World Trade Organization, was due to very high trade barriers before NAFTA or other regional trade agreements.
INVESTMENT The US foreign direct investment (FDI) in NAFTA Countries (stock) was $327.5 billion in 2009 (latest data available), up 8.8% from 2008. The US direct investment in NAFTA countries is in nonbank holding companies, and in the manufacturing, finance/insurance, and mining sectors. The foreign direct investment, of Canada and Mexico in the United States (stock) was $237.2 billion in 2009 (the latest data available), up 16.5% from 2008.
ENVIRONMENT Overall, none of the initial hypotheses were confirmed, NAFTA did not inherently present a systemic threat to the North American environment, as was originally feared. NAFTA-related environmental threats instead occurred in specific areas where government environmental policy, infrastructure, or mechanisms, were unprepared for the increasing scale of production under trade liberalization. In some cases, environmental policy was neglected in the wake of trade liberalization; in other cases, NAFTA's measures for investment protection, such as Chapter 11, and measures against non-tariff trade barriers, threatened to discourage more vigorous environmental policy. 23
The most serious overall increases in pollution due to NAFTA were found in the base metals sector, the Mexican petroleum sector, and the transportation equipment sector in the United States and Mexico, but not in Canada.
Mobility of persons According to the Department of Homeland Security Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, during fiscal year 2006 (i.e., October 2005 through September 2006), 73,880 foreign professionals (64,633 Canadians and 9,247 Mexicans) were admitted into the United States for temporary employment under NAFTA (i.e., in the TN status). Additionally, 17,321 of their family members (13,136 Canadians, 2,904 Mexicans, as well as a number of third- country nationals married to Canadians and Mexicans) entered the U.S. in the treaty national's dependent (TD) status. Because DHS counts the number of the new I-94 arrival records filled at the border, and the TN-1 admission is valid for three years, the number of non-immigrants in TN status present in the U.S. at the end of the fiscal year is approximately equal to the number of admissions during the year. (A discrepancy may be caused by some TN entrants leaving the country or changing status before their three-year admission period has expired, while other immigrants admitted earlier may change their status to TN or TD, or extend TN status granted earlier). Canadian authorities estimated that, as of December 1, 2006, a total of 24,830 U.S. citizens and 15,219 Mexican citizens were present in Canada as "foreign workers". These numbers include both entrants under the NAFTA agreement and those who have entered under other provisions of the Canadian immigration law. New entries of foreign workers in 2006 were 16,841 (U.S. citizens) and 13,933 (Mexicans).
24
3.3 ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC)
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for 21 Pacific Rim member economies that seeks to promote free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia- Pacific region. It was established in 1989 in response to the growing interdependence of Asia-Pacific economies and the advent of regional trade blocs in other parts of the world; to fears that highly industrialized Japan (a member of G8) would come to dominate economic activity in the Asia-Pacific region; and to establish new markets for agricultural products and raw materials beyond Europe (where demand had been declining). APEC works to raise living standards and education levels through sustainable economic growth and to foster a sense of community and an appreciation of shared interests among Asia-Pacific countries. APEC includes newly industrialized economies, although the agenda of free trade was a sensitive issue for the developing NIEs at the time APEC founded, and aims to enable ASEAN economies to explore new export market opportunities fornatural resources such as natural gas, as well as to seek regional economic integration (industrial integration) by means of foreign direct investment. Members account for approximately 40% of the world's population, approximately 54% of the world's gross domestic product and about 44% of world trade. For APEC Economic Trends Analysis in 2012, see. An annual APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting is attended by the heads of government of all APEC members except Taiwan (which is represented by aministerial-level official under the name Chinese Taipei as economic leader). The location of the meeting rotates annually among the member economies, and a famous tradition, followed for most (but not all) summits, involves the attending leaders dressing in a national costume of the host country.
APECS THREE PILLARS To meet the Bogor Goals, APEC carries out work in three main areas: 1. Trade and Investment Liberalisation 2. Business Facilitation 3. Economic and Technical Cooperation
25
APEC AND TRADE LIBERALISATION
According to the organization itself, when APEC was established in 1989 average trade barriers in the region stood at 16.9 percent, but had been reduced to 5.5% in 2004.
APEC'S BUSINESS FACILITATION EFFORTS
APEC has long been at the forefront of reform efforts in the area of business facilitation. Between 2002 and 2006 the costs of business transactions across the region was reduced by 6%, thanks to the APEC Trade Facilitation Action Plan (TFAPI). Between 2007 and 2010, APEC hopes to achieve an additional 5% reduction in business transaction costs. To this end, a new Trade Facilitation Action Plan has been endorsed. According to a 2008 research brief published by the World Banks part of its Trade Costs and Facilitation Project, increasing transparency in the region's trading system is critical if APEC is to meet its Bogor Goal targets. The APEC Business Travel Card, a travel document for visa-free business travel within the region is one of the concrete measures to facilitate business. In May 2010 Russia joined the scheme, thus completing the circle.
PROPOSED FREE TRADE AREA OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC
APEC first formally started discussing the concept of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific at its summit in 2006 in Hanoi. However, the proposal for such an area has been around since at least 1966 and Japanese economist Kiyoshi Kojima (ja)'s proposal for a Pacific Free Trade agreement proposal. While it gained little traction, the idea led to the formation of Pacific Trade and Development Conference and then the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council in 1980 and then APEC in 1989. In more recent times, economist C. Fred Bergsten has been the foremost advocate of a Free Trade Agreement of Asia-Pacific. His ideas convinced the APEC Business Advisory Council to support this concept. The proposal for a FTAAP arose due to the lack of progress in the Doha round of World Trade Organization negotiations, and as a way to overcome the "noodle bowl" effect created 26
by overlapping and conflicting elements of the copious free trade agreements there were approximately 60 free trade agreements in 2007, with an additional 117 in the process of negotiation in Southeast Asia and the Asia-Pacific region.
In 2012, ASEAN+6 countries alone had 339 free trade agreements - many of which were bilateral. The FTAAP is more ambitious in scope than the Doha round, which limits itself to reducing trade restrictions. The FTAAP would create a free trade zone that would considerably expand commerce and economic growth in the region. [22][24] The economic expansion and growth in trade could exceed the expectations of other regional free trade areas such as the ASEAN Plus Three (ASEAN + China, Japan, and South Korea). Some criticisms include that the diversion of trade within APEC members would create trade imbalances, market conflicts and complications with nations of other regions. The development of the FTAAP is expected to take many years, involving essential studies, evaluations and negotiations between member economies. It is also affected by the absence of political will and popular agitations and lobbying against free trade in domestic politics.
27
3.4 ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS (ASEAN)
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) a political and economic organisation of ten countries located in Southeast Asia, which was formed on 8 August 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Since then, membership has expanded to include Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (Burma) and Vietnam. Its aims include accelerating economic growth, social progress, sociocultural evolution among its members, protection of regional peace and stability, and opportunities for member countries to discuss differences peacefully. ASEAN covers a land area of 4.46 million km, which is 3% of the total land area of Earth, and has a population of approximately 600 million people, which is 8.8% of the world's population. The sea area of ASEAN is about three times larger than its land counterpart. In 2012, its combined nominal GDP had grown to more than US$2.3 trillion. If ASEAN were a single entity, it would rank as the sixth largest economy in the world, behind the US, China, India, Japan and Germany.
THE MEMBER STATES OF ASEAN
Burma (Myanmar), Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia. ASEAN was existing before by an organisation called the Association of Southeast Asia (ASA), a group consisting of the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand that was formed in 1961. The bloc itself, however, was inaugurated on 8 August 1967, when foreign ministers of five countries Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand met at the Thai Department of Foreign Affairs building in Bangkok and signed the ASEAN Declaration, more commonly known as the Bangkok Declaration. The five foreign ministers Adam Malik of Indonesia, Narciso Ramos of the Philippines, Abdul Razak of Malaysia, S. Rajaratnam of Singapore, and Thanat Khoman of Thailand are considered the organisation's Founding Fathers. The motivations for the birth of ASEAN were so that its members governing elite could concentrate on nation building, the common fear of communism, reduced faith in or mistrust of external powers in the 1960s, and a desire for economic development. 28
The block grew when Brunei Darussalam became the sixth member on 8 January 1984, barely a week after gaining independence on 1 January.
CONTINUED EXPANSION
On 28 July 1995, Vietnam became the seventh member. Laos and Myanmar (Burma) joined two years later on 23 July 1997. Cambodia was to have joined together with Laos and Burma, but was deferred due to the country's internal political struggle. The country later joined on 30 April 1999, following the stabilisation of its government. During the 1990s, the bloc experienced an increase in both membership and drive for further integration. In 1990, Malaysia proposed the creation of an East Asia Economic Caucus
comprising the then members of ASEAN as well as the People's Republic of China, Japan, and South Korea, with the intention of counterbalancing the growing influence of the United States in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and in the Asian region as a whole.This proposal failed, however, because of heavy opposition from the United States and Japan. Despite this failure, member states continued to work for further integration and ASEAN Plus Three was created in 1997. In 1992, the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme was signed as a schedule for phasing tariffs and as a goal to increase the regions competitive advantage as a production base geared for the world market. This law would act as the framework for the ASEAN Free Trade Area. After the East Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, a revival of the Malaysian proposal was established in Chiang Mai, known as the Chiang Mai Initiative, which calls for better integration between the economies of ASEAN as well as the ASEAN Plus Three countries (China, Japan, and South Korea). Aside from improving each member state's economies, the bloc also focused on peace and stability in the region. On 15 December 1995, the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty was signed with the intention of turning Southeast Asia into a Nuclear-Weapon- Free Zone. The treaty took effect on 28 March 1997 after all but one of the member states have ratified it. It became fully effective on 21 June 2001, after the Philippines ratified it, effectively banning all nuclear weapons in the region.
29
ASEAN PLUS THREE Leaders of each country felt the need to further integrate the region. Beginning in 1997, the bloc began creating organisations within its framework with the intention of achieving this goal. ASEAN Plus Three was the first of these and was created to improve existing ties with the People's Republic of China, Japan, and South Korea. This was followed by the even larger East Asia Summit, which now includes these countries as well as India, Australia, New Zealand, United States and Russia. This new grouping acted as a prerequisite for the planned East Asia Community, which was supposedly patterned after the now- defunct European Community. The ASEAN Eminent Persons Group was created to study the possible successes and failures of this policy as well as the possibility of drafting an ASEAN Charter. In 2006, ASEAN was given observer status at the United Nations General Assembly. As a response, the organisation awarded the status of "dialogue partner" to the United Nations.
ASEAN CAPITAL MARKET FORUM ASEAN Capital Market Forum (ACMF) consist of: ASEAN Linkage, until end of 2013 only has 3 stock exchange members: Bursa Malaysia, Singapore Exchange and Stock Exchange of Thailand, but cover 70 percent of transaction values of 7 ASEAN Stock Exchanges, with objective to integrate ASEAN Stock Exchanges to compete with International Stock Exchanges Mutual Recognigtion of Disclosure Standards, with objective to harmonise and equal of ASEAN Standards Mutual Recognition of Collective of Investment Scheme (CIS), with objective to harmonise all regulations in ASEAN which related with CIS, some countries are still categorised as Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Non-Cooperative Country which are not maximum to do with money laundering and terrorism
30
3.5 SOUTH ASIAN ASSOCIATION FOR REGIONAL COOPERATION (SAARC)
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is an economic and geopolitical organization of eight countries that are primarily located in South Asia. The SAARC Secretariat is based in Kathmandu, Nepal. The idea of regional political and economical cooperation in South Asia was first raised in 1980 and the first summit was held in Dhaka on 8 December 1985, when the organization was established by the governments of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Since then the organization has expanded by accepting one new full member, Afghanistan, and several observer members. The SAARC policies aim to promote welfare economics, collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia, and to accelerate socio-cultural development in the region. The SAARC has developed external relations by establishing permanent diplomatic relations with the EU, the UN (as an observer), and other multilateral entities. The official meetings of the leaders of each nation are held annually whilst the foreign ministers meet twice annually. The 18th SAARC Summit is scheduled to be held in Kathmandu in November 2014.
IDEA OF CO-OPERATION The idea of co-operation in South Asia was discussed in at least three conferences: the Asian Relations Conferenceheld in New Delhi on April 1947; the Baguio Conference in the Philippines on May 1950; and the Colombo Powers Conference held in Sri Lanka on April 1954.The first concrete proposal for establishing a regional cooperation in South Asia was made by the late president of Bangladesh, Ziaur Rahman, on May 2, 1980. In the ending years of the 1970s, the seven inner South Asian nations that included Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka agreed upon the creation of a trade bloc and to provide a platform for the people of South Asia to work together in a spirit of friendship, trust and understanding. President Ziaur Rahman later addressed official letters to the leaders of the countries of the South Asia, presenting his vision for the future of the region and the compelling arguments for region. During his visit to India in December 1977,President Ziaur Rahman discussed the issue of regional 31
cooperation with the Indian Prime Minister, Morarji Desai. In the inaugural speech to the Colombo Plan Consultative Committee which met in Kathmandu also in 1977, King Birendra of Nepal gave a call for close regional cooperation among South Asian countries in sharing river waters. After the USSR's intervention in Afghanistan, the efforts to established the union was accelerated in 1979 and the resulting rapid deterioration of South Asian security situation. Responding to the President Zia Rehman and King Birendra's convention, the officials of the foreign ministries of the seven countries met for the first time in Colombo in April 1981. [18] The Bangladesh's proposal was promptly endorsed by Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutanand the Maldives but India and Pakistan were skeptical initially. The Indian concern was the proposals reference to the security matters in South Asia and feared that President Zia Rehman's proposal for a regional organization might provide an opportunity for new smaller neighbors to renationalized all bilateral issues and to join with each other to gang up against India. Pakistan assumed that it might be an Indian strategy to organize the other South Asian countries against Pakistan and ensure a regional market for Indian products, thereby consolidating and further strengthening Indias economic dominance in the region. However, after a series of quiet diplomatic consultations between South Asian foreign ministers at the UN headquarters in New York from August to September 1980, it was agreed that Bangladesh would prepare the draft of a working paper for discussion among the foreign secretaries of South Asian countries. The foreign secretaries of the inner seven countries again delegated a Committee of the Whole in Colombo on September 1981, which identified five broad areas for regional cooperation. New areas of co-operation were added in the following years. In 1983, the international conference held by Indian Minister of External Affairs PVN Rao in New Delhi, the foreign ministers of the inner seven countries adopted the Declaration on South Asian Association Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and formally launched the Integrated Programme of Action (IPA) initially in five agreed areas of cooperation namely, Agriculture; Rural Development; Telecommunications; Meteorology; and Health and Population Activities. Officially, the union was established in Dhaka with Kathmandu being union's secretariat- general. The first SAARC summit was held in Dhaka on 78 December 1985 and hosted by the President of Bangladesh Hussain Ershad.
The declaration signed by King of Bhutan Jigme Singye, President of Pakistan Zia-ul-Haq, Prime Minister of India Rajiv Gandhi, King of 32
Nepal Birendra Shah, President of Sri Lanka JR Jayewardene, and President of Maldives Maumoon Gayoom. The group was given an impetus in 2014 with the inauguration of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the consequent foreign policy of Narendra Modi.
SAARC was founded by seven states in 1985. In 2005, Afghanistan began negotiating their accession to SAARC and formally applied for membership on the same year. The issue of Afghanistan joining SAARC generated a great deal of debate in each member state, including concerns about the definition of South Asian identity because Afghanistan is a Central Asian country. The SAARC member states imposed a stipulation for Afghanistan to hold a general election; the non-partisan elections were held in late 2005. Despite initial reluctance and internal debates, Afghanistan joined SAARC as its eighth member state in April 2007.
OBSERVERS
States with observer status include Australia, China the European Union,
Iran, Japan Mauritius, Myanmar, South Korea and the United States. On 2 August 2006, the foreign ministers of the SAARC countries agreed in principle to grant observer status to three applicants; the US and South Korea (both made requests in April 2006),
as well as the European Union (requested in July 2006).
On 4 March 2008, Iran requested observer status, followed shortly by Mauritius.
POTENTIAL FUTURE MEMBERS
Myanmar has expressed interest in upgrading its status from an observer to a full member of SAARC.
Russia has applied for observer status membership of SAARC. Turkey applied for observer status membership of SAARC in 2012. South Africa has participated in meetings.
33
SECRETARIAT
Secretariat of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation in Kathmandu, Nepal The SAARC Secretariat was established in Kathmandu on 16 January 1987 and was inaugurated by Late King Birendra Bir Bikram Shah of Nepal.
REGIONAL CENTRES
The SAARC Secretariat is supported by following Regional Centres established in Member States to promote regional co-operation. These Centres are managed by Governing Boards comprising representatives from all the Member States, SAARC Secretary-General and the Ministry of Foreign/External Affairs of the Host Government. The Director of the Centre acts as Member Secretary to the Governing Board which reports to the Programming Committee. SAARC Agricultural Centre (SAC), Dhaka, Bangladesh SAARC Meteorological Research Centre (SMRC), Dhaka, Bangladesh SAARC Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Centre (STAC), Kathmandu, Nepal SAARC Documentation Centre (SDC), New Delhi, India SAARC Human Resources Development Centre (SHRDC), Islamabad, Pakistan SAARC Coastal Zone Management Centre (SCZMC), Maldives SAARC Information Centre (SIC), Nepal SAARC Energy Centre (SEC), Pakistan SAARC Disaster Management Centre (SDMC), India SAARC Forestry Centre (SFC), Bhutan
34
APEX AND RECOGNIZED BODIES
SAARC has six Apex Bodies namely, SAARC Chamber of Commerce & Industry (SCCI), SAARCLAW (South Asian Association For Regional Cooperation In Law), South Asian Federation of Accountants (SAFA), South Asia Foundation (SAF), South Asia Initiative to End Violence Against Children (SAIEVAC), Foundation of SAARC Writers and Literature (FOSWAL) Hemant Batra is the current incumbent Secretary General of SAARCLAW. SAARC also has about 17 recognised bodies.
POLITICAL ISSUES
Lasting peace and prosperity of the Indian subcontinent has been elusive due to the various ongoing conflicts and in the region. Political dialogue is often conducted on the margins of SAARC meetings which have refrained from interfering in the internal matters of its member states. During the 12th and 13th SAARC summits, extreme emphasis was laid upon greater co-operation between the SAARC members to fight terrorism.
SOUTH ASIAN FREE TRADE AREA (SAFTA)
SAFTA was envisaged primarily as the first step towards the transition to a South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) leading subsequently towards a Customs Union, Common Market and Economic Union. In 1995, the Sixteenth session of the Council of Ministers (New Delhi, 18 19 December 1995) agreed on the need to strive for the realisation of SAFTA and to this end an Inter-Governmental Expert Group (IGEG) was set up in 1996 to identify the necessary steps for progressing to a free trade area. The Tenth SAARC Summit (Colombo, 2931 July 1998) decided to set up a Committee of Experts (COE) to draft a comprehensive treaty framework for creating a free trade area within the region, taking into consideration the asymmetries in development within the region and bearing in mind the need to fix realistic and achievable targets. The SAFTA Agreement was signed on 6 January 2004 during Twelfth SAARC Summit held in Islamabad, Pakistan. The Agreement entered into force on 1 January 2006, and the Trade Liberalization Programme commenced from 1 July 2006. Under this 35
agreement, SAARC members will bring their duties down to 20 per cent by 2009. Following the Agreement coming into force the SAFTA Ministerial Council (SMC) has been established comprising the Commerce Ministers of the Member States.
SAARC VISA EXEMPTION SCHEME
The SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme was launched in 1992. The leaders at the Fourth Summit (Islamabad, 2931 December 1988), while realising the importance of having people to people contacts, among the peoples of SAARC countries, decided that certain categories of dignitaries should be entitled to a Special Travel document, which would exempt them from visas within the region. As directed by the Summit, the Council of Ministers regularly kept under review the list of entitled categories. Currently the list included 24 categories of entitled persons, which include Dignitaries, Judges of higher courts, Parliamentarians, Senior Officials, Businessmen, Journalists, Sportsmen etc. The Visa Stickers are issued by the respective Member States to the entitled categories of that particular country. The validity of the Visa Sticker is generally for one year. The implementation is reviewed regularly by the Immigration Authorities of SAARC Member States.
36
5.1 CONCLUSION
I CONCLUDE THAT, The effects of regional integration on trade depend on the relative position of each country with respect to others in terms of factor endowment ratios. Countries with the highest capital-labour ratio in a trade bloc benefit from integration since regional integration will divert some imports of capital-intensive goods from outside countries. Economic integration of developing countries has been a failure owing to poverty, political turmoil, overlapping membership and differences in economic structure of members. Researchers have advocated for regional cooperation agreements, rather than regional trade blocs, as better schemes for developing regions. Sub-Saharan Africa is no exception. International trade is indeed an essential policy formulation for the growth and development of a country. Developmental theories and Economic Adjustment Programmes have cited trade liberalisation as one of the policy reforms necessary for the growth of developing countries. The growing trend in world trade shows bilateral and regional agreements taking greater precedence over global or inter-regional trade and to that effect every continental region has at least one major integration movement. Almost all countries are members of at least one trade bloc and now one third of world trade takes place within such agreements. Despite these gradual developments in regional trade.
37
6.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Web sites http://www.google.com/forms of economic integration http://www.google.com/benefits from economic integration http://www.google.com/ Levels Of Economic Integration http://www.google.com/ Aims And Objectives Of Economic Integration http://www.google.com/advantages of regional economic integration http://www.wikipedia.com/NAFTA http://www.ask.com/SAARC
BOOK ECONOMICS OF GLOBAL TRADE AND FINANCE (MCOM).