www.foranmining.

com
September 2014
The McIlvenna Bay Deposit &
Hanson Lake Camp
Forward Looking Statements
2
This presentation contains "forward-looking information" (also referred to as "forward looking statements") which may include,
but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future financial or operating performance of the Company, its subsidiaries
and its projects, the future price of metals, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the realization of mineral reserve
estimates, costs and timing of future exploration, the timing of the development of new deposits, requirements for additional
capital, foreign exchange risk, government regulation of mining and exploration operations, environmental risks, reclamation
expenses, title disputes or claims, insurance coverage and regulatory matters. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "hopes", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates",
"forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or "believes" or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or state
that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.
Forward-looking information involves and is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may
cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company and/or its subsidiaries to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors include,
among others, general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; the actual results of current
exploration activities and feasibility studies; assumptions in economic evaluations which prove to be inaccurate; fluctuations in
the value of the United States dollar and the Canadian dollar relative to each other; future prices of metals; possible variations of
ore grade or recovery rates; accidents, labour disputes or slow downs and other risks of the mining industry; climatic conditions;
political instability, insurrection or war; arbitrary decisions by governmental authorities; delays in obtaining governmental
approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities. Although the Company has attempted to
identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-
looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated
or intended. Forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this presentation and the Company
disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or
results or otherwise. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information or statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information or statements. Accordingly,
readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Dr. Fiona Childe (Ph.D., P. Geo), VP of Corporate Development for the Company, is a Qualified Person as defined in National
Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed the disclosure of a technical or scientific nature contained in this presentation. Mr. Roger
March (B.Sc. (Hons.), P. Geo), VP Project Exploration for the Company, is a Qualified Person as defined in National Instrument 43-
101 and is the Qualified Person for the McIlvenna Bay Deposit.
5 Reasons to Invest in Foran
3
Management
team with a
depth of
industry
experience
Management
team with a
depth of
industry
experience
Solid
shareholder
base mining
industry
executives
Solid
shareholder
base mining
industry
executives
Superior
project location
& existing
infrastructure
Superior
project location
& existing
infrastructure
McIlvenna Bay:
100% ownership
of a large base
metal deposit
McIlvenna Bay:
100% ownership
of a large base
metal deposit
Resource
growth &
discovery
potential
Resource
growth &
discovery
potential
Management & Directors
4
Board of Directors
Darren Morcombe, Chairman
Founder of private investment company Springtide Capital
Pty. Ltd., former Chairman and major shareholder of
European Gold Refineries SA and Director of AGR Matthey
Patrick Soares
30 years experience in the mining industry, former
President, CEO & Director of Brett Resources Inc. (acquired
by Osisko Mining in 2010)
Sharon Dowdall
Over 30 years' experience in the legal field; former Chief
Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary of Franco-Nevada
Corporation
Maurice Tagami
Metallurgical Engineer; Vice President, Mining Operations
for Silver Wheaton Corp.
Bradley Summach
CFO of BBS Aircraft Inc. & President of Summach Ventures;
past President & CEO of Foran
David M. Petroff
Over 30 years' experience in the mining & investment
industry; former President, CEO & Director of Breakwater
Resources Ltd. (acquired by Nyrstar NV in 2011)
Management
Patrick Soares (BSc (Hons) PGeo) - President, CEO, Director
30 years experience in the mining industry (incl. Sutton, EuroZinc, Aurizon);
President, CEO & Director of Brett Resources until its acquisition by Osisko
Mining in 2010
Tim Thiessen (BComm, CA) - CFO
Chartered Accountant; 15 years international experience in public accounting
& the mining industry; former CFO of Aurcana Corporation and former VP
Finance for Endeavour Mining Corporation
Fiona Childe (PhD, PGeo) - VP Corporate Development
PhD in VMS deposits; 15 years international experience in the mining
industry, former VP Corporate Communications with Tau Capital Corp.,
involved with the advancement of AfriOre from an early-stage explorer to its
acquisition by Lonmin in 2007
Roger March (BSc (Hons), PGeo) - VP Project Exploration
20 years exploration & project management experience; including with
Cumberland Resources as part of the team responsible for the resource
growth & prefeasibility-feasibility studies for the Meadowbank Gold Project
David Fleming (BSc, PGeo) - VP Exploration
30 years' experience in mineral exploration generation, management and
implementation in North America; experience with several major mining
companies. Involved in the exploration & development of the Meadowbank
Gold Deposit from exploration to feasibility stage with Cumberland
Resources (acquired by Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. In 2007)
Capital Structure
5
83.4 M
I&O
4.0 M
Warrants
7.1 M
Options
94.5 M
Fully Diluted
Capital Structure as at Sept. 15, 2014; 1M Warrants @ $0.70 exp. Dec. 2015; 3M Warrants @0.30 exp. Aug. 2015; Options
Ave. $0.71; Market Cap based on I&O Shares; Treasury includes cash & short-term investments; All figures in CDN$
Treasury
$3.9M as at June 30, 2014
No debt
Share Price & Capitalization
Recent: $0.17-$0.20
52 week high-low: $0.32-$0.14
Market Cap: ~$15M
Ownership
>20%
19%
11%
Pierre Lassonde
Mgt. & Directors
Institutional
The Case for Zinc
6
Improved western demand &
high Chinese imports has
resulted in low inventories
As major mines close on or
before schedule the zinc market
continues to tighten
With no significant new projects
underway to replace lost
production the market is
expected to continue to tighten
As the zinc supply gap widens the market will look to those
projects with reasonable capital costs & a clean, saleable product
located in stable, low-risk jurisdictions
Source: CRU Metals; Glencore website
Key Project McIlvenna Bay
7
Located in Saskatchewan, Canada a
safe, stable pro-mining jurisdiction
Excellent access & infrastructure:
65 km west of Flin Flon, Manitoba
Year-round road access
Nearby railhead & hydroelectricity
Significant work since discovery in
1988
Resource growth potential both at
McIlvenna Bay & in satellite deposits
Foran is de-risking the McIlvenna Bay deposit
Large 100% Foran-owned Copper-Zinc-Gold-Silver Deposit
Significant advancements
in the last 3 years
8
+20,000m of Drilling
Doubling of the Resource Base
Completion of Positive PEA-level Metallurgy
Completion of Environmental Baseline Studies
Commencement of PEA
Presentation of Traditional Land Use Study to First Nations
New Discovery in an Emerging VMS Camp
Community Involvement
9
Foran has established a positive
relationship with First Nations &
other stakeholders in the area
Foran continues to engage & involve local
stakeholders
Contractors & employees hired from local
Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation (PBCN)
communities
CanNorth Environmental Services, an 100%
aboriginal-owned, multi-disciplinary
environmental consulting firm conducted
environmental baseline studies
Management of McIlvenna Bay environmental
program by ASKI, an experienced & well-
respected environmental consultancy set up
by the PBCN
Foran sponsorship of PBCN students at
Mining Matters Earth Sciences Camps
Regional Mining Camps
10
McIlvenna Bay
& the Hanson
Lake Camp
VMS Deposits
11
Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposits form from metal-rich brines deposited on &
below the seafloor
Major source of base metals; gold & silver by-products
Idealized Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposit
(after Hannington et al., 1998)
Copper-Gold Stockwork:
CSZ at McIlvenna Bay
Massive to Semi-
Massive Sulphides:
Main Lens (Upper West
Zone & Zone 2) & Lens
3 at McIlvenna Bay
Zn-Cu-Au-Ag
Zn-Ag
Zn-Ag
black smoker
alteration pipe
Cu-Au
Cu-Au
Metal-rich black smokers on the ocean floor
Form in clusters giving rise
to VMS mining camps
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
F
l
i
n

F
l
o
n
L
a
l
o
r
M
c
I
l
v
e
n
n
a

B
a
y
T
r
o
u
t

L
a
k
e
7
7
7
S
t
a
l
l

L
a
k
e
C
h
i
s
e
l
S
t
r
a
t
m
a
t
C
a
l
l
i
n
a
n
C
h
i
s
e
l

U
/
G
C
o
r
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
O
s
b
o
u
r
n
e
R
e
e
d
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
K
o
n
u
t
o
S
p
r
u
c
e

P
o
i
n
t
S
c
h
i
s
t

L
a
k
e
C
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
W
e
s
t

A
r
m
C
o
r
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
h
i
t
e

L
a
k
e
D
I
c
k
s
t
o
n
e
R
o
d
D
i
c
k
s
t
o
n
e
P
h
o
t
o

L
a
k
e
G
h
o
s
t

&

L
o
s
t
C
u
p
r
u
s
F
l
e
x
a
r
B
i
r
c
h

L
a
k
e
N
o
r
t
h

S
t
a
r
H
a
n
s
o
n

L
a
k
e
M
a
n
d
y
D
o
n

J
o
n
VMS Deposit Size Comparison
12
VMS deposits form in clusters
Majority of the deposits in each
VMS cluster are 3-5 Mt, with
potential for 1-2 large (+20Mt) to
very large (+50Mt) deposits
This clustering of VMS
mineralization is being outlined
at McIlvenna Bay
D
e
p
o
s
i
t

S
i
z
e
(
M
t
)
VMS Deposits: Flin Flon Snow Lake McIlvenna Bay
Sources: Galley et al. (2007), company websites
62.5
McIlvenna Bay
13.9Mt indicated
11.3Mt inferred
McIlvenna Bay Deposit Overview
13
Large Zinc-Copper-Gold-Silver VMS deposit:
Top of deposit lies
within 35m of surface,
below dolomite cap
Deposit extends 2
km down-plunge
Open to depth
Steep dip (~65
o
) &
wide zones (18-20m
horizontal thickness)
potentially amenable
to cost-effective bulk
underground mining
Main Lens:
Upper West Zone (UWZ): zinc-copper-rich massive sulphides
Zone 2: zinc-rich massive sulphides
Copper Stockwork Zone (CSZ): copper-gold stockwork directly below UWZ & Zone 2
McIlvenna Bay Mineral Resources
1
14
1
Effective date Jan. 1, 2013; Metal prices for 2013 Resource are US$3.25/lb. Cu, US$1.10/lb. Zn, US$1,400/oz. Au & US$25/oz. Ag; The base
case uses a US$60/t NSR cut-off using provisions for metallurgical recoveries, smelter payables, refining costs, freight, and applicable royalties;
see appendices for full footnotes; for additional information see the Foran news release dated March 27, 2013 at www.sedar.com
15
McIlvenna Bay: Copper Stockwork Zone (CSZ)
Indicated: 7.61 MT @ 1.60% Cu, 0.30% Zn, 0.50 g/t Au
Inferred: 5.48 MT @ 1.56% Cu, 0.47% Zn, 0.42 g/t Au
View looking down and
South West
Indicated
Inferred
16
McIlvenna Bay: CSZ + UW MS + Zone 2 MS
Indicated: 3.39 MT @ 0.31% Cu, 7.15 % Zn, 0.38 g/t Au
Inferred: 2.80 MT @ 0.51% Cu, 7.13% Zn, 0.38 g/t Au
Indicated: 7.61 MT @ 1.60% Cu, 0.30% Zn, 0.50 g/t Au
Inferred: 5.48 MT @ 1.56% Cu, 0.47% Zn, 0.42 g/t Au
Indicated: 2.15 MT @ 1.66% Cu, 4.10 % Zn, 0.88 g/t Au
Inferred: 2.91 MT @ 1.63% Cu, 3.68% Zn, 0.51 g/t Au
View looking down and
South West
Indicated
Inferred
McIlvenna Bay
Contained Metal Summary
1
17
2013 McIlvenna Bay Mineral Resource Contained Metal
Cu
(Mlbs.)
Zn
(M lbs.)
Au
(k oz.)
Ag
(k oz.)
Indicated
Massive to semi-
massive sulphides
(Upper West Zone,
Zone 2, Lens 3)
122 770 94 5,054
Copper Stockwork Zone
269 475 126 2,598
Total Indicated
391 817 220 7,651
Inferred
Massive to semi-
massive sulphides
(Upper West Zone,
Zone 2, Lens 3)
140 683 83 4,191
Copper Stockwork Zone
188 57 73 2,136
Total Inferred
328 740 157 6,327
Resource Value
by Metal
1
Based on the mineral resource estimate with an effective date of Jan. 1, 2013; see resource estimate slide and appendices for additional information.
Cu
47%
Zn
35%
Au
11%
Ag
7%
Based on US$3.25/lb. Cu, US$1.10/lb. Zn,
US$1,400/oz. Au & US$25/oz. Ag
McIlvenna Bay Metallurgy
18
Testwork conducted by G&T Metallurgical Services (Stewart Group) on 3 composite samples prepared from core drilled by the Company in 2011;
for additional information see Appendices & www.foranmining.com
Positive PEA-level results
Concentrates amenable to conventional grinding & flotation
Coarse sulphides with moderate hardness
Clean concentrates with low penalty elements
Zone Cu Concentrate Zn Concentrate Cu-Pb Concentrate
CSZ Grade:
29% Cu, 6.4 g/t Au, 126 g/t Ag
Recoveries:
94% Cu, 85% Au, 77% Ag
UWZ Grade:
24% Cu, 6.5 g/t Au, 216 g/t Ag
Recoveries:
84% Cu, 60% Au, 50% Ag
Grade:
54% Zn
Recovery:
76% Zn
Zone 2 Grade:
55% Zn
Recovery:
85% Zn
Grade:
12% Cu, 59% Pb, 5.3 g/t Au, 332 g/t Ag
Recoveries:
56% Cu, 59% Pb, 39% Au, 34% Ag
The Hanson Lake Camp
19
Bigstone
20
1
Foran is not treating the historic estimate as current; a Qualified Person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101
has not completed sufficient work to classify the historic estimate as current; additional work, including re-surveying, re-logging
and drill core QA/QC would be required to verify and upgrade the historic estimate to current.
Cu Cut-off
(%Cu)
Tonnage
(kt)
Cu
(%)
Au
(g/t)
1.0 3,748 2.03 0.33
1.5 3,137 2.26 0.36
2.0 1,984 2.57 0.48
2.5 1,199 3.11 0.61
Bigstone Property located 10 km west of the McIlvenna Bay Property
Previous operators identified zones of copper- and zinc-rich VMS mineralization
Historic mineral resource estimate of 3.75 Mt grading 2.03% Cu, 0.33 g/t Au in the
Bigstone Copper Zone
1
Geophysics (EM) conducted in winter 2014 to better resolve the conductors associated
with Bigstone & identify other nearby conductors detailed modeling of the 2014 data
underway
Bigstone Copper Zone
Historic Mineral Resource Sensitivity Analysis
1
Regional Exploration
21
2013 DEEP-EM survey
identified 2 high-priority
targets:
Target A
1.6 km long EM
conductor - similar
size & character as
McIlvenna Bay
Initial drill test
inconclusive further
testing required to
determine source
Target B
Final hole drilled in the
winter 2013 regional
program hit high-
grade copper
mineralization in the
Thunder Zone (4.1%
Cu & 0.43 g/t Au over
3.7m)
22
Regional Exploration
2013 DEEP-EM survey 3D rendering McIlvenna Bay & Balsam Grids; looking east
McIlvenna Bay Deposit
13.9Mt of 1.96% CuEq (indicated)
11.3Mt of 2.01% CuEq (inferred)
Target A
1.2-1.6km long high-priority target
Further drill testing required
Target B
Thunder Zone Discovery Hole:
4.1% Cu over 3.7m
Balsam
McIlvenna Bay
Deposit
Resource Shell
The Road Ahead
23
Continue to Engage & Involve
Local Stakeholders
McIlvenna Bay PEA Underway
Results Expected Q4/14
Stay Tuned for 2015 Winter
Exploration Program
Contacts
24
Patrick Soares
President & CEO
904-409 Granville Street,
Vancouver, BC, V6C 1T2
Fiona Childe
VP, Corporate Development
2000-199 Bay St., P.O. Box 285
Toronto, ON, M5L 1G9
ir@foranmining.com
416-363-9229
Appendices
25
McIlvenna Bay Resource Footnotes
26
1
Effective date January 1, 2013; CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Resources; CuEq =
copper equivalent; ZnEq = zinc equivalent; NSR = Net Smelter Return.
2
The base case mineral resource is estimated based on 178 diamond drill holes and a NSR
cut-off grade of US$60/t. NSR grades were calculated and high grade caps were applied as
per the discussion in Estimation Methodology and Parameters below and include provisions
for metallurgical recovery and estimates of current shipping terms and smelter rates for
similar concentrates. Metal prices used are US$3.25/lb. Cu, US$1.10/lb. Zn, US$1,400/oz. Au,
and US$25/oz. Ag. Specific gravity was interpolated for each block based on measurements
taken from core specimens.
3
Mr. David Rennie, P.Eng., of RPA, prepared this mineral resource estimate. Mr. Rennie is
independent of Foran and is a Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101.
4
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, marketing or other issues.
5
CuEq and ZnEq values were estimated based on $53.94 per % Cu, $8.11 per % Zn, $31.16
per g/t Au and $0.03 per g/t Ag.
6
For additional information see the Foran news release dated March 27, 2013 at
www.foranmining.com & www.sedar.com
Resource Sensitivity
1
27
Tonnage Tonnage Tonnage Tonnage
(kt) (kt) (kt) (kt)
Copper Copper Copper Copper
(%) (%) (%) (%)
Zinc Zinc Zinc Zinc
(%) (%) (%) (%)
Gold Gold Gold Gold
(g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
Silver Silver Silver Silver
(g/t) (g/t) (g/t) (g/t)
CuEq CuEq CuEq CuEq
(%) (%) (%) (%)
ZnEq ZnEq ZnEq ZnEq
(%) (%) (%) (%)
US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off - -- - indicated indicated indicated indicated
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 2,022 1.71 4.24 0.92 32 2.88 19.39
Main Lens - Zone 2 2,143 0.35 7.73 0.26 24 1.66 11.15
Zone 3 431 1.65 2.36 0.34 17 2.21 14.84
Copper Stockwork Zone 5,645 1.79 0.27 0.62 12 2.19 14.71
Total Total Total Total Indicated Indicated Indicated Indicated 10,242 10,242 10,242 10,242 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 19 19 19 19 2.21 2.21 2.21 2.21 14.89 14.89 14.89 14.89
US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut US$75/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off inferred inferred inferred inferred
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 2,888 1.63 3.70 0.51 19 2.48 16.69
Main Lens - Zone 2 2,356 0.56 7.30 0.41 26 1.89 12.72
Zone 3 86 1.92 3.52 0.62 23 2.81 18.90
Copper Stockwork Zone 4,127 1.73 0.50 0.48 14 2.08 13.99
Total Total Total Total Inferred Inferred Inferred Inferred 9,457 9,457 9,457 9,457 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 19 19 19 19 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 14.54 14.54 14.54 14.54
US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off indicated (base case) indicated (base case) indicated (base case) indicated (base case)
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 2,148 1.66 4.10 0.88 31 2.79 18.75
Main Lens - Zone 2 3,386 0.31 7.15 0.24 24 1.51 10.19
Zone 3 756 1.23 2.55 0.30 15 1.79 12.03
Copper Stockwork Zone 7,610 1.60 0.30 0.50 11 1.90 13.10
Total Total Total Total Indicated Indicated Indicated Indicated 13,900 13,900 13,900 13,900 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 2.67 2.67 2.67 2.67 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 17 17 17 17 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 13.19 13.19 13.19 13.19
US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut US$60/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off inferred (base case) inferred (base case) inferred (base case) inferred (base case)
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 2,913 1.63 3.68 0.51 19 2.47 16.62
Main Lens - Zone 2 2,796 0.51 7.13 0.38 26 1.79 12.04
Zone 3 124 1.61 2.67 0.51 18 2.31 15.52
Copper Stockwork Zone 5,478 1.56 0.47 0.42 12 1.87 12.59
Total Total Total Total Inferred Inferred Inferred Inferred 11,311 11,311 11,311 11,311 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 17 17 17 17 2.01 2.01 2.01 2.01 13.52 13.52 13.52 13.52
US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off indicated indicated indicated indicated
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 2,191 1.64 4.02 0.87 30 2.75 18.51
Main Lens - Zone 2 3,911 0.30 6.78 0.23 24 1.45 9.74
Zone 3 1,150 1.02 2.25 0.27 13 1.52 10.21
Copper Stockwork Zone 9,086 1.48 0.27 0.46 10 1.79 12.03
Total Total Total Total Indicated Indicated Indicated Indicated 16,337 16,337 16,337 16,337 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 2.47 2.47 2.47 2.47 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 16 16 16 16 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 12.22 12.22 12.22 12.22
US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut US$45/t NSR cut- -- -off off off off inferred inferred inferred inferred
Main Lens - Upper West Zone 3,061 1.58 3.53 0.50 18 2.40 16.14
Main Lens - Zone 2 3,076 0.48 6.91 0.36 26 1.72 11.56
Zone 3 234 1.13 1.60 0.54 13 1.67 11.27
Copper Stockwork Zone 6,716 1.42 0.47 0.36 11 1.71 11.48
Total Total Total Total Inferred Inferred Inferred Inferred 13,087 13,087 13,087 13,087 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 2.72 2.72 2.72 2.72 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 16 16 16 16 1.87 1.87 1.87 1.87 12.59 12.59 12.59 12.59
McIlvenna Bay Metallurgy
28
Testwork conducted by G&T Metallurgical Services (Stewart Group); for additional information see Foran June 20, 2012 news release
Copper Stockwork Zone (1
o
grind of 100 m K
80
, regrind of 35 m K
80
)
Product
Assay Distribution
Mass
(%)
Cu
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(%)
Au
(%)
Feed 100 1.57 0.16 8 0.38 100 100 100 100
Cu Concentrate 5.1 29.2 1.05 126 6.38 94.4 33.8 76.9 84.6
Cu First Cleaner Tail 3.9 0.79 0.57 14 0.81 2.0 14.1 6.8 8.3
Cu Rougher Tail 91.0 0.06 0.09 2 0.03 3.7 52.1 16.4 7.1
Upper West Zone (1
o
grind of 100 m K
80
, regrind of 12 m K
80
for Cu & 14 m K
80
for Zn)
Product
Assay Distribution
Mass
(%)
Cu
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(%)
Au
(%)
Feed 100 1.75 0.18 4.02 26 0.66 100 100 100 100 100
Prefloat 2.8 0.86 0.13 1.44 23 1.16 1.4 2.1 1.0 2.5 4.9
Cu Concentrate 6.0 24.2 1.3 6.40 216 6.50 83.4 43.4 9.6 50.3 59.7
Zn Concentrate 5.6 1.87 0.24 54.3 63 0.81 6.0 7.5 76.3 13.6 6.9
Zn First Cleaner Tail 7.7 0.69 0.14 2.39 22 0.53 3.0 6.0 4.6 6.6 6.2
Zn Rougher Tail 77.8 0.14 0.10 0.44 9 0.19 6.2 41.0 8.5 27.0 22.2
Zone 2 (1
o
grind of 73 m K
80
, regrind of 16 m K
80
for Zn)
Product
Assay Distribution
Mass
(%)
Cu
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
Au
(g/t)
Cu
(%)
Pb
(%)
Zn
(%)
Ag
(%)
Au
(%)
Feed 100 0.33 0.41 6.96 15 0.21 100 100 100 100 100
Prefloat 3.5 0.20 0.32 5.89 11 0.11 2.1 2.8 3.0 2.6 1.9
Bulk Concentrate 1.6 11.9 15.4 9.18 332 5.27 56.0 59.1 2.1 34.4 38.5
Zn Concentrate 10.8 0.63 0.46 55.0 38 0.29 20.5 12.2 85.4 27.3 14.6
Zn First Cleaner Tail 17.8 0.16 0.15 0.96 10 0.15 8.4 6.5 2.5 11.6 12.7
Zn Rougher Tail 66.3 0.07 0.12 0.74 5 0.10 13.1 19.5 7.0 24.1 32.3
Overall Metallurgical Response
locked cycle testing of composite samples