MIKES HUNTSVILLE, LLC, An ) Alabama Limited Liability Company; MIKES HOLDINGS, LLC, An ) Alabama Limited Liability Company; MIKE RAY JONES, individually ) and doing business as Mikes Merchandise, )
Defendants. )
COMPLAINT
Statement of Parties and Facts 1. Plaintiff and Defendant Mike Ray J ones (hereinafter referred to as J ones) are residents of Marshall County, Alabama.
2. Mikes Huntsville, LLC is an Alabama limited liability company.
3. Mikes Holdings, LLC is an Alabama limited liability company.
4. On or about May 31, 2002, Plaintiff and Mike Ray J ones formed Mikes Huntsville, LLC (hereinafter Mikes Huntsville) by executing and filing Articles of Organization of Mikes Huntsville, LLC (hereinafter Mikes Huntsville Articles) in the Office of the Probate J udge of Marshall County, Alabama, a true and correct copy of Mikes Huntsville Articles are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
5. On or about J uly 13, 2007, Mikes Huntsville Articles were subsequently amended by the First Amendment to the Articles of Organization of Mikes Huntsville, LLC executed by Plaintiff and J ones and filed in the Office of the Probate J udge of Marshall County, Alabama, a true and correct copy of said amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. (That Mikes Huntsville Articles and the First Amendment to Mikes Huntsville Articles are collectively referred to herein as the Mikes Huntsville Articles.)
6. On or about May 31, 2002, Plaintiff and J ones provided for the terms and conditions for operating Mikes Huntsville by each executing an Operating Agreement for Mikes 1
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/28/2014 3:50 PM 50-CV-2014-900513.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MARSHALL COUNTY, ALABAMA CHERYL PIERCE, CLERK Huntsville, LLC (the Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement), a true and correct copy of the Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference.
7. Pursuant to the Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement, Plaintiff and J ones commenced operating Mikes Huntsville and have continued to operate it to the present date at three locations in Decatur, Alabama, Huntsville, Alabama and Muscle Shoals, Alabama.
8. On or about J uly 20, 2006, Plaintiff and J ones formed an Alabama limited liability company known as Mikes Holdings, LLC (hereinafter Mikes Holdings) by executing and filing Articles of Organization of Mikes Holdings, LLC (hereinafter Mikes Holdings Articles) in the Office of the Probate J udge of Marshall County, Alabama, a true and correct copy of Mikes Holdings Articles are attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference.
9. On or about J uly 20, 2006, Plaintiff and J ones provided for the terms and conditions for operating Mikes Holdings by each executing an Operating Agreement for Mikes Holdings, LLC (the Mikes Holdings Operating Agreement), a true and correct copy of the Mikes Holdings Operating Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit E and incorporated herein by reference.
10. Pursuant to the Mikes Holdings Operating Agreement, Plaintiff and J ones commenced operating Mikes Holdings and have continued to operate it to the present date.
11. Mikes Merchandise is a sole proprietorship owned and operated by Defendant Mike Ray J ones and whose principal business location is in Guntersville, Marshall County, Alabama. COUNT ONE Accounting and Injunction 12. Plaintiff adopts paragraphs One through Eleven of his complaint as if fully set forth herein.
13. Upon information and belief, commencing in approximately J uly 2014 J ones began transferring and diverting certain inventory, assets, merchandise, and property of Mikes Huntsville from its business locations in Huntsville, Decatur and Muscle Shoals to J oness separately owned business, Mikes Merchandise in Guntersville, Alabama.
14. Mikes Merchandise in Guntersville, Alabama sells and otherwise deals in the same type of inventory and merchandise as Mikes Huntsville.
15. The transfers and diversions made by J ones were made without consideration, not in the ordinary course of Mikes Huntsville business and without the knowledge or consent of Plaintiff.
2
16. Upon information and belief, J ones has diverted and withdrawn funds from Mikes Huntsville and appropriated funds of Mikes Huntsville to his own personal use and benefit.
17. The transfers, diversions and appropriations by J ones herein alleged are fraudulent transfers, are in breach of the Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement and J oness statutory duty of loyalty, good faith and fair dealing owed to Plaintiff and Mikes Huntsville.
18. Plaintiff is unable to determine the exact dollar amount of the assets, inventory, merchandise and funds transferred, diverted or appropriated by J ones from Mikes Huntsville without an accounting.
19. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law and invokes the power of the Court pursuant to Section 10A-5-4.03(c) of the Code of Alabama.
20. Unless Defendant is restrained from transferring, diverting or converting inventory, assets, merchandise and funds of Mikes Huntsville, the assets of Mikes Huntsville will be dissipated and Plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss and damage. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant Mike Ray J ones for an accounting of all dealings and transactions between Mikes Huntsville, LLC and Mike Ray J ones, individually and doing business as Mikes Merchandise in Guntersville, Alabama; for the appointment of a receiver for Mikes Huntsville, LLC to perform a full accounting of the assets and liabilities of Mikes Huntsville, LLC since May 1, 2014; voiding all transfers of Mikes Huntsville, LLC property or assets to Defendant Mike Ray J ones, both individually and doing business as Mikes Merchandise Guntersville, Alabama; for the restoration to Mikes Huntsville, LLC of all funds, inventory, merchandise, assets or property diverted, transferred, or appropriated by Defendant Mike Ray J ones and rightfully belonging to Mikes Huntsville, LLC or a money judgment for the value thereof; an injunction enjoining Defendant Mike Ray J ones, individually and doing business as Mikes Merchandise from interfering with and disposing of Mikes Huntsville, LLC assets or property pending the further orders of the court; for a reasonable attorneys fee for Plaintiffs attorneys in prosecuting this action; costs, and for such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled. COUNT TWO Breach of Fiduciary Duties 21. Plaintiff adopts paragraphs One through Twenty of his complaint as if fully set forth herein.
22. J ones is a managing member of Mikes Huntsville and as such, pursuant to Section 10A- 5-3.03, Code of Alabama, 1975 owes to Plaintiff and Mikes Huntsville the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care.
3
23. J ones has failed to account to Mikes Huntsville and hold as trustee for it property, profit, and benefit derived by him in the conduct of the business of Mikes Huntsville or derived from a use by him of the property of Mikes Huntsville.
24. J ones has dealt with Mikes Huntsville in the conduct of its business as a party having an interest adverse to Mikes Huntsville.
25. J ones has engaged in intentional misconduct and knowing violations of the law in the conduct of the business of Mikes Huntsville.
26. J ones had failed to discharge his duties to Mikes Huntsville and Plaintiff under the Alabama Limited Liability Company Law and Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement and exercise his rights consistently with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant Mike Ray J ones for damages in such amount as may be determined by the evidence and the Court; for a reasonable attorneys fee for Plaintiffs attorneys in prosecuting this action; interest; costs, and for such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled. COUNT THREE Conversion
27. Plaintiff adopts paragraphs One through Twenty-Six of his complaint as if fully set forth herein.
28. Commencing on or about J uly 2014, J ones converted to his own use inventory, property, assets, merchandise and funds of Mikes Huntsville of an unknown value, but which will be determined in the accounting requested in this action, the property of Mikes Huntsville. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant Mike Ray J ones in a sum to be determined by the evidence and the Court, interest, and costs. COUNT FOUR J udicial Dissolution of Mikes Huntsville, LLC
29. Plaintiff adopts paragraphs One through Twenty-Eight of his complaint as if fully set forth herein.
30. Pursuant to Section 10A-5-7.02 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, as amended, Plaintiff hereby applies for a decree of judicial dissolution of Mikes Huntsville and avers that it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business of Mikes Huntsville in conformity with the Mikes Huntsville Articles and Mikes Huntsville Operating Agreement.
4
31. That it would be in the best interest of the winding up of the business of Mikes Huntsville that a receiver of the assets and property of Mikes Huntsville be appointed with the powers and duties as provided in Section 10A-5-7.03, Code of Alabama, 1975. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant dissolving Mikes Huntsville, LLC; appointing a receiver for winding up the affairs of Mikes Huntsville, LLC; and for such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled. COUNT FIVE J udicial Dissolution of Mikes Holdings, LLC 32. Plaintiff adopts paragraphs One through Twenty-Eight of his complaint as if fully set forth herein.
33. Pursuant to Section 10A-5-7.02 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, as amended, Plaintiff hereby applies for a decree of judicial dissolution of Mikes Holdings and avers that it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business of Mikes Holdings in conformity with the Mikes Holdings Articles and Mikes Holdings Operating Agreement.
34. That it would be in the best interest of the winding up of the business of Mikes Holdings that a receiver of the assets and property of Mikes Holdings be appointed with the powers and duties as provided in Section 10A-5-7.03, Code of Alabama, 1975. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant dissolving Mikes Holdings, LLC; appointing a receiver for winding up the affairs of Mikes Holdings, LLC; and for such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be entitled.
s/ George M. Barnett George M. Barnett (BAR034) Attorney for the Plaintiff 431 Gunter Avenue Guntersville, AL (256) 582-0133 gbarnett@gbarnettlaw.com
In The Matter of Commonwealth Corporation, Bankrupt. The First National Bank of Mobile v. Lee A. Everhart, Trustee of The Commonwealth Corporation, 617 F.2d 415, 1st Cir. (1980)
The 5 Elements of the Highly Effective Debt Collector: How to Become a Top Performing Debt Collector in Less Than 30 Days!!! the Powerful Training System for Developing Efficient, Effective & Top Performing Debt Collectors
Illinois Real Estate License Law and Principles: A Simplified Explanation of the Essential Knowledge Every Licensee Needs to Know to Pass the State Real Estate License Exam